Page 28 of 28 < 1 2 ... 26 27 28
Topic Options
#1522707 --- 01/18/19 05:08 PM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2261
Loc: Waterloo, NY

“Tetanus vaccines is probably one of the most ridiculous vaccines ever. Your chances of
getting tetanus are about the same as walking outta here and getting hit by a meteor.
If you get a cut or puncture wound and you put peroxide on it, your chances of getting
tetanus are zero because tetanus organism is anaerobic. It can not live in oxygen.
Tetanus comes from the bowels of animals. As long as you don’t have a sheep or a cow
in your house, I don’t think you’re in any danger.” Dr. Russell Blaylock, M.D., retired
Neurosurgeon turned Neuroscientist.

Seneff: “Gardasil for infants? When will the insanity end?”

K.B.: “What parent on God's green earth would offer their infant up for a vaccine trial?”

Gardasil HPV Vaccine Trial Using Infants as Young as One Year of Age by Marcella Piper-Terry

When Gardasil was released, the marketing campaign claims touted it as a preventive specifically for cervical cancer. That’s why it was only recommended for girls and young women.

In order to increase the number of vaccines sold, the age for administration was lowered to 12. There was a minor outcry, but nothing significant, and it died down quickly.

Then came the recommendation for girls AND boys as young as 9 years to be vaccinated because NOW they say Gardasil doesn’t just “prevent” cervical cancer, it also “prevents” oral and anal cancer, AND since boys can also contract HPV and boys have sex with girls, “It’s only responsible to get your sons vaccinated so they don’t spread HPV to our daughters.”

This was how they justified the recommendation for boys, who obviously do not have a cervix.

It’s not unbelievable and it’s not over the top for the CDC and ACIP.

They’ve done this before.

They did it with the Hepatitis B vaccine.

Hepatitis B vaccine was initially introduced and targeted at-risk adults, including those who engaged in promiscuous sex (heterosexual and homosexual) and IV drug users. Other “at-risk” populations included hospital workers (due to potential exposure to infected blood and body fluids) and people who were incarcerated or institutionalized.

The problem was, just as has happened with Gardasil, they couldn’t get the numbers up. They couldn’t get enough adults to take the vaccine (Hep B), so they added it to the infant schedule, because that’s when they could “get everyone.”

Research shows that among those who mount an initial response to Hepatitis B vaccination, up to 50% have no evidence of immunity as soon as five years after completing the three-shot series. For infants vaccinated at birth, any benefit is gone well before they would become sexually active or use IV drugs.

Gardasil also wears off quickly…

Dr. Diane Harper (internationally recognized expert on HPV infection and developer of Gardasil) says there is ZERO evidence the vaccine will prevent cancer and any protection conferred is gone in 5 years.

Mandatory Vaccines for Adults Also
This is not just about kids, either.

They are coming after adults and they are mandating more vaccines for employment. Hospital employees in Indiana are about to lose their right to say “No” to multiple vaccines, including Hepatitis B, Varicella, MMR, Influenza and TDap. The first hearing of SB 162 sailed through the Indiana Senate with no opposition, passing with a vote of 50 yes, 0 no.

In Virginia, a Bill was introduced that would remove all religious exemptions and restrict medical exemptions to only those that conform to the very narrowly defined criteria from The CDC, which would eliminate medical exemptions for 99.99% of the population. If your family has a history of vaccine-injury, including death? Your child still wouldn’t qualify for a medical exemption.

Posey Questions CDC on Autism Research - 2012

Medical Doctor Calls Out Mainstream Media for Reporting Fake Numbers of Flu Deaths in Order to Sell More Flu Vaccines

Any death is tragic. However, vaccinating 325 million people to prevent the 1,647 from dying from the flu is beyond ridiculous. And, I did not even go over the side effects of the flu vaccine.

Does the flu vaccine protect against deaths from pneumonia? Nope.

Folks, the flu vaccine only works on a very small percentage of the population—less than 10% who receive it benefit from it.

And, the elderly, the most vulnerable to the flu, have the worst response to the flu vaccine—perhaps 1% of the elderly are protected from the flu from the flu vaccine.

When you factor in the toxic agents, such as mercury, in a flu vaccine, the question of whether to get a flu vaccine is easy: No way!!

Barbara Loe Fisher sums up the recent Sharyl Attkisson report on vaccines.

Attkisson Report Reveals Threats Against Congressmen Investigating Autism-Vaccine Link

The “Vaccination Debate” report was featured on “Full Measure,” Sinclair’s investigative news show anchored by Attkisson, who said, “We spoke to 11 current and former members of Congress and staff who claim they faced pressure, bullying or threats when they raised vaccine safety questions.” Physician and former Rep. Dave Weldon commented, “It would typically be in a hallway or the street and people would come up to you and say, “You know, you really need to, you know, back off on this. It could be, it could be bad for the community or bad for the country or bad for you.”

After Rolf Hazelhurst learned that Dr. Zimmerman’s expert opinion was discounted and misrepresented by federal government officials for the purpose of denying federal vaccine injury compensation to his son3 and thousands of other children with vaccine related autism,4 Hazelhurst told congressional staffers at a 2013 briefing, “If I did to a criminal in a court of law what the United States Department of Justice did to vaccine injured children, I would be disbarred and I would be facing criminal charges.” He and environmental activist attorney Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. have filed a fraud complaint with the Justice Department Inspector General about the withholding of Zimmerman’s expert opinion on vaccine-induced autism in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims proceedings.

A CBS correspondent for more than 20 years, Sharyl Attkisson is a five-time Emmy Award winner and recipient of the Edward R. Murrow award for investigative reporting and Pillar Human Rights Journalism Award for “Fearless Reporting in the Face of Government Retaliation.” From 1996-2001, she hosted a half-hour weekly medical news magazine on PBS entitled “Health Week.” She is the best-selling author of the books Stonewalled (2014) and The Smear (2017). After leaving CBS in 2014, Attkisson joined Sinclair to head up the investigative journalism team staffing “Full Measure” to explore government waste, national security and whistleblower reports on government and corporate abuse.14
For more than a decade, Attkisson has authored and produced reports on a number of vaccine safety issues, including these:

Top Cancer Doctor, Forced Out Over Ties to Drug Makers, Joins Their Ranks

AstraZeneca has hired Dr. José Baselga, the former chief medical officer at Memorial Sloan Kettering, to lead its cancer research unit.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome after H1N1 Shot in Pregnancy: Maternal and Fetal Care in the Third Trimester—Case Report - 2012

We presented a case of a 36-year-old pregnant woman that was immunized to H1N1 in the last trimester; 10 days later she developed shoulder and lumbar spine’s pain, limbs weakness and facial paralysis with unfavorable clinical evolution and was submitted to intensive therapy care. We described clinical and obstetrical approach, pointing out peculiarities involved in this pathology in pregnancy.

Highwire with Del Bigtree

Zen Honeycutt of Moms Across America: France bans Monsanto’s 360 herbicide. Costco removes Roundup from their shelves and Charles Benbrook’s study that just came out this week that shows EPA used industry funded studies to approved glyphosate.


Cancer Expert's Shocking Death; Vaccine Risk Awareness Tops Charts; Plotkin on Vaccines; Ethical Uprising at BMJ.

At 30:00 Stanley Plotkin’s 9 hour testimony under oath, ACIP,

This course is closed now, but fyi...


IPAK 1001 is an IPAK Citizen Scientist Course.

Instructor: James Lyons-Weiler, PhD

Course Description: This is an online IPAK Certificate course designed to empower individuals to know the landscape and layout of scientific studies. Topics will include the basics like types of studies, how to find published studies and preprints, how to access supplemental material, what to expect to find in specific sections of a typical peer-reviewed study, including the abstract, introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion, acknowledgements, funding information, conflicts of interest, and citations; how to approach an author for access to data and software; how and why to respond to studies that are flawed and/or unethical. Course material will include case studies of specific publications – both well-done and flawed. The course will be a 2.5 hr per week experience, with pre-class assigned readings, videos, and lectures. Course assignments will including finding specific types of studies. Students will be evaluated with weekly quizzes. Three levels of competency certificates will be issued: Basic, Intermediate and Advanced based on the student’s ability to answer questions at all three levels. By the end of the course, students will be comfortable navigating the familiar territory of published scientific studies.

5 Research Based Reasons To Avoid The Flu Shot!

They are injecting a lab altered virus into your body! Think about that. Read it again and think about it some more.

3. There are toxic ingredients- and not just Mercury!

Have you ever read the warnings or the ingredient list for the flu vaccine? Let me make it easy for you. Here’s a link to the CDC’s own page with the ingredients.

Vaccine Inserts...

Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary

Excipients Included in U.S. Vaccines, by Vaccine

In addition to weakened or killed disease antigens (viruses or bacteria), vaccines contain very small amounts of other ingredients – excipients or media.

Some excipients are added to a vaccine for a specific purpose. These include:

Preservatives, to prevent contamination. For example, thimerosal.

Adjuvants, to help stimulate a stronger immune response. For example, aluminum salts.

Stabilizers, to keep the vaccine potent during transportation and storage. For example, sugars or gelatin.

Others are residual trace amounts of materials that were used during the manufacturing process and removed. These include:

Cell culture materials, used to grow the vaccine antigens. For example, egg protein, various culture media.

Inactivating ingredients, used to kill viruses or inactivate toxins. For example, formaldehyde.

Antibiotics, used to prevent contamination by bacteria. For example, neomycin.

The following table lists all components, other than antigens, shown in the manufacturers’ package insert (PI) for each vaccine.

Each of these PIs, which can be found on the FDA’s website (see below) contains a description of that vaccine’s manufacturing process, including the amount and purpose of each substance. In most PIs, this information is found in Section 11: “Description.”

All information was extracted from manufacturers’ package inserts.

If in doubt about whether a PI has been updated since this table was prepared, check the FDA’s website at:

Vaccine Inserts - Vaccines Licensed for Use in the United States

Food and Drug Administration - Vaccine Inserts

A Free Ap to find Vaccine Inserts

Seneff: “I love this new article on sunscreen and vitamin D supplements! It basically says you should throw them both away and get out in the sun!”

Is Sunscreen the New Margarine?
Arty turns 10 this summer.

#1523407 --- 01/25/19 10:02 AM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2261
Loc: Waterloo, NY

“It looked like a virus, it smelled like a virus, a retrovirus, because those are
the types of viruses that disrupt the immune system. And several other investigators
back in the 90s had actually isolated retroviruses from these people but the
government called them ‘contaminants,’ that they weren’t real and that they didn’t
have anything to do with the disease. Well, we isolated a new family of viruses
that were called xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus. So these viruses
were murine leukemia viruses, mouse viruses.

So spin forward two years, our paper published in one of the best scientific journals
in the world in Science, October 8th, 2009. Usually that makes one’s career, in my
case it ended my life as a scientist as I knew it.” Judy Mikovits, Ph.D.

E.B. 1/22/19: “It's crazy how a person gets caught with a little bit of Marijuana
(a f’g plant!) on them can get years in prison on there first offense, (mind you),
but a VACCINE company that goes by the name of Merck! They are Manufacturers of poison
and are knowingly Injuring thousands and kill hundreds of children yearly and
gets in no trouble at all! but gets more money from the government and is
allowed to keep on killing more. Explain to me how this is right! My 14 year old son
died from the HPV VACCINE on August 14th of 2018 and they cannot be held responsible
for it. I hate you MERCK and everything you stand for! You destroyed our lives!
You MURDERED my son.”

Seneff: “More evidence coming out of Corvelva (in Italy) showing that the vaccine manufacturing process is sloppy - leading to both missing antigens (ineffective) and unexplained unknown toxic chemicals (unsafe).”

Exposing Vaccine Contamination – More Results from Corvelva

In December 2018, the Italian research company, Corvelva, released an explosive research paper. Vaxxter reported on their findings, exposing the ingredients in the vaccine Infanrix Hexa, the combination vaccine given to infants across Europe. Of course, the pro-vaccine machine immediately went into high gear, attacking and discrediting Corvelva’s testing methodologies. In response, Corvelva issued a technical report documenting their methods, declaring:

Emboldened by these findings, researchers tested two more vaccines, Hexyon and Gardasil 9.\

Using the same methods used to analyze Infanrix Hexa, Hexyon was found to have 216 toxic chemicals and contaminants, of which 70% could not be identified. An additional 16 toxic residues were present and thought to be cross-contaminants from different vaccines, meaning, the machines were not thoroughly cleaned between production runs.

Researchers confirmed that all three of the DTaP toxoid antigens were present in Hexyon. However, they shockingly discovered that the antigens for hepatitis B, HiB and polioviruses 1, 2 and 3 were all missing. The entire analysis of Hexyon can be found here in English.

For those who trust that vaccines provide protection, how can Hexyon be “effective” when only 3 of the 8 stated antigens are present? Even more, how can Hexyon be called “safe” when it contains cross-contaminants and more than 150 compounds that cannot be identified in any chemical databases?

Dr. Richard Moskowitz MD On "Anti-Vaxxers"

In addition to the tragic experience of so many families, here are a few more equally important reasons put forth by prominent physicians and scientists to cast doubt on the standard orthodoxy that vaccines are uniformly safe and effective:

1) even the CDC now admits that supposedly vaccine-preventable diseases are being spread primarily by vaccinated individuals;2

2) the small outbreaks now occurring are predominantly in vaccinated individuals;3

3) many vaccines have led to the emergence of new, resistant strains of the same organisms that we vaccinate against, as well as altogether new species in some cases;4

4) children coming down with and recovering from acute febrile illnesses like flu, measles, mumps, rubella, and chickenpox are much less likely to develop chronic autoimmune diseases and cancers later in life;5

5) vaccine safety studies are conducted primarily by the drug industry itself, or by government agencies that are run mainly by past, present, or future executives of the industry, in lieu of the independent regulation and oversight they are supposed to provide;6

6) these studies rarely include unvaccinated subjects as "controls," and typically give other vaccines or toxic chemical adjuvants instead of genuine placebos for comparison;7

7) adverse reactions are accepted as vaccine-related only if they occur within a few hours or days of the vaccination, thus arbitrarily excluding the chronic dimension entirely from consideration;8

8) the lead investigator has absolute authority to decide whether unsolicited reports of other adverse reactions by the subjects themselves are or are not vaccine-related, based on criteria that are never specified and allowed to remain a trade secret, if indeed they exist at all;9 and accumulated over the patients' lifetime, which means that they are inherent in the vaccination process per se, as well as in this or that particular vaccine;10

10) many vaccines contain chemical adjuvants and other ingredients known to be neurotoxic, such as aluminum, mercury, and detergents like Polysorbate 80, which when injected are known to cross the blood-brain barrier, accumulate in brain tissue, and have been causally linked to various forms of brain damage;11

11) the CDC admits that over 25% of American children born today suffer from some form of brain damage, yet has never investigated, or even shown much interest in investigating, what percentage of these cases are vaccine-related;12

12) other vaccine ingredients include human and animal cells, DNA, RNA, and proteins, which almost certainly provoke immunological reactions but have not been studied, or at any rate such studies have never been made public.13

Highwire with Del Bigtree

NY Times article about antivaxers,
6:40 - lawsuit against HHS and their response - no safety testing being done, no reports to Congress in over 30 years

36:00 HHS’ placebo pyramid scheme - new vaccines approved based on an already approved vaccine, that by the way, could have been a bad vaccine taken off the market,

41:00 another excerpt from Stanley Plotkin’s deposition. At 43:50: “ and large those data come out much later after experience with a vaccine used in thousands and millions of people.”

57:00 Dr. Larry B. Palevsky, M.D., Pediatrician tells us what pediatricians don’t know. “...the vaccines are not safe the way we are told they are our current state of affairs, we’re not allowed to ask questions. That’s not science anymore…”

Seneff: “This is wild! Merck experienced a cyber-attack that caused a shortage of Hep-B vaccine, normally administered at birth and containing a particularly toxic form of aluminum. A strong signal comes through in VAERS that this shortage has been a windfall for kids - dramatic drop in reports of death and injury in 2018.”

Merck’s Recombivax Vaccine Shortage Causes Reduced Deaths In Babies – A Natural Experiment?

It is unknown whether this anomaly was as a result of the switch to the GSK version of the vaccine, but considering the concern some scientists have over the lack of science and unsupported safety of Merck’s AAHS, the FDA should be concerned. At the very least, there should be a moratorium on reinstating Recombivax until the disparity can be investigated. Vaccine safety should be everyone’s concern, not just vaccine safety advocates. The precautionary principle must be invoked where there is doubt. We hope the FDA agrees.

Nursing homes see spate of deaths amid flu outbreak across Japan

All residents and staff members at the facility received flu vaccinations...

Meryl Nass MD comments on the New York Times editorial

Yet vaccines are the only category of products in the United States for which manufacturers are faced with absolutely no liability when they cause injuries, cause deaths, or fail to generate immune responses.

While the New York Times has correctly gone after the Sackler family, who own Purdue Pharma, a small pharmaceutical company, for misleading marketing of Oxycontin and ushering in the opioid epidemic, the Times has shut its eyes to the epidemic of chronic neurological illnesses in children and adolescent caused by vaccines that are produced by some of the most profitable corporations on earth. (Two examples include narcolepsy in adolescents due to Pandemrix vaccine, and Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) in adolescents due to HPV vaccine.)

The NY Times editors write that "public health can prevail." And it should. Let's examine the true magnitude of the risk to public health we face today from 3 well known childhood viruses.


I hope I have made it clear that the risk of measles, mumps and rubella posed by unvaccinated children to both healthy Americans, and to immune-compromised Americans is very close to zero. The same holds for other conditions for which children are vaccinated. Here is an article detailing the evidence of risk to the immune compromised from unvaccinated children that I wrote in 2015.

Vaccinating high risk children will produce a larger public health problem than not vaccinating them

In fact, there exists no reliable evidence that unvaccinated children in the US pose a serious threat to anyone; the claim that they do is an urban legend promulgated by Big Pharma and its wholly owned subsidiary, CDC. (Note that CDC purchases $5.0 Billion in vaccines annually for the Vaccines for Children program, by far its largest line item. Then CDC must convince the country to consume them.)

Yet how many columns inches, how many hours of TV news programs have been devoted to scaring the American public about the dire threat of measles? Fear of measles has been the major driver of the campaigns to eliminate vaccine exemption. Parents of immunocompromised children have been incited to frenzy about the risks posed to their children by unvaccinated classmates. Yet they are rarely told their immunocompromised child might actually develop measles due to vaccination, or catch it from a newly vaccinated classmate.

Who really benefits from this hue and cry? Only vaccine manufacturers, whose market is forcibly expanded, while these same manufacturers face no liability for consequent vaccine injuries.

Herd Immunity: A False Rationale for Vaccine Mandates

The NYU authors note that the herd immunity model “entirely discounts the possible benefits of contracting and overcoming disease naturally, thereby achieving long-lasting immunity.” In the pre-vaccine era, children routinely got the measles—which even the most enthusiastic vaccine proponents recognized as a “self-limiting infection of short duration, moderate severity, and low fatality.” These individuals, once recovered, confidently carried their natural immunity into adulthood without ever worrying about the measles again.

The various forms of vaccine failure not only make herd immunity impossible to achieve but also feed the occurrence of “vaccine-preventable illnesses” in highly or even fully vaccinated populations. There are numerous examples of this in the published literature. One example cited by Holland and Zachary was a 1985 measles outbreak in a Texas high school where 99% of the students had been vaccinated and 96% had detectable measles antibodies—the authors of the outbreak report acknowledged that “such an outbreak should have been virtually impossible.” More recent studies around the world describe mumps and pertussis outbreaks in highly or fully vaccinated middle and high school populations, including in Belgium (2004), Korea (2006), the U.S. (2007) and Ontario (2015). The Ontario researchers perplexedly stated, “In light of the high efficacy of the MMR [measles-mumps-rubella] vaccine against mumps, the reason for these outbreaks is unclear.”


In 1986, after a four-year campaign by the pharmaceutical industry, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. It gave liability protection to vaccine makers, medical professionals, and government agencies – anyone involved in vaccination – for any death or injury that resulted from a vaccine. At that time, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine schedule had recommended 24 doses of vaccines for children, starting at 2 months of age to 18 years of age. From 1963-1988, the schedule remained at either 24 or 25 doses; and vaccine-industry revenues at the time were about $750 million per year.

Suddenly, though, Big Pharma saw that it had a product line for which they could not be sued, and that governments marketed for them via school mandates and by insurance incentives to pediatricians. They began pouring research and development dollars into new, less-necessary, and riskier vaccines. Almost thirty years later, after adding just a few vaccine doses to the schedule every year, the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule has grown from 24 doses to 70 doses (at a minimum). If you had a baby today, and vaccinated him according to the current schedule, that baby would receive more doses of vaccine by the time he was six months old than most Baby Boomers received by the time they went to college.

There is no safety testing of the vaccine schedule as a whole. In fact, the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies has clearly stated that, “Key elements of the Immunization schedule – for example, the number, frequency, timing, order, and age at the time of administration of vaccines – have not been systematically examined in research studies.” Our children are being used as unwitting, and often unwilling, guinea pigs to test dangerous, even deadly, drug concoctions for which no one can be held liable when they cause harm.

At the same time, vaccine profits have gone from $750 million per year in 1986 to an insane $32 billion per year in 2014 and expected to reach $60 billion by 2020. Moreover, 54.1% of American children are chronically ill, developmentally delayed, and/or obese. Something is clearly wrong with this picture…


Pharma tries to sell flu shots to Hollywood

A lowered probability of pregnancy in females in the USA aged 25-29 who received a human papillomavirus vaccine injection. 2018

Abstract: Birth rates in the United States have recently fallen. Birth rates per 1000 females aged 25-29 fell from 118 in 2007 to 105 in 2015. One factor may involve the vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV). Shortly after the vaccine was licensed, several reports of recipients experiencing primary ovarian failure emerged. This study analyzed information gathered in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which represented 8 million 25-to-29-year-old women residing in the United States between 2007 and 2014. Approximately 60% of women who did not receive the HPV vaccine had been pregnant at least once, whereas only 35% of women who were exposed to the vaccine had conceived. For married women, 75% who did not receive the shot were found to conceive, while only 50% who received the vaccine had ever been pregnant. Using logistic regression to analyze the data, the probability of having been pregnant was estimated for females who received an HPV vaccine compared with females who did not receive the shot. Results suggest that females who received the HPV shot were less likely to have ever been pregnant than women in the same age group who did not receive the shot. If 100% of females in this study had received the HPV vaccine, data suggest the number of women having ever conceived would have fallen by 2 million. Further study into the influence of HPV vaccine on fertility is thus warranted.

Public Health Officials Know: Recently Vaccinated Individuals Spread Disease

Washington, D.C., March 3, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Physicians and public health officials know that recently vaccinated individuals can spread disease and that contact with the immunocompromised can be especially dangerous. For example, the Johns Hopkins Patient Guide warns the immunocompromised to "Avoid contact with children who are recently vaccinated," and to "Tell friends and family who are sick, or have recently had a live vaccine (such as chicken pox, measles, rubella, intranasal influenza, polio or smallpox) not to visit."1

A statement on the website of St. Jude's Hospital warns parents not to allow people to visit children undergoing cancer treatment if they have received oral polio or smallpox vaccines within four weeks, have received the nasal flu vaccine within one week, or have rashes after receiving the chickenpox vaccine or MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine.2

"The public health community is blaming unvaccinated children for the outbreak of measles at Disneyland, but the illnesses could just as easily have occurred due to contact with a recently vaccinated individual," says Sally Fallon Morell, president of the Weston A. Price Foundation. The Foundation promotes a healthy diet, non-toxic lifestyle and freedom of medical choice for parents and their children. "Evidence indicates that recently vaccinated individuals should be quarantined in order to protect the public."

"Vaccine failure and failure to acknowledge that live virus vaccines can spread disease have resulted in an increase in outbreaks of infectious disease in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals," says Leslie Manookian, producer of The Greater Good. "CDC should instruct physicians who administer vaccinations to inform their patients about the risks posed to others by those who've been recently vaccinated."


Look at the graphs. You can find them on the website. They all show decreases. Why? What was invented during those years? Plumbing. Notice after the decreases, vaccines were invented.

India Court Rules No Mandatory Vaccine, Must Get ‘Informed Consent’

The petition claims that the government’s reasoning for the ruling runs counter to the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare’s has said in the past vaccines should not be mandatory in nature. The petition argues for “informed consent” of vaccines. Justice Vibhu Bakhru agreed with the spirit of the petition, hence, handing down the ruling that by default cancels mandatory vaccination. The court ruled that informed consent must be given before a vaccine is administered.

How a pro-vaccine doctor reopened debate about link to autism

Dr. Zimmerman now has signed a bombshell sworn affidavit. He says that, during a group of 5,000 vaccine-autism cases being heard in court on June 15, 2007, he took aside the Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers he worked for defending vaccines and told them he’d discovered “exceptions in which vaccinations could cause autism.”

“I explained that in a subset of children, vaccine-induced fever and immune stimulation did cause regressive brain disease with features of autism spectrum disorder,” Dr. Zimmerman now states. He said his opinion was based on “scientific advances” as well as his own experience with patients.

For the government and vaccine industry’s own pro-vaccine expert to have this scientific opinion stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate — if people were to find out.

But they didn’t.

Dr. Zimmerman goes on to say that once the DOJ lawyers learned of his position, they quickly fired him as an expert witness and kept his opinion secret from other parents and the rest of the public.

Jabbed: How the Vaccine Industry, Medical Establishment, and Government Stick It to You and Your Family

Lovett: Health Committee pol raises eyebrows with investments in drug firms

ALBANY — The head of the powerful Senate Health Committee has up to $130,000 in investments in pharmaceutical and other health-related companies, state records show.

"These investments show that he has a personal stake in how the state handles health care policy," he said. "He's an important player that should not be seen as benefiting personally from the decisions he's a part of."

Look at the list of vaccines…


Dr. Obukhanych is on Facebook...


There are two major directions the immune response can take: Th1 and Th2. The Th1 response is necessary to fight infections. But aluminum adjuvants take the immune system into the Th2 direction and away from Th1, derailing the ability of the immune system to fight infections. Communities in developing countries may see an uptick of deaths from infections soon after babies are vaccinated. Why wouldn't that make them vaccine-hesitant?

The majority of vaccines used in developed countries also contain aluminum adjuvants. Did you notice your baby getting sick after each round of vaccines, necessitating rounds of antibiotics? Would you be surprised by now to know that a pilot study done in the U.S. found that fully vaccinated children were 3.8-times more likely to have had ear infections and 5.9-times more likely to have had pneumonia compared to completely unvaccinated children?

FDA Approves VAXELIS Combo Vaccine Despite Infant Mortality by Ty Bollinger

As the vaccine schedule for children continues to inflate, we need to start asking better questions. Is this vaccine safe? Is it effective? Are developers adequately testing these drugs before going to market? At 6 weeks, are infants equipped to handle the increasing burden of vaccines being mandated by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)?

Here’s what you need to know about the new combo drug:


The limited research on the adverse effects of VAXELIS showed some troubling trends, and several children died after receiving the combo vaccine. Lethal side effects included asphyxia (loss of breathing), excess fluid in the brain, “unknown causes”, and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Somehow, none of these fatalities were attributed to the vaccine, including half that had no other attributable cause.

Here it comes, the government will come into your home and tell you what you have to do with your children. If you disagree, will your newborn baby be taken from you?

B.W.: “Will it one day be impossible to protect ourselves and our children from Pharma "Health" Nazis? We're moving in that direction. Mandatory poisoning. No liability free shots, no work, no school, no travel, no kids. Welcome to our future.”

Oregon to Become First State to Mandate Universal Home Visits of All Families with Newborn Children

When the program is complete, every new parent — this includes adoptions — would receive a series of two or three visits by someone like a nurse or other health care practitioner.

The visits could include basic health screenings for babies; hooking parents up with primary care physicians; linking them to other services; and coordinating the myriad childhood immunizations that babies need. (Emphasis added.)

Allen made it clear that they were targeting all children, not just troubled families:

Dr. Braun made it clear in her interview that home visits would not just be evaluating the health of the children in the home, but also the parents:


Scientist Jailed After Discovering Deadly Viruses Are Delivered Through Vaccines - 2018

So when did we start vaccines? 1953, 1934, right in the 30s with the polio, and what we were doing to attenuate, to make the virus less pathogenic, less toxic, is we were passing them through mouse brains, so we were passing them through the brains of mice, and every scientist who works with these viruses, and worked at the National Cancer Institute recognized the possibility that if you put human tissue and mouse tissue together the possibility is that you’re going to pick up a virus that is silent, in the mouse, that is it doesn’t hurt the mouse, but it kills the human, or causes serious disease in the human.

The Lack of Legal Precedent for Modern Day U.S. Mandatory Vaccination Laws

Vaccine Mandates Results Don’t Safeguard Children’s Rights or Health: How Did We Get Here?

As New York University legal scholar Mary Holland explains in a 2010 working paper, this edifice relies primarily on two century-old Supreme Court decisions—from 1905 and 1922—and on the game-changing National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986, which fundamentally altered the legal landscape for vaccination by exempting vaccine manufacturers and medical practitioners from liability for childhood vaccine injuries.

The 1986 Act, in particular, resulted in an absence of legal protections for vaccinated children that is “striking compared to almost all other medical interventions.”

Examining the legal trajectory of vaccine mandates since 1905, Holland argues that current childhood mandates are not only radically different from what the earlier courts and legislators envisioned but are “unreasonable and oppressive and have led to…perverse results” that do not safeguard children’s rights and health.

On the one hand, the legislation “for the first time publicly acknowledged that universal compulsory vaccination is likely to cause permanent injury and death to some infants and children”; on the other hand, it forces healthy children to give up ordinary legal protections, including informed consent, and takes away from injured children the right to sue manufacturers directly.

Meanwhile, ACIP has continued to promote a shift away from “necessity” as the rationale for vaccine mandates. A number of the vaccines that ACIP now calls for American children to get to attend school—70 doses of 16 vaccines by age 18—are for rarely fatal illnesses and for conditions “not contagious through ordinary social contact.”

Holland’s conclusion is that:

“Necessity no longer determines the validity of state childhood vaccination mandates…. New vaccine mandates are guided by financial returns on low prevalence diseases, not protection of the entire population against imminent harm.”

U.S. Water Fluoridation: A Forced Experiment that Needs to End by RFJ, Jr.’s Children’s Health Defense Team

Pregnancy and Fluoride Do Not Mix shows that the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, Harvard’s National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and National Toxicology Program all are well aware of the substantial evidence of fluoride’s developmental neurotoxicity, yet no action has been taken to warn pregnant women. Instead, scientists with integrity, legal professionals and the public increasingly are taking matters into their own hands. A Citizens Petition submitted in 2016 to the EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act requested that the EPA “exercise its authority to prohibit the purposeful addition of fluoridation chemicals to U.S. water supplies.” This request—the focus of a lawsuit to be argued in court later in 2019—poses a landmark challenge to the dangerous practice of water fluoridation and has the potential to end one of the most significant chemical assaults on our children’s developing bodies and brains.

Another doctor...

Dr.Rebecca Carley - Vaccine Induced Diseases - 2011

ADVERSE REACTIONS to immunizations are more common than many people realize.

Another doctor…

Dr Pam Popper on the medical profession.

“...the chemical imbalance theory a little white lie.”

From Med Science Research…

Hepatitis B vaccination and associated oral manifestations: a non-systematic review of literature and case reports. - 2014

ABSTRACT: ...After reviewing the literature, we observed that complications seen after Hepatitis B vaccination are sudden infant death syndrome, multiple sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, vasculititis optic neuritis, anaphylaxis, systemic lupus erytymatosus, lichen planus and neuro-muscular disorder.

RFK, Jr.: “On Jan. 17, 1961, outgoing President Dwight Eisenhower gave the most important speech of his lifetime, warning his fellow citizens that the greatest threat to our democracy and our values was not a foreign foe, but the expanding power of our homegrown military-industrial complex. If unchecked, he predicted this cabal would transform our nation from the world’s exemplary democracy into a militarized plutocracy. The assassinations of my uncle, my father, Dr. King and Malcolm X were four of the great traumas that pushed America off its historical path of idealism and onto the trajectory of imperialism abroad and a national security state at home. Mountains of undeniable proof now support involvement by U.S. military, intelligence and police agencies in those murders — and their subsequent cover-ups. The process of recovering our national idealism must begin with an effort to acknowledge the truth about these assassinations.”

Arty turns 10 this summer.

#1523847 --- 01/30/19 11:18 AM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2261
Loc: Waterloo, NY

!!! BREAKING NEWS: RFK, Jr. and other law firms suing Merck - Gardisil !!!

Remember Merck's new target for their Gardisil vaccine are babies and 45 year olds and up.

Currently boys and girls aged 9 to 18 are getting this vaccine.

Some baby boomers don't use computers. They have no idea that their doctors base their
decisions on their health care based on CDC recommendations of fraudulent science coming
from Pharmaceutical companies and Pharma reps. Those good looking, nicely dressed folks
you see with the big suitcase full of drugs in the waiting room at your doctor's office.
Those Pharma reps go through intense training on how to get the doctor to write prescriptions
for their drugs.

It's the CDC that makes the recommendations for vaccines.

Follow this trial. Learn how the science is manipulated by the Pharma companies, monetary
connections to the CDC, patents that the CDC owns, etc.

Our government AND government employees are making money from selling these vaccines.

Young parents trust their pediatricians. Ask the young parents in your family to take a look at
what other parents or you are learning before they vaccinate themselves or their children.

Pregnant women. Dtap and Flu vaccines are associated with fetal death.

These law firms are going after Merck, like they went after Monsanto.

Seneff: “Bobby Kennedy, Jr. is building a really strong case for Gardasil causing debilitating autoimmune disease in a new court case.”

Court Hears Gardasil Science and Moves Forward

By Lyn Redwood, R.N, M.S.N., President, Children’s Health Defense

Plaintiffs began the day with a 2.5 hour presentation. Sol Ajalat first introduced Paul Pennock of Weitz & Luxenberg. Pennock ran through a riveting 50-minute slide show demonstrating how Gardasil’s super-powered Amorphous Aluminum Hydroxyphosphate Sulfate (AAHS) adjuvant over-stimulated the immune systems of vaccine recipients tipping them into autoimmune conditions in which their redlining immune defenses begin attacking their bodies’ own organs. This “autoimmune process” causes a cascade of illnesses that, in Jennifer Robi’s case, resulted in damage and deterioration in diverse organ systems throughout her body.

Victims like Jennifer are left exhausted as the body fights off disease on multiple fronts. Pennock explained that vaccine makers add aluminum adjuvants (to weak antigens and a long list of other potentially toxic ingredients) to elicit an immune response, hoping to extend the short-term immunity otherwise provided by most vaccines. Among vaccinologists, it’s axiomatic that the duration of immunity correlates directly to the toxicity of the adjuvant; the more toxic the adjuvant, the longer the duration of immunity. Most vaccines provide immunity for only 5-10 years. Gardasil’s promoters were promising lifelong protection, and needed a super toxic adjuvant that would provide this unprecedented level of protection. After all, Merck was promising regulators, pediatricians and the public that inoculations given to 9-12-year-old girls would provide immunity against a relatively rare cancer that typically doesn’t kill until age 58!

Pennock explained that Merck has refused to disclose the contents of AAHS or to provide samples to independent and university scientists for testing. AAHS, astonishingly, has never been safety tested by government regulators or by Merck. Studies on animals conducted by world renowned independent scientists like Dr. Chris Exley, Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld, Dr. Chris Shaw and others have found that mice and sheep exposed to aluminum adjuvants, at concentrations comparable to those found in vaccines, develop strange behavioral patterns and illnesses resembling autoimmune diseases.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. next gave the court an explosive 50-minute presentation of 112 disturbing slides describing the parade of deceptive canards that composed Merck’s clinical trials. Kennedy described a series of fraudulent gimmicks employed by Merck to deceive regulators during the clinical trials including the use of a “spiked” extremely toxic AAHS placebo rather than a true inert placebo that is standard for control groups in blue ribbon safety studies for other pharmaceutical products. Using a poisonous placebo in the control group allowed Merck to mask the cascade of injuries suffered by girls in the Gardasil group during the clinical trials. Half the girls in the Gardasil group and half the girls in the spiked placebo group suffered serious injuries, including several deaths, in the first seven months of the clinical trials, yet Merck was able to claim that reactions in the study group “were similar to the reactions in the placebo group,” and that, therefore, the vaccine was safe. Merck reported most of these serious injuries as “new medical conditions” not adverse events, dismissing any connection to the vaccine by fiat. Information about this parade of grave injuries appears nowhere in the Gardasil package insert.

Merck committed its boldest fraud in its key clinical trial, Protocol 18. Merck told FDA that Protocol 18 was the single study in which its researchers gave the control group a true inert placebo. For this reason, FDA declared Protocol 18 “of special interest.” However, in reality, Merck appears to have taken the precaution of removing half the aluminum from the vaccines administered to this study group. Plus, The Company laced the “placebo” with a witches’ brew of other toxic chemicals. This study, the only “controlled” study that included children in the target cohort of 9-12-year olds, may not have in fact tested the vaccine that Merck went on to inject into millions of young children around the world. Kennedy told the judge that this is not just scientific malpractice, it is outright fraud!

Another tactic utilized by Merck was to purge the study group of anyone with the slightest vulnerabilities to the vaccine or its ingredients despite the fact that the vaccine would ultimately be marketed to girls with the very vulnerabilities excluded during the clinical trials. This precaution allowed the company to mask effects that occur only in vulnerable subgroups. Mr. Kennedy drew laughter from the large court room audience when he described how Merck had prescreened the study subjects to exclude people with allergies, immunological or nervous disorders, more than 4 lifetime sexual partners, genetic vulnerabilities to cancer or to any other medical condition, or with any hint of general infection, a history of alcohol or drug abuse, or a serious or chronic illnesses, and so forth. Finally, Merck told its researchers to exclude any individual with “any condition which in the opinion of the researchers might interfere with the study objective.” The remaining participants were an elite club of super healthy individuals. “You couldn’t get into the clinical trials unless you were a superhero,” Kennedy told Judge Nelson. “You had to be eligible for the Avengers.” The problem, of course, is that none of the people receiving the vaccine under CDC’s mandate are screened for these vulnerabilities. In other words, Merck’s control groups did not reflect the target population for its drug.

The mayhem caused by Gardasil

Even these flimflams could not conceal the mayhem caused by Gardasil. Kennedy showed the court data from Merck’s own package insert showing that 2.3 % of the girls receiving the vaccine complained of symptoms of autoimmune disease within 7 months. Since cervical cancer kills only 1.5 Americans in every 100,000, he noted, “Merck’s own data show that the chances of getting an autoimmune disease from this vaccine are 1000 times the risk of dying from cervical cancer.”

Kennedy closed his powerful presentation by chronicling the parade of corrupt conflicts that caused HHS officials to turn a blind eye to the rife fraud that characterized the clinical trials. Merck loaded the two FDA and CDC panels that approved Gardasil, with paid toadies. He showed that the pharmaceutical industry actually pays 45% of FDA’s annual budget and that NIH and its officials own part of the patents to the Gardasil vaccine and collect royalties on every vaccine sold. NIH collects tens of millions of dollars annually from Gardasil sales. Finally, 45% of CDC’s budget goes to promoting and purchasing vaccines. Merck exerts control over the CDC with millions of dollars in contributions to the CDC foundation, which allows funding for pet projects. This level of support gives Merck the power to also punish the CDC by withholding funding if displeased by the agency.


Watch RFK, Jr. describe his plan to take this issue to the courts

RFK, Jr. : "We're going to fight this battle for you. We're going to take it to the streets. We're going to take it to Congress. We're going to take it to the regulatory agencies. We're going to force the press to start covering this issue honestly for the first time, and allowing this debate to take place. And above all, we're going to take it to the court room, and we're going to win these cases. We're going to find justice for you, for your families and for our country at last. If we’re going to do this effectively, we need your support.

L.M.: “My message to everyone who is flooding timelines with how outraged they are by full term abortions:

In the under-oath deposition from January 2018, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, one of the most respected physicians in the vaccine industry, admits to have used 76 fetuses --> in just ONE study related to vaccines. Most were born via waterbag abortion LIVE and intact for proper organ harvesting. Plotkin states that this was just one of many studies he personally worked on and that many more babies were harvested for other vaccine groundwork studies. So many studies that he can't even recall how many.

I would also like to add, in case you weren't aware -- Vaccines contain aborted fetal DNA.

So while you are displaying how utterly disgusted you are about full term abortions, you are silently supporting them by supporting vaccines.”

Bill mandates informed consent for childhood vaccinations

But he said there has been an explosion in the number of vaccines that are scheduled to be given to children, going from five in the 1960s to more than 70 now.

More to the point, Boyer said parents are entitled to the same kind of “informed consent” about vaccines as they would get before any medical procedure. And his SB 1115 would require that any health professional provide not just the positive effects of vaccinations but also the full list of ingredients and side effects &#8722; and before a vaccine could be administered.

And Boyer said he doesn’t really believe that vaccines help create herd immunity. He said 2016 figures from Maricopa County showed that 30 percent of the children admitted to the hospital for pertussis were fully vaccinated.

15 Must See Documentaries About Vaccines

Dr. Anthony Phan

Medical Doctor who Escaped Vietnam as a Child in the 1970s Explains Why He no Longer Vaccinates

He was practicing in geriatrics at the time, and he noticed that every time he gave the flu shot to his older patients, they would get very sick.


He knew something was wrong. He began doing his own research into vaccines, and encountered the evidence of fraud within the CDC.

He then began looking at what he calls “real data” that was not controlled by the CDC. He challenges the 300,000 plus physicians in the United States to watch the documentary VAXXED.

Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych: “ICAN has responded to HHS's "assurance" of vaccine safety. ICAN's letter goes through pre-licensure clinical trials for vaccines currently used in the U.S. childhood schedule and finds lack of a saline placebo in a control group or, in some cases, no control group. Without a proper placebo control, vaccine safety profile cannot be established/assured. But, regardless, all these vaccines were licensed and are deemed safe. Link to ICAN's letter below.”

December 31, 2018

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
HHS Office of the Secretary
Alex M. Azar II, Secretary of Health & Human Services
Tammy R. Beckham, Acting Director, National Vaccine Program Office
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201

Re: HHS Vaccine Safety Responsibilities and Notice Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-31

Dear Secretary Azar and Acting Director Beckham:

In our letter of October 12, 2017, we notified HHS of a number of serious concerns
regarding how the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) fulfills its obligations
to ensure vaccine safety under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (the 1986
Act).1 We voiced these concerns along with 55 other organizations who were copied on our
letter and who represent over 5 million Americans.2

We thank HHS for the time and resources it dedicated to respond to our concerns in
its letter of January 18, 2018, including having its response reviewed and cleared by the
following agencies within HHS: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
Food & Drug Administration (FDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Office of the
General Counsel (OGC), Human Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), and
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).3

We write again because, after careful review, the substance of HHS’s responses
heightens the serious concerns we previously raised regarding the safety of HHS’s
childhood vaccine schedule.

As HHS is aware, the 1986 Act gave pharmaceutical companies immunity from
liability for injuries caused by most of their vaccines and instead made vaccine safety the
responsibility of HHS.4

As the Secretary of HHS (the Secretary), you have the ultimate authority and responsibility to assure implementation of the vaccine safety obligations in the 1986 Act.5 The importance of assuring the safety of the 71 vaccine doses injected into
children pre-and-postnatally pursuant to HHS’s vaccine schedule cannot be overstated.6

Given the gravity of HHS’s responsibility, it is deeply troubling that the majority of
HHS’s letter contains little more than broad unsupported conclusory assertions. Most of
these conclusory assertions do not withstand basic scrutiny. HHS’s responses even often
contradict its own source materials.

HHS’s letter begins with the incorrect claim that the safety of many pediatric vaccines
was investigated in clinical trials that included a placebo, and falsely implies these trials are
typically longer than mere days or weeks. (Section I below). It then fails to support the
safety of injecting babies with the Hepatitis B vaccine (Section II) and reaffirms HHS’s
refusal to: automate VAERS reporting (Section III); research the most commonly claimed
vaccine-injury pairs (Section IV); identify which children will suffer a serious vaccine injury
(Section V); pause claiming “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” until it has the studies to
support this claim (Section VI); conduct vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies (Section
VII); purge itself of conflicts of interest (Section VIII); or use the Vaccine Safety Datalink and
PRISM to actually improve vaccine safety (Section IX).

History is replete with products that caused harm for years or decades longer than
necessary because of gridlock at HHS.7 The gridlock at HHS over vaccines makes that
history look trivial.

A large and growing proportion of Americans have concerns regarding vaccines.
8 Inorder to persuade this population, including the over five million Americans represented
by the groups listed on our opening letter, HHS must either substantiate that its vaccine
schedule and representations regarding vaccine safety are based on rigorous and robust
science, or acknowledge areas of failure to fulfill its vaccine safety duties. Unsupported and
incorrect assertions will not suffice and will only deepen concerns regarding vaccine safety.

Only by providing the science to support vaccine safety or acknowledging
shortcomings in this science can HHS begin to restore Americans’ confidence in its ability
to objectively assess and improve vaccine safety. Since parents and children are the most
important stakeholders when it comes to vaccine safety, in addition to distributing these
letters to the organizations listed in our opening letter, we intend to widely distribute these
letters to the news media and the public at large.

In our opening letter, we asked that HHS identify the clinical trial data showing that
the safety of pediatric vaccines was carefully studied prior to licensing and injecting them
into millions of American children.9

In response, HHS did not cite any such data. Instead, HHS merely made conclusory assertions regarding pediatric vaccine clinical trials that
contradict HHS’s published documents. We take each point in HHS’s letter regarding
vaccine clinical trials in turn below.

A. Placebo Controls Were Not Used in Pediatric Clinical Trials

Our opening letter expressed serious concern that the clinical trials relied upon to
license pediatric vaccines did not include a control group receiving a placebo. Reflecting its
importance, HHS’s response letter addresses this concern in its first two sentences:

I would like to address a comment made in Section II of your
letter about pre-licensure safety review of pediatric vaccines.
Contrary to statements made on page two of your letter, many
pediatric vaccines have been investigated in clinical trials that
included a placebo.10

Unfortunately, HHS’s assertion that prior to licensure for children “many pediatric vaccines
have been investigated in clinical trials that included a placebo” is untrue.

(i) HHS’s False Claim Regarding Use of Placebos



S. Siegel: Through their eyes

“I’ve often spoken of the neurological havoc wreaked by vaccines, and an autistic young man’s description of that reality, as relayed to us by his mom in a VaxXed interview, corroborates, in surreal fashion.

As described by his dad, after getting several vaccines at around two years of age – the MMR and one or two others - the boy’s affect, his bearing, changed. He was no longer happy; he wouldn’t track - his eyes would be to the side. He lost eye contact. Ultimately he was diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder.

Some years later, when chelation and other treatments had restored the young man’s ability to speak and resolved his visual issues, his mom asked him if he could remember and describe how that felt; why for so long he couldn’t look at her. The boy had recently studied Picasso in a class at school, and he asked his mom if she remembered the paintings. Then he put his hands on her face and told her that that’s how her face had looked; her mouth was off one side of her face, her eye off to the other, and he didn’t know where to look.

I sometimes find myself thinking, no – this can’t really be going on. But it is. I don’t know how many autistic kids would similarly describe what they’d experienced, visually, but I have no doubt it would be many – and how confounding and disturbing a reality. We can only imagine the other effects of vaccine induced brain damage; of the preponderant damage to the myelin making up the insulation of our nerves, meant to protect the transmission of signals to, from and within the brain.

Vaccination’s a travesty.”

Here's the interview. The description of the visual issue is at 12:20…

Surgeon with Vaccine Injured Son

California Medical Doctor Sues Medical Board Over Intimidating Doctors Who Write Vaccine Medical Exemptions

Dr. Kennedy states that the California Medical Board goes from school to school demanding medical records of children, without any permission from the parents. Dr. Kennedy says that according to his attorney, this practice by the Medical Board violates two federal laws and two state laws.

The Medical Board then allegedly examines these medical records of school children to find out which doctors are writing vaccine medical exemptions, and then goes after those doctors.

Dr. Kennedy claims that no doctor has been willing to stand up to this practice until now. He is suing each of the 14 members of the State Medical Board in California.

Watch the following interview with Dr. Kennedy:

From the CDC website...

Cancer, Simian Virus 40 (SV40), and Polio Vaccine Fact Sheet

Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate model - 2014

Abstract: Pertussis is a highly contagious respiratory illness caused by the bacterial pathogen Bordetella pertussis. Pertussis rates in the United States have been rising and reached a 50-y high of 42,000 cases in 2012. Although pertussis resurgence is not completely understood, we hypothesize that current acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines fail to prevent colonization and transmission. To test our hypothesis, infant baboons were vaccinated at 2, 4, and 6 mo of age with aP or whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines and challenged with B. pertussis at 7 mo. Infection was followed by quantifying colonization in nasopharyngeal washes and monitoring leukocytosis and symptoms. Baboons vaccinated with aP were protected from severe pertussis-associated symptoms but not from colonization, did not clear the infection faster than naïve animals, and readily transmitted B. pertussis to unvaccinated contacts. Vaccination with wP induced a more rapid clearance compared with naïve and aP-vaccinated animals. By comparison, previously infected animals were not colonized upon secondary infection. Although all vaccinated and previously infected animals had robust serum antibody responses, we found key differences in T-cell immunity. Previously infected animals and wP-vaccinated animals possess strong B. pertussis-specific T helper 17 (Th17) memory and Th1 memory, whereas aP vaccination induced a Th1/Th2 response instead. The observation that aP, which induces an immune response mismatched to that induced by natural infection, fails to prevent colonization or transmission provides a plausible explanation for the resurgence of pertussis and suggests that optimal control of pertussis will require the development of improved vaccines.

You can find many of Dr. Blaylock’s talks on You Tube.


Russell Blaylock, MD, neurosurgeon

“That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth can be proven quite simply. When I was in medical school, we were taught that all of the childhood vaccines lasted a lifetime. This thinking existed for over 70 years. It was not until relatively recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.

Then they discovered an even greater problem, the boosters were lasting for only 2 years or less. This is why we are now seeing mandates that youth entering colleges have multiple vaccines, even those which they insisted gave lifelong immunity, such as the MMR. The same is being suggested for full-grown adults. Ironically, no one in the media or medical field is asking what is going on. They just accept that it must be done.

That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth can be proven quite simply. When I was in medical school, we were taught that all of the childhood vaccines lasted a lifetime. This thinking existed for over 70 years. It was not until relatively recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.

If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.

When we examine the scientific literature, we find that for many of the vaccines protective immunity was 30 to 40%, meaning that 70% to 60% of the public has been without vaccine protection. Again, this would mean that with a 30% to 40% vaccine-effectiveness rate combined with the fact that most people lost their immune protection within 2 to 10 year of being vaccinated, most of us were without the magical 95% number needed for herd immunity. This is why vaccine defenders insist the vaccines have 95% effectiveness rates.

Without the mantra of herd immunity, these public-health officials would not be able to justify forced mass vaccinations. I usually give the physicians who question my statement that herd immunity is a myth a simple example. When I was a medical student almost 40 years ago, it was taught that the tetanus vaccine would last a lifetime. Then 30 years after it had been mandated, we discovered that its protection lasted no more than 10 years. Then, I ask my doubting physician if he or she has ever seen a case of tetanus? Most have not. I then tell them to look at the yearly data on tetanus infections – one sees no rise in tetanus cases. The same can be said for measles, mumps, and other childhood infections. It was, and still is, all a myth.”


Changing the Measles Discussion

2) Is the measles vaccine safer than the measles? Physicians for Informed Consent put out a good statement here: “It has not been proven that the MMR vaccine is safer than measles. The vaccine package insert raises questions about safety testing for cancer, genetic mutations, and impaired fertility. Although VAERS tracks some adverse events, it is too inaccurate to measure against the risk of measles. Clinical trials do not have the ability to detect less common adverse reactions, and epidemiological studies are limited by the effects of chance and possible confounders. Safety studies of the MMR vaccine are particularly lacking in statistical power. A review of more than 60 MMR vaccine studies conducted for the Cochrane Library states, “The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate.” Because permanent sequalae (aftereffects) from measles, especially in individuals with normal levels of vitamin A, are so rare, the level of accuracy of the research studies available is insufficient to prove that the vaccine causes less death or permanent injury than measles.” (7)

Food Allergies: A Man-Made Issue?

The terms “allergy” and “anaphylaxis” were created following a strange illness that affected up to 50% of vaccinated children at the close of the 1800s. This illness was simply called “serum sickness” and followed the first mass administration of diphtheria anti-toxin sera.

Prior to the advent of vaccination, mass allergy such as serum sickness was unknown. At the dawn of the 20th century, doctors identified the problem of allergy as an outcome of mass vaccination – on which government relied. The dilemma of serum-induced allergy was summarized by allergist Warren Vaughan in 1941:

“Serum disease, as this is called, is a man-made malady. If we had no curative serums and if there were no such thing as a hypodermic syringe with which to introduce the material under the skin, there would be no serum disease.” Excerpt from a book by Warren Vaughan, Strange Malady (1941)

As vaccine ingredients became better refined to reduce the sensitizing proteins, prevalence of serum sickness decreased. With the 20th century expansion of vaccination programs and schedules to include food proteins and adjuvants, however, other unforeseen problems arose to take its place: food allergies.

As Dr. Richet demonstrated over a hundred years ago, injecting a protein into animals or humans causes immune system sensitization to that protein. Subsequent exposure to the protein can result in allergic reactions or anaphylaxis (sometimes fatal). This fact has since been demonstrated over and over again in humans and animal models.

“Currently, the increasing numbers of vaccine administrations are associated with increased reports of adverse vaccine reactions. While the general adverse reactions including allergic reactions caused by the vaccine itself or the vaccine components, are rare, they can in some circumstances be serious and even fatal. Anaphylaxis, an acute hypersensitivity reaction with multi-organ system involvement can present as a severe life-threatening reaction, or can occur after vaccination.” — Vaccine Allergies, Jan 2014, Clinical Experiments in Vaccine Research

Who Is Making Money From The Vaccine Industry by Mark Blaxill

S.P.: “When I started nursing school, I was required to get multiple vaccine boosters because I tested negative for antibodies for things I had been vaccinated against. This was/is not uncommon in nursing school. That alone helped wake me up to the lie called 'herd immunity'.”

Herd Immunity: A False Rationale for Vaccine Mandates By the Children’s Health Defense Team

Herd immunity is a largely theoretical concept, yet for decades, it has furnished one of the key underpinnings for vaccine mandates in the United States. The public health establishment borrowed the herd immunity concept from pre-vaccine observations of natural disease outbreaks. Then, without any apparent supporting science, officials applied the concept to vaccination, using it not only to justify mass vaccination but to guilt-trip anyone objecting to the nation’s increasingly onerous vaccine mandates.

US Food and Drug Administration lashes pharmaceutical giant CSL over lab practices

SECRET audits by the powerful US Food and Drug Administration have revealed a multitude of manufacturing flaws at Australia's biggest pharmaceutical company, CSL. The FDA's 2010 and 2011 audits, released to The Australian yesterday after a Freedom of Information request, cite a string of "objectionable conditions and practices" used by CSL to make vaccines.

The FDA documents reveal that CSL took six months to start investigating the cause of mysterious dark particles in the national stockpile of swine flu vaccine.

The most recent audit, in March, branded as "inadequate" CSL's investigation of febrile fits among children immunised with Fluvax, its seasonal flu vaccine.

Eleven months after Fluvax was banned for young children, the FDA audit discovered CSL had not compiled an investigations report or even designated anyone to be in charge of the investigation.

Australia's pharmaceutical regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, refused to release the findings of its own audits into CSL.

Temple Health Jeanes Hospital...

Please note the lines that say "If you've had a live vaccine within 30 days: Chickenpox, MMR, Shingles, Nasal Flu mist, Rotavirus, Yellow Fever"

This hangs outside the terminal cancer ward. Do they know something others don't care to admit?
YES, Live vaccines shed and spread sickness!!

Special Ed "Mysteriously" Up in California

Back in 2009, as I watched that video, I kept waiting for someone to say that we have to find out why this is happening to so many children. We can't keep adding thousands like this. This is a national health care emergency. But no one did.

B. Wilcox: “Remember when uninformed people used to say that the anti-vaccine movement is a recent fad?”

Vaccination - The Silent Killer, A Clear and Present Danger - 1977

HERE'S THE MEDICAL MARIJUANA AD CBS Banned From Super Bowl Broadcast
Arty turns 10 this summer.

#1524026 --- 02/02/19 09:42 AM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2261
Loc: Waterloo, NY
“That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth can be proven quite simply. When I was in medical school, we were taught that all of the childhood vaccines lasted a lifetime. This thinking existed for over 70 years. It was not until relatively recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.

If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.” Russell Blaylock, MD, neurosurgeon https://thereisnoherdimmunity.wordpress....Gu185dgLKzrCV-0


Remember what Mikovits told us was found in vaccines?

Enter Corvelva...

Finding in Gardasil 9 Linked to Many Cancer Types by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM

The Italian research group, Corvelva, is continuing to release more information on what’s really coming through that needle when you or your child receives a vaccine.

So far, Corvelva has released three reports. The first was on Infanrix-Hexa, the vaccine commonly given to infants in Europe as one of their first vaccinations. This six-in-one vaccine was found to offer no benefit; it is only an injection of chemicals and toxins. While Infanrix-Hexa has not been used in the U.S., the FDA has recently approved this vaccine for American children under a different name: Vexelis.

Two other reports have been released by Corvelva. One report revealed the ingredients in another six-in-one vaccine name Hexyon or Hexacima, depending on the country where it is used. We previously reported on this analysis here. They also released a preliminary report on Gardasil 9, the vaccine given ostensibly to prevent cervical cancer.

This week, further details were released along with the complete analysis of Gardasil 9. What they found is beyond disgusting. Be prepared: What you’re about to read this is truly disturbing.

Corvelva discovered stray genetic material – both DNA and RNA – in the vial solutions. Here are a few of their findings:

Adventitious genetic material present as RNA:

Bacteria – The bacteria appear to be active and replicating during the manufacturing process.

Yeast and its viruses: Yeast RNA can give rise to allergenic proteins. In fact, there are significant and legitimate concerns that the injection of yeast protein into a muscle may be associated with inflammatory bowel disease. The possible effects the injected yeast and yeast viruses may have on the gut microbiota are unknown.

Adventitious genetic material present as DNA:

Bacteria – contaminants primarily from the yeast culture.

Molluscum contagiosum virus – this virus belongs to the pox family of viruses, Poxviridae. It is responsible for causing molluscum, a benign skin infection characterized by small white bumps whose core may be expressed, producing a white cheesy material.

Mouse and human DNA – origins unknown

Phages – Phages are a type of virus that infects bacteria, replicates within the bacteria, then kills its host when it is released to invade other bacteria. Active phages were found in Gardasil 9.

Infectious equine anemia virus and mouse leukemia virus –

First, how did a HORSE virus end up in a HUMAN vaccine?
Second, the mouse virus is present as both DNA and RNA. Therefore, it a complete virus and can behave like a primary infecting virus.

Retroviruses: Both mouse leukemia virus and human endogenous retrovirus K (HERV-K) were identified.

Let’s take a look at the potential ramification of these contaminants:

The bacterial DNA could interact with the adjuvant aluminum and cause allergies, inflammation, and autoimmunity. Gardasil 9 contains 500 mcg of aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS), the most toxic form of aluminum used in vaccines.

The mouse, horse, and human DNA fragments can integrate into the host (human) DNA, leading to cytokine release, inflammation, and autoimmunity.

It is unknown if antibodies are formed against the phages. It is also unknown if the phages can infect with normal bacterial flora in the intestine causing significant disruptions in the gut microbiome.

The mouse and human retroviruses can integrate into human DNA and transform the cells into cancer.
Corvelva’s full report can be found here.

Gardasil: Causing Cancer?

Now, couple the HERV-K with the known toxic ingredients in Gardasil – Aluminum, polysorbate 80 and sodium borate that can contribute to infertility – this vaccine is a human disaster in the making. No child should be subjected to the potential effects of these contaminants.

In fact, the entire human race is at serious risk of serious from all vaccines, not just Gardasil 9.

Seneff: “CORVELVA has a new report out on Gardasil 9. It is not good news for the vaccine industry.”

Vaccinegate: Metagenomic analysis report on Gardasil 9

With these analyses we have finished the first level screening of the Gardasil 9 vaccine.


Presence of adventitious genetic material in residual quantities. The following essential points can be summarized:

Dr. Humphries has many videos on You Tube...

New interview with Suzanne Humphries (author of Dissolving Illusions)

Dr. Suzanne Humphries on The Leon Show - 20 minutes

Lawrence Solomon: The untold story of measles

Several decades following the vaccine’s introduction, the measles death rate rose, largely because the vaccine made adults, expectant mothers and infants more vulnerable

Vaccines for measles have had spotty safety records. Soon after their introduction, the Vital Statistics of the United States began recording deaths from the measles vaccine, along with deaths from other vaccines. By 1970, one of the two original measles vaccines was withdrawn in Canada and the U.S. after causing atypical measles syndrome, a harsh disease triggering high rates of pneumonia. In 1975, the second original vaccine was withdrawn due to 103-degrees-plus fevers, among other severe side effects. Two variants of this vaccine also proved unsatisfactory. A measles vaccine then became part of the combination MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine in the 1980s, only to be withdrawn in 1990 by Canada and in 1992 by the manufacturer after reports from Canada, the U.S., Sweden and Japan blamed MMR for febrile convulsions, meningitis, deafness and deaths. A second version of MMR, now in widespread use, is believed safe by government officials.

Safety aside, vaccines repeatedly failed worldwide in the 1980s and 1990s. As described in “Measles Elimination in Canada”, a 2004 report authored by Canadian government officials and academics, “despite virtually 100% documented one-dose coverage in some regions, large outbreaks of measles involving thousands of cases persisted … Clearly, because of primary vaccine failure, Canada’s one-dose program was insufficient.”

The solution finally arrived at — adding a second dose for children — initially seemed to tame measles outbreaks. But in recent years, the new vaccination regime, too, has been failing, with widespread outbreaks again occurring, including among those who have received the recommended dose and especially among infants too young to be vaccinated, and thus unprotected because their mothers had been vaccinated. Now health experts, scrambling to find solutions, are suggesting numerous reforms, including earlier child vaccinations and second doses for adults.

Clearly, the science is not settled, making for parents a numbers game of the decision to vaccinate their children. Some parents rely on the press or health authorities to interpret the numbers. Others defy the authorities and weigh the risks in the numbers differently, in deciding what’s best for their own families. Who are these others? According to a survey in Pediatrics, unvaccinated children in the U.S. have a mother who is at least 30 years old, who has at least one college degree and whose household has an annual income of at least $75,000. In the absence of studies showing vaccinated children to be healthier than those unvaccinated, the parents in these educated households have determined that the numbers argue against vaccination.

A Line Too Far: How Pharma Could Lose BIG in the Bid for Stripping Away Vaccine Exemption Rights by James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D.

#1. Many families need personal/philosophical exemptions to protect their families from vaccine injury.
Medical professionals are willfully mislead by CDC, AAP and other organizations on the reality of vaccine injury. As a scientist who has participated in over 100 research studies of myriad types, including neurodevelopment and immunology, I can say that the denial that vaccine cause both neurodevelopmental disorders and autoimmunity is paper thin. Let me give you an example. Researchers routinely induce human autoimmunity disorder in mice using aluminum hydroxide. Very low doses are needed if a genetic risk to an autoimmune condition already exists. Aluminum hydroxide is present in over 1/2 of the vaccines children receive due to CDC ‘s recommended pediatric schedule.

So, Pharma, ask yourself: where is a line too far? Where do you stand to lose it all? California was a fluke. Pan had to lie to his colleagues in the California Senate about the use of aborted fetal cells in vaccines to trick them into stripping their constituents’ rights to refuse or to vaccinate selectively. I’m surprised Pan wasn’t sanctioned for that outright lie. But now that Stanley Plotkin has told the world in videotaped testimony that aborted fetal cells are indeed in vaccines, and that he knows that the studies conducted to date cannot be used to rule out that vaccines might cause autism, and the entire vaccine risk aware community has the evidence that aborted fetal cells are used in vaccines, that aluminum is used to induce autoimmunity in animals, that mercury and aluminum synergistic toxicity is real… there will not be another California, and if there is, the people of the next state will remember who stripped them of their rights to choose.

I’m in this area of research to help make artificial approaches to immunity safer with biomarkers and changes to vaccine formulas. I do what I do because I’d like to see medical practices based on valid, not fake, science. I provide evidence in support of vaccine injury backed by science because I’m an ethical scientist. I won’t participate in scientific fraud that leads innocent moms and dads to unwittingly help doctors injure their children.

In my opinion, Pharma has already crossed a line too far. I’m against corporations running America. In my view, to engender any type of legitimacy in the public’s eye, the following reforms must take place:

Unsafe epitopes must be banned. No one should inject proteins that are similar to human proteins into any human being.


In 2013, biologist Dr. Brian Hooker received a call from a Senior Scientist at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) who led the agency’s 2004 study on the Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine and its link to autism.

The scientist, Dr. William Thompson, confessed that the CDC had omitted crucial data in their final report that revealed a causal relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism. Over several months, Dr. Hooker records the phone calls made to him by Dr. Thompson who provides the confidential data destroyed by his colleagues at the CDC.

Dr. Hooker enlists the help of Dr. Andrew Wakefield, the British gastroenterologist falsely accused of starting the anti-vax movement when he first reported in 1998 that the MMR vaccine may cause autism. In his ongoing effort to advocate for children’s health, Wakefield directs this documentary examining the evidence behind an appalling cover-up committed by the government agency charged with protecting the health of American citizens.

Interviews with pharmaceutical insiders, doctors, politicians, and parents of vaccine-injured children reveal an alarming deception that has contributed to the skyrocketing increase of autism and potentially the most catastrophic epidemic of our lifetime.

Vaccine Inserts...

Vaccine Inserts - Vaccines Licensed for Use in the United States

Food and Drug Administration - Vaccine Inserts

Arty turns 10 this summer.

#1524263 --- 02/08/19 11:33 AM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2261
Loc: Waterloo, NY

“Those of you who have been involved in the past in the battle to protect our children from poorly
made vaccines or toxic chemicals in our food or in our water know the power of these industries and
how they’ve undermined every institution in our democracy that is supposed to protect little children
from powerful, greedy corporations. Even the pharmaceutical companies have been able to purchase
congress. They’re the largest lobbying entity in Washington D.C.. They have more lobbyists in Washington
D.C. than there are congressman and senators combined. They give twice to congress what the next largest
lobbying entity is, which is oil and gas… Imagine the power they exercise over both republicans and
democrats. They’ve captured them (our regulatory agencies) and turned them into sock puppets. They’ve
compromised the press… and they destroy the publications that publish real science.” (Robert F.
Kennedy Jr, from the video below)

A.F.: “Everything in this life has become all about money. We are killing ourselves & future generations.
No one seems to have integrity anymore. No one seems to be standing up & protecting America & our
health & well being. I always thought we were such a strong nation. But the reality has become so
sad, we are sick & weak & so very fake. Everything here seems fake, esp. smiles & handshakes from
the very people who pretend to care about us & our health. Oh, & most of our food is fake too, made
from disgusting crap & chemicals. America is doomed as a whole if people don't start standing up &
demanding more. Don't we all want to be a healthy nation again, strong & united to take down evil??
Evil keeps trying to poison us, all for profit & power. I pray so hard for our nation.”

At 54:00 IOM “Few studies have comprehensively assessed the association between the entire
immunization schedule or variations in the overall schedule and categories of health outcomes,
and no study … compared the differences in health outcomes … between entirely unimmunized
populations of children and fully immunized children. Experts who addressed the committee
pointed not to a body of evidence that had been overlooked but rather to the fact that existing
research has not been designed to test the entire immunization schedule … Also studies designed
to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the
immunization schedule have not been conducted … (2013 Institute Of Medicine (IOM) review highlights
need for vaccinated vs, unvaccinated study at 54:00)


RFK, Jr.: “This is the third installment in Jeremy Hammond's must-read series on the corporate and government corruption behind the flu vaccine. Simply stated, flu vaccines raise your risk of serious injury from the flu, makes you 4.5 times more likely to contract non-flu infections and vaccinated individuals spread the flu throughout their communities more efficiently then people infected with the flu itself. The vaccine commonly causes grave side effects including narcolepsy and febrile convulsions and occasionally death. Many flu shots contain megadoses of neurotoxic mercury. CDC blatantly lies about the number of annual flu deaths to drum up public fear and drive vaccine uptake. No one who reads Hammond's brilliantly researched and written series will ever go near a flu shot again.”

How You’re Being Lied to about the Risks of Getting a Flu Vaccine Annually

In this third installment, we will dive much deeper into the question of vaccine safety. You will learn:

How the media lie about the safety of the CDC’s routine childhood vaccine schedule;

Why claims that serious adverse events from the influenza vaccine are “rare” cannot be trusted, and how serious negative consequences could be far more common than publicly acknowledged;

How public vaccine policy effectively treats the entire US population as the subjects of a mass uncontrolled experiment;

How the government has prioritized the goal of maintaining public policy over the goal of bettering public health by granting the pharmaceutical industry legal immunity from vaccine injury lawsuits;

How studies have found that the diphtheria, tetanus, and whole-cell pertussis (DTP) vaccine is associated with an increased risk of childhood death, and why the lessons from this are relevant to the question of whether you should get an annual flu shot;

How studies have shown that getting an annual flu shot can actually increase your risk of illness and why this is so.

In a forthcoming fourth installment, we will continue to carefully examine the question of influenza vaccine safety, and you’ll learn how the CDC lies about the toxicity of the mercury that is contained in some flu shots, and why the CDC’s recommendation that pregnant women get a flu shot is criminally irresponsible.

If you have not already, please be sure to read the first two installments of this series because they contain important contextual information that you will need in order to get the most benefit out of reading this third installment:

Dr. Suzanne Humphries, M.D. – Vaccine Strain of Measles Virus Found in Measles Outbreaks

Dr Suzanne Humphries on Measles and Shedding - 2015

The Vaccine Information War: Government, Big Pharma, Gates Fund Corporate Media Attack on “Vaccine Hesitancy” as “Public Threat” by Barbara Loe Fisher, National Vaccine Information Center

WHO, Pharma, Gates & Government: Who’s Calling the Shots?

Multi-national pharmaceutical corporations 26 27 in command of a global 34 billion dollar vaccine market 28 29 are holding billion dollar contracts with mass communication companies 30 and public-private partnerships with governments to purchase vaccines and create vaccine marketing campaigns 31 32 33 34 that dwarf the relatively small number of websites and blogs labeled “anti-vax” simply for criticizing vaccine science and government policy. 35

Yet, there is no recognition by mainstream media articles of the fact that wealthy corporations and philanthropic foundations with political agendas, 36 37 well paid medical doctors, 38 39 40 and government health officials in charge of operating the vaccine system 41 are in privileged positions of power with a distinct advantage over ordinary people subjected to vaccine laws that place an unequal risk burden on individuals with genetic and biological susceptibility to suffering harm from vaccination. 42 43

The single biggest funding source for Gavi is the Gates Foundation, which has donated more than $3B or 20 percent of Gavi’s total income. 61 Between 2000 and 2013, only about 10 percent of total funding provided by Gavi ($862M) was used to strengthen health systems in developing countries, such as improving sanitation and nutrition, while nearly 80 percent was used to purchase, deliver and promote vaccines. 62

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Marketing Vaccines

The Gates Foundation was established in 2000 by Microsoft Corporation founder Bill Gates and his wife, Melinda. 70

Headquartered in Seattle, Washington, the Gates Foundation is the largest philanthropic foundation in the world with a $43.5B trust that makes grant payments of more than $3B annually to advance the foundation’s goals for reforming education systems, such as institution of Common Core curriculum in all U.S. schools, 71 and funding public health initiatives, primarily global vaccination programs. 72 A major goal of the Gates Foundation is to make sure every child in the world is vaccinated. 73

Investor businessman Warren Buffet, who took control of textile manufacturer Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. in 1965 and went on to amass a personal fortune of more than $60B, pledged $31B and became a co-director of Gates Foundation in 2006. 74

In 1998, the same year that the U.S. Department of Justice filed an anti-trust lawsuit against Microsoft Corporation, 75 Bill and Melinda Gates committed $100M to create the Bill & Melinda Gates Children’s Vaccine Program. One purpose of that program was to establish an international consensus on vaccine use recommendations:,-Pharma,-Gates.aspx

The CDC is being influenced by corporate and political interests - 2016


Concerns about the inner workings of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have been mounting in recent months amid disclosures of cozy corporate alliances. Now a group of more than a dozen senior scientists have reportedly lodged an ethics complaint alleging the federal agency is being influenced by corporate and political interests in ways that shortchange taxpayers.

A group calling itself CDC Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research, or (CDC SPIDER), put a list of complaints in writing in a letter to CDC Chief of Staff and provided a copy of the letter to the public watchdog organization U.S. Right to Know (USRTK). The members of the group have elected to file the complaint anonymously for fear of retribution.

“It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests… and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception,” the letter states. “These questionable and unethical practices threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health.”

The complaint cites among other things a “cover up” of…

Seneff: “Seems perfectly reasonable to me that doctors should be required to inform parents about what ingredients are going into their children's arm when they receive a vaccine. This Arizona lawmaker thinks so too!”

Arizona Lawmaker Wants to Mandate that Parents are Fully Informed of Vaccine Ingredients and Side Effects Before Children Receive Shots

Robert F. Kennedy Jr Explains How Big Pharma Completely Owns Congress

The corruption is never-ending when it comes to the link between corporations and government agencies. In fact, only a few years ago, more than a dozen scientists from within the CDC put out an anonymous public statement detailing the influence corporations have on government policies. They were referred to as the Spider Papers.

Dr. William Thompson is a longtime CDC scientist who has published some of the most commonly cited pro-vaccine studies, some of which claim that there is absolutely no link between the MMR vaccine and autism. He pointed to a specific study that he co-authored in 2004 for the CDC, which claimed that “the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine does not cause autism or any particular subtypes of autism spectrum disorder.” This study is often cited when trying to justify the use of this vaccine, despite the fact that he later stated they deleted important findings from that study. He said that “it’s the lowest point in my career that I went along with that paper and uh, I went along with this, we didn’t report significant findings… I’m completely ashamed of what I did, I have great shame now that I was complicit and went along with this. I have been a part of the problem.” (source)

Anxious to get this information out, Thompson sent various documents to Congressman Bill Posey, who addressed the congress, reading a statement that he had received from Dr. Thompson:

Sometime soon after the meeting, we decided to exclude reporting any race effects, the [CDC] co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the [MMR vaccine] study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can. (source)

ICAN Submits Point-by-Point Refutation and Notice of HHS's Unwillingness or Inability To Support Its Claims or Answer Questions About Vaccine Safety

LOS ANGELES, Jan. 31, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) has submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) a formal response to HHS's answers to requests ICAN made to HHS to obtain the basic support for the vaccine safety claims made by HHS.

This letter exchange between ICAN and HHS provides a comprehensive debate concerning vaccine safety with the government agency responsible for vaccine safety.

"We spent nearly a year going through every assertion and citation with our subject matter experts and found, to our profound discouragement, that many of their assertions were not actually supported by existing science in our opinion," Bigtree says.

The new 88-page response dismantles HHS's replies, detailing:

HHS's claims regarding use of placebos in clinical trials to license childhood vaccines
HHS's claims regarding the duration of the safety review period in the clinical trials relied upon to license childhood vaccines
HHS's refusal to conduct any valid post-licensure vaccine safety science, including refusing to conduct a vax/unvaxxed study
HHS's refusal to reduce its serious conflicts of interest in assuring vaccine safety
A separate ICAN lawsuit recently revealed HHS has not prepared and filed required vaccine safety reports for 31 years, despite being ordered to do so in 1986 after Congress made it illegal to sue pharmaceutical companies for injuries caused by their vaccine products. The US government assumed responsibility for making payment for these injuries and has paid out over $4 billion for vaccines injuries.

ICAN's letter exchange with HHS debating vaccine safety is found in its entirety at…

Highwire with Del Bigtree

Big Pharma Unhinged; Indignant HHS Refuses Safety Study (2013 Institute Of Medicine review highlights need for vaccinated vs, unvaccinated study 54:00); Experiments on the Handicapped?!; Dengenzia vaccine failure 104:00, Exiled Doc Healing Cancers

At 40:00 - 47:00: More testimony from Stanley Plotkin. Ethics, a million people in the Congo experimented on, like the Nazis...

Q: Have you ever used orphans to study an experimental vaccine?

A: Yes.

Q: Have you ever used the mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine?

A: the 1960’s it was not an uncommon practice...I would not deny that I may have done the 1960’s that was more or less common practice…

Q: Have you ever used babies of mothers in prison on experimental vaccines?

A: Yes

At 54:00 IOM: “Few studies have comprehensively assessed the association between the entire immunization schedule or variations in the overall schedule and categories of health outcomes, and no study … compared the differences in health outcomes … between entirely unimmunized populations of children and fully immunized children. Experts who addressed the committee pointed not to a body of evidence that had been overlooked but rather to the fact that existing research has not been designed to test the entire immunization schedule … Also studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted …” (2013 Institute Of Medicine (IOM) review highlights need for vaccinated vs, unvaccinated study at 54:00)

RFK, Jr.: “Prof. Martin Gore, 67, one of the UK’s leading cancer scientists, has died. His death was following a yellow fever vaccination.”

Top cancer scientist dies after yellow fever vaccination

Seneff: “This is a very informative article on measles and MMR.”

Measles Scare Tactics Hurt Us All

By the time the measles vaccine was patented in 1963 in the US, the mortality rate from measles was about 1 in 500,000.¹ This is less than your risk of death from falling off furniture.² Let’s also consider that over 600,000 people annually die of heart disease in the US, over 500,000 people die from cancer in the US each year and over 250,000 annually die from medical errors alone.³

So why is the media reporting tiny measles outbreaks as if the sky itself is about to fall? Doesn’t it seem as if everywhere you turn, another outbreak is reported with dire warnings that the unvaccinated are about to bring us an epidemic, the likes of which we’ve never seen? Kind of reminds you of the media frenzy over the Disneyland outbreak in 2014–2015, doesn’t it? That’s when Big Pharma focused their efforts on California and pushed through SB277, a law which removed religious and personal belief exemptions from the mandatory vaccine schedule in order for a child to attend daycare or school&#8202;—&#8202;public or private. Perhaps they figured that if they could manage to remove parental health choice in California, it would be a domino effect in the rest of the country.

And just in time for the start of state legislature sessions all over the country, Big Pharma has gotten the media onboard the measles terror train again. Over 70 vaccine related bills have been introduced across the country, and they are pulling out all stops to ensure that as many of their sponsored bills make it through to law.&#8308;

What’s the big deal, you might ask? Well

Utah mom says healthy 19-year-old son died from flu shot

Measles and Vitamin A

Vitamin A supplements for preventing mortality, illness, and blindness in children aged under 5: systematic review and meta-analysis

Food sources, Vitamin A

Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych, Ph.D. - Measles

Harvard Immunologist to Legislators: Unvaccinated Children Pose ZERO Risk to Anyone

An Open Letter to Legislators Currently Considering Vaccine Legislation from Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD

Dear Legislator:

My name is Tetyana Obukhanych. I hold a PhD in Immunology. I am writing this letter in the hope that it will correct several common misperceptions about vaccines in order to help you formulate a fair and balanced understanding that is supported by accepted vaccine theory and new scientific findings.

Do unvaccinated children pose a higher threat to the public than the vaccinated?

It is often stated that those who choose not to vaccinate their children for reasons of conscience endanger the rest of the public, and this is the rationale behind most of the legislation to end vaccine exemptions currently being considered by federal and state legislators country-wide.

You should be aware that the nature of protection afforded by many modern vaccines – and that includes most of the vaccines recommended by the CDC for children – is not consistent with such a statement.

I have outlined below the recommended vaccines that cannot prevent transmission of disease either because they are not designed to prevent the transmission of infection (rather, they are intended to prevent disease symptoms), or because they are for non-communicable diseases.

People who have not received the vaccines mentioned below pose no higher threat to the general public than those who have, implying that discrimination against non-immunized children in a public school setting may not be warranted.

Furthermore, the 2013 meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors at the CDC revealed additional alarming data that pertussis variants (PRN-negative strains) currently circulating in the USA acquired a selective advantage to infect those who are up-to-date for their DTaP boosters, meaning that people who are up-to-date are more likely to be infected, and thus contagious, than people who are not vaccinated.

In summary, a person who is not vaccinated with IPV, DTaP, HepB, and Hib vaccines due to reasons of conscience poses no extra danger to the public than a person who is. No discrimination is warranted.

Can discrimination against families who oppose vaccines for reasons of conscience prevent future disease outbreaks of communicable viral diseases, such as measles?

Measles research scientists have for a long time been aware of the “measles paradox.” I quote from the article by Poland & Jacobson (1994) “Failure to Reach the Goal of Measles Elimination: Apparent Paradox of Measles Infections in Immunized Persons.” Arch Intern Med 154:1815-1820:

“The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons.” [2]

Further research determined that behind the “measles paradox” is a fraction of the population called LOW VACCINE RESPONDERS. Low-responders are those who respond poorly to the first dose of the measles vaccine. These individuals then mount a weak immune response to subsequent RE-vaccination and quickly return to the pool of “susceptibles’’ within 2-5 years, despite being fully vaccinated. [3]

Re-vaccination cannot correct low-responsiveness: it appears to be an immuno-genetic trait. [4] The proportion of low-responders among children was estimated to be 4.7% in the USA. [5]

Studies of measles outbreaks in Quebec, Canada, and China attest that outbreaks of measles still happen, even when vaccination compliance is in the highest bracket (95-97% or even 99%, see appendix for scientific studies, Items #6&7). This is because even in high vaccine responders, vaccine-induced antibodies wane over time. Vaccine immunity does not equal life-long immunity acquired after natural exposure.

It has been documented that vaccinated persons who develop breakthrough measles are contagious. In fact, two major measles outbreaks in 2011 (in Quebec, Canada, and in New York, NY) were re-imported by previously vaccinated individuals. [6] [7]

Dr Tetyana Obukhanych, Ph.D. - Natural Immunity and Vaccination

At 3:00 and 6:00, Measles - look at the graphs, note the rates of deaths BEFORE the vaccine was introduced.

Measles outbreaks involve vaccinated people...8:30

Where is the herd immunity...17:00

She summarizes at 20:00

Definitions...Immunity, immunization, vaccination, natural defenses, titers, ...23:00

Raise your hand if you believe a vaccine caused your child’s autism! (1 minute video)

RFK, Jr.: “Private emails between employees at The Coca-Cola Company and the CDC have been exposed in a new research paper, raising questions about just how extensive of a relationship the soda company has had with the nation's public health agency.”

D.B.: “Coca Cola and CNN aren't separate entities. They're a revolving door - one big mafia including the CDC, FDA, EPA, Big Pharma/Chemo, Big Agra, medical industry, sold-out scientists, Congress bought out by corporate lobbyists, and big corporate media that shovels fake information down the public's throat. A good example is Dr. Julie Gerberding, formerly VP at the CDC who covered up damaging facts on autism with vaccines, then got rewarded in 2015 with a $2.5 million salary position at Merck as Pres. of the Vaccine Division. It's predatory capitalism and we and our children are the prey.”

Old emails hold new clues to Coca-Cola and CDC's controversial relationship

Now, "these email exchanges show what appear to be attempts to leverage personal relationships at the CDC to further these goals at the expense of population health -- and lead to questions about whether organizations like the CDC should refrain from engaging in partnerships where there is such a potential for conflict of interest," he said.


Dr. William Thompson is a longtime CDC scientist who has published some of the most commonly cited pro-vaccine studies, some of which claim that there is absolutely no link between the MMR vaccine and autism. He pointed to a specific study that he co-authored in 2004 for the CDC, which claimed that “the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine does not cause autism or any particular subtypes of autism spectrum disorder.” This study is often cited when trying to justify the use of this vaccine, despite the fact that he later stated they deleted important findings from that study. He said that “it’s the lowest point in my career that I went along with that paper and uh, I went along with this, we didn’t report significant findings… I’m completely ashamed of what I did, I have great shame now that I was complicit and went along with this. I have been a part of the problem.”

Anxious to get this information out, Thompson sent various documents to Congressman Bill Posey, who addressed the congress, reading a statement that he had received from Dr. Thompson: Sometime soon after the meeting, we decided to exclude reporting any race effects, the [CDC] co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the [MMR vaccine] study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can.

In other news...

Here's a MUST READ article by the founding director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council--Dr. Devra Davis.

RFK, Jr.: “Learn the shocking truth about the toxic dangers of Teflon and C8. The award winning movie THE DEVIL WE KNOW can be seen on Netflix. Watch the movie about the biggest environmental disaster in America and how a handful of lawyers went to war with DuPont and won.”

The Devil We Know[0]=33.%7B%22logging_data%22%3A%7B%22page_id%22%3A1411189272541151%2C%22event_type%22%3A%22clicked_all_page_posts%22%2C%22impression_info%22%3A%22eyJmIjp7InBhZ2VfaWQiOiIxNDExMTg5MjcyNTQxMTUxIiwiaXRlbV9jb3VudCI6IjAifX0%22%2C%22surface%22%3A%22www_pages_home%22%2C%22interacted_story_type%22%3A%22565413710334575%22%2C%22session_id%22%3A%225584a6dd4644987c4e897c3ccd4565d5%22%7D%7D
Arty turns 10 this summer.

#1524335 --- 02/10/19 11:10 PM Re: More Doctors Speaking Out About Vaccines [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2261
Loc: Waterloo, NY

“I often tell people if they are so into vaccines,
then go get the other 30 that they didn’t receive,
that their child will.

Nobody has volunteered yet. (Author unknown)

In the 1960's vaccine data was written on the child's birth
certificate. Check yours. How many vaccines did you receive?


Measles has been a focus in the media, so Children's Health Defense addressed this important issue with two articles this week.

CDC, Check YOUR Data: MMR Vaccination Rates are NOT Declining

Luckily, the CDC has a super-easy, interactive map that answers this question very clearly, and I hope any members of the media with a brain start to take a look at the actual data, I took a screenshot of Oregon’s and you better take a screenshot of your state’s before the CDC takes down this weblink:

So, basically, here’s how it works: abuse and misinterpret a rising exemption number–guaranteed to go up if you add new vaccine requirements to the schedule–and generalize that it’s happening for all vaccines. Then, NEVER show the historical data, because it decimates your story.

I hope state activists grab the data for their state, share it with their legislators, and ask a simple question:

“Where’s the decline?”

New York State…

The Facts About Measles

While instilling fear, rarely do any of these mainstream media announcements alert parents to the downsides of vaccination. And, should something go horribly wrong with the vaccination of their child, they are on their own as vaccine manufacturers are liability free due to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP). It is a disservice because the fact is vaccine injuries can and do happen. To date, this program has paid out in excess of $4 billion dollars injuries.

According to a Medalerts search of the FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database as of 2/5/19, the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines alone was: 93,929 adverse events, 1,810 disabilities, 6,902 hospitalizations, and 463 deaths. What is even more disturbing about these numbers is that VAERS is a voluntary and passive reporting system that has been found to only capture 1% of adverse events.

The manufacturer’s package insert lists all of these conditions as potential adverse reactions to the MMR-II vaccine. These serious and sometimes deadly adverse events should not be taken lightly by parents or the media.

Here are a few CHD articles and research that help to build understanding about measles, risks of vaccination, herd immunity, and the benefits of natural vs. artificial immunity:

Measles - look at the CDC’s chart...

Measles Madness: Five Things You Need to Know Before Freaking Out

Is this “outbreak” a scare tactic to increase vaccines sales? News reports show more parents are saying no to vaccines, some after realizing that vaccines contain toxins that can actually harm your health and cause health issues (like T1 diabetes, developmental delays, tics, seizures, autoimmune issues, sudden death, etc). More than a thousand science studies on this here. These issues are also listed as adverse events (aka side effects) on vaccine product labels. These 20-40 page product labels are rarely shown to those receiving vaccines. While pharmacists are required by law to go over prescription drug side effects with all patients,this rule doesn’t seem to apply to vaccines.

Back to measles: there are a few hundred cases of the measles spread out around the US every year. There’s no emergency “outbreak.” CDC measles stats here.

2. Why is there all this fear of measles when it’s not a fatal disease in countries with proper sanitation?

While there have been no confirmed deaths caused directly by measles in the US in more than 10 years, there have been at least 96 reported deaths from the measles vaccine. A 2010 Harvard Medical School report on the relatively unknown US government reporting system call VAERS states that fewer than 1% of all vaccine adverse events and reactions are even reported. Did the media forget to mention this?

Even in the U.S. when sanitation systems were still being built, the highest rate of death for measles was in 1915 with 14 deaths per 100,000 people. This is 3-4 times LESS than being struck by lightning. Do you a lightening strike every time you leave your house?

Measles death rates steadily declined over the next couple of decades to almost zero by 1955. The trend followed the same decline as other diseases, even those without vaccines like cholera and typhoid. The measles vaccine was introduce in 1963 when disease deaths were lower than 1 per 100,000 people.

3. The measles vaccine did NOT reduce measles deaths.

Media reports often rely heavily on drama and lightly on actual data. If you look at the historical death reports by year, it’s easy to see that the vaccine was not responsible for the decline in measles deaths. According to a report in the journal of Pediatrics titled Trends in American Health in the 20th Century, researchers who analyzed death data from the years 1900-1999:

“Vaccination does NOT account for the impressive declines in mortality seen in the first half of the century…Nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among US children occurred before 1940, when few antibiotics or vaccines were available.”

RFK, Jr.’s Children Health Defense articles...

The Rotavirus Vaccine: A Case Study in Government Corruption and Malfeasance

Among the Congressional investigation’s findings were that three out of five members of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) “who voted to approve the rotavirus vaccine in December 1997 had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine”, while four out of eight members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) “who voted to approve guidelines for the rotavirus vaccine in June 1998 had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine”.

Offit joined the ACIP in October 1998 and three times voted in favor on decisions related to the use of the rotavirus vaccine, including a vote to add the vaccine to the CDC’s “Vaccines For Children” program—all while sharing ownership of a patent for a rotavirus vaccine being developed under a grant from Merck.

A member of the CDC’s advisory committee until June 2003, Offit’s vaccine was approved by the FDA in 2006 under the trademark “RotaTeq”. The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia was listed alongside Offit as a patent owner on the filing certificate issued by the US Patent and Trademark Office, and the hospital sold its stake in RotaTeq in 2008 under a deal in which Offit profited handsomely; he has acknowledged that he made “several million dollars, a lot of money”.

Offit also happens to be a routinely cited go-to “expert” on vaccines for the mainstream media. He once penned an op-ed for the New York Times accusing parents who choose not to vaccinate their children of child abuse on the grounds that Jesus, were he with us in the flesh today, would advocate forcibly vaccinating children against their parents’ will.

By a parent that did the research...

Written Testimony for HB 1638 – 2019-20 Madam Chair and Members of the Committee

To: Members of the House Committee on Health Care & Wellness

From: Eric Ranger, 2004 United States Naval Academy Graduate, Washington (WA) resident of 10 years

Subj: Written Testimony for HB 1638 – 2019-20 Madam Chair and members of the committee,

I am Eric Ranger from Vancouver, WA. The following is my written testimony for the public hearing in the House Committee on Health Care & Wellness for HB 1638 – 2019-20 on vaccine preventable diseases. I am not representing other citizens or a separate group. The purpose of this testimony is to explain how, after researching the topic of vaccines for over 1,000 hours, I am still left questioning the risks and benefits of the MMR-II vaccine for my children.

I have so many unanswered questions with respect to vaccines, there is no way I could ever sign such a consent form. I also feel that the risks of vaccination, and when they occur specifically, are largely unknown by anyone. This is after 3-1/2 years and over 1,000 hours of deliberate, intensive, and exhaustive research into vaccines, which includes:

reading over 10 books on the subject,
reading scientific published peer-reviewed research, IOM Reports, Cochrane Collaboration Systematic Reviews,
extensively exploring the NIH, FDA, and CDC websites,
exploring the VAERS database,
discussions with several pediatricians, other medical doctors, and nurses,
email exchanges with Ph.D. research scientists, medical journalists, and nurses, and
reviewing dozens of hours of documentaries, depositions, interviews, medical conferences, and lectures written, featured, and presented by doctors of medicine, doctors of osteopathic medicine, Ph.D. research scientists, medical journalists, and former editors of prestigious medical journals.

Unless the verbiage changes on the informed consent paperwork for immunization, I cannot in good conscience sign my name giving authorization. Most parents who sign their name have probably given moments to researching the topic. This would have been the case for me if my wife had been pregnant 10 years ago when I was 26. For me at that time, vaccines were a no- brainer; the right thing to do. However, certain things occurred in my life for which I am eternally grateful, which sparked my questioning attitude on this subject.

Why are natural viruses important? Science discovers common viruses REDUCE later health issues, including cancer

Pharmaceutical companies and the medical system love to vilify viruses, but are they really bad for your body?

No. Everyone is regularly exposed to viruses and bacteria — they’re all around us (indoors and out) and, even, inside us. Yes, our bodies have viruses that co-exist with us in our bodies. Scientists in 2014 discovered the average HEALTHY person has 5.5 viruses in their body, with some having many more, according to BMC Biology study.

We encounter dozens of viruses everyday and we even have latent viruses in our bodies — without being sick, according to Medical Daily studies. Science is discovering there are many benefits to common illnesses, particularly in childhood, and theorize that viruses actually help train the immune system in a way that can REDUCE the risk of more serious issues later in life, including cancer.

Arty turns 10 this summer.

Page 28 of 28 < 1 2 ... 26 27 28