 |
 |
 |
 |
#766580 --- 03/07/08 09:12 PM
Re: To vaccinate or not to vaccinate-that is the ?
[Re: lncooper]
|
Diamond Member
Registered: 07/11/04
Posts: 34421
Loc: Herkimer County NY
|
I have a small scar on my left arm. My children do not. It is from a smallpox vaccination. I would much rather have that small scar than had to have faced that dreadful disease. It's not a choice of A) vaccine and maybe a small scar from the shot but guaranteed health or B) no vaccine and definite illness. There is an option C) no vaccine and still have a high likelihood of not getting the illness, especially when you take good care of your general health. Take a look at some remote thrid world countries without the options of immunizations for all. Something the free world is trying to help with. It is your right and your choice not to vaccinate your child, no matter why you make that choice as you feel this is protecting your children. It is also my choice and others, to choose to have had or to have our children vaccinated to protect them. As much as you say we are hammering on you for your beliefs, you are hammering back, and that is what started the thread in the first place. I have a friend whose Mother was afflicted with polio. She lived, but now has a permanent limp and great amount of pain. She has lived with this since childhood, and you will not hear her complain. But, her daughter knows the pain she feels. I would not want to watch my children suffer.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#766583 --- 03/07/08 09:18 PM
Re: To vaccinate or not to vaccinate-that is the ?
[Re: lncooper]
|
Diamond Member
Registered: 07/11/04
Posts: 34421
Loc: Herkimer County NY
|
You brought religion into the discussion. If you didn't want to go there, then you shouldn't have taken it there. The only reason I 'went there' in the first place is because it feels pretty insulting when others keep saying that those of us who don't vaccinate must be ignorant on the risks and facts, and I was just trying to make a point that for most of us, there is more to it than just numbers. Well, sorry but "your side" threw the first insult (and Thena and I usually get along pretty well) i think pumping infant fulls of vaxes before giving their bodies a chance to start building their own immunization is assicine.
It is your choice, yes. You decide. You want to educate on us on why not to vaccinate, and we choose to educate on why you should. Pretty simple. We don't agree. As far as God, I believe He created those who discovered the way to make vaccinations. I do believe He intends to have diseases and such, but He also gives the gift of scientists and such to find the cures, slow the progression, etc. It is your right to believe in your religious aspects, but it is also my right to believe they are not what God intended.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#766587 --- 03/07/08 09:27 PM
Re: To vaccinate or not to vaccinate-that is the ?
[Re: Strawberry Jam]
|
Member
Registered: 09/12/06
Posts: 68
|
Take a look at some remote thrid world countries without the options of immunizations for all. Something the free world is trying to help with. Yes, *third world countries* with awful, unsanitary living conditions. Disgusting water. Many people living together in close, dirty shelters. Vaccines *may* help protect them against some of the diseases that obviously run rampant in these conditions, but vaccines alone don't solve what make a third world country a third world county  It is your right and your choice not to vaccinate your child, no matter why you make that choice as you feel this is protecting your children.
It is also my choice and others, to choose to have had or to have our children vaccinated to protect them. I totally agree. I have never said otherwise. As much as you say we are hammering on you for your beliefs, you are hammering back, and that is what started the thread in the first place. Can you please show me where I 'hammered' anyone? I don't think I've been anything but clear in this thread about my beliefs being just that- MY beliefs- and they don't have to be anyone else's, and that I am in total support of each parent making the decision that they feel is best for their children. I have explained some of our personal reasons for not vaccinating simply b/c others have seemed to imply that not vaccinating=ignorance and endangerment. I have a friend whose Mother was afflicted with polio. She lived, but now has a permanent limp and great amount of pain. She has lived with this since childhood, and you will not hear her complain. But, her daughter knows the pain she feels. Counting back the generations, yes, that was a time when polio was an awful disease, and I'm sorry for what she has to live with as a result. I would not want to watch my children suffer. Neither would I. Again, it's not a choice of suffer or don't suffer, and just because I don't vaccinate doesn't mean that I'm not doing other things to help protect them.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#767559 --- 03/09/08 06:57 PM
Re: To vaccinate or not to vaccinate-that is the ??
[Re: goingcrazyinny]
|
Diamond Member
Registered: 07/11/04
Posts: 34421
Loc: Herkimer County NY
|
This post does not reflect a stance to just "educate" people. Especially the big "NOT!" to start it off and rhe "WTF" about the chicken pox vaccine. NOT!!!!!! http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/newyork.htmVaccinations (PLEASE do not call them immunizations, they do NOT guarantee immunity) actually weaken your immune system. Not only do they contain DNA particles and any number of other cross-contaminants, they contain preservatives like ANTIFREEZE, ALUMINUM, and FORMELDAHYDE (sp?). And sure, they say they don't make vaccines with MERCURY anymore, but the ones that WERE made with mercury are still out there and being used up- just not on my children  Even if they could make a vaccine without any of these preservatives or additives, I personally still would not inject my children with them. Our immune systems become stronger as they develop their own naturally formed antibodies. Many people credit modern medicine with improved maternity rates and disease control. This is really not modern medicine's doing! It's because of the improvements in basic sanitation, standards of living, and general health. If you look back at ANY disease throughout history, they all have their own natural pattern of rising and falling, and the diseases that are typically vaccinated against today were already on the natural decline when the vaccines came into use. Yes, vaccines may have sped up the decline process, but at what cost? Weakened immune systems, allergic reactions, autism, learning disabilities? And WTF is with the chicken pox vaccine people?!?! Seriously. It has one of the lowest effectivity rates, and what little bit of 'immunity' it may provide is only a TEMPORARY immunity. A chicken pox vaccine means that to continue to receive 'protection' your child will need booster shots for his or her whole life. Now let's be honest here: as an adult, when's the last time you've gone in for a booster shot? Children vaccinated with the chicken pox vaccine are not going to be likely to keep up on it as adults, and because the 'protection' the shot gives is only temporary, they will be left with little defenses against it as an adult, and we all know that chicken pox is MUCH more serious to catch as an adult, as opposed to catching it when you're a child, which is typically pretty mild. Chicken pox was a 'right of passage,' if you will, for my generation and generations before mine; why we are vaccinating against this normal, common, rarely deadly childhood disease? Also, most people forget that you don't need to be actively sick to have acheived natural immunity. So, back to where I started: you do NOT need to have your child vaccinated for school. We ALL have federally guaranteed rights that allow us to make our own medical decisions and practice our own beliefs. Federally guaranteed rights trump any state laws (which all have exemptions anyways). Many states won't 'allow' for a philosophical exemption, but it is worth noting that there have been numerous cases where parents' personal beliefs have been considered acceptable for religious exemption, and you don't need to be a member of an organized religion for a religious exemption, either. It just amazes- and scares- me how many people don't realize this. You DO have a choice, and there's a REASON you have choice: because there are very real risks that come along with choosing to vaccinate. Everyone has to make the choices that are right for their own family. I don't look down on anyone who chooses to vaccinate because they feel it's best for their family, and I don't expect to be looked down on by anyone because we choose not to vaccinate because that's what we feel is safest for our family. But I do feel badly for anyone who 'chooses' to vaccinate without all of the information, and for anyone who doesn't realize that they even have a choice or reason to need to choose.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#767578 --- 03/09/08 07:10 PM
Re: To vaccinate or not to vaccinate-that is the ??
[Re: Strawberry Jam]
|
Diamond Member
Registered: 07/11/04
Posts: 34421
Loc: Herkimer County NY
|
You want education? Here ya go.
And WTF is with the chicken pox vaccine people?!?! Seriously. It has one of the lowest effectivity rates, and what little bit of 'immunity' it may provide is only a TEMPORARY immunity. A chicken pox vaccine means that to continue to receive 'protection' your child will need booster shots for his or her whole life. Now let's be honest here: as an adult, when's the last time you've gone in for a booster shot? Children vaccinated with the chicken pox vaccine are not going to be likely to keep up on it as adults, and because the 'protection' the shot gives is only temporary, they will be left with little defenses against it as an adult, and we all know that chicken pox is MUCH more serious to catch as an adult, as opposed to catching it when you're a child, which is typically pretty mild. Chicken pox was a 'right of passage,' if you will, for my generation and generations before mine; why we are vaccinating against this normal, common, rarely deadly childhood disease?
Can a healthy person who gets varicella die from the disease? Yes. Many of the deaths and complications from chickenpox occur in previously healthy children and adults. From 1990 to 1994, before a vaccine was available, about 50 children and 50 adults died from chickenpox every year; most of these persons were healthy or did not have a medical illness (such as cancer) that placed them at higher risk of getting severe chickenpox. Since 1999, states have been encouraged to report chickenpox deaths to CDC. These reports have shown that some deaths from chickenpox continue to occur in healthy, unvaccinated children and adults. Most of the healthy adults who died from chickenpox contracted the disease from their unvaccinated children.http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/varicella/dis-faqs-gen.htm
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#767589 --- 03/09/08 07:21 PM
Re: To vaccinate or not to vaccinate-that is the ??
[Re: Strawberry Jam]
|
Diamond Member
Registered: 11/29/05
Posts: 38160
Loc: Ship of Fools
|
From the article I linked above:
There is one other very important thing to note from the graphs. Anti-vaccination advocates often try to explain the dramatic decrease in vaccine-preventable diseases in terms of increased sanitation. They say that these disease rates are so low because we have developed better sanitary practices over the years. However, these graphs show that this is just not true. After all, the polio disease rates decreased dramatically in the late 1950s. However, the measles rates did not decrease dramatically for another 10 years. If good sanitary practices were responsible for the drop in disease rates, you should see the disease rates fall roughly at the same time. That’s just not the case. The disease rates fell only when vaccines were tested and then approved. Also, note the short time over which the disease rates fell so dramatically. Do sanitation practices change so quickly that they completely "clean up" a country in a matter of a few years? Definitely not! Improved sanitation just does not explain the data.
In fact, most medical historians blame increased sanitation for the rise in polio from 1944 to 1952. When sanitary practices were rather poor, people were regularly exposed to small amounts of the polio virus, usually when they were babies and therefore had the extra protection given to them by the antibodies they received through their mothers’ milk. Their immune systems were able to conquer the weak exposure to the virus with the help of their mothers’ antibodies, and thus they became immune. As a result, the poor sanitation was actually acting like a "dirty" vaccine! As sanitary practices improved, fewer people were exposed to small amounts of the virus as infants. As a result, when they were exposed to concentrated amounts of the virus (from a person who already had the disease, for example), they would succumb to the disease4. Note that this makes sense in the light of the data, because the rise in the polio rate occurred slowly, which is what you expect when sanitation is playing a role.
Although these graphs are very effective illustrations of the power of vaccines, as we stated before, they are not definitive evidence. After all, coincidences could explain the graphs. By far, the best evidence of how effective vaccines are comes from controlled studies. In these studies, vaccinated people are compared directly to unvaccinated people, and the results are astounding,
For example, Feikin and others studied all measles and pertussis cases among children (age 3-18) in Colorado from 1987 to 19885. When they compared the vaccinated children to the unvaccinated children, they found that vaccinated children were 22.2 times less likely to contract measles than were the unvaccinated children. In the same way, vaccinated children were 5.9 times less likely to contract pertussis than were unvaccinated children. In other words, according to this study, if you do not vaccinate your children, you have increased their risk of getting measles by 2,220%, and you have increased their risk of getting pertussis by 590%!
Another finding from this study is that schools in which outbreaks occur have 2.9 times the percentage of unvaccinated students as do schools in which outbreaks do not occur. Thus, this study tells us that those who do not vaccinate their children are not only putting their own children in danger, but they are also putting other people’s children in danger, because the larger the number of unvaccinated children in a group setting, the more likely an outbreak is to occur.
But face it, SJ; we're not going to convince them; they'll continue to put their children and other people at risk.
_________________________
If you vote for government, you have no right to complain about what government does.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|