Page 30 of 30 < 1 2 ... 28 29 30
Topic Options
#1530330 --- 05/13/19 08:10 PM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2336
Loc: Waterloo, NY

Someone’s on a losing streak! $2 Billion!!!

What's in vaccines? Glyphosate!

Bayer Jury Awards $2 Billion Damages in Third Roundup Trial

Bayer AG was ordered to pay more than $2 billion in damages to a California couple that claimed they got cancer as a result of using the company’s Roundup weedkiller for about 30 years.

It’s the largest jury award in the U.S. so far this year and the eighth-largest ever in a product-defect claim, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Bayer has now lost three trials in a row over claims Roundup causes cancer.

A jury in state court in Oakland, California, issued the verdict Monday after two other California trials over the herbicide yielded combined damages of $159 million against the company. Bayer is appealing those verdicts and vowed to challenge Monday’s as well, calling it “excessive and unjustifiable.”

The verdict “conflicts directly with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s interim registration review decision released just last month, the consensus among leading health regulators worldwide that glyphosate-based products can be used safely and that glyphosate is not carcinogenic,” Bayer said in a statement.

When the company’s lawyer asked a juror after the verdict what the panel wanted to hear from Bayer, the juror responded that he wanted proof the chemical was safe: “I wanted you to get up and drink it.” The juror declined to be identified.

For Bayer on Trial, Weeding Out Roundup-Wary Jurors Isn’t Easy

The jurors agreed that Alva and Alberta Pilliod’s exposure to Roundup used for residential landscaping was a “substantial factor” in their non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. In addition to $1 billion for each spouse, the jury awarded damages of about $55 million for the couple’s medical bills and pain and suffering.

The verdict will be vulnerable to a legal challenge by Bayer because courts have generally held that punitive damages shouldn’t be more than 10 times higher than compensatory damages.

Monsanto Co., the maker of Roundup acquired by Bayer last June, is the named defendant in similar U.S. lawsuits filed by at least 13,400 plaintiffs.

“The verdict in this trial has no impact on future cases and trials, as each one has its own factual and legal circumstances,” Bayer said in its statement.

While it was a “risky move” to ask for an award of more than $1 billion -- and the damages will probably be reduced by the judge -- the three verdicts against Bayer show jurors are convinced by evidence against the company, said Anna Pavlik, senior counsel for special situations at United First Partners LLC in New York.

“In this case there appeared to be more detailed evidence damaging to Monsanto, which strengthens plaintiffs’ cases down the pipeline even further,” said Pavlik, who has followed the trials.
Arty turns 10 this summer.

#1530397 --- 05/14/19 02:53 PM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
Pravda1984 Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 08/31/17
Posts: 7
Loc: Fingerlakes
Save lives, vaccinate now.

#1530428 --- 05/15/19 03:24 AM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2336
Loc: Waterloo, NY

"I'm sure all of you are aware what a vaccine is. Essentially, it's a virus in liquid that we inject.
The viruses are long strands of RNA or DNA, thousands of RNA molecules or DNA molecules. It's too
expensive to make the virus in a test tube. What the pharmaceutical companies do is they
mimic nature's way of making viruses and they infect cells. The cells produce the virus and then they
try to purify the virus away from the cellular material to put it in our final product. Anyone who has
ever taken chemistry would know that no final product is ever pure. You would particularly know that
when you go from a small scale manufacturing or production batch to a large scale batch your impurities
increase dramatically in your final product.

In your final product there are contaminants from the cell that was used to make the virus. When we use
chicken egg embryos there are contaminants from the chicken egg in the final vaccine. That chicken
contaminant level is not human. We recognize it as foreign, we mount an immune response to it, and
we eliminate it from our bodies. In the case when we are using human fetal cells to manufacture the
vaccines, we have fragments of a retrovirus (because one of the babies from which the cells were taken
had a retrovirus), we have large amounts of fragments of human DNA (primitive human DNA because it's
fetal DNA) and in some cases the contaminants are at higher levels than the active ingredient of
the vaccine.

That's alarming. What does that mean to a child who is injected with those materials? Two things are very
possible and the science that demonstrates that these things happen is well established.

There's a chance that the child would have an immune response to that fetal material, because it's so close
to that child (because it's human) that that immune response could turn on the child itself and become
an autoimmune response. That's one danger. The second danger, which we believe is playing the predominant
role in damage done to children, is a process called insertional mutagenesis. Those DNA fragments can insert
into the genome of the child, create subsequent mutations and create problems. There are 30-40+ papers now
looking at the genomes of children who have developed autism. These children have hundreds of "de novo"
mutations. Those are mutations that their parents do not have. Science has established very clearly what
can cause hundreds of diverse de novo mutations: radiation exposure, chemical toxin exposure, and
foreign DNA exposure. The only one of those three that corresponds with the change points
worldwide are the fetal manufactured contaminants." Dr Theresa Deisher, President & CEO of AVM Biotech. At 21:00

“Oregon parents, and a few good doctors and senators did what seemed impossible. Love to you all.”
Suzanne Humphries

“What a day! In addition to our miraculous triumph against Monsanto, we just killed mandates in
Portland. Yes, people! Oregon’s vaccine bill is dead. The reason the bill died is because
Republican senators stood up for our most fundamental civil rights. Plus, our community mounted
the most intensive and well organized grassroots lobbying campaign in Oregon history….We faced
down the largest media firestorm on measles in history, meticulously orchestrated by pharma,
it’s captive regulators, and media dependents. They had the gift of an outbreak 10 miles from the Oregon
border. A super majority of Dems still couldn’t pass the law. Thank God that Oregon legislators still
listen to facts. I’m ashamed of my Party and grateful for the GOP’s courage in standing up to pharma.” RFK, Jr.

“They don’t teach us about the ingredients, they don’t teach us about the studies. I almost feel like an ass.
I just blindly followed through with vaccination with no real data, didn’t know what was in them.”
Dr. Rachel Ross, from The Doctors TV Show


Many of us that took the time to research gmo, glyphosate and vaccines have experienced backlash
from our families who don’t get it or don’t want to know. Did RFK, Jr.’s family bring anything to
the table to prove their brother wrong? Or are they just repeating pharma’s phrase “safe and
effective?” They don’t mention the 1986 Act, that the studies were done with another vaccine and
not a placebo or that the studies only followed the patients for 42 days (sounds like a Monsanto study,
30 days). Wouldn’t that be important? This part of the Kennedy clan doesn’t care that we can’t sue
vaccine manufacturers. Why are they suddenly coming out? Is someone pressuring them? Do any of
them have patent or stock money interests? They bring up JFK and RFK’s support in the past, but what they
didn’t mention is that in the 1960’s, there were THREE vaccines. Today, the kids gets 72 shots (boosters
because vaccines wane) of 16 vaccines, and there are more in development.

Humphries: “What a load of brainwashed (or bought out) parroting bollocks. Please go and leave your own comments. This woman is so wrong on so many of her statements that nobody should have trouble countering her nonsense.”

Holly Lynn: “Then let’s have a public debate if he’s wrong. The pro side can bring their best (Paul offit, Stanley plotkin) against RFK jr. Since he is so wrong, those scientists should be able to mop the floor with him. Then it’ll be over. Until that is done, we aren’t having “a conversation”. It’s a one- sided push with blinders on.”

Iva Covington: “If he was so wrong and off base then why did they bail on an open debate over it already. Why won't they show up and prove him wrong? Because the Science is actually on his side and the parent's side. Already proven!!!...”

Thomas McLeod: “Like Satan himself, Pharma thrives on breaking up families and stoking social conflict. The goal: eliminate the healthy, vaccine free "control group" so no one can compare Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed in a scientifically valid way.”

Charlie Read: “Tragically, you are not only wrong, but you are also allowing corporate marketing propaganda to come between family. How sad for you that your need to be approved of by the pharmaceutical industry and their captured government agencies, has led to throwing your family's name under the bus. Shameful. And 10 minutes of google research would tell you that Robert F Kennedy Jr is not even close to wrong. Believe me, we all wish he were. The real tragedy is the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and its ensuing carnage on over a generation of American children and counting…”

Eli Martus: “50,000 Amish children tracked 20 years. No vaccines No Autism. Jehovas Witnneses, million kids worldwide, no vaccines, no Autism.”

Amanda Michelle: “So much misinformation in one article. One simple way to shut him up, debate him one on one! If he is so wrong shut him down with straight facts. No one can do that because they know they will lose. He is outing all of the corruption and fraud and the only way anyone can go after him is with lies.”

Jina James: “FOIA requests revealed that the MMR vaccine that has been and is still given to millions of children around the world, was licenced by the FDA based on clinical trials that had a total of less than 1000 (no, that's not a typo!) children who were followed/monitored for a mere 42 days following vaccination. Some key revelations about these trials: -There were eight clinical trials that in total had less than 1,000 individuals, out of which only 342 children received the MMR vaccine-The safety review period only tracked 'adverse events' for 42 days after injection-More than half or a significant percent of all participants in each of the eight trials developed gastrointestinal symptoms and upper respiratory infections-All adverse events were generically described as 'other viruses' and not considered in safety profile of licensure-The control group received other vaccines for either rubella or measles and rubella, and none of the controls received a placebo (an inert substance such as a saline injection) me again how "safe and effective" the vaccine is!”

Tara Michelle: “Per the CDC casualty count in the US from the 2018-2019 Measles "Outbreak": ZERO. When you are not allowed to question science, it is no longer science - it has become religion. By its own nature - science is NEVER settled. The "safe" in "safe and effective" insinuates that the "Gold Standard" safety testing was done - NONE of the vaccines on the schedule have been tested via a Double Blind INERT Placebo based study. Therefore - safety has NOT been established. As far a effective - Merck is in a lawsuit because they tampered their efficacy testing by inserting rabbit antibodies in to their testing to increase efficacy readings. Efficacy has not been established. "Safe and Effective" is MARKETING. Not SCIENCE.”

Krista Gallagher: “He is a hero. He isn't afraid to stand up and fight for all of us who have been injured by dangerous vaccines and the corrupt pharmaceutical industry. There are literally thousands of published studies on the danger of vaccines. I work in childcare and have seen children react adversely and suddenly regress into autism or develop autoimmune disease and severe allergies following their vaccines. We need to be allowed to talk about this.”

Cheryl Lynn: “This is a mere opinion piece without references or proof for their statements. They are worried for their own reputations and not for the American children who are chronically sick at 54%. They clearly haven’t studied the risks on both sides and frankly, they don’t care. Look at Infant mortality rates. Look at cancer, autoimmune disease, and neurological effects. Tetanus alone: per CDC stats between 2001-2008 show a 400% increase in death for a tetanus vaccine compared to tetanus itself. Why were disease rates and mortality rates significantly decreased BEFORE vaccines were introduced? That’s called natural herd immunity, which can’t and never will exist with artificial immunity. Vaccines have not been safety tested against a true inert placebo- period. Read the inserts. Saying they are “safe and effective” is misinformation and an insult to the American public.”

Jennifer Western: “Yet, every lawsuit proves he’s right”

Theresa Christine Marie: “To the family members of RFK Jr, Have you studied the information brought forward regarding the skyrocketing infant mortality rate in the US? We are now 56th in the world. Yet, just ten years ago, we were 34th and even that seemed bad for a country that spends so much on healthcare. Do you think that for profit healthcare is to blame for this and for the fact that three times more mothers die in childbirth here compared to England? Before writing this opinion piece, did you bother to find out why Japan quit recommending the MMR and HPV vaccines? Did you look at how their infant mortality rate and infertility rate compares to ours? Did you ask yourselves if the measles outbreaks could be caused by shedding vaccines? Did you bother to thoroughly study the website, ? Did you bother to read the testimony of William Thompson of the CDC or Andrew Zimmerman, MD, former expert witness for the US government? How do you justify allowing a for-profit product to be injected into people with no liability for the manufacturers whatsoever? Do you understand that more and more vaccine injuries and deaths are occurring even though only a fraction are actually recorded as being caused by vaccines? Do you understand coroners are told not to list vaccine reaction as the cause of death and no records are kept as to how many deaths occur in relation to how recently vaccines were injected? Surely, a country that cares about its citizens would keep thorough records on such matters and respond accordingly as Japan has in recent years. There is no excuse for not bothering to collect this data and to make sure that every baby who dies within a month of vaccines receives a complete autopsy which includes thorough toxicology testing. The power of Pharma to prevent this from happening is appalling. The power of Pharma to prevent its industry from being sued is literally killing our children. Can you imaging not holding automobile makers liable for 33 years? Cars are much safer now due to liability concerns. We need to make vaccine makers liable again so that there is incentive to create better, safer vaccines and so that those most at risk for a reaction are not receiving vaccines. The current outbreaks of measles and mumps among vaccinated individuals proves that vaccines are not effective as we were made to believe. The irony is that more vaccines are being added which results in more shedding, more profit, and more adverse reactions. Merck is benefitting from its ineffective, shedding, unsafe products. Let’s change this through awareness and through laws that force vaccine makers to do more thorough testing and to be liable for any and all damages caused by their for-profit vaccines. You ought to be thanking RFK Jr. and all of us who are trying to protect our children and our society from Pharma’s greed.”

Theresa Coburn: “The Supreme Court ruled vaccines to be unavoidably unsafe in 2011.”

Theresa Blair: “Well Kathleen, maybe you are unaware of the lawsuit RFK jr and Del Bigtree won against HHS, which totally admits that zero safety studies have been done since the vaccine act of 1986. None, though they were ordered for every 2 years. So, when they locate those, come back and call him an outlier. Look just one of the moms or dads, who watched their child regress before their eyes, following vaccines, speak with some non Pharma patrolled scientists and doctors, or maybe just have a real “come to Jesus moment” and bring whistleblower William Thompson before Congress, we’ve only been waiting like 5 years. Certainly it would be less expensive and more fruitful than what’s been done to Trump, in my opinion. Then, you may have grounds to throw stones at RFK jr. At this point, you appear to be nothing more than another bought and paid for pharmacy parrot.”

Jenni Maria Holzhauer: “What I will never understand is this: We are told we have an agenda. But doesn’t that mean we GAIN something?? The irony is the system has money to gain. But we only get ridiculed and have nothing to gain in society and neither does RFK. Except he can sleep at night knowing he did everything he could to protect human beings.”

Susan Butler Waibel: “When RFK Jr speaks, he cites published peer-reviewed research to back up every statement. This is an opinion piece with no facts to back up the claims made; these are the same big pharma propaganda points that have been churned over and over in the media (where big pharma is 40-60% of ad revenue) but again with no science to back them up. I’ll go with Bobby and the science.”

Tamsin Scott: “If RFK Jr is lying about vaccines, why aren't the makers suing?”

Tammy Watson Bogart: “If you repeat a lie often enough eventually people will believe it's true. That's what they did in Nazi Germany, and look what happened there.”

RFK Jr. Is Our Brother and Uncle. He’s Tragically Wrong About Vaccines.

We love Robert F. Kennedy Jr., but he is part of a misinformation campaign that’s having heartbreaking—and deadly—consequences.


It is understandable that parents may have questions about vaccines and health care procedures concerning their children. We need to be able to have conversations that address skepticism about the safety and efficacy of vaccines without demonizing doubters. The reality is that vaccines can have side effects. However, the public health benefits of vaccines to every citizen far outweigh any potential side effects, which, when they do occur, are overwhelmingly minor, rarely serious, and more than justified by the overall benefit to vulnerable populations.

Sarah Coyle: “Once again Mr. Kennedy educates even those of us who thought we already knew it all. &#128513;Many blessings!”

ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. BREAKS HIS SILENCE - Yesterday’s NY Rally (May 14, 2019)

The leading environmental activist speaks out in NY after recent attacks from mainstream media and his family.

Very important that you know this, Biologics loophole, no safety testing required for products called “biologics,” none of the vaccines have been tested for safety at 9:00.

Maine - Vaccine manufacturers are exempt from safety testing their product!!!

Senate reverses course, approves bill to eliminate nonmedical exemptions for childhood vaccines

The Senate's 18-17 vote Tuesday means the bill faces a round of procedural votes in both chambers before heading to Democratic Gov. Janet Mills' desk.

The governor's administration has backed the bill to ending non-medical vaccine opt-outs by 2021 for schoolchildren, as well as nursery school and health care facility employees.

The Senate previously supported an amendment to protect religious exemptions. But the House recently sent the original bill back to the Senate.

FDA Depends on Industry Funding; Money Comes with “Strings Attached” - 2016

The meetings, closed to the public, weren’t just talks. They were negotiations. And if the two sides didn’t reach an agreement, the FDA could find itself in a world of hurt.

The agency, whose responsibilities include making sure that prescription drugs sold in the United States are safe and effective, receives almost three-quarters of its funding for that work from drug makers. In Fiscal Year 2015, the agency spent about $1.1 billion on prescription drug oversight—more specifically, those activities the agency categorizes as part of its “process for the review of human drug applications.” Congress delivered 29 percent of that money—$331.6 million. Drug companies provided the rest—$796.1 million.

The system at the FDA is “unique in the degree to which industry sets the terms of the agenda,” said Daniel Carpenter, a Harvard professor of government who has published work on the FDA and on “regulatory capture,” a process by which special interests gain influence over their regulators.

More specifically, the fees are intended “to speed and enhance the [drug] review process,” the FDA presentation said.

Former FDA drug reviewer Ron Kavanagh told POGO that, when he was at the agency from 1998 to 2008, PDUFA’s target dates for FDA action left too little time to review drug company submissions, which could total 160,000 pages not counting supporting data. Reviewers were told not to worry about studying all of the material, Kavanagh said.

“There’s a lot of things I simply didn’t look at,” Kavanagh said. “And even without looking at things I barely made the deadlines.”

Kavanagh shared an internal FDA email from 2007 in which he gave this account: “I finally had to stand up and say that I would take being written up for insubordination and would risk a poor performance evaluation, but that I would not curtail my evaluation of a potential safety concern simply to meet a PDUFA goal date.”

He was later fired.

However, POGO’s investigation found that of the 42 “stakeholder groups” listed as participants in the meetings, the vast majority had connections to pharmaceutical companies. More than 90 percent of them received funding from drug companies. More than 35 percent of them had drug company personnel on their governing boards.

“I was ordered to withdraw the paper or 'face severe consequences'—which I interpreted to mean that I would be fired," The Los Angeles Times quoted Graham as saying when the research was ultimately published.

The culture of the FDA “views the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate as its client. It overvalues the benefits of the drugs it approves, and it seriously undervalues, disregards and disrespects drug safety,” Graham said at the 2004 Senate hearing.

“For some staff and policy analysts, user-fee funding, combined with industry’s considerable role in shaping PDUFA-associated goals and expectations, further reinforces the perception that the industry has become a primary driver of the agency’s priorities and performance,” the Institute of Medicine reported. “The notion of ‘regulatory capture’ has been employed to describe the state of affairs created or, more likely, exacerbated by the user fee system, namely that powerful industry interests control or strongly influence the regulatory agency’s decision making.”

“FDA’s lack of reliable, readily accessible postmarket safety data has prevented the agency from publishing required reports in a timely manner and has restricted its ability to conduct systematic oversight,” the Government Accountability Office said in a December 2015 report. As of October 2015, the FDA had not published required annual reports containing data on postmarket studies for fiscal years 2013 or 2014, the GAO said.

Part II

In FDA Meetings, "Voice" of the Patient Often Funded by Drug Companies - 2016

RFK, Jr.

Kathleen Kennedy Townsend…

New CDC Guidelines: 5 Year-Old Can Receive up to 19 Vaccinations in One Month - 2017

The CDC has just launched a program that will calculate a catch-up schedule for children who were not vaccinated on schedule. A 5-year-old child who was not previously vaccinated would be required to receive 19 vaccines in one month, including 6 doses of aluminum-containing injections! This catch-up schedule was NOT tested for safety to determine the immediate or long-term risk of neurological or immunological damage.”

HPV vaccine carries 25% chance of lifelong sterilization, study finds - 2018

A new research study has found that 25% of girls who receive the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine end up sterilized. They will never be able to conceive children.

This information comes from a study published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health in June 2018 and titled, “A lowered probability of pregnancy in females in the USA aged 25–29 who received a human papillomavirus vaccine injection.”

Researchers examined 8 million women in the United States between 25 and 29. Among married women who had never been vaccinated with the HPV vaccine, 75% had had at least one child. Among married women who had been vaccinated, the number was 50%. The same gap existed in unmarried women – about 25% fewer vaccinated women had conceived children. The study’s authors report that statistically if all 8 million women in the study had been vaccinated, the United States would have suffered a catastrophic drop in the US birth rate that would have translated into 2 million fewer babies.

“...fewer shots.” Like Monsanto said they’d use less glyphosate.

S. Martinez: “Peanut butter used to be in EVERYBODY's lunchbox, and now peanut anything is banned everywhere because so many people are allergic to peanuts. Two very interesting facts related to this stark reversal have been pointed out by my online acquaintance and vaccine guru, Margaret Kuebler: 1.) In 1913 Richet won the Nobel prize for his research on anaphylaxis when he discovered that when any protein is injected into the bloodstream of any mammal, an allergy to that protein can develop. Upon a second injection of any amount after an incubation period, anaphylaxis can occur. (Read his Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1913). 2.) At some point the FDA granted GRAS status ("Generally Recognized as Safe") to peanut oil being in vaccines, which meant that it did not need to actually be listed as an ingredient in the vaccine.”

PEANUT OIL USED IN A NEW VACCINE; Product Patented for Merck Said to Extend Immunity - 1964

WASHINGTON, Sept. 18—A pharmaceutical manufacturer has developed a vaccine that it predicts will considerably lengthen immunity from influenza and other virus infections, thereby requiring fewer “shots.”

The key ingredient, called Adjuvant 65, which contains peanut oil, was patented this week for Merck & Co., Inc., by Dr. Allen F. Woodhour and Dr. Thomas B. Stim. They, discovered it in the company's research laboratory at West Point, Pa.

[Increase of immune response by administration of metabolizable vegetable oil emulsions].

Charles Richet, Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1913 - Anaphylaxis

How a pro-vaccine doctor reopened debate about link to autism

A world-renowned pro-vaccine medical expert is the newest voice adding to the body of evidence suggesting that vaccines can cause autism in certain susceptible children.

Pediatric neurologist Dr. Andrew Zimmerman originally served as the expert medical witness for the government, which defends vaccines in federal vaccine court. He had testified that vaccines do not cause autism in specific patients.

Dr. Zimmerman now has signed a bombshell sworn affidavit. He says that, during a group of 5,000 vaccine-autism cases being heard in court on June 15, 2007, he took aside the Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers he worked for defending vaccines and told them he’d discovered “exceptions in which vaccinations could cause autism.”

“I explained that in a subset of children, vaccine-induced fever and immune stimulation did cause regressive brain disease with features of autism spectrum disorder,” Dr. Zimmerman now states. He said his opinion was based on “scientific advances” as well as his own experience with patients.

For the government and vaccine industry’s own pro-vaccine expert to have this scientific opinion stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate — if people were to find out.

But they didn’t.

Dr. Zimmerman goes on to say that once the DOJ lawyers learned of his position, they quickly fired him as an expert witness and kept his opinion secret from other parents and the rest of the public.

What’s worse, he says the DOJ went on to misrepresent his opinion in federal vaccine court to continue to debunk vaccine-autism claims.

The Vienna Report

Medical Professionals Speak Out

This is a list of medical doctors and PhD medical scientists who explain why vaccines have risks, and may not be as safe or as effective as we are being led to believe (in their linked videos/ lectures, click on the name).

MMR Vaccine Licensing Called Into Question Following ICAN's Latest FOIA Exposure of FDA Coverup

AUSTIN, Texas, May 2, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- In another significant legal win for vaccine risk awareness non-profit Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), a new Freedom of Information Act disclosure from the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has revealed that the MMR vaccine was licensed based on clinical trials which in total had less than 1,000 participants and far more adverse reactions than previously acknowledged.

"It's alarming that an appeal was required to get this information, but it's more alarming that every time ICAN prevails in obtaining a FOIA disclosure from the FDA, CDC or HHS, we learn about another serious shortcoming in their duties to assure Americans' health and health care," says Del Bigtree, ICAN founder and host of the weekly fact-based medical news show "The HighWire."

The MMR vaccine is at the heart of the vaccine debate. The following are some of the key facts learned from the clinical trial reports produced by the FDA, which the agency relied upon to license the MMR:

Bigtree, an Emmy-Award winning producer, and director of the documentary "Vaxxed: From Coverup to Catastrophe," says the reason for increased vaccine hesitancy is not unreasonable fear, but a growth in awareness of the corruption, secrecy and obvious overt propaganda surrounding vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry.

"Thanks to the laws in this country that for now at least permit access to various government records, we now know the MMR vaccine was licensed using an irresponsibly small and limited group of children," says Bigtree.

"But what's even more alarming is learning about the serious adverse events that were known and acknowledged, yet ignored in order to license the MMR vaccine," Bigtree adds, noting "This was after only tracking adverse events for 42 days after injection – imagine what they might have found had they tracked safety for three years against an appropriate control, like they do for drugs."

Oregon State Senator...

Vaccine law takes away parental rights By DENNIS LINTHICUM State Senator, District 28

I am an Oregon Senator representing five rural, mostly-eastern Oregon counties.

A father of two and a grandfather of five, I am deeply concerned about the health and well-being of Oregon’s children. Which is why I have been troubled by the legislature’s response to a small cluster of measles in our state.

We have had 10 cases of measles this year, in a population of over 4 million. While we can agree that’s 10 cases too many, the legislative response teaches us much more about herd mentality than about the measles.

At issue is whether it is necessary or prudent to force vaccinations on school-age children for “restrictable diseases,” which is what Oregon’s HB 3063 seeks to do. This is a newly minted phrase, “restrictable diseases” and it means much more than yesteryear’s “communicable diseases” language.

The new nomenclature refers to a policy category for diseases rather than a scientific one. Forged, hammered, and pressed by the pharmaceutical industry, this category refers to diseases for which there are commercially available vaccines: Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Polio, Measles, Rubella, Mumps, Haemophilus influenzae type b, Hepatitis A and B, and Varicella.

Like a swollen river following a torrential storm, this list of “restrictable diseases” is designed to grow. After all, this is big business.

Let’s not forget that at the same time that lawmakers in Oregon and several other states have pushed to abolish religious and philosophical exemptions to push vaccination, Merck, a multi-billion-dollar pharmaceutical giant which manufactures the only measles vaccine commercially available, has quadrupled their earnings in the last quarter.

However, the real debate is about government’s meddling into our private lives. The question becomes, when does my personal lifestyle and private health management rise to become a concern for lawmakers and public health officials?

Is measles so concerning that we must hand our medical choices over to the state?

During the past decade, in Oregon, there have only been 14 total cases. Although the media constantly warns the public of the deadly nature of measles, during these past 10 years, there have been no deaths from measles (apart from one child who was vaccinated as an infant in another country).

Yet, during the same period over 3,000 children in our state have actually died from bee stings, drownings, external injuries and highway related accidents.

Are 14 cases of measles during a 10-year period the Rubicon for creating a reasonable public health measles policy?

Even if this could justify a measles law (which it doesn’t), why the rash demands to exclude children from school if they are not current on the full schedule of six dozen doses of FDA approved, commercially available vaccines?

New facts about the safety and efficacy of MMR have recently been uncovered by Freedom of Information Act requests. We now know that the FDA, which licenses the MMR vaccine, relied on clinical trials with a total of fewer than 1,000 individuals. Of these study participants, only 342 children received the MMR vaccine.

Their safety review tracked “adverse events” for only 42 days. Yet more than half of all participants developed gastrointestinal symptoms and upper respiratory infections. These reactions were not considered side effects, labeled as “other viruses,” and not considered in the safety profile of licensure.

None of the control subjects received a placebo (an inert substance such as a saline injection).

The lack of adequate safety testing is unacceptable. But the FDA also relies on post-market surveillance to track vaccines.

I have heard from hundreds of my own constituents that they vaccinated on the recommended schedule and that their children’s health declined after each doctor’s visit. They tell me their children now have damaged immune systems, diarrhea for months on end, and cognitive decline.

These Oregon parents are begging lawmakers to pay attention. But many of my colleagues dismiss them as “hysterical,” or, worse, “selfish.”

HB 3063 seeks to force medicine on Oregon’s youngest citizens, children who have no choice or say in the matter.

The purpose of life is not to serve the state. Rather, it is to become a full and flourishing human being who is capable of critical thinking and has the ability to recognize the true, good and beautiful, while exhibiting virtue and contributing positively to one’s family and community.

Families must live with the consequences of their health choices and it is families that must have the right to choose.

Dennis Linthicum, OR Senate District 28

Highwire: “BREAKING: Multiple sources reporting to The HighWire, Oregon legislators are walking away from vaccine bill HB3063, citing unprecedented grassroots opposition.”

"I'm sure all of you are aware what a vaccine is. Essentially, it's a virus in liquid that we inject. The viruses are long strands of RNA or DNA, thousands of RNA molecules or DNA molecules. It's too expensive to make the virus in a test tube. What the pharmaceutical companies do is they mimic nature's way of making viruses and they infect cells. The cells produce the virus and then they try to purify the virus away from the cellular material to put it in our final product. Anyone who has ever taken chemistry would know that no final product is ever pure. You would particularly know that when you go from a small scale manufacturing or production batch to a large scale batch your impurities increase dramatically in your final product.

In your final product there are contaminants from the cell that was used to make the virus. When we use chicken egg embryos there are contaminants from the chicken egg in the final vaccine. That chicken contaminant level is not human. We recognize it as foreign, we mount an immune response to it, and we eliminate it from our bodies. In the case when we are using human fetal cells to manufacture the vaccines, we have fragments of a retrovirus (because one of the babies from which the cells were taken had a retrovirus), we have large amounts of fragments of human DNA (primitive human DNA because it's fetal DNA) and in some cases the contaminants are at higher levels than the active ingredient of the vaccine.

That's alarming. What does that mean to a child who is injected with those materials? Two things are very possible and the science that demonstrates that these things happen is well established.

There's a chance that the child would have an immune response to that fetal material, because it's so close to that child (because it's human) that that immune response could turn on the child itself and become an autoimmune response. That's one danger. The second danger, which we believe is playing the predominant role in damage done to children, is a process called insertional mutagenesis. Those DNA fragments can insert into the genome of the child, create subsequent mutations and create problems. There are 30-40+ papers now looking at the genomes of children who have developed autism. These children have hundreds of "de novo" mutations. Those are mutations that their parents do not have. Science has established very clearly what can cause hundreds of diverse de novo mutations: radiation exposure, chemical toxin exposure, and foreign DNA exposure. The only one of those three that corresponds with the change points worldwide are the fetal manufactured contaminants." Dr Theresa Deisher, President & CEO of AVM Biotech. At 21:00

Remember Dr. Stanley Plotkin confirmed in his 9 hour deposition that yes indeed, they do use aborted fetal cells.

Scientists in China Create New Vaccines Using Body Parts From Nine Aborted Babies - 2015

Due to dwindling capacity for existing aborted fetal cell lines to self-replicate, scientists in China have developed a new aborted fetal cell line, WALVAX 2 that will be used for viral vaccine production. The existing cell lines, MRC-5 and WI-38 are currently used in MMR, Varicella, Hepatitis-A, Shingles, some rabies and some polio vaccines.

WALVAX 2 is taken from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation female who was ultimately selected from among 9 aborted babies. The scientists noted how they followed specific guidelines to mimic WI-38 and MRC-5 in selecting the aborted babies, ranging from 2-4 months gestation. They further noted how they induced labor using a “water bag” abortion to shorten the delivery time and prevent the death of the fetus to ensure live intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.

The Tip of the Needle

“In this book Catherine O’Driscoll will take you through the gripping tale of her own personal journey, warts and all, from a blind faith in the pronouncement of experts, to the realisation that she had to do her own research and become her own expert in her animals’ health. She describes the toll it took on her life, health and family and the interpersonal politics that go on in even small organisations where everyone is ostensibly devoted to the same cause.

“Her scope is wide. By the time you finish the last chapter, you will have a global understanding of the complex interests controlling the health and well-being of your animals, your children, and yourself – and perhaps the beginning of an inkling of an answer to the question, ‘Why?’” Dr Jayne LM Donegan

RFK, Jr.: “How business interests deceive, misinform, and buy influence at the expense of public health and safety.”

From the Union of Concerned Scientists

The Disinformation Playbook

How Business Interests Deceive, Misinform, and Buy Influence at the Expense of Public Health and Safety

Here are five of the most widely used “plays” and some of the many cases where they have been used to block regulations or minimize corporate liability, often with frightening effectiveness—and disastrous repercussions on public health and safety.

The Fake: Conduct counterfeit science and try to pass it off as legitimate research
The Blitz: Harass scientists who speak out with results or views inconvenient for industry
The Diversion: Manufacture uncertainty about science where little or none exists
The Screen: Buy credibility through alliances with academia or professional societies
The Fix: Manipulate government officials or processes to inappropriately influence policy
Like public interest organizations, many companies or industry trade associations lobby the government to help enact legislation favorable to their interests. Some companies, however, go so far as to undermine the way federal agencies use science to develop policy, pushing for changes that make it harder for agencies to fulfill their science-based missions, or using political connections to gain access to top-level agency officials. Such actions compromise the government’s ability to protect the public.

Unfortunately, a “revolving door” between industry and government presents a huge opportunity for people with industry ties and clear financial conflicts of interest to hold key decision making positions. Such officials can help develop policies that benefit a former or prospective employer, policies that may live on long after their departure.

While it’s certainly reasonable for industry to participate as a stakeholder in policy decisions, transparency and public vigilance are needed to keep companies from using their deep pockets and powerful networks to promote policies that undermine scientific evidence and threaten public health and safety.

FAIL: 26% Contract Measles Despite 2 or More Measles-Containing Vaccines, New Chinese Study Finds

The study concluded with the following dismal prospects for the much heralded high effectiveness of the measles vaccination programs:

“This analysis of measles cases in Tianjin found that among children with a recorded vaccine history, a substantial number of those who contracted measles had received at least one MCV dose. Although time-to-diagnosis following vaccination increases with receipt of each successive dose of measles vaccine, the fact that 8.5% of cases in the surveillance dataset and 26% in the case series contracted measles despite 2 or more doses of MCV is surprising. This also has implications for the VE of the measles vaccine series in Tianjin. Future research is needed to identify whether this is due to primary or secondary vaccine failure, and whether cold chain management, low vaccine efficacy, scheduled dose timing, or host factors such as co-morbidities and waning immunity might be responsible. This analysis motivates further research to discern the cause of these breakthrough cases in both outbreak and isolated case settings."

Clearly, a 26% failure rate in those receiving 2 or more measles-containing vaccines is not only surprising, but demonstrates how the present-day myth that receipt of the measles vaccinae (including multiple "boosters") equates to bona fide immunity (or any vaccine, for that matter) is no longer tenable, as judged by the evidence itself, especially given a long recorded history of measles outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations. Here are just a few examples reported in the medical literature:..

Fyi, did you know that the research information your child has access to at school is also controlled by these agenda seekers? I learned this recently after reading a high schooler’s report on gmo foods.

Astroturf and manipulation of media messages | Sharyl Attkisson - 10 Minutes

“Hallmarks of astroturf include….crank, quack, nutty, lies, paranoid, pseudo, and conspiracy…”

In this eye-opening talk, veteran investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson shows how astroturf, or fake grassroots movements funded by political, corporate, or other special interests very effectively manipulate and distort media messages.

Sharyl Attkisson is an investigative journalist based in Washington D.C. She is currently writing a book entitled Stonewalled (Harper Collins), which addresses the unseen influences of corporations and special interests on the information and images the public receives every day in the news and elsewhere. For twenty years (through March 2014), Attkisson was a correspondent for CBS News. In 2013, she received an Emmy Award for Outstanding Investigative Journalism for her reporting on “The Business of Congress,” which included an undercover investigation into fundraising by Republican freshmen. She also received Emmy nominations in 2013 for Benghazi: Dying for Security and Green Energy Going Red. Additionally, Attkisson received a 2013 Daytime Emmy Award as part of the CBS Sunday Morning team’s entry for Outstanding Morning Program for her report: “Washington Lobbying: K-Street Behind Closed Doors.” In September 2012, Attkisson also received an Emmy for Oustanding Investigative Journalism for the “Gunwalker: Fast and Furious” story. She received the RTNDA Edward R. Murrow Award for Excellence in Investigative Reporting for the same story. Attkisson received an Investigative Emmy Award in 2009 for her exclusive investigations into TARP and the bank bailout. She received an Investigative Emmy Award in 2002 for her series of exclusive reports about mismanagement at the Red Cross.

Netflix - The Bleeding Edge

This eye-opening look at the fast-growing medical device industry reveals how the rush to innovate can lead to devastating consequences for patients.
Arty turns 10 this summer.

#1530443 --- 05/15/19 11:19 AM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
Pravda1984 Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 08/31/17
Posts: 7
Loc: Fingerlakes
Anti-Vaxxers resorting to racist and religious bigotry to support the "message" -

Save lives - vaccinate your self and your children.

#1530529 --- 05/17/19 04:44 PM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2336
Loc: Waterloo, NY

Millennials Besieged by Chronic Illness: From Age 27, It’s All “Downhill”

Millennials (the generation born between the early 1980s and approximately the mid-1990s) just got some bad news. Health insurance data from 2017 show that many of them, especially older millennials in their mid-30s, are facing unprecedented levels of mental and physical illness.

In addition to highlighting the strikingly poorer health of millennials compared to Gen Xers, the BCBS report noted the following:

Of the top 10 health problems affecting millennials, six are behavioral and mental health conditions (major depression, psychotic conditions, substance/alcohol/tobacco use disorders and hyperactivity) and four are physical conditions (hypertension, high cholesterol, Crohn’s disease/ulcerative colitis and type II diabetes). Behavioral health conditions affect millennials more than the U.S. population as a whole.

Looking at the three-year period between 2014 and 2017, BCBS found that nearly all of the health conditions became more prevalent—especially major depression and hyperactivity, both of which increased by roughly 30% in just three years.

Although the BCBS report on millennials does not specifically mention anxiety disorders, the 2016 Harris Poll survey found that anxiety disorders were one of the three most common diagnoses among millennials. Fourteen percent reported an anxiety disorder diagnosis in that survey, and nearly one-fourth (23%) reported being diagnosed with any mental illness. In fact, anxiety is a prominent enough affliction for this generation that some writers have half seriously proposed renaming millennials as “Generation Anxious.”

Vaccines represent one group of obvious suspects, particularly if one recognizes that the millennial generation’s arrival on the scene roughly coincided with the end of manufacturer liability for childhood vaccine injuries and the beginning of the rush to pile ever-more vaccines onto the childhood schedule. Other environmental factors, such as the ubiquity of glyphosate in food, air, water (and vaccines) and young people’s immersion in a wireless-saturated environment also merit close attention and an immediate response.



Brent Wisner In Studio with his $2B Monsanto Verdict; Del Rocks Rockland; Shocking MMR Trial Data; Dr. Toni Bark Breaks Down Vaccine Scandal That Devastated Israel.

“...the movement of the vaccine educated…”

“Vaccines are not safe and effective for everyone.”

Monsanto/Bayer verdict, Brent Wisner, the new evidence , 12:23 document Monsanto gives to their employees on how to spray Roundup, 15:00 email by a pediatrician to Donna Farmer about feeding gmo foods to children, they were laughing about it, EPA standing with Monsanto, mistrust of our government agencies; gathering of the Orthodox Jewish community, measles hysteria “born out of stupidity;” 33:00 Rally in Albany, NY on Tuesday, misrepresentation by CBS’ report, 53:00 a new MMR vaccine study, 102:00 it’s financial disclosure (lol, not surprised!), 104:00 Hepatitis vaccine in Israel, Dr. Tony Bark on Sci-B vaccine scandal at 1:07:00, “Vaccines are not safe and effective for everyone;” the Neuronburg Code at 1:29:00; forced adult mandate coming, Oregon bill killed, at 140:00:00

Suspend All Existing FDA Vaccine Drug Approvals as Violating 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act

The President promised to act expeditiously on the critical issue of Vaccine Safety, for the safety of our children, and is bound by the Article II, Section 3 provision of the Constitution that the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed...” The FDA has failed, for over 30 years, to obey the safety and reporting provisions of the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act thereby rendering all current vaccine approvals unlawful We call upon the President to intervene with FDA pending petition & suspend all current vaccine drug approvals until, and unless, the existing law is enforced, requiring safer vaccines and full annual reports to Congress and the Public regarding vaccine safety. FDA Petition: FDA-2019-P-1130-0001.

Hep-B and BCG Vaccines Affect Brain Development By Immune Activation - 2016

“Early-life immune activation has been well-established to regulate the programming of brain development and influence behavior in later life…”
-Dr Zhibin Yao et al, 2016, Sun Yat-Sen University (Consistently ranked among the top 10 universities in mainland China)

An important new study by Li et al. reports that bacillus calmette-guerin (BCG) vaccine (for tuberculosis) and hepatitis B vaccine affect brain development in infant rats. The study relates the observed brain changes to the type of immune activation (Th1 or Th2, explained below) stimulated by the vaccines. The BCG and hep B vaccines produced opposite effects (BCG being beneficial, and hep B being detrimental). The combination of both vaccines resulted in cancellation of the effects.

This is the first study of immune activation by vaccination on brain development. Other studies of immune activation use non-vaccine immune activators like “poly-IC” or lipopolysaccharide. These immune stimulants can create very intense inflammation. A common criticism from vaccine advocates is that the immune activation experiments are not relevant to vaccines because vaccines cause a milder immune activation than injections of poly-IC or lipopolysaccharide. This argument is contradicted by the Li et al study. Li et al proves that vaccines can affect brain development via immune activation.

This new study is very important for the vaccine safety controversy because it connects vaccines with the studies showing that immune activation impacts brain development and causes brain disorders.

The study…

Neonatal vaccination with bacillus Calmette–Guérin and hepatitis B vaccines modulates hippocampal synaptic plasticity in rats - 2015

ABSTRACT: Immune activation can exert multiple effects on synaptic transmission. Our study demonstrates the influence of neonatal vaccination on hippocampal synaptic plasticity in rats under normal physiological conditions. The results revealed that neonatal BCG vaccination enhanced synaptic plasticity. In contrast, HBV hampered it. Furthermore, we found that the cytokine balance shifted in favour of the T helper type 1/T helper type 2 immune response in BCG/HBV-vaccinated rats in the periphery. The peripheral IFN-&#947;:IL-4 ratio was positively correlated with BDNF and IGF-1 in the hippocampus. BCG raised IFN-&#947;, IL-4, BDNF and IGF-1 and reduced IL-1&#946;, IL-6, and TNF-&#945; in the hippocampus, whereas, HBV triggered the opposite effects.

Del Bigtree interviews Aluminum Expert Prof. Christopher Exley

Rome, Italy - May 8, 2019 - Italian Revolution Against Mandatory Vaccinations.

10 short videos, click on right arrow to proceed to next video.

Seneff: “This is a fantastic presentation by Bobby Kennedy, Jr. on Gardasil. Please set aside time to watch!”

Science Day Presentation...

RFK, Jr.: Gardasil “The Science” Video and Other Facts

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.—“Many of the things I’m going to say today would be slanderous if they weren’t true. And, if they are not true, then Merck should sue me. But Merck won’t do that. And they won’t do that because in the United States, truth is an absolute defense against slander.”

This must-watch video details the many problems with the development and safety of Merck’s third-highest grossing product, Gardasil. Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., CHD’s Chairman and Chief Legal Counsel, ask that you watch and share this video so that you, and others, may make an informed decision of whether or not to give your child, boy or girl, a Gardasil vaccine. It can also be a useful tool for pediatricians who are trying to understand how this vaccine, that is actually causing health problems with young people, could have been approved by FDA and then recommended by CDC. The video is full of jaw-dropping facts about Gardasil and the clinical trials leading up to its release upon an unsuspecting public.

Transcript of “The Science” presentation:
Arty turns 10 this summer.

#1530724 --- 05/20/19 08:29 PM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2336
Loc: Waterloo, NY

"This is a chronic disease epidemic.

I have six kids. I had eleven brothers and sisters. I had over fifty cousins. I didn't know a single
person with a peanut allergy. Why do my kids all have food #allergies? Because they were born after
1989. If you were born prior to 1989 your chance of having a chronic disease, according to HHS, is
12.8%. If you were born after 1989 your chance of having a chronic disease is 54%. What are they?
They're the neurodevelopmental diseases; ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, tourette syndrome,
ASD/autism. The autoimmune diseases; guillain barre, multiple sclerosis, juvenile diabetes, rheumatoid
arthritis. The anaphylactic diseases; food allergies, rhinitis, asthma, eczema. All of these exploded in
1989. Congress order the EPA to do a study to find out what year the disease #epidemic started, and the EPA
did that study. They said it started in 1989.

There's lots of culprits, many new things. We have cell phones, PFOA, ultrasound, #glyphosate etc. Our kids
are swimming around in a toxic soup. We're not saying all of those illnesses came from vaccines. But
there is no intervention that is so exquisitely and precisely timed as what happened when we went in
1989 and changed the #vaccine schedule, and raised the levels of aluminum and mercury - tripling and
quadrupling them - and went from the three vaccines I had [as a child], to the 72 that my kids had, and the
75 that kids will have next year."

— Robert F. Kennedy, Jr, Director of Children's Health Defense, at the New York Rally & Lobbying Day for Vaccine
Injury/Vaccine Rights (5/14/19)


Finally, some of our Legislators are listening.

In 2011, the Supreme Court made a decision that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.”

And Americans lost their right to sue a vaccine company in civil court.

These legislators want to overturn that decision.

Please watch this and learn about what this case did and why it’s important to repeal it.

We need to make vaccine manufacturers responsible for their product, just like every other manufacturer in the United States.

Pharma Vax's free ride; they're going to try to stop this.

Please write to our Reps and Senators and ask them to support this resolution.


Resolution to Repeal Bruesewitz v. Wyeth (2011), part of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act of 1986

Representative Jeremy Munson
Senator Jim Abeler - making manufacturers liable again
Randall Knutson, Esq. - talks about his clients and vaccine court
Wayne Rohde - father of a vaccine injured child, tells the story of the child, Bruesewitz, and the vaccine that injured her was removed from the market by the manufacturer, 17:00 listen

Well, here we go, a Federal bill has been introduced.

I see no New York legislators sponsoring the bill but, it would be wise for us to let our
Representatives and Senators know we are concerned and ask why are there are no bills
Being put forth demanding safety testing for multiple vaccines injected at once. Don’t
forget “Healthy Adults 2020.” That’s Pharma coming after the adult market.

“...accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices…”

The committee (ACIP) that recently approved a new vaccine for adults…

“We have no data to make a recommendation one way or the other,”
“...we’ll look at the post-marketing data…”

Here’s a short reminder...

The bill…

H.R.2527 - Vaccinate All Children Act of 2019

To amend the Public Health Service Act to condition receipt by States (and political subdivisions and public entities of States) of preventive health services grants on the establishment of a State requirement for students in public elementary and secondary schools to be vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and for other purposes.…/116th-cong…/house-bill/2527/text

This is how they've hidden vaccine injury for the last 30 years…

Why Did the CDC Silence the Million Dollar Harvard Project Charged With Upgrading Our Vaccine Safety Surveillance System?

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gave Harvard Medical School a $1 million dollar grant to track VAERS reporting at Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare for 3 years and to create an automated reporting system which would revolutionize the VAERS reporting system- transforming it from “passive” to “active.”

I’ll quote the findings directly from the report, “Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. […] Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of ‘problem’ drugs and vaccines that endanger public health. New surveillance methods for drug and vaccine adverse effects are needed.”

To assist you in your decision making, I’ll leave you with a statistic from the ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network) request to the HHS to meet the obligations set forth by the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Safety Act regarding the CDC’s role in the vaccine industry market, “When the CDC recommends a pediatric vaccine for universal use, it creates for that vaccine’s maker a liability free market of 78 million children typically required by law to receive the vaccine.”

Look how corrupt Merck is.
And we are supposed to trust their MMR vaccine.
I don't think so.

POGO: Project on Government Oversight

Federal Contractor Misconduct Database (FCMD)

The federal government routinely awards contracts to companies with histories of misconduct, including contract fraud and other violations. POGO believes that providing this website will help to improve contracting decisions and increase public knowledge of how the government spends billions of taxpayer dollars each year. Read more…

Search FCMD…

Merck & Co., Inc.

33 instances of misconduct since 1995 | $8,813.3M in penalties

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is introduced and recognized by the Texas Senate as a trailblazer for the
welfare of children's health and the environment. Truly a special moment for RFK, Jr. and the
movement to protect medical freedom![0]=68.ARApLEXXykcwHP5ZF557Am5yvxnXGZwgbeUwcvBvDslkwGehyfXgnd6mn4oeQhgp5W9k2snbn7tDW0cgZ6Mbs8gtk9p4PT87pqvLYGvf0p0XlDxMoa2rOcVIJ7u_9K9grAjRiIe1PX2o8fsw1mLBFKBNNFINbS-XUZvXHjnUwmydezIl_bXEQM5OjqIuz36L2WBT0GpB_DY96ZY1rPHsUSVZ3KPML6JuhPdC9Im41nP9L6J5_w_xDXrFV5DPMUXaNM5uXkAe1cVtN-gpuwVkvIbg3rCWjzypg5FPdS9tHSGOHJZHyplr6hL0WEZ2FK7dLyqCtdPZUWigBAxxg3k

MMR Vaccine Licensing Called Into Question Following ICAN's Latest FOIA Exposure of FDA Coverup

AUSTIN, Texas, May 2, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- In another significant legal win for vaccine risk awareness non-profit Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), a new Freedom of Information Act disclosure from the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has revealed that the MMR vaccine was licensed based on clinical trials which in total had less than 1,000 participants and far more adverse reactions than previously acknowledged.

The CDC’s Criminal Recommendation for a Flu Shot During Pregnancy

When it comes to vaccines, we are not supposed to concern ourselves with the methodological weaknesses of the kinds of studies the CDC relies on to support its flu shot recommendation for pregnant women. We are not supposed to notice that the CDC’s statement that “there’s a lot of evidence” that it’s safe to vaccinate pregnant women also implies that there’s at least some evidence that it is not.

And this careful wording of the CDC’s statement is understandable, given the fact that the agency’s own researchers have found an association between vaccination of pregnant women and a significantly increased risk of miscarriage.

This is the fourth installment of a multi-part exposé demonstrating how the government and media routinely and systematically deceive the public about the safety and effectiveness of the influenza vaccine. In this installment, you will learn:

How the CDC’s own researchers have found that repeated annual vaccination of pregnant women may increase their risk of miscarriage;

How if pharmaceutical companies made the same claims that the CDC makes about the safety of vaccinating pregnant women, they could be sued for fraud;

How the CDC grossly mischaracterizes the findings of studies it cites to support its recommendation that pregnant women get a flu shot;

How the CDC places the goal of maintaining or increasing vaccination rates above the goal of bettering public health;

How the CDC deliberately misinforms the public about the toxicity of thimerosal, the mercury-based preservative that’s used in some flu shots;

How, until thimerosal’s removal from most vaccines in the early 2000s, the CDC’­s routine childhood vaccine schedule was exposing children to cumulative levels of mercury that exceeded the government’s own safety guidelines;

How the CDC maintains that the type of mercury used in vaccines passes through the body harmlessly despite its own cited sources acknowledging that it is a known neurotoxin that can be transported across both the placental and blood-brain barriers and accumulate in the brain;

How the CDC claims that science has proven that vaccines do not cause autism despite the biological plausibility of the hypothesis that vaccines can cause autism in subpopulations of genetically susceptible individuals and the absence of studies properly designed to actually test that hypothesis;

How the only study designed to investigate whether getting a flu shot during pregnancy might increase the risk of having a child with autism did find an association, and why the statistical method the study authors used to make that association disappear was invalid.

How studies have established that activation of the maternal immune system during pregnancy and the resulting inflammatory response is a risk factor for the development of autism in offspring.

How, when it comes to vaccines, the mainstream corporate media refuse to serve the public by doing journalism and instead dutifully serve the state by colluding with the government to keep the public misinformed about what the science actually says about vaccine safety and effectiveness.

If you have not already, please be sure to read the first three installments of this series because they contain important contextual information that you will need in order to get the most benefit out of reading this fourth installment:

Part 1: Should You Get the Flu Shot Every Year? Don’t Ask the New York Times.

Part 2: How the CDC Uses Fear and Deception to Sell More Flu Vaccines.

Part 3: How You’re Being Lied to about the Risks of Getting a Flu Vaccine Annually

I am presenting the information in this third part of the series on the assumption that you already have the knowledge provided in the first three essays. So with that understood, let’s proceed.

Seneff: “Hmmm. The highest rates of HPV vaccination correlated with the highest rates of cervical cancer! Might this imply that the vaccine is not working?”

HPV-related cancer rates affect vaccine uptake in Alabama, USA Health study says

By University of South Alabama, March 24, 2019

“It was exactly the opposite of what we expected,” said Dr. Jennifer Young Pierce, who heads Cancer Control and Prevention at USA Health Mitchell Cancer Institute. “We found that the higher the rate of cancer in the county, the higher the rate of vaccination.”

Children’s Health Summit 4!

A groundbreaking online event where we tackle this year's topic: Preventing and Reversing Childhood Chronic Illness

Normal Immune Function And Vaccination Interference - Thomas Cowan, MD

Autoimmune Disorders Caused by Vaccines - 2012

Autoimmune disorders—chronic diseases—have become a way of life for children and young adults, yet the cause is not being addressed. Here is clear and strong evidence that the cause is the massive number of vaccinations.

The authors concluded:

Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host’s immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system’s self-organized criticality.

This study is a smoking gun tying vaccines to the massive upsurge in life-destroying chronic autoimmune diseases. That leaves only one question, with some corollaries:

Why do our public health agencies insist on pressing all these vaccinations?

Why are there no studies to determine the effects of the full schedule of vaccinations?
Why are there no studies to determine the effects of multiple antigens in single vaccines?
Why are we even losing our right to refuse?

It’s obvious that public health agencies have something other than our health at the forefront of their deliberations. It’s equally obvious, with the revolving door between agency employees and Big Pharma/Agribusiness, that far too many employees in the most responsible positions are beholden to the companies they’re supposed to regulate. Agencies like the FDA, CDC, NIH, EPA, and USDA do not exist to protect the public. They exist as little more than marketing fronts for Big Pharma and Agribusiness.

The study…

The role of interleukin 2 in autoimmunity. 1989.

Abstract: In addition to playing a major role in physiological immune responses against foreign antigens, the interleukin 2 (IL-2)-IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) system may also be implicated in autoimmune phenomena. Initial studies on the role of IL-2 in autoimmunity indicate a deficiency in the production of this lymphokine in autoimmune disease. Here, Guido Kroemer and Georg Wick review recent data supporting the notion that an excess of endogenous or exogenous IL-2 may aggravate autoaggression by triggering autoreactive effector cells, and they speculate that IL-2 might favor the de novo development of autoimmunity by breaking autotolerance.

Dutra: “GlaxoSmithKline testing a GMO pediatric vaccine in South Africa. The Mayo Clinic says that RSV virus is common and does NOT do great damage to children; so WHY is GlaxoSmithKline doing these trials and planning on pushing this vaccine on the public?”


Arty turns 10 this summer.

#1530750 --- Yesterday at 07:37 AM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2336
Loc: Waterloo, NY

Dr. Toni Bark: “For those of you who don’t “get” what’s going on, the Federal hearings on vaccinations
and exemptions will impact you whether you have children or not. This is about setting the stage for
the adult mandates which will roll Out with “healthy people 2020.” By staying silent and uninvolved
you are complicit in your own demise of bodily freedoms, choice and likely health outcomes. You will
be asked to roll up your sleeve every ten years for repeated shots since they now admit, vaccine
immunity doesn’t last. Each shot is a step closer to autoimmunity, allergy and encephalopathy.
Good luck with that!”

“...Now I know too much, that’s my curse, I read this stuff and I can’t unthink it...Merck lied about this
vaccine, it deceived the regulators, it deceived the public. The vaccine, there is no proof that the vaccine
does anything to solve the problem of cervical cancer. There’s indications that the vaccine actually gives
you cancer and if I am misstating anything, I know what I’m talking about and I’m saying this not on
belief but because it’s true and I’m saying it that way so that Merck will sue me if I’m saying something
wrong. And they won’t.” RFK, Jr.

“Until you can prove vaccines do not cause DNA mutations, I do not consent.
Until you can prove vaccines do not carry cancer causing retroviruses, I do not consent.
Until you can prove vaccines do not impair fertility, I do not consent.
Until you can prove vaccines are safe using the gold standard in medicine with an inert placebo, I do not consent.
Until you can prove it’s safe and effective to inject 8 different viruses at one time, I do not consent.
Until you can prove it’s safe to inject 18 times the “safe” limit of Aluminum into day 1 old babies, I do not consent.
Until you can prove none of the 16 vaccines and their components do not cause autism, I do not consent.
Until you can prove vaccines are not permanently harming the immune system and creating an epidemic of autoimmune diseases, I do not consent.
Until you can prove vaccines do not contribute to SIDS, I do not consent.
Until you can prove vaccinated individuals are healthier, live longer or thrive more so than their non vaccinated counterparts, I do not consent.
Unless you carried, loved and cared for MY child, I do not consent.” Jamie McGuire


Ongoing case against Merck…

Former Merck Scientists Sue Merck Alleging MMR Vaccine Efficacy Fraud

Stephen A. Krahling and Joan A. Wlochowski, former Merck virologists blew the whistle by filing a qui tam action lawsuit — U.S. v Merck & Co. — in August 2010. The scientists allege that the efficacy tests for the measles, mumps, rubella vaccine (MMR) were faked. The document was unsealed in June, 2012.

This is a major federal case alleging fraud in vaccine testing; it encapsulates how medical research can be manipulated to achieve desired results, and why it may be wise to question the integrity and the validity of “science-based medicine.”

The suit charges that Merck knew its measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine was less effective than the purported 95% level, and it alleges that senior management was aware and also oversaw testing that concealed the actual effectiveness. According to the lawsuit, Merck began a sham testing program in the late 1990’s to hide the declining efficacy of the vaccine. The objective of the fraudulent trials was to “report efficacy of 95% or higher regardless of the vaccine’s true efficacy.”

According to Krahling and Wlochowski’s complaint, they were threatened with jail were they to alert the FDA to the fraud being committed.

In January 31, 2016, the court ordered that discovery, the process of gathering evidence, must be completed by 1 March 2017, over a year from now. The court also ordered that expert discovery needs to be completed by 31 October 2017.

Other motions must be filed by 20 December 2017. A motion for class action certification must be filed by 1 March 2018; and Merck must file its opposition to class certification by 5 April 2018.

The plaintiffs charge that Merck defrauded the U.S. for more than a decade by faking a vaccine efficacy rate of 95% even though the real rate was significantly lower.


Two other class action lawsuits against Merck were filed in 2012.

One was filed by a clinic, the other by two physicians claiming Merck violated the Sherman Act – with monopolistic, anti-competitive practices – and various violations of state laws. The two suits are being handled together. (U.S. v. Merck and U.S. v Merck and Chatom v. Merck). Courthouse News Service, July 2012:


Civil Cover Sheet, Class Action Complaint - 2012

2. This lawsuit is brought as a proposed class action against Merck for unlawfully
monopolizing the U.S. market for Mumps Vaccine by engaging in a decade-long scheme to
falsify and misrepresent the true efficacy of its vaccine.

3. Specifically, Merck fraudulently represented and continues to falsely represent in
its labeling and elsewhere that its Mumps Vaccine has an efficacy rate of 95 percent or higher.
In reality, Merck knows and has taken affirmative steps to conceal -- by using improper testing
techniques and falsifying test data -- that its Mumps Vaccine is, and has been since at least 1999,
far less than 95 percent effective.

7. First, Merck designed a testing methodology that evaluated its vaccine against a
less virulent strain of the mumps virus. After the results failed to yield Merck's desired efficacy,
Merck abandoned the methodology and concealed the study's findings.

8. Second, Merck designed an even more scientifically flawed methodology, this
time incorporating the use of animal antibodies to artificially inflate the results, but it too failed
to achieve Merck's fabricated efficacy rate. Confronted with two failed methodologies, Merck
then falsified the test data to guarantee the results it desired. Having reached the desired, albeit
falsified, efficacy threshold, Merck submitted these fraudulent results to the Food & Drug
Administration ("FDA") and European Medicines Agency ("EMA").

9. Third, Merck took steps to cover up the tracks of its fraudulent testing by
destroying evidence of the falsified data and then lying to an FDA investigator that questioned
Merck about its ongoing testing. Merck also attempted to buy the silence and cooperation of its
staff by offering them financial incentives to follow the direction of the Merck personnel
overseeing the fraudulent testing process. Merck also threatened a relator in the Qui Tarn
Action, Stephen Krahling, a virologist in Merck's vaccine division from 1999 to 2001, with jail
if he reported the fraud to the FDA.

12. Sixth, Merck continued to conceal what it knew (or should have known) about the
diminished efficacy of its Mumps Vaccine even after significant mumps outbreaks in 2006 and

44. Even with a deviation that could only overstate how well the vaccine worked, the
results from Merck's preliminary testing (which involved testing blood samples of
approximately 60-100 children) yielded seroconversion rates significantly below the desired 95
percent threshold. Krah admitted as much to Relator Krahling. He also admitted to Krahling
that the efficacy of Merck's vaccine had declined over time, explaining that the constant
passaging of virus to make more vaccine for distribution had degraded the product and that
because of this, mumps outbreaks would increase over time.

45. Krah further admitted to Krahling that he and Yagodich tried numerous other,
often undocumented, techniques to modify the PRN test to improve the seroconversion results
they could measure, including trying different virus dilutions, different staining procedures and
even counting plaques more liberally. These other techniques -- like using the vaccine strain
rather than a wild-type strain of the virus -- subverted the purpose of the PRN test. In the end,
however, none of it mattered. Merck had to abandon its methodology because no matter how
Krah and Yagodich manipulated the procedures, they could not reach the 95 percent
seroconversion threshold.

46. So, Merck abandoned the PRN methodology that yielded unsatisfactory results
and worked towards developing a new, rigged methodology that would allow Merck to report its
desired seroconversion results.

47. The new methodology Merck devised and ultimately used to perform the mumps
efficacy testing under Protocol 007 was an "enhanced" PRN Assay. It was again led by Krah
and approved by Shaw and commenced in 2000. Relators Krahling and Wlochowski
participated on the team that conducted the testing using this supposedly enhanced methodology.
Each of them witnessed firsthand the falsification of the test data in which Merck engaged to
reach its 95 percent seroconversion threshold. In fact, each was significantly pressured by Krah
and other senior Merck personnel to participate in this fraud.

49. To reach the stated objective for its "enhanced" test and increase the measured
seroconversion rate to the predetermined 95 percent threshold, Merck continued to use its
scientifically flawed PRN methodology -- that tested against the vaccine strain rather than a
wild-type strain -- but with one additional material change. Merck added animal antibodies to
both the pre and post-vaccination blood samples. The use of animal antibodies in laboratory
testing is not uncommon. They can serve as a highlighter of sorts to identify and count human
antibodies that otherwise might not be identifiable on their own. When used in that way, animal
antibodies make it easier to see the human antibodies. They do not alter what is being measured.
However, Merck added animal antibodies for the singular purpose of altering the outcome of the
test by boosting the amount of virus neutralization counted in the lab.

(Natural herd immunity!)
55. Pre-positives ordinarily occur in a small percentage of the child population that is
immune to mumps even without vaccination. This immunity would principally come from a
previous exposure to the mumps virus, or from immunity transferred to a child from the mother
in utero. However, the incidence of this immunity is small, generally measured by the scientific
community at around 10 percent of the child population.

56. The problem for Merck was that with the addition of the animal antibodies to the
pre-vaccination blood samples it was seeing a significantly higher percentage of pre-positives
than the 10 percent industry recognized occurrence of such immunity. In the results of one test
that Relators Krahling and Wlochowski both witnessed in the summer of 2001, the pre-positive
rate was more than 80 percent. Krah instructed Wlochowski to throw out the results and the
actual experimental plates of that particular test, thereby destroying all traces of the unwanted

60. The problem was that no amount of tinkering with the amount of animal
antibodies added would produce a pre and post-vaccination virus neutralization for Merck's
vaccine within the desired range. Without the animal antibodies, Merck could not support a
sufficient level of post-vaccination neutralization. Conversely, by adding the animal antibodies,
Merck could not avoid having too high a level of pre-vaccination neutralization (i.e., too many
pre-positives). This left only one way for Merck to reach its desired seroconversion outcome --
falsify the test results.

*Krah also engaged in the destruction of evidence to minimize the chances of
detection. He not only employed the excel spreadsheet which left no paper trail.
He also destroyed test results, substituted original counting sheets with "clean"
sheets, and ordered the staff in the lab to do the same.

64. Relators Krahling and Wlochowski engaged in numerous efforts to stop the fraud.
They questioned and complained to Krah about the methodology being employed, particularly
the manipulation of pre-positive data. They attempted to dissuade others from participating.
They initiated numerous calls to the FDA to expose the fraud. And they attempted to document
the fraud, even as evidence of it was being destroyed. But Relators' efforts were to no avail. For
every effort they took to stop the fraud, Merck adapted the scheme to assure the falsification
continued. For example, when Relators objected to changing their own plaque counts, Krah
appointed other staff, as so-called auditors, willing to falsify the data.

65. In July 2001, Relators Krahling and Wlochowski secretly conducted their own
audit of the test results to confirm statistically the fraud that was occurring with the "enhanced"
testing. They reviewed approximately 20 percent of the data that Merck had collected as part of
the "enhanced" test. In this sampling, they found that 45 percent of the pre-positive data had
been altered to make it pre-negative. No pre-negatives were changed to pre-positives. No postpositives were changed to post-negatives. No post-negatives were changed to post-positives.
The statistical probability of so many changes occurring in just the pre-positive data and in no
other data was more than a trillion to one. And that is a conservative measure given the
likelihood that an even greater number of pre-positives were changed but remained undetected
because the changes were not recorded in Merck's files.

(d) The Complicity of Merck's Senior Management

66. Krah did not act alone in orchestrating the falsification of the "enhanced" PRN
test results. He acted with the knowledge, authority and approval of Merck's senior

67. For example, in April 2001, after Merck cancelled the planned outsourcing of the
remainder of the Mumps Vaccine efficacy testing, Emilio Emini, the Vice President of Merck's
Vaccine Research Division, held a meeting with Krah and his staff, including Relators Krahling
and Wlochowski. Emini was clearly on notice of protests that had been going on in the lab
because he directed Krah's staff to follow Krah's orders to ensure the "enhanced" testing would
be successful. He also told the staff that they had earned very large bonuses for the work they
had completed on the project so far. He was going to double the bonuses and pay them once the
testing was complete.

72. The next morning, Krah arrived early to the lab and packed up and destroyed
evidence of the ongoing Mumps Vaccine testing. This evidence included garbage bags full of
the completed experimental plates, containing the cell sheets with plaques, that would have (and
should have) been maintained for review until the testing was complete and final. The
destruction of the plates would make it difficult to compare the actual plaque counts in the test
with what was documented and changed on the counting sheets, as Krahling had done the day
before in Emini's office. Despite the threats he received from Suter and Emini, Krahling called
the FDA again and reported this latest activity in Merck's ongoing fraud.

76. The entire FDA interview with Krah and Shaw was short, probably less than half
an hour. The FDA agent did not question Relators Krahling or Wlochowski or other members of
Krah's staff in order to corroborate what Krah and Shaw said. As far as Relators witnessed, the
FDA agent did not attempt to substantiate Krah's or Shaw's responses by reviewing any of the
testing samples or backup data that had escaped destruction. And the FDA agent did not address
the actual destruction of evidence that Krah had already facilitated.

77. The FDA issued a one page deficiency report identifying a few relatively minor
shortcomings in Merck's testing process. These principally related to flaws in Merck's recordkeeping and in its validation/explanation of changes to the test data.

78. The report did not address or censure Merck for any issues relating to Merck's
improper use of the animal antibodies or Merck's wide-scale falsification of pre-positive test
data. The FDA did not discover this fraudulent activity in the course of the perfunctory visit
because of Krah's and Shaw's misrepresentations to the FDA.

80. After the FDA visit, Relator Krahling was barred from any further participation in
the Protocol 007 Mumps Vaccine testing project. He was also prohibited from accessing any
data related to the project. Shortly thereafter, he was given a poor performance review and
barred from continuing to work in Krah's lab on any matter. He was offered a position in a
different lab within Merck's vaccine division, but it involved work for which Krahling had no
prior experience or interest. In December, 2001 Krahling resigned from the Company.

81. Relator Wlochowski continued to work at Merck, though she was transferred out
of Krah's lab at the end of September, 2001. She spent an additional year working at Merck in a
different lab before she too left Merck.

82. Before Relators Krahling and Wlochowski left Krah's lab, Merck conducted the
internal audit Emini had promised Relator Krahling would take place. However, as Krahling had
warned against, the audit was anything but independent. Unsurprisingly, therefore, Merck
completed its Protocol 007 testing in late summer or early fall 2001 and Merck reported the 95
percent seroconversion it had targeted from the outset. What no one knew outside of Merck --
not the FDA, the CDC or any other governmental agency -- was that this result was the product
of Merck's improper use of animal antibodies and the wide-scale falsification of test data to
conceal the significantly diminished efficacy of its Mumps Vaccine.

83. Notably, while Relators Krahling and Wlochowski were immediately removed
from Krah's lab for their protests against and efforts to stop the fraudulent testing, those that
facilitated the fraud remained. Indeed, Krah, Yagodich and other members of Krah's staff who
were instrumental in the fraud continue to work jn vaccine development at Merck today and are
still working together in Krah's lab.

97. In 2006, more than 6,500 cases of mumps were reported in the Mid-West in a
highly vaccinated population. This was the largest mumps outbreak in almost twenty years and a
significant spike from the annual average of 265 cases that had been reported for the years
leading up to the 2006 outbreak. Astoundingly, 84 percent of the young adults who contracted
the disease had been vaccinated with two doses of the Mumps Vaccine.

98. The CDC, FDA and Merck publicly worked together to determine the cause of
this 2006 outbreak. Of course, only Merck knew that outbreaks would occur because its vaccine
had degraded over time and was weaker than what Merck represented. Nonetheless, Merck
continued to represent its inflated efficacy rate while government and private health care
providers continued to believe that there was no problem with the vaccine. During the
investigation of the outbreak, the CDC's then Director, Julie Gerberding, reaffirmed the CDC's
view that nothing was wrong with the Mumps Vaccine, a belief fed by Merck's continued
misrepresentations: "We have absolutely no information to suggest that there is any problem
with the vaccine." Director Gerberding and the CDC emphasized that "[tlhe best protection
against the mumps is the vaccine."

101. At the same time Dr. Dayan published his study questioning whether it may be
time for a new vaccine, Merck publicly proclaimed that its Mumps Vaccine had not been
changed since its introduction in 1967 and that Merck had no plans to change it. So, while Dr.
Dayan questioned whether it "may" be time for a new vaccine, Merck attempted to reassure the
public that there was no need for any such change. The vaccine worked just fine.

104. Currently, Emory University is conducting a clinical trial of its university students
in yet another attempt to explain the cause for the 2006 mumps outbreak among college-age
students who had received both doses of the vaccine. However, Merck is listed as a collaborator
on that study and is providing funding, thus continuing to exert its influence to perpetuate its
fraudulent efficacy findings.

107. In August 2009, another mumps outbreak began just as Dr. Dayan predicted. As
with the 2006 outbreak, the 2009 outbreak occurred despite high vaccination coverage among the
U.S. children's population. In total, roughly 5,000 cases were confirmed by the CDC during the
2009 outbreak. This outbreak reaffirmed Krah's prediction that mumps outbreaks would
reemerge and increase over time.

109. Because of the 2006 and 2009 outbreaks, the CDC has also pushed back its target
date for eradicating mumps from its original 20 10 goal to no earlier than 2020. But no amount
of extra time or dosages will be enough to eliminate the disease when the vaccine does not work
as represented in the labeling. It will merely allow Merck to continue to misrepresent the
vaccine's efficacy and thereby maintain its exclusive hold on the Relevant Market with an
inadequate vaccine.

110. To date, the government has not acted on Dr. Dayan's conclusion that it "may" be
time for a new Mumps Vaccine. Instead, it continues to build its strategy around the existing
vaccine. Nor is Dr. Dayan likely to pursue his own conclusion. He left the CDC to take a
position in the Clinical Department of Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccine division of the Sanofi Aventis
Group, Merck's partner in manufacturing and selling M-M-RVaxpro and ProQuad in Europe.
Dr. Gerberding has also left the CDC. In January 2010, she became the president of Merck's
Vaccine Division, a position she holds currently.

1 13. Merck also provides funding to the IAC. The IAC asserts that Merck's Mumps
Vaccine has an efficacy rate of 97 percent. This comes from the following Mumps Vaccine
"Question and Answer" information sheet posted on the IAC's website: "How effective is this
vaccine? The first dose of M-M-R vaccine produces good immunity to .. . mumps (97%)"

120. Merck's unlawful conduct has harmed competition by foreclosing other
manufacturers from entering the Relevant Market. Without such competition, Merck has been
able to unlawfully maintain and profit from its monopoly in this Market even though it is
manufacturing and selling a sub-par vaccine. In the absence of this illegal market foreclosure,
other manufacturers would have entered the Relevant Market with a higher quality andlor
cheaper vaccine. This competition, or the threat of such potential competition, would have
forced Merck to respond by either selling its existing vaccine at a lower price or developing a
better vaccine.

122. Given the absence of any competition in the Relevant Market, Merck has used its
unlawful monopoly power to charge artificially inflated prices for its Mumps Vaccine. During
the Class Period, Merck increased the prices it charged private health providers such as Plaintiff
for M-M-RBII vaccine by an astounding 85%. See Figure 1.

Catie Clobes: “After weeks of calling and trying to get updates, having awful conversations with the medical examiner, being denied a full and proper autopsy, and getting nowhere with that office, I was told today that her initial autopsy is officially finalized and I will have the report in a couple of days. &#128588; This means we can go forward in seeking the truth and discovering the real reason as to why my 15 lb., "well nourished", perfectly healthy, beautiful best friend &#128519; died a day and a half after receiving 6 "necessary" vaccinations.

I also received Evee's medical records (and death reports from the ambulance and ER and it's something you should never have to go through). &#128560; On each vaccination visit it says the same thing in her chart: "Counseled parents about risks and benefits of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, pneumococcal 13-valent and polio vaccinations today." HA!

Moms and dads, please do you and your children the biggest favor you could ever do &#128591; and just do your research about these vaccinations. Maybe you think you've been counseled on the risks and benefits but I was NOT. The risks are significant and they definitely outweigh the benefits, and I get to say that and be absolutely right given my situation!! &#129324; Ask for the "inserts" of the vaccinations that are going to be given to your child. Please do this! It's their job to give them to you, and read them over beforehand! Here is the Pediarix insert online, cripes just bookmark and do it later even&#8252;&#65039;…/Pres…/Pediarix/pdf/PEDIARIX.PDF…

This is STRAIGHT from the PEDIARIX insert itself : &#128073; "By chance alone, some cases of SIDS can be expected to follow receipt of pertussis-containing vaccines." &#128072;

And by chance alone, MY baby had to be 1 in 8000 who probably died because of this damn vaccination. If my pediatrician had really done her job and told me all of the risks and the benefits of what her nurse was about to stick into my child, I would have said HELL NO. &#128074; Because there isn't an odd great enough to put my child's life at risk. I'm not some crazy mom trying to force things onto anyone. I found my baby blue and cold one morning, a day and a half after she was given this shot. I held her lifeless body in my arms and screamed over and over because I knew she was gone. &#128532; I will never be the same person again, and I don't wish this pain on anyone.

Make the decision you want, but please do the research first. And check out my baby's hammies in this picture!! &#128525;&#128523; #justiceforevee”

Evee's original story:

Are vaccines profitable? According to the 2012 World Health Organization report:

“Global Vaccine Market Features and Trends”

Regarding the global market for vaccines:

(1) It has a “spectacular growth rate” of 10-15%, versus only 5-7% for pharmaceuticals.
(2) It has tripled in value from USD $5 Billion in 2000 to almost USD $24 Billion in 2013.
(3) It is projected to rise to USD $100 Billion by 2025.
(4) There are More than 120 new products in the development pipeline.
(5) It is becoming an engine for the pharmaceutical industry.

It is noted that important growth factors for the global vaccine market involve a combination of making cost effective vaccines, obtaining funding from government, increasing demand, accelerating uptake, raising prices, and improving profitability for the industry (including marketing “blockbuster” vaccines).

Future trend is toward more active marketing of vaccines, with an increased presence of sales forces and multinational corporation representatives using a “pharma like model”.

Public Health Officials Know: Recently Vaccinated Individuals Spread Disease

Washington, D.C., March 3, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Physicians and public health officials know that recently vaccinated individuals can spread disease and that contact with the immunocompromised can be especially dangerous. For example,the Johns Hopkins Patient Guide warns the immunocompromised to “Avoid contact with children who are recently vaccinated,” and to”Tell friends and family who are sick, or have recently had a live vaccine (such as chicken pox, measles, rubella, intranasal influenza, polio or smallpox) not to visit.“1

A statement on the website of St. Jude’s Hospital warns parents not to allow people to visit children undergoing cancer treatment if they have received oral polio or smallpox vaccines within four weeks, have received the nasal flu vaccine within one week, or have rashes after receiving the chickenpox vaccine or MMR (measles,mumps, rubella) vaccine.2

“The public health community is blaming unvaccinated children for the outbreak of measles at Disneyland, but the illnesses could just as easily have occurred due to contact with a recently vaccinated individual,” says Sally Fallon Morell, president of the Weston A.Price Foundation. The Foundation promotes a healthy diet, non-toxic lifestyle and freedom of medical choice for parents and their children. “Evidence indicates that recently vaccinated individuals should be quarantined in order to protect the public.”

Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps and rubella),rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterwards and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.11.12

Furthermore, vaccine recipients can carry diseases in the back of their throat and infect others while displaying no symptoms of a disease.13,14,15

Both unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals are at risk from exposure to those recently vaccinated. Vaccine failure is widespread; vaccine-induced immunity is not permanent and recent outbreaks of diseases such as whooping cough, mumps and measles have occurred in fully vaccinated populations.16,17 Flu vaccine recipients become more susceptible to future infection after repeated vaccination.18,19

Adults have contracted polio from recently vaccinated infants. A father from Staten Island ended up in a wheel chair after contracting polio while changing his daughter’s diaper. He received a 22.5 million dollar award in 2009. 20,21

“Vaccine failure and failure to acknowledge that live virus vaccines can spread disease have resulted in an increase in outbreaks of infectious disease in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals,” says Leslie Manookian, producer of The GreaterGood. “CDC should instruct physicians who administer vaccinations to inform their patients about the risks posed to others by those who’ve been recently vaccinated.”

According to the Weston A.Price Foundation, the best protection against infectious disease is a healthy immune system, supported by adequate vitamin A and vitamin C. Well-nourished children easily recover from infectious disease and rarely suffer complications.

The number of measles deaths declined from 7575 in 1920 (10,000 per year in many years in the 1910s) to an average of 432 each year from 1958-1962.22 The vaccine was introduced in 1963. Between 2005 and 2014, there have been no deaths from measles in the U.S. and 108 deaths reported after the MMR vaccine.23\
Arty turns 10 this summer.

#1530764 --- Yesterday at 03:31 PM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
Pravda1984 Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 08/31/17
Posts: 7
Loc: Fingerlakes

Page 30 of 30 < 1 2 ... 28 29 30