Not that any of that would at all change anything that was written in the "Apology".
As near as I can deduce, the information is completely accurate and includes all sources and requisite citations.
Feel free to challenge the material with some actual proof instead of pathetically trying to dodge the facts by attempting to discredit the dialogue with a straw man argument. It certainly has nothing to do with taxes, though farm subsidies definitely do.
You're a real winner, you are.
Everyone's entitled to their own opinions, but not their own facts.