FingerLakes1.com Forums
Page 18 of 20 < 1 2 ... 16 17 18 19 20 >
Topic Options
#1494177 --- 01/15/17 08:23 PM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY
Short info video...

http://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/own-vacc...f8e1e11d04a4d06

Episode 6

showing now...Part 2 Brian Hooker and documentary about military vaccination.

Hooker discusses how CDC scientist Wm. Thompson contacted him, the information he provided and how he was able to legally record four phone calls to prove it.

Our top government CDC officials lied to us and Brian Hooker has provided the proof.

Everyone needs to see this.

http://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/



_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
FingerLakes1.com
#1494200 --- 01/16/17 09:48 PM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY
Episode 7

showing now...

Sherri Tenpenny, D.O.: Polio, Smallpox, Monkeypox, Scarlet fever eradication, herd immunity, HPV three extra office visits, bullying to push $100,000 worth of vaccine inventory that has time period to be sold, Wakefield.

"I’m afraid that too many doctors have become “glorified drug reps”

"If you asked your doctor, “name 3 ingredients in that syringe”, most doctors wouldn’t be able to tell you. I feel it’s our responsibility as doctors to stand up for patients and stop stuffing them full of drugs."

"The National Vaccination Injury Compensation Program has been a disaster. ... It's a complete kangaroo court that's set up to make it look like we're trying to do something to compensate people who are injured by these vaccines."

"I can remember cases of my own that broke my heart...I remember the one father I put in jail for shaken baby syndrome, which is the person that I will never forget as I am looking into the eyes of his child and thinking, feeling very pompous about identifying shaken baby syndrome and watching the police haul this gentlemen away in handcuffs behind his eyes, I will go to my grave remembering that look on his face knowing now what I know...and to think here's his child who's dieing and I'm the one who put him in jail and that's the reason why...and people will ask me why don't doctor's get it, why don't pediatricians get it, and I always say it's because they'll have to do their own forgiveness work because they'll walk into their chartroom and look at all those charts...maybe I played a role in that, maybe that was me by injecting all of those kids and ignoring the signs and ignore when the parents when they would call me and tell me their kids were crying and saying oh, that's normal, they're just going to cry...and if they really realized what they were doing to destroy the human race and the dna of humanity they would have to stop, drop to their knees and say God forgive me and turn around and do something different..."


Gayle Delong Ph.D.


Dr. Patrick Gentempo



http://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/


_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494222 --- 01/17/17 04:19 PM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY

Episode 8 is out at around 6 p.m. tonight

Part 3 of Dr. Brian Hooker's interview and free showing of “Trace Amounts.”

http://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/



TRUMP TAPS ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR. TO HEAD NEW COMMISSION ON VACCINE SAFETY AND SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY

“The CDC is a troubled agency. There have been four separate scathing Federal studies about the CDC. I’m not talking about the whole agency; I’m talking about the vaccine division. One by the United States Senate; a three year study, one by the House, another by HHS by the Inspector General and a study this year by The Office of Research and Integrity. And all of together and separately paint a picture of an agency that has become a cesspool of corruption.”

http://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/trump-...tific-integrity



Board Certified Medical Doctor Explains Why Vaccine Policies and Injections Onto Children Are An 'Egregious Crime' by DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES

My name is Dr Suzanne Humphries. I am a medical doctor, board certified in Nephrology and trained in Internal Medicine. I hold active unrestricted medical licenses in Maine and Virginia. After 10 good years as a nephrologist at Eastern Maine Medical Center, I resigned from my position, sold my share of my medical practice and left because of the issues I faced regarding vaccination in my own patients.

For me the problems began with a hospital policy, which changed in 2008 to vaccinate as many patients as possible, on the first hospital day, even if they were in acute kidney failure, heart failure, sepsis, or were cancer patients on chemotherapy.

A pharmacist would go into the patient’s room, show them one sheet of paper from the CDC with limited biased information, and offer them one or more vaccines. If the patient consented, which most did, an order was put into the computer with the attending physician’s name often before a doctor had even seen the patient or a diagnosis had been made, and the nurse would give the vaccine.

Sometimes the order had my name on it, even though I would not have ordered the vaccine.

I was not happy, and decided to speak to the hospital management about what I was seeing. So I put my concerns in writing, and meetings were held to discuss the issue, but I was not invited to attend. The result? I was told that acutely ill inpatients would continue to be offered vaccines on arrival at hospital. I asked myself..."exactly what is the science that says that these vaccines are safe for really sick people?"

I assumed that there were studies on the subject, and writings in the medical literature, in order for them to be so sure of the rightness of their policy. After all, it’s science we’re talking about? And the science is supposed to be all settled on the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.

Because the hospital policies were centered on flu and pneumonia vaccines, this was where my research started.
I submitted a written report to the administration, which is now available on drsuzanne.net. HERE.
This paper outlines the many issues involved in adult vaccines and kidney patients.

So, I discussed all this evidence for over a year with the administration and with my various colleagues. Other doctors were starting to change their previously set minds, and a high number of nurses were catching on. But then, because the hospital administration could not rebut my arguments, they called upon an expert to set me straight.

http://preventdisease.com/news/15/081715...ous-Crime.shtml
http://drsuzanne.net/
https://www.facebook.com/drsuzanne/
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/148021...22O33MAA3NAZFNG



Conflicts of Interest in Vaccine Safety Research byGayle DeLong, Department of Economics and Finance, Baruch College. 2012.


Abstract: Conflicts of interest (COIs) cloud vaccine safety research. Sponsors of research have competing interests that may impede the objective study of vaccine side effects. Vaccine manufacturers, health officials, and medical journals may have financial and bureaucratic reasons for not wanting to acknowledge the risks of vaccines. Conversely, some advocacy groups may have legislative and financial reasons to sponsor research that finds risks in vaccines. Using the vaccine-autism debate as an illustration, this article details the conflicts of interest each of these groups faces, outlines the current state of vaccine safety research, and suggests remedies to address COIs. Minimizing COIs in vaccine safety research could reduce research bias and restore greater trust in the vaccine program.

http://www.rescuepost.com/files/conflicts_of_interest_in_vaccine_safety_research_gayle_delong1.pdf



How Independent Are Vaccine Defenders?

But CBS News has found these three have something more in common - strong financial ties to the industry whose products they promote and defend.

The vaccine industry gives millions to the Academy of Pediatrics for conferences, grants, medical education classes and even helped build their headquarters. The totals are kept secret, but public documents reveal bits and pieces.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-independent-are-vaccine-defenders/



ROF Responds to the Corporate Media’s Anti-Vaxxer Attack on RFK, Jr.

Ring of Fire's Mike Papantonio lays down the truth on the dysfunctional corporate media's attacks on our own Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU0dfU1FtuE



Seneff: “New article on Merck and Gardasil: incredibly detailed account of how the safety trials were designed to overlook ovarian failure as an issue with Gardasil.”

Did Merck Deceive FDA About Gardasil Vaccine Research Omitting Data Concerning Ovarian Failure?

My latest research on the Gardasil® vaccine has been to see if it causes endocrine disruption. This led me to an excellent article published in January of 2016 by the American College of Pediatricians (ACP). [1] The ACP voiced concerns about premature ovarian failure (POF) or premature menopause, which can occur after vaccination with Gardasil®. They did such a great job that I am going to quote their concerns.

The article is written as a warning to pediatricians about HPV vaccines. It tells them, “There are legitimate concerns that should be addressed.” These are the concerns they stated:

http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/did-merck-...varian-failure/



Vaccine Inserts from A to Z

https://www.facebook.com/notes/vaxxed-a-...185106191896975



WIDE AWAKE: The Seminar that Changed Everything

They told us vaccines were safe. They lied. They told us vaccines were effective. They lied. They told us vaccines were necessary. They lied. It's time to learn the truth and see the information they don't want you to see. See a rare, full-length, cinema seminar presentation regarding the danger of vaccination, why the viruses and bacteria are beneficial, and ways to boost your immune system naturally.

https://vimeo.com/ondemand/wideawakeseminar/199340171



Polysorbate 80: A Risky Vaccine Ingredient

Within the pharmaceutical industry, polysorbate 80 is used to improve and maintain consistency of gel capsules; assist in keeping medication suspended in liquids; in preparation of intravenous fluids; as an excipient in tablets, and in the manufacture of vaccines.1 4
...
Furthermore, once injected into the body, polysorbate 80 can rapidly break down into sorbitol and ethylene oxide. Sorbitol has the ability to increase the risk of diabetes, cell death, mitochondrial failure and DNA fragmentation.2

http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2016/01/polysorbate-80-a-risky-vaccine-ingredient/



Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Speech Green Our Vaccines

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DzeNy-5324&feature=share



Seneff: “In this podcast, I talk about how glyphosate works together with vaccines (especialy MMR) to cause autism.”

http://learntruehealth.com/cause-of-autism-dr-stephanie-seneff/

You can read about Dr. Stephanie Seneff’s work by going here: http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff



My Journey of Disillusionment - Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych, Ph.D., in Immunology, the field of science that invented vaccination.

I hold a PhD in Immunology, the field of science that invented vaccination. I joined this field for my research dissertation while being a faithful believer in vaccination. I felt very adamantly that the established immunologic theory provides a strong scientific foundation and a rational justification for the practice of mass vaccination. Based on such textbook-instilled view, I saw no reason to question or scrutinize the proclaimed virtues of vaccination programs. Until one day… when I had to come to terms with an eye-opening personal realization that the immunologic theory of lifelong vaccine immunity does not pan out in real life, that my professional stance on vaccination had been constructed on falsehood.

As if to make me "see" the truth for myself, Mother Nature has put me through an experience of contracting measles and whooping cough despite being fully vaccinated for these childhood diseases. Neither immunologic theory nor my extensive training in immunologic laboratory research had prepared me to understand why this happened to me, a person with no apparent defects in antibody production or any immuno-deficiencies. But I was not content to leave my experience unexplained.

http://www.tetyanaobukhanych.com/blog/my-journey-of-disillusionment



Avoiding the Smallpox Vaccine - St. Jude Hospital’s warning (Shedding)

Any person with a weakened immune system, including patients with cancer or HIV infection should NOT receive the smallpox vaccine. People who have close contact with a person having any of these conditions also should not get the smallpox vaccine. That means parents, siblings and caregivers of St. Jude patients should not be immunized against smallpox. St. Jude patients could catch the virus by touching a person who has been immunized or by touching objects that have been touched by a person who received the vaccine.

https://www.stjude.org/treatment/patient-resources/before-arrival/avoiding-the-smallpox-vaccine.html



Marcella On Glyphosate in Vaccines

It was recently discovered that glyphosate is found in vaccines that are injected into our children. Should we be worried?!? Marcella Piper-Terry talks about this frightening new discovery.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AJNzGKFG7c&feature=youtu.be



Quote from RFK, Jr.’s World Mercury Project page…

"People ask me why are you doing this...this isn't what I wanted to do. I had a choice of either putting my head down and walking away from and pretending I didn't see it or getting involved...and I have taken those risks and I have endured what came along with it but, I've endured it happily because I believe if I can spare one kid from getting this injury...these companies are stealing that from them...that is assault and battery, it's child abuse, in some cases it's even worse. I feel like I didn't have any choice but to get involved with this fight...I'm going to fight it till the end, and I am not going to stand down, I am not going to give up. I'm going to fight for you, I'm going to fight for your children and I need your support because the forces I am up against are forces that have been able to compromise every major institution in our democracy, and the people who stand up against them get crushed but, I know how to fight them because I've spent a lifetime fighting big shots and fighting bullets...and fighting the greedy, greedy bullies and that's who we're dealing with today, people who have that errogance of power, people who believe they can get away with anything including destroying the lives of our children and I'm not going to let them do that and I'm going to fight till the last day of my life to the last bit of energy I have to make sure that we get justice for these children...produce a healthy generation of American children that doesn't have this epidemic of neurological and other injuries, and that we have good science, transparent science, a robust regulator that's independent from the industry that they're supposed to regulate and we may never have honest politicians in this country, they're always going to be compromised by money but we deserve good regulators, we deserve good science and we deserve healthy children and that's what I'm going to fight for...please give me your support..." https://worldmercuryproject.org/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7S5lJ_DKrXw



VACCINES, GOVERNMENT & BIG PHARMA'S DIRTY MONEY - 2015

Exclusive: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. shares truths establishment newspapers wouldn't touch

http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/vaccines-government-big-pharmas-dirty-money/#6P3tUX54Sz1iJGz0.99



If only half of America is properly vaccinated, where are the epidemics?

While herd immunity may not exist, herd mentality most definitely does. Health authorities, media commentators, and schools and their parent–teacher associations waste no opportunity in perpetuating this myth. Proponents have done such a thorough job of convincing the public that a parent who questions it is treated like someone who thinks the earth is flat or believes climate change is a conspiracy. On the contrary: an unprejudiced view of the science about vaccines, and an examination of history, clearly show that the herd immunity theory is—and always has been—flawed.

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/h...d-where-are-the



Former Merck Rep Says Mandatory Vaccination Is For Profit and Not Public Health

Brandy Vaughan is a former sales rep for Merck & Co. - a vaccine maker - and she details how vaccine companies are using vaccines as a vehicle for massive profit and not public health. Brandy researched the safety of vaccines and found that not only do vaccines contain known toxins that can cause neurological damage, but that vaccine makers do not create the same safety studies for vaccines as they do for other drugs. This lack of true safety research of vaccines combined with the known adverse reactions to vaccination has helped Brandy to decide to never vaccinate her own child. Brandy says giving children a vaccine is like playing Russian roulette with our children and that mandatory vaccination is simply a way for vaccine makers to profit off of our children. Don’t be fooled: we do not need mandatory vaccination.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUduiwgHMQs



Dr. Andrew Moulden: Learning to Identify Vaccine Damage

http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-andrew-moulden-learning-to-identify-vaccine-damage/



The Refusal to Vaccinate form

https://parentsaganinstmandatoryvaccines.net/2015/08/18/do-not-sign-the-refusal-to-vaccinate-form/



Measles, Back In The Days Before The Marketing Of The Vaccine

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDb0ZS3vB9g



Afraid of an educated public?

Fake News 101? Lawmakers want California schools to teach students how to evaluate what they read on the web

http://www.latimes.com/politics/essentia...-htmlstory.html
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494239 --- 01/17/17 10:46 PM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY
Episode 8

Part 3 interview with Dr. Brian Hooker and Premiere of “Trace Amounts”

What is thimerosal? From Trace Amounts page…

Thimerosal is a poison, neurotoxin, cancer-causer, and can interrupt the immune system and the normal development of an unborn baby or a child. Thimerosal is so toxic that putting it on your skin is illegal. However, the government not only allows but also defends its injection into the population, especially pregnant women and newborn children, as part of influenza vaccines currently recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

http://traceamounts.com/ten-lies-told-about-mercury-in-vaccines/


In part 2 of Hooker's interview in Episode 7, Hooker talked about how he got involved with CDC scientist William Thompson. Hooker had many phone calls with Thompson and Thompson started sending him documents. He wanted to be able to prove this, so he made four phone calls to Thompson in states that allowed calls to be recorded. He felt he had do this so that he would be believed. In the documentary, Vaxxed, they play some of these recorded conversations. http://vaxxedthemovie.com/watch/

Hooker talked about the cover up of the link between the MMR vaccine and autism. The top people at the cdc called a meeting and everyone was to bring all their copies of this study and they were told to put it in the trash can provided in the room. Dr. Thompson kept a copy of the study, including an electronic copy.

I'm hoping to get my hands on the part 2 transcript.


Part 3 of Dr. Hooker's interview:

Dr. G is Dr. Patrick Gentempo, Dr. H is Dr. Brian Hooker.

Dr. G: In your conversations with Dr. Thompson the autism issue wasn't the only issue that came out, there's an issue with mercury and tics …

Dr. H: It's very interesting when you go to CDC's website and they have a specific website on thimerosal what they report is that there is no incidence of harm and that there is no harm caused by thimerosal except for occasional redness and swelling at the injection site . Nothing could be further from the truth and we don't have to go to independent literature to find that out. We go to CDC's literature. Thompson wrote a study that was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2007 and he looked at neurotypical kids, these are kids with no developmental delays, no malities, their ages were somewhere between 6 and 10 I believe and what they did is that they split the group into a high exposure group that had thimerosal vaccines and a low exposure group that had a lesser amount of thimerosal and they looked at all of these different psychological and neurological battery tests and what they found was a very, very profound difference in the number of boys that had tics in the high thimerosal group versus the numbers of boys that had tics in the low thimerosal group. ...It was statistically significant the relative risk was above 2.0 which means that it would argue in a court of law, so boys that were receiving the lion's share of thimerosal in their vaccines were at least twice as likely to have tics and show tics ... evaluated by an independent professional ...this isn't just due to parental reporting but an independent professional who’s trained to see these types of issues was observing these children over a three hour period and those that exhibited tics again the high thimerosal group had a lot more tics in boys than the low thimerosal group. The study that they didn't do they didn't have enough thimerosal control, so you could imagine if you had a control that wasn't exposed to mercury at all that the difference would probably be significant....Not only, the Thompson study came out in 2007 but the Verstratten study that the CDC used to bury the connection between vaccines and autism had a corollary... and it basically said that in one of the ... tested they showed a strong relationship, statistically significant again, between thimerosal exposure and tics.

The CDC had a hand in a UK study they were actually ultimately responsible for the funding decision for the UK study where they came out in 2004 that also showed a relationship again between thimerosal and tics and this time they looked at boys and girls together, they didn't separate them out but it was statistically significant. Add on to that another study that Thompson did, he was extremely emphatic that thimerosal was causing tics especially in boys and so he did another study in 2012 that was published with a graduate student by the name of Jack Bareil ... and again a strong statistically significant relationship between thimerosal and tics in boys.

In what he described was this systematic watering down of any result that he had if there was a statistical significance. ... He described it to me on the phone and he also shared documentation where there were memos written about his paper specifically on why he should not publish the result on thimerosal and tics. A chief CDC official, his name was Ed Travatan who was in the National Immunization program basically came down hard on Thompson and said you will not publish this result unless you can have a tic expert verify the result and basically what Dr. Travatan was trying to do was trying to dissuade Thompson from publishing the results in the first place. He wanted it in the background, he wanted it to never see the light of day.

Dr. G: And if you're called upon you have the documentation to support what you're asserting…

Dr. H: Oh, absolutely, yea I have the documentation, I also have Dr. Tonya Popavic who used to be the Associate Director for Science for the entire CDC. She was like one of the number two in the second tier but directly below the CDC director who said that what Thompson had to do was empathize the non statically significant relationship, those things that showed that thimerosal wasn't in the clear and downplay those few relationships that showed that thimerosal was causing harm.

Dr. G: So top level officials at the CDC directed him to downplay the relationship that he was observing in his research?


Dr. H: That is correct and it was so transparent that Dr. Thompson with his 2012 paper he went to the Journal of the American Medical Association and tried to get it published there ... The reception that he got from the peer reviewers was laughable. They basically said when CDC tries...sees a relationship that they don't like they try to downplay it, they try to do everything in their power basically to convince the public that this isn't a true statistically significant relationship even though it is.

Dr. G: So the peer reviewers saw that the paper was attempting to water it down and they basically said we're not buying it.


Dr. H: They're not publishing it, so they had to go to a second tier journal in order to get that research published. The Journal of the American Medical Association basically called foul on the CDC .

Dr. G: Now in your recorded conversation with Dr. Thompson do you talk about this mercury issue in tics and does he talk about what happened?


Dr. H: Not only do we talk about the relationship between mercury and tics but he also wanted me to launch a campaign basically suing CDC science against them showing, hey there are four publications that have CDC direct ties that shows that mercury causes tics in boys, why is this still in the flu shot.


Dr. G: So if you were to interpret the dynamics of the circumstance, basically this guy is having private conversations with you and he’s saying they're not letting me reveal what I have found in my research. Can you please get that data and get it out to the world? So do you feel that he was having an issue of conscience trying to do the right thing even though he was in an environment that would not permit it?


Dr. H: Absolutely, he wanted the truth to be revealed. He wanted the truth to be revealed about mercury and tics. He wanted the truth to be known about the MMR and autism and the day my paper was published, that MMR paper was published, he said he called me up and he said, you have vindicated me, the results are out. He figuratively breathed a sigh of relief that this thing that he had been hiding for all those years since 2001 was finally brought into the forefront and was actually published, and so it was a crisis of conscience for Dr. Thompson, he tried to alert chief cdc officials about these relationships and he was shut down summarily and instead of anybody, including all the way to the top, the CDC director at the time was Dr. Julie Gerbidin, shut him directly down and instead they made it an issue of his psychological state and said look, he's unstable, HR recommended that he get counseling, that he see a counseling psychologist, and that's traditionally what the CDC does. If someone falls out of line and is not spewing the party line of this CDC, then they become a personnel problem

Dr. G: What does the CDC say as their signature on their emails "Saving Lives, Protecting People." ...that's their moniker, yet there's now documentary evidence that they're doing exactly the opposite of that and then when somebody mentally breaks down, because they have an issue of conscience as a scientist who's charged with finding the truth and can't reveal it, they now think they need counseling.

Dr. H: They need counseling, these are crazy people, so instead of saving lives and protecting people it's saving programs and protecting profits. Exactly, that is what they are trying to do. People need to understand CDC functions as a for profit company. They are taking money, taxpayer dollars, they're buying vaccines, they're distributing those vaccines to the state public health department and then they are getting reimbursed for that distribution. If vaccine rates fall off, CDC loses money.


Trace Amounts shows after Hooker’s interview…

Eric Gladen, filmmaker

“The more I researched, the more I couldn’t believe my eyes, and the more I knew there was no way I could just sit back and not do anything about this.

I quit my career, moved into an RV, hired a production crew, and hit the road for years attending Autism conferences, filming Autism rallies, performing experiments with Scientists, interviewing everyone and anyone who would talk to us, and so much more.
When the tour was over, I spent the next two years sifting through almost 300 hours of video footage, thousands of leaked documents, closed door meeting transcripts, and countless scientific studies.

It then took me another 3 years working with my post-production team to piece everything together into what has become the feature documentary film Trace Amounts.”

http://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/

http://traceamounts.com/

http://vaxxedthemovie.com/watch/
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494269 --- 01/18/17 09:30 PM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY

Episode 9 now showing

You will have the treat of hearing from Sayer Ji again! Make sure and catch what he says about “hazmat suits” in doctors offices in the first 5 minutes.

And…

What about the most controversial vaccine of all time… Gardasil.

You’ll be appalled when you hear what Brian Hooker (quickly becoming a watcher favorite) has to say about that @ 22:32 in this episode.

And tonight - what a treat: I have the honor of introducing you to Dr. Heather Wolfson. Interestingly, Heather is married to Dr. Jack Wolfson - a Board-Certified Cardiologist.

Dr. Heather Wolfson has a view on health and healing that will really reel you in and wait until you hear how Dr. Jack Wolfson was vilified for his atypical views on medicine @ 49:14.

As a parent, you’ll connect with the message.

AND FINALLY

And, this is what you’ve overwhelmingly been clamoring for.

I can’t even count the number of messages, emails and reaching out that you’ve done, with this singular question:

Dr. Gentempo - “So what do I do now?”

Well, you are in for a real treat. Dr. Dan Pompa - a Cellular Detox Expert will be talking expressly about this issue - for those of you who’ve had those questions.

You’ll be leaning in for this one.

http://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494270 --- 01/19/17 12:30 AM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY
Episode 9: Part 4, Dr. Brian Hooker

Dr. G: So, Dr. Hooker, you're a research scientist, your Ph.D. is in biochemical engineering and you know something about toxicity especially because a lot of your career was spent cleaning up the environment from toxins. What can you say to us about Gardasil and what's in Gardasil and what you think of that particular vaccine?

Dr. H: The Gardasil vaccine is loaded with aluminum, upwards to 750 micrograms of aluminum per shot, okay, and they're giving the Gardasil vaccine down to girls and boys of 9 years of age...nine years old, there are some pediatricians, some physicians are giving it as early as 9 years of age. Aside from the fact that Gardasil was never really tested on that population, aluminum does not belong in human body. It just doesn't, there is no purpose for it, it has been tied to amnioplax (spelling?) in the brain, it is increases risks of neurological difficulties, the immune system doesn't know what to do with the aluminum atom, and so what we're doing is through a series of shots we're introducing not micrograms but milligrams of this toxic substance into girls and boys. It's incidents and we're seeing that Gardasil is having the highest amount of adverse reactions reported of any other vaccine that's on the market. It is truly a dirty vaccine. Now if you look at the number of reports of adverse events of Gardasil it is similar to the number of reports of adverse events to the birth control pill Yaz. Yaz was on the market several years ago and there were over 13,000 reports of adverse events from Yaz and so the FDA made the decision to pull Yaz out of the market, okay. Gardasil has been on the market since 2007 and it's far eclipse adverse event reporting that was made in conjunction with the Yaz but yet instead of pulling Gardasil out of off the market, or trying to do rational testing or trying to change the formulation to eliminate aluminum exposure, instead what they're doing is now they're looking at trials to give Gardasil at birth, so instead of giving Gardasil to a 9, 10, 11 year old child, they're giving it to, they want to ultimately give Gardasil to an infant.

Dr. G: So, let me get this straight, it has the highest reporting of adverse reactions events of any vaccine,

Dr. H: that is correct.

Dr. G: and the reaction to that is not only keep it on the market, but to now give it to infants instead, or in addition.

Dr. H: In addition to give it to infants. In the public health community a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, and so if they can get that baby at a well baby visit then they feel like they're going to have better vaccine compliance if they can pop that into an infant rather than trying to coax an adolescent and their families to come to a physician, so that's why they're doing it.

Dr. G: Why do they put aluminum in them in these vaccines, what's the purpose of it from a say if you're a vaccine advocate here's why we put aluminum in them?

Dr. H: Aluminum in the formulation in vaccines basically stimulates a non specific immune response. So if you ad it, it's called an adjuvant and when you ad an adjuvant to vaccines that drastically magnifies the immune response that the antigen, the HPV virus partical that's in that vaccine that drastically increases the response and it basically tricks the immune system into thinking that it has a bigger problem then it actually has. The problem with that is when you trick the immune system in that you get a prolonged immune response and you get an immune response that's improper for the human body. Not only does Gardasil when you have the quadravalent Gardasil that has four different types of the human papa...virus and then you have the 9 valiant vaccine that has 9 different types, not only is that completely unnatural in the way that the human immune system responds, we just don't, in nature we don't inject antigens directly into our body, 4 at a time, 9 at a time, that's completely improper, that's not how the immune system works but now we ad an adjuvant like aluminum, that drastically magnifies the response so the response is prolonged, the response is much more severe so you start to see auto immune immunity in the men and women that are getting this vaccine.

Dr. G: Wow, and if they have the adjuvant does that mean they could reduce the amount of antigen and save some money?

Dr. H: If they have the adjuvant literally there is another adjuvant that's used in vaccines called squalene and the term for squalene inside the CDC is Hamburger Helper because it can extend it. You can take a small amount of antigen and you can add adjuvant to it and it will magnify the response so that so you can save money, you hit the nail on the head, you can save money by adding that aluminum which is completely toxic to human physiology.

As soon as I get the full transcript, I will post it.
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494320 --- 01/19/17 09:58 PM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY

We heard you.

So many of you have written in worried about missing the final episode - episode 9. The episode that brings everything together.

Well, We’re keeping it up one more day! - So, you have a few more hours to catch that important episode information.

http://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/

***I have the transcript from the last interview coming shortly.
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494324 --- 01/20/17 08:59 AM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY
Here's your chance to see all the interviews. Available through the weekend.

TONIGHT: Starting at 6pm PST watch any of the episodes you missed and replay all the ones that you loved! You must be registered to get the email link to the replay page. Tag a friend who needs to see this or missed out the first time.

www.vaccinesrevealed.com
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494325 --- 01/20/17 10:40 AM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY
Just my opinion:

Dr. Pompa's interview was my favorite because he put everything together that I've been trying to teach a sick family member. All of these chemicals and ingredients together causes a storm of illnesses in the body. I wish he had spoke of his specific illnesses, but some of the illnesses he's talking about can include: Gerd Acid Reflux, Iritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), Fibromyalgia, Psoriasis, pain everywhere, brain fog, Lupus, light and sound sensativity, anxiety, Chrones, food allergies, excellerated aging, infertility, organ damage (gallbladder, when did we ever hear years ago of twenty year olds needing to get their gallbladder removed), fibroids (tumors) and ammenhoria (severe bleeding) in women (Seralini's rat study - tumors).

My other favorites were RFK, Jr.'s interview and Dr. Tenpenny's admission that she was responsible for putting a father in jail for SIDS while his child lay dieing, she knew now that it was the vaccine that killed the child and Dr. Pompa stating that there was Thimerosal in contact lens solution.

I hope folks will take the opportunity to watch these interviews that are available all weekend. It's a total of 9 episodes from 1 1/2 to 2 hours, so get started early. Do not miss Dr. Hooker's interviews about his contact with the CDC whistleblower.


Last interview on Episode 9

Part of Dr. Dan Pompa, Cellular Detox Expert interview by Dr. Patrick Gentempo

Dr. P: I'm Dr. Dan Pompa, I really became known for my cellular detox work which really came out of my own story, so from pain to purpose is what I love to say and now I'm blessed to train doctors around the country to do what I do.

Dr. G: So Dan you've had quite a journey in your life that's led you where you are today, can you give us your background and what brought you into your interest in being able to do detox and detox the body from things like vaccines.

Dr. P: Yea, you know I mean it wasn't something that I sat down and thought here's a great career, right I'm just gonna to do cellular detox work. No, it really came out of my own story as you said, I really at the best shape of my life, honestly, we just had two boys, life couldn't be better, a thriving practice at the time and all of a sudden fatigue out of nowhere and I guess if it was just that it would have been simple but it went from fatigue to anxiety, sleep problems, couldn't get to sleep, wake up and I couldn't get back to sleep, debilitating anxiety even at that time, and then I became allergic to everything I ate, so like many other people I'm sure even watching this it was like this food and that food and then I became chemically sensitive where I couldn't even leave my environment without getting sick so life as I knew it came to a screeching halt, I mean my hair got thin, I mean I wasn't healing normally, I couldn't even adapt to even normal stresses like sound, let alone a crying baby where my wife would have to take the child and go and, my adrenals were shot, my thyroid was shot, but when I would address those things it would seem like some things would get better but other things not so well, they would get worse. So life as I knew it changed.

Dr. G: It seems somewhat explicable, it's like where did this come from.

Dr. P: I didn't know at the time and I went from being very healthy, I was in the best shape of my life and two young kids as I said and all of a sudden this comes out of no where. Years later, after suffering for many years, I realized the source which was mercury.

Dr. G: How did you finally figure out that you had mercury toxicity that was causing all these really strange symptoms in your body?

Dr. P: After some years of researching I mean when you can't sleep in the middle of the night you know you get some of your best work done and by the way I was like I was dyslexic as a child so I had this photographic very odd good memory that I developed through it I'm sure, but that went to waste in my illness. I started not being able to do that but at times it would come and I would be able to learn and read research. I came across Mad Hatters disease and if you recall what that is but people making felt hats they used mercury to attenuate molds and other things that would happen in the felt and they became known as Mad Hatters. Well that was me, I okay this is me, I went down I got a blood test and it came out negative. I was devastated. A year or so later I became friends with an endocrinologist Brian... great guy, and I knew my thyroid... wasn't working well, and body temperatures were so low and he said you know Dan I think you have mercury poisoning, just based on your body temperatures, the hormone disregulation that you have. I said I thought so too. I got tested, I was negative. He said what test did you do. I said a blood test. That was that was the wrong test. That's good for acute mercury poisoning but not so good for chronic. I think you have chronic poisoning. Where do you think I got it. He said did you have any dental work done around the time this happened and I thought I might because I had a gold filling put in and they drilled out an amalgam filling, I still had six. By the way, the amalgam fillings fifty percent mercury in the filling and so I said well, I called my best friend who actually did the work, got the date, it was days after that actually my symptoms started. I just never put it together, I thought it was the anestetic, who knows but that's when it started and then it just built from there. In no doubt I had been accumulating it through out my life time through vaccinations, my father slathered me in Merthiolate. Another source was saline solution was the number one adult source . It was actually Thimerosal was put in the saline solution all the way through 70's, 80's, 90's, then it was outlawed.

Dr. G: Wow, so the mercury poisoning that you experienced, which created all these debilitating things for you personally, is this going on with people who are getting vaccinated .. with vaccines that contain Thimerosal?

Dr. P: Oh, there's no dought, I said I got to experience what a damaged child on the autism spectrum would see, except my brain was already developed but literally not dealing with sound, you know the sensitivities that I developed, just the inability even to look people in the eyes, that shyness, I found out later is called Mercurialism, where literally you just lose this socialibility. I didn't want to leave my home, trust me.

Dr. G: Mercurialism, I've never heard that before.

Dr. P: Yea, it's literally known as this shyness, ...I wouldn't call myself an extrovert like my wife but I definitely was more outgoing and I went from that to where I couldn't even look people in the eye, I didn't even want to have social interaction, I was autistic in an adult body.

Dr. G: ...you felt that kind of withdrawal .. where you don't want to be out and sounds can bother you, etc. Now that you discovered this, I guess in once sense it's like good at least there's an explanation for what I'm experiencing.

Dr. P: Yea, exactly I just got goosebumps right now, it's certain things in your story, it just brings you back but through it my wife had said look God is not only going to help you and take you through this but He's going to take a message to the world through you and at that time, ...because at that time I didn't see that, I couldn't see that. At that time, it was I didn't want to live, honestly I didn't and that was that bad. I couldn't imagine living life like that, I would have rather have died and there was times, believe me, I thought that was the easy way and she would remind me of that and honestly I would get angry at her because I would think if you only knew what I felt like, I'd get angry because of her hope that she had but that came to fruition. I came through it, I learned what I learned ... what I teach today it came out of that pain. So my mantra has become from pain to purpose.

Dr. G: And so now what you have figured out is how to detox a body that has been poisoned with heavy metals that vaccines contain because you know we spend a lot of time in this program in Vaccines Revealed talking about damage, how the damage occurs, mercury, aluminum, etc. the combination of these things, how the body responds to it, different milestones in development... All of these things have been discussed but really it's very critical because it might be one thing for people to say wow glad I found out about this in time I'm not vaccinating my kids but the majority of people out there have been vaccinated and kids have been vaccinated and they're probably experiencing these vague symptoms like you are describing. It's one thing when you have a very overt, wow, immediate cause and effect, vaccine reaction but it's another thing when it's a little bit more insidious a little more subtle and then you start, people try to tell you you're crazy and they think there's something psychologically wrong with you as compared to biologically wrong with you so in this case now I think it's critical that we talk about the fact that there's hope for people who have been damaged, that they can somehow detox these heavy metals, these poisons or toxins out of their body so what exactly happens kind of on the cellular level and then what is the processes that you recommend so that people can improve themselves?

Dr. P: You said a lot of amazing things there, I'm coming out of my skin because number one just because you don't get damage after vaccination does not mean that you're not damaged. We take these kids, they didn't end up on the autism spectrum but if we understand what's happening right now with autoimmune most of it is undiagnosed and most people have it at some level. And one autoimmune builds on another. This is a the real epidemic. These kids that are being vaccinated today, when you talk about it, there are some generational things that are happening, right, but we are having an explosion yes of autism related disorders which by the way is considered autoimmune but, we're having all these children and people later that are developing autoimmune conditions. We, our generation, didn't get nearly the vaccinations, right, but yet in the 30's, and 40's and 50's we're seeing an explosion of autoimmune.

Look, they're toxic but they stimulate the wrong immune system, they stimulate and activate a type two reaction (or "type of reaction" a little inaudible), which is an emergency reaction so with every vaccine you're training the body to over react into autoimmune, not to mention the nuerotoxins. You know all of these things can turn on genes of autoimmune, we all have them, so we don't get the condition because you have the gene, you get the condition because the gene is turned off. So look the bottom line is this you know that's a big thing that we have to understand is that people have been conditioned to think that we never thought it was the bio accumulation of toxins and stressors to our lifetime through the vaccines, the flu shots, whatever it is, that's one thing I have a pet peev of detox okay, because today I think people realize the need for the detox and it's in vogue, if you will, but most people do it wrong so I was getting my life back you know it was years and understanding and researching really what detox is to what I teach today. It has to be a cellular detox.
You have to go up to the level of the cell to really that's where true detox is. So I became known what I call is true cell detox because that's what it is. So I have nothing against colon cleanses, there's a lot of different things, the liver cleanse, this ten day cleanse, I mean there all over the market but, their fine, I have nothing against those detoxes but the point is, is that they're down stream from where the real problem is and that's the cell so real detox you have to getthe cell doing what the cell does naturally.

Dr. G: So you're saying that it benefits these organ detoxes but you're saying that it's got to get down to a cellular level (Dr. P: Absolutely) in order for it to truly detox these poisons or toxins out of the system.

Dr. P: When you look at what was damaged on me, when you look at what's damaged in an autistic child, it's a cellular issue. Yes certain genes get turned on even because the cell itself is not able to get rid of the toxins that are now accumulating in the cell turning on bad genes but when the cell membrane gets damaged the mitochondria gets damaged. These things are all needed in the normal process of a cell getting rid of toxins. That's what you have to fix, so I don't care how much of these herbals that you take, things like Chlorella, they're actually weak binders anyway. You have to get the cell doing what it should be doing, that's real detox and that happens in three phases. We do a prepatory phase where we prepare the down stream pathways like the gut, the liver, the kidneys and the cell and then we have to use what I like to call true binders to make sure that the toxins once the cell starts actually up regulating its detox, that we bring the toxins all the way out of the body. That's real detox. So we have a prep phase, we have a body phase and we ultimately have a brain phase where we have to go deep enough with the cellular detox to where it matters. I got my life back by detoxing my brain and that's the key, that's what people are missing. You know it's that deep level brain detox that really is how we're going to change and make a difference in all those conditions, not just autism.

.Dr. G: So basically the problem is when we say ...aluminum, mercury, they have these adverse affects and it can lead to really devastating your health and your life moving forward but, the key is so you're saying if we going to get, reverse that process to whatever degree it can be reversed, it's a matter that this stuff is in the cells and that's where you have to take it out and mercury does accumulate in the brain (Dr. P: Absolutely), so it's a matter of saying hey, we've got to get this stuff out of the body and use the term binder so it's a matter of having things that can get to the cell, (Dr. P: Absolutely) bind with the heavy metal and pull it out and take it out of the body.

Dr. P: There's been some amazing breakthroughs in this and that we have some things that are true binders and that's key because most of the herbals are not true binders. They're not but they're able to cross into these membranes, the cell membranes as well as the blood brain barrier and actually be able to be a vehicle that doesn't let go of something like a heavy metal is very difficult to remove and make sure it moves all the way out of the body so when you put it in a system, what I call a true cellular detox, you know that's the magic, I mean that's really how you get people's lives back and you know I have to, you know I said that there's something happening today. The need to get into the brain into that deeper tissue is key. We were exposed, we grew up in the mercury generation. You know I jokingly said my father slathered me in Merthiolate which actually contained mercury, remember that stuff, that was mercury right there, the Mercurochrome and then the contact lens fluids. Thimerosal was in more than that and these were just some of the examples. Thimerosal has ethyl mercury that stuff goes right into the brain and I'm sure some of your folks have talked about that but you know then the Lead generation. We grew up with Lead gasoline. I mean it's like Lead in all the paint. Guess where most of it went, in the bones of our parents, guess what, when mom is pregnant, out comes the Lead. During pregnancy it's natural to lose bone but they lose Lead and guess what, it is going into the children. There's a study, called the Duress study where they looked at the number of fillings in mom's mouth, was proportional to how much mercury they were finding on autopsies in baby's brains. So got mom's amalgam mercury, then the Lead. So out of mom comes the Lead into the baby. That was our generation.

Today, there's a new problem, Glyphosate. Glyphosate is the ingredient in Roundup in so many different herbicides today and pesticides . So Glyphosate according to studies, Stephanie Seneff, I think you're interviewing her, right? She was one of the first to show that Glyphosate allows these nuerotoxins like mercury and Lead to cross deeper into the brain.

Dr. G: So basically Glyphosate which is almost ubiquitous now, if you're not eating organic stuff, if you have gmo foods, right, it's almost like saying it's opening the door saying come on in. (Dr. P: Oh, yea.) So the body doesn't it typically trys to keeps this stuff out, but your saying that this chemical that's sprayed all over the place is something that invites in these toxins, so it amplifies the affect.

Dr. P: Absolutely. It's breaking down the gut barrier, so it's allowing more toxins to cross the gut, but remember the gut barrier is very similar to the blood brain barrier. It's opening that up and it's allowing these toxins to cross deeper Not to mention it's creating disruption in the microbiome, the good bacteria, which is affecting detox, hormones, neurotransmitters, I mean the whole thing, the immune system, but, so I mean it is a three prong destruction that's occurring, I mean it's so much damage at the cellular level.

Dr. G: So we kind of have this perfect toxic storm in today's world so, and you could see any one of these things, vaccination could be just in and of itself a bad thing, but we take vaccines, you take the mom's amalgam, you take the Glyphosate that's being ingested and you start putting all these things together and you're whipping up quite a cocktail here that our gnome has no reference point for it to even try to adapt to it.

Dr. P: It's a perfect storm ... you had three storms come together and catastrophic storm occurs, right, that's what's happening. So you know I think it's going to be very difficult ever to say vaccines is the cause of autism. Well look, you know we could debate that til the cow's come home but when we look at what's happening, we know that it's a part of it, but it's these perfect storms are happening.

Hepatitis B vaccine, it has 200 times the amount of aluminum that they consider safe when they give a baby an IV, so what's the difference, what's the difference, we're injecting in IV, so why's your standard one thing here and we're giving it 200 times more in a vaccination?

I mean, so point is, is this amount of nuerotoxins with something that already in utero they're being exposed to Glyphosate, you know we find it in mother's breast milk, opening up the blood brain barrier, allowing these nuerotoxins to cross in. When you look at a statistic that possibly if things remain the same by 2032, one out of two kids are going to be on the autism spectrum. It seems impossible until you explain this, you know this perfect storm, that's happening

Dr. G: That's the way the graph is charting, right?

Dr. P: That's the graph it's charting, maybe it's going to get better, who knows, but when I heard that statistic even myself I said wait a minute that sounds hard to believe but when you think about what's happening with the perfect storm with this generation you say, I could see it.

Dr. G: I know you developed detox protocols that now there's hundreds of providers throughout the world that are incorporating, but somebody who's watching this at home right now whose been vaccinated, my kids been vaccinated, I'm relating to what your saying, what types of actions can they take to try to remedy their situation?

Dr. P: You know one of the game changers for me if you understand when I started researching the cellular membrane it's so many things happened. You know the cell membrane is key. I really think that Bruce Lipton really identified that life happens on the membrane, you know everything happens on the membrane. Intelligence resides in this membrane (Dr. G: There's a brain in the membrane.) Right, if you understand, I don't want to bore people with too much science but if it's literally how our nerve system comes from a membrane and there lies the intelligence but that membrane allows the good stuff into the cell but it also when it's functioning properly allows the toxins to come out. When that gets compromised, I think most people watching has heard inflammation is the cause of everything. I mean right but we're not talking about inflammation of your sore shoulder, but inflammation of every cell. That membrane becomes inflamed. Now it doesn't function the way it should. Bad genes get turned on, to turn them off we have to fix the membrane. Bruce Lipton that's a lot of his work.

To detox, if you don't fix that membrane the cell doesn't detox so, I developed something I call my five R's on how to fix a cell. It became a road map that I teach practitioners on what to do to fix a cell. R number 2 is regenerating that cell membrane. Fats are key, everybody should be paying attention to fats. When I started increasing fats in my diet, even real butter, grass fed butter, Arachidonic acid is a fat that I think most people think that's a bad one right, well we know it stabilizes the membrane. So you take something like Arachidonic acid and many parents say they are just loading up their child on fish oil and they are forgetting about if you don't have enough Arachidonic acid, fish oil actually becomes dangerous. So increasing some of these fats from grass fed meats and actually butter, could really be a game changer.

Today what we have happening in the autistic world, even the general population that eats healthy, they are taking fish oils and they're creating something called Omega 3 dominance. So imagine, so we're doing a few things wrong here. Like everyone's taking probiotic ... bacteria creating disbiosis. Everybody's taking fish oils thinking this is great creating something called Omega 3 dominance. So the point is that increase your good fats. Don't be afraid of the saturated fats, they help stabilize the membrane to. Cholesterol, there's a fat that people fear I would think.

Dr. G: Many times practitioners give drugs to try to inhibit the production of it.

Dr. P: Absolutely, so these fats from real foods, grass fed foods, grass fed butters, fantastic. You know I'm not against fish oil, but I like it in fish and if you get a fish oil, be selective and, we rotate those in. We don't keep people on them because you know we're searching for certain ratios. So diet does play a role, even putting people into ketosis is key. We know ketones, by the way they are a product of fat matabolism so as you break fat down you make something called ketones, they change the brain, they can heal the brain, that's what the science shows, they can even turn off bad genes. So changing people and getting their cells to burn fat is a majority energy source is called ketosis and that can also be a really healing property from those ketones.

Dr. G: So if I'm a mom right now and I want to try and help my kids in this way one thing that I can do is get butter from grass fed cows (Dr. P: Absolutely.) meat from grass fed cows and get more natural sources such as some of these things fish oil as compared to having them extracted. (Dr. P: Absolutely.) and put that together that these can help heal and regenerate and detox.

Dr. P: And don't forget ... we like coconut oil, we like medium chain fats, olive oils, the mono fat, you know get a variety of...but adding these fats into the diet sounds like an obvious thing or a small thing, but it really is key to fixing the membrane and fixing this brain all at the same time.

Dr. G: Anything else that you would give advice for to somebody whose watching .. right in the household I can do this which would help?

Dr. P: Well removing source, remember I said I have the 5 R's. R number one is remove the sources, obviously remove the sources from the brain.

Dr. G: So eat non gmo foods so you're not getting the Glyphosate?

Dr. P: Right, but remove the sources from your life. Look at the cleaning supplies that your using. It's so easy to do it natural these days. I mean you can make your own for goodness sake, but you know we're eating organic, especially in things like grains if you're going to eat grains because they're sprayed with that Glyphosate, all the grains are sprayed unless your 100 percent. Grain, by the way taking grains away is another good tip because a fast way to down regulate cellular inflammation is to control glucose and insulin. Taking grains away actually can do that faster, believe it our not, even than sugar . It just seems to take more of the inflammation out faster. Then you should take sugars away too, processed sugar, but grains have a big impact because there's a lot of things in grains, not just gluten, that is leaking across a leaky gut that is driving inflammation and autoimmune.

Dr. G: Well I think those are some great advice and I'm sure people can search online about getting deeper into some of these things but like you said removing things that are facilitating the problems that you have and adding some things like healthy fats could make a big difference in people's lives.
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494373 --- 01/20/17 02:04 PM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY

Available all weekend, starting at 6 pm tonight...

VACCINES REVEALED | EPISODE GUIDE &#11088;

Episode 1 –
Andrew Wakefield, Gary Goldman, Toni Bark
TOPICS:
• The Autism/Vaccine Connection
• Chickenpox
• Unknown Dangers of Vaccines

Episode 2 –
Suzanne Humphries, Sayer Ji, Mary Holland
TOPICS:
• The overview of vaccines and the history of vaccine use
• General Vaccine information
• Legal Vaccine Overview
• The Vaccine Court

Episode 3 – (Includes “Vaxxed” Movie Presentation)
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Scott and Melissa Miller
TOPICS:
• The Anthrax Vaccine and its devastation on our military
• Mercury in Vaccines – Thimerosal

Episode 4 –
Brian Hooker, Dawn Loughborough, Sara Bridges
TOPICS:
• Autism
• Vaccine Injury
• Political Activism
• CDC Fraud

Episode 5 –
James Chestnut, Kelly Brogan, Sayer Ji, Gary Goldman, Stephanie Seneff
TOPICS:
• Aluminum
• Gardasil
• Flu Vaccine
• Vaccine and Big Pharma Fraud

Episode 6 – (Includes “Vaccines Syndrome” Movie Presentation)
Brian Hooker
TOPICS:
• Vaccine Injury
• Fraud
• Aluminum & Mercury
• Autism Epidemic

Episode 7 –
Sherri Tenpenny, Patrick Gentempo, Gayle DeLong
TOPICS:
• Fraud/Corruption
• Flu Vaccine
• Vaccine Safety
• Financial Conflict of Interest
• National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Program

Episode 8 – (Includes “Trace Amounts” Movie Presentation)
Brian Hooker
TOPICS:
• CDC guidelines and cover-ups
• Vaccine Science and Realities
• Vaccine Schedule
• Autism Connection

Episode 9 –
Sayer Ji, Brian Hooker, Jack and Heather Wolfson, Dan Pompa
TOPICS:
• Vaccine Solutions

www.vaccinesrevealed.com

Look for your link in an email in your junk folder from Patrick Gentempo and don't miss Brian Hooker's interviews about the cdc whistleblower.
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494433 --- 01/21/17 02:15 PM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY
CDC Knew Its Vaccine Program Was Exposing Children to Dangerous Mercury Levels Since 1999 by RFK, Jr. & Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN

Uncovered documents show that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) knew that infant vaccines were exposing American children to mercury far in excess of all federal safety guidelines since 1999. The documents, created by a FDA consulting toxicologist, show how federal regulators concealed the dangerous impacts and lied to the public.

...

Seventeen years later, thanks to the FDA's 1999 sleight of hand, neurotoxic thimerosal, an unnecessary and dangerous vaccine preservative, continues to be injected into pregnant women, infants and children in the U.S. pursuant to the CDC's recommendations and, in much larger doses, into hundreds of millions of children across the developing world.

Sophocles wrote, "All men make mistakes, but a good man yields when he knows his course is wrong, and repairs the evil. The only crime is pride." The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Ruth Etzel, MD, gave similar advice to her fellow regulators immediately after the FDA toxicologist repeated the monumental error by vaccine safety officials:

"The AAP should be dedicated to promptly providing truthful information about this situation to pediatricians. We must follow three basic rules:

Act quickly to inform pediatricians that the products have more mercury than we realized.
Be open with consumers about why we didn't catch this earlier.

Show contrition.

"As you know, the Public Health Service informed us yesterday that they were planning to conduct business as usual and would probably express no preference for either product. While the Public Health Service may think that their 'product' is immunizations, I think their "product" is their recommendations. If the public loses faith in the PHS recommendations, then the immunization battle will falter. To keep faith, we must be open and honest now and move forward quickly to replace these products."

Ignoring Etzel's wise advice, the CDC elected to paper over their catastrophic mistake and double down on vaccine mercury. By continuing to allow thimerosal to be used in vaccines, the CDC is causing harm to American pregnant women, their growing babies and to 100 million children all over the planet. And now we have proof that our regulators know exactly what they are doing.

http://www.ecowatch.com/cdc-mercury-vaccines-kennedy-2199157054.html?page=2



Examining RFK Jr.'s claim that the CDC “Owns over 20 vaccine patents.” (With links to the patents, discussion on those patents in the comments section.)

Mr. Kennedy is in very safe territory by reporting that the CDC has over 20 patents that create vast, undisclosed conflicts of interests in vaccine safety. He is understating the problem by more than half.

This brief look at current patents held by the CDC deserves an in-depth review to determine exactly what current financial relationships with vaccine makers now exist and what the current impact those revenue streams are likely having on vaccine safety positions. Furthermore, one must closely look at the financial relationships between the CDC and vaccine makers it is currently courting, to include the potential exploitation of new patents for financial gain. These are merely a few lines of inquiry, among hundreds, needing to be examined and why the potential RFK commission on vaccine safety must be impaneled.

No wonder the vaccine industry (and let's not kid ourselves, CDC IS the vaccine industry) and their media outlets are fighting with such a fury to prevent the #RFKcommission from being formed.

Fortunately, Mr. Kennedy has already said he will fight this corruption against our children until his last breath, and we seem to have a new president who doesn't care what Pharma and the mainstream media throw at him. There is more than 20 years’ worth of documented abuse and corruption in the vaccine program that, if properly examined, would at the very least force reforms that would drastically reduce the profits of the industry.

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/examining-rfk-jrs-claim-cdc-owns-over-20-vaccine-patents
RFK Jr. on cdc, two minutes, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYQ39Q7w79I&feature=youtu.be



MMR vaccine strain of virus, found in the brain tissue of a child, who developed vaccine induced Autism

Deep sequencing reveals persistence of cell-associated mumps vaccine virus in chronic encephalitis

Abstract: Routine childhood vaccination against measles, mumps and rubella has virtually abolished virus-related morbidity and mortality. Notwithstanding this, we describe here devastating neurological complications associated with the detection of live-attenuated mumps virus Jeryl Lynn (MuVJL5) in the brain of a child who had undergone successful allogeneic transplantation for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). This is the first confirmed report of MuVJL5 associated with chronic encephalitis and highlights the need to exclude immunodeficient individuals from immunisation with live-attenuated vaccines. The diagnosis was only possible by deep sequencing of the brain biopsy. Sequence comparison of the vaccine batch to the MuVJL5 isolated from brain identified biased hypermutation, particularly in the matrix gene, similar to those found in measles from cases of SSPE. The findings provide unique insights into the pathogenesis of paramyxovirus brain infections. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1629-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication...ic_encephalitis



Seneff: “Wow, Tim! I am so thrilled that you have taken the time to draw together all of this material into one place and then to use your film-making skills to create a really engaging documentary packed full of useful information. I am hoping that everyone who watches this will realize that we now know what is causing the epidemic in autism. And I hope it goes viral. All we need now is to act on our knowledge to reverse the problem. I really hope President-elect Trump will find time to watch this documentary. It might be the most important thing he does in his presidency - especially if he can implement and enforce policy to fix the problem. America knows how to act swiftly to correct a problem once we've identified it. I hope we can make 2017 the year that we conquer autism! Make America great again! Ban glyphosate!&#65279;”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PW5Z1qMpQ8&feature=youtu.be



Blog post about RFK Jr's appointment from an attorney, Richard Jaffe, Esq.

HEY ROBERT KENNEDY JR: CONGRATS AND HERE’S A SUGGESTED FIRST TOPIC FOR THE VACCINE COMMISSION: ARE ALUMINUM ADJUVANTS IN CHILDHOOD VACCINES HARMING KIDS?

But Robert, there’s one thing you can do, and it will scare the bejesus out of them: shine a light on the growing body of scientific evidence on the dangers of vaccination which is being ignored, suppressed or altered. The thing they fear most is an open and public debate on these issues.And with your new gig, you can definitely shine a lot of light.

http://rickjaffeesq.com/2017/01/10/hey-r...s-harming-kids/



Seneff: “Mike Adams has some sobering statistics on the flu shot in America. I must be quite an outlier, having never had a flu shot!”

The flu shot is the most defective vaccine ever made – here’s proof

You may not want to hear it put this plainly, but vaccines, as administered today, are the most devastating form of chemical violence in the history of medicine. The annual flu vaccine is by far the most dangerous medical product in the world. Every month, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) updates their data on vaccine injury compensation, and you are about to read some very alarming statistics compiled and charted over the past decade. The reason why the flu vaccine is the most dangerous vaccine in the United States is because the government and the CDC push for all citizens, including infants, pregnant women and seniors, to be injected with neurotoxins every year. In fact, according to HHS reports (Department of Health and Human Services), yearly sales of the flu jab exceed 134 million doses–while all other vaccines combined total less than 200 million doses.

http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-01-18-th...eres-proof.html



Families are under no obligation to put their children at risk by participating in the corrupt current US National Immunization Program

Our experience is identical to that of untold thousands of parents, who learn the hard way that once your child is injured by a vaccine, you are on your own. The system has chosen to respond to those families with neglect, insults, coercion and even Child Protective Service intervention, rather than to reform the program to put measures in place to protect children and families from harm and fraud, as is the case with every other medical product in this country.

http://healthchoice.org/2017/01/20/narra...zation-program/



Nancy Banks speaks out on the problems with vaccination

"When you're going to medical school, you actually think that you're studying science but, you're studying the science that someone has decided that is appropriate for you and the science that they consider not appropriate for you, you don't study.

For example, at the beginning of the century the Rockefellar and Carnage Foundations took over the discipline of allopathic medicine. How did they do that? They did it through their foundations and they were able to finance those schools and those people that would actually promote the ideas of the eugenic ideas. So most of the students who come out of medical school are not going to question that, they are simply going to say this is what I learned and so this is how I am going to proceed. It must be true and they will go to the CDC or the FDA website and that website will repeat the things they heard in medical school and one of the things that I found is that these doctors do not go to the original literature. They don't read the literature that would really question whether or not these vaccines are safe and there's an enormous amount of propaganda, for example, from the pharmaceutical industries. So the pharmaceutical industries have enormous amounts of money to promote their particular products. Whereas the people who are promoting health benefits of a more normal or natural type, have almost no money. So this is one of the problems. So you now have a group of people who've spent four years under these conditions, who come out of medical school and now they are expected to be the authority and their patients think that they are the authority, except the authority that they have is the authority that they've been given, it's almost papel in nature and so that is basically how we get to the point where we are today."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5F_yj1T8Qu8



The Effect of Aluminum in Vaccines on Humans

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCzdliixnmI



New to Researching Vaccines? Articles to Get You Started: http://vaxtruth.org/
Vaccine Information Kiosk - National Vaccine Information Center: http://www.nvic.org/vaccine-information-kiosk.aspx
NVIC Advocacy Portal - Vaccine Bills by State: https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx
Learn the Risk: http://www.learntherisk.org/
Vaxxed: http://www.vaxxed.com/home/
The Vaccine Book available on Amazon by Dr. Robert W. Sears, MD, FAAP
Are Vaccines Safe? http://www.arevaccinessafe.org/
Click on state to watch vaccine injury story or submit your story: http://www.vaxxed.com/home/

NY Parents Aware of Vaccine Dangers https://www.facebook.com/groups/623168844382030/
New York Parents for Informed Consent https://www.facebook.com/groups/NYparentsForInformedConsent/



There are thousands of doctors all over the world who speak out against vaccines and warn of their dangers. Here is a comprehensive list of over 50 of them.

1. Dr. Nancy Banks - http://bit.ly/1Ip0aIm
2. Dr. Russell Blaylock - http://bit.ly/1BXxQZL
3. Dr. Shiv Chopra - http://bit.ly/1gdgh1s
4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny - http://bit.ly/1MPVbjx
5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries - http://bit.ly/17sKDbf
6. Dr. Larry Palevsky - http://bit.ly/1LLEjf6
7. Dr. Toni Bark - http://bit.ly/1CYM9RB
8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield - http://bit.ly/1MuyNzo
9. Dr. Meryl Nass - http://bit.ly/1DGzJsc
10. Dr. Raymond Obomsawin - http://bit.ly/1G9ZXYl
11. Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot - http://bit.ly/1MrVeUL
12. Dr. Robert Rowen - http://bit.ly/1SIELeF
13. Dr. David Ayoub - http://bit.ly/1SIELve
14. Dr. Boyd Haley PhD - http://bit.ly/1KsdVby
15. Dr. Rashid Buttar - http://bit.ly/1gWOkL6
16. Dr. Roby Mitchell - http://bit.ly/1gdgEZU
17. Dr. Ken Stoller - http://bit.ly/1MPVqLI
18. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein - http://bit.ly/1LLEqHH
19. Dr. Frank Engley, PhD - http://bit.ly/1OHbLDI
20. Dr. David Davis - http://bit.ly/1gdgJwo
21. Dr Tetyana Obukhanych - http://bit.ly/16Z7k6J
22. Dr. Harold E Buttram - http://bit.ly/1Kru6Df
23. Dr. Kelly Brogan - http://bit.ly/1D31pfQ
24. Dr. RC Tent - http://bit.ly/1MPVwmu
25. Dr. Rebecca Carley - http://bit.ly/K49F4d
26. Dr. Andrew Moulden - http://bit.ly/1fwzKJu
27. Dr. Jack Wolfson - http://bit.ly/1wtPHRA
28. Dr. Michael Elice - http://bit.ly/1KsdpKA
29. Dr. Terry Wahls - http://bit.ly/1gWOBhd
30. Dr. Stephanie Seneff - http://bit.ly/1OtWxAY
31. Dr. Paul Thomas - http://bit.ly/1DpeXPf
32. Many doctors talking at once - http://bit.ly/1MPVHOv
33. Dr. Richard Moskowitz - http://bit.ly/1OtWG7D
34. Dr. Jane Orient - http://bit.ly/1MXX7pb
35. Dr. Richard Deth - http://bit.ly/1GQDL10
36. Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic - http://bit.ly/1eqiPr5
37. Dr Chris Shaw - http://bit.ly/1IlGiBp
38. Dr. Susan McCreadie - http://bit.ly/1CqqN83
39. Dr. Mary Ann Block - http://bit.ly/1OHcyUX
40. Dr. David Brownstein - http://bit.ly/1EaHl9A
41. Dr. Jayne Donegan - http://bit.ly/1wOk4Zz
42. Dr. Troy Ross - http://bit.ly/1IlGlNH
43. Dr. Philip Incao - http://bit.ly/1ghE7sS
44. Dr. Joseph Mercola - http://bit.ly/18dE38I
45. Dr. Jeff Bradstreet - http://bit.ly/1MaX0cC
46. Dr. Robert Mendelson - http://bit.ly/1JpAEQr
47. Dr. Garth Nicolson - http://bit.ly/1OQVJsF
48. Dr. Marc Girard - http://bit.ly/1iw0smT
49. Dr. Charles Richet - http://bit.ly/1G5GG7j
50. Dr. Zac Bush - http://bit.ly/1LS19OZ
51. Dr. Lawrence Wilson - http://bit.ly/1kcdirf
52. Dr. James Howenstine - http://bit.ly/1iNyFOy
53. Dr Burton A. Waisbren, Sr., M.D. - http://bit.ly/1Nj8LRe
54. Dr. Sam Eggertsen - http://bit.ly/1Mww9XV
55. Dr. Bonnie Dunbar - http://bit.ly/1N5DXNi
56. Dr. Judy Mikovits - http://bit.ly/1QIzmHU
57. Dr. John Bergan - http://bit.ly/1KYv1yY



Marcella Piper-Terry: “The United States government has known about the dangers of human DNA from aborted fetal cell-lines since at least 2005. They set guidelines which are supposed to keep the DNA at a specific limit, which they hypothesize won't cause cancer. There is no monitoring of vaccines by our government agencies to ensure those limits are adhered to. Vaccines (MMR, Varicella, and Hepatitis A) sent for independent analysis have consistently shown levels of human fetal DNA that are far beyond the "established safety limits." Here is the link to the FDA PowerPoint (draft). Download it before it disappears.”


http://www.fda.gov/…/docke…/ac/05/slides/5-4188S1_4draft.ppt


_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494556 --- 01/22/17 10:38 AM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY
From Episode 4

Part 1 interview of Dr. Brian Hooker, Bioengineer, Associate Professor of Biology

My name's Brian Hooker and I have a Ph.D. in Biochemical Engineering. I've been involved in biotechnology research for over 25 years now. Currently Associate Professor of Biology at Simpson University and also Science Advisor for the Focus For Health Foundation. Prior to that, I worked in areas of Environmental Restoration and also Plant Genetic Engineering when I was a Senior Research Scientist at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. I am the father of an 18 year old son who was damaged by his infant vaccines and he has autism.

Dr. G: So Brian, your a Ph.D. in Biochemical Engineering. What type of work have you done over your career?

Dr. H: Over my career as a BE, I started working in environmental restoration. I was working primarily on EPA superfund sites, the cites that are considered the most contaminated and the most toxic in the United States, and so I worked in developing strategies using natural micro organisms that would degrade the contaminants, eat the contaminants and then release things that were innocuous.

Dr. G: For a period of time you were working and doing research for the US government, correct?

Dr. H: That is correct, yes. I worked for National Laboratory actually in Eastern Washington and the National Laboratory was co-located at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, which is a superfund cite. It's one of the most laden with toxic waste sites in the country, taking some of the legacy waste, some of the waste that had been there for years and years and converting it to benign substances before the waste actually reached the Columbia River. We were running out the clock, trying to make sure that when, what we call these plumes of toxic waste would travel through the groundwater, we would want to be able to clean them up before they became a hazard to humans that were in, and animals in the environment, that all in that area were relying on the Columbia River.

Dr. G: Now you've also published several Papers, if I read your bio correctly, you have over 60 peer reviewed Papers to your credit?

Dr. H: That is correct. I started publishing as a part of my Ph.D. dissertation back in 1990 and I've continued to publish doing work starting out in environmental restoration, then I did some work in plant genetic engineering and ultimately where I am now at Simpson University. Then primarily I'm doing epidemiology research and something that is near and dear to my heart that is the connection between vaccines, vaccine components and nuero developmental disabilities like autism.

Dr. G: What got you interested in vaccine research?

Dr. H: What got me interested in vaccine research primarily was my son's adverse reaction to vaccines. We believe he had an adverse reaction and accumulative adverse reaction from all the vaccines that he received from two weeks of life all the way to his 15 month well baby check up and that's when he had his most severe reaction and we curtailed vaccination at that time. Because of that I became deeply interested in the connection between vaccines primarily I started out with the vaccine component Thimerosal. Thimerosal is about 50 percent mercury by weight, and it's used as a preservative in still in the flu shot. At that time it was used in three of the childhood vaccines that my son received and he was on a single day, and I didn't know this until after he had had his adverse reaction to vaccines, but on a single day he was receiving over 100 micrograms of mercury which vastly exceeded the EPA guidelines and the FDA guidelines for a single dose of mercury for an infant of his size. Even if he had received one of those vaccines when he was an adult, as an adult in order to correctly process that mercury based on the EPA guidelines, he would have had to weigh 550 pounds and he didn't weigh 550 pounds, he started out as an 8 pound infant and it just over whelmed his system.

Dr. G: It seems somewhat ironic that your career has been spent detoxifying the environment and yet you have a child who now has been vaccine damaged because of the toxic substances that went into the ecology of his system.

Dr. H: It's very ironic. I started out my career, I'm still doing environmental restoration as a part of my career and yet one of the most toxic things that I ever encountered was handling the body fluids from my son because he was detoxifying mercury and other components that are in vaccines, including aluminum, including formaldehyde and when I originally, when my wife and I originally made the decision to vaccinate my son, we had no idea that these poisons were in these vaccines in such high quantities. If I would have known what I know now, there is absolutely no way that we would have anybody touch him with any type of vaccine or any type of vaccine component and anything that enters his body as a practice now, anything that enters his body we look at the packet insert. We make sure that there's anything if there's anything that's questionable that that particular medication, that therapeutic, does not enter my son's body. We trusted the medical establishment because of my background, I grew up in a public health family. My mother served as a public health nurse for many, many years and we were taught that vaccinations were safe, there were efficacious and I remember when my son was being vaccinated for things like Chickenpox thinking oh how convenient, he's never going have to get the Chickenpox, and he'll never have to miss school and, but little did I know, the toxic storm that at that point was going on in his body.

Dr. G: That was 18 years ago, now given what the vaccine schedule is today and the contents of the vaccines, how do you think he would have responded?

Dr. H: If we had vaccinated today, given the bloated CDC vaccine schedule, I really don't know if my son could have survived that. I think, you know, you hear of infants dying of within hours, days after receiving their two week, two month, four month, six month vaccines. I believe that he very well could have been one of those cases because his system, the schedule was so relatively innocuous in 1998 as compared to what it is today and his system couldn't even handle that and so knowing the toxins that are going in, knowing the multiple doses of vaccines that are going in left arm, right arm, left leg, right leg, in a single doctor's visit, I don't see how he could have survived.

Dr. G: Now, we'll talk about the science surrounding all of this or maybe the lack of science surrounding all this, but from the personal side here you are a young couple at that point you have a child and the child becomes vaccine damaged, how has that altered the course of your life and the experience of family?

Dr. H: Having a vaccine damaged child is basically living at ground zero of a nuclear explosion everyday, 24/7. Things that happened in our life were so drastically altered by my son's vaccine injury. We planned to have other children and because of his vaccine injury and because of the some of the moral choices we would make and not vaccinating our other children, we decided that it wasn't a choice that we could make. We couldn't look at him and say I'm sorry your vaccine damaged and your siblings dogged a bullet. So we did not have other children and part of the reason was because of the 24/7 care that my son needed. My son sleeps an average of 3 to 4 hours a night and so my wife and I have to take shifts, she stays up late with him, I wake up early with him. There's a constant battle in terms of deciding what type of supplementation we're going to give him, what type of therapies we're going to use for him, what type of individuals we're going to allow into our household that might provide care for him, because my wife does need to break away to do grocery shopping, to take care of our family's personal needs and so it is such a drastic alteration of life to see autism modeled in the press as oh these children are a little weird or a little geeky or they're just a little bit different than the mainstream society. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Dr. G: So you're a well credentialed research scientist with multiple degrees, publications, patents, etc., is there any doubt in your mind that the vaccines caused his autism?

Dr. H: There is no doubt in my mind that the vaccines that my son received caused his autism. There is absolutely no doubt. We saw the regression, we saw the implications of every vaccine that he received on the schedule. It seemed as if every vaccine that he received would cause more damage and then we would see a little more damage and as new parents we didn't really have a baseline, we did not have other siblings that we could compare my son's development to. I remember teaching my son how to crawl and having a conversation with another parent and that parent saying, well you know how kids just pick up things on their own, and I scratched my head, I was stymied, like my son doesn't really pick up anything on his own. We've taught him to sit up, we've worked hours to get him to sit up, we've taught him to roll over, we've taught him to crawl, we've come up with games, moving blankets around so it would force him to crawl. We worked to get and hit every milestone and the milestones that we did hit we're all abolished when he received his 15 month vaccines. Before my son's 15 month vaccines he had language, he was speaking, we have him on video saying short phrases referring to the dog next door which was one of his wonderful passions when he was one years old. Then all of that is lost. There are things that we have captured my son doing on video before his 15 month vaccines that he still cannot do to this day.

Dr. G: Is he verbal today?

Dr. H: No, my son is non verbal. He has a few words he can say, mama, daddy, yes, no and that's really just about it. He does understand language, we can give him simple commands and we're working through communicating with him through an Ipad, but other than that, there is no expressive language.

Dr. G: So I think you're to be commended with your wife on an extraordinary expenditure of energy and emotion to adapt your entire lives for the needs of your son. It's really incredible. What is the financial impact?

Dr. H: The financial impact is immense. The outlay that you never see that is never talked about in the media is the shear damage that my son can do to physical property. Things having to be replaced, things that he needs. He has his routines and his certain videos that he has to watch, but he also doesn't understand that if he breaks those videos that they have to be replaced. If he puts a whole in the wall, and he has been in severe pain and unfortunately where he is not violent against other people but he's self injurious, so he'll knock his shoulder up against the wall, he'll put a whole in the wall, we have to get the hole in the wall repaired and then on top of that, many of the therapies that we use with him are not covered by insurance, obviously the over-the-counter supplements, the things we have taken on to keep his primarily his gastrointestinal system which is, you know what's screwed up from stem to stern you know from his asophigis, all the way down to his rectum, we had problems and so medically we have to address that. So the financial outlay is immense. In order to provide for my family and provide for this sort of intense drain on our budget, then not only am I a professor at a university but I also run a consulting firm, I consult for multiple clients and I teach adjunct at a community college. So I'm juggling three jobs and having a family in order to provide financially because of the train wreck that autism is.

Dr. G: So, a little bit of a touch question, do you ever reflect on how life would have been different for you and your family if this didn't happen?

Dr. H: That's a really good question, I reflect on that on a regular basis. This year the beginning of the semester when I had students come in for their classes was rather hard on me because this would have been the freshman year of college that my son would have started if he hadn't have been vaccine damaged and seeing these young adults come in, take their classes, buy their books, study, interact with their peers, go have a good time, go to movies, drive a car, all of these things that my son cannot do, it really, really hit me hard this year. It was the first time that I had actually encountered that. We've home schooled my son since he was four years old. We had a bad experience in a public preschool and at that point we decided that we would withdraw him from the school district, and so we chose to home school him but, this was the first time I interacted with students that were the same age as my son and saw the, just the complete difference, going home and helping my son with his Barney videos, watching Barney, watching Bob the Builder, watching things that just are not age appropriate for an 18 year old whose voice has changed, whose developing a beard. These are just not the things that you plan in life.

Dr. G: So with this obviously if you had understood the nature of vaccines, the risks of vaccines, the components of vaccines and especially with your education and academic background, you had had the to make other choices perhaps at least the opportunity to weigh it out and decide if this was the right thing or not and you've now done a good bit of research and in the vaccine community, in the autism community, you've become a very strong advocate for getting the truth out there, where has this lead you this journey to discover, why does the public not know about this, why do parents not know about this, why is it maybe a bad idea that the government wants to mandate that children get vaccinated? So talk about that journey a little bit.

Dr. H: Well my journey started in 2001. That's the first time that the Institute of Medicine (IOM) which is a part of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), that was the first time they convened a meeting and they specifically convened a meeting regarding Thimerosal, the mercury containing preservative that was in three of the series of vaccines that my son received, that's the first time that there was every any type of public meeting where parents could participate, parents could send in comments. I was on the west coast, the meeting was in the east coast but, I was firing away emails to the NAS, I was following the research at the CDC which at that point, even though the CDC had not officially published any research on Thimerosal, we knew because of some of the things that were being leaked out, that the CDC had found a relationship between Thimerosal containing vaccines and autism, especially within the first month of life. The CDC was actively working to cover that up with very dubious statistics and I knew something was dead wrong and I was, with the internet really starting to grow at that particular point in time, the early 2000's, I was starting to meet other parents, other families, other people that were going through the same nightmare in their own personal lives that my family was going through and so I became active. In my past research I had done a lot of statistics. When you clean up a super fund site and you say it's clean, you have to prove it to some level of certainty . So I had developed an expertise in statistics and I tried to and I believe was successful in applying that expertise to the epidemiology that the powers that be, the CDC, the NIH, the things, and the FDA, the things they were relying upon in order to somehow proclaim in a very religious fashion that Thimerosal was safe. We knew that it was proposterous that anybody would say mercury, in any form, was safe to inject into an infant's body. We knew that and so the eyes were on the NAS, the IOM did deem that they could not rule out a relationship between T containing vaccines and neuro-developmental disabilities and then the race was on. The CDC was trying to cover up this relationship. I was actively at that point calling CDC researchers, giving my input on their studies, studies that they were doing in the United States, studies that they were planning to do in Denmark, Italy, the UK. The CDC was so desperate that at that time to find any population of children that would somehow indemnify Thimerosal that they were going to Greenland. They were looking at cohorts of individuals with autism in Greenland to somehow to use that particular population to say there's no relationship between the Thimerosal that you get in the infant schedule in the United States and autism. They were completely desperate and so I knew at that particular point in time I had to get involved.

Dr. G: Wow, ... quite a journey because you ended up in communication with CDC scientists and most notably probably, Dr. Thompson. So you had a series of conversations now that have now been made public and some of them were recorded and were made public and it's kind of out there and people are seeing you know kind of behind the curtain. Can you speak to those conversations and what Dr. Thompson revealed to you?

Dr. H: Dr. Thompson was one of the scientists that I interacted with very early on in an official capacity. When I contacted the CDC's public liaison, she referred me to Dr. Thompson and another physician by the name of David Shay, who was working with Dr. Thompson at the time and so we had several very abrupt conversations, the CDC didn't like what I was saying, I received a cease and desist letter in 2004 from a CDC attorney saying that I was no longer allowed to contact these scientists, that the only recourse that I had was through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Dr. G: Why do you think that they felt so threatened that they had to cease and desist just to have conversations with their own scientists from one person whose got expertise in bio statistics and others and saying hey I want to talk to you about this. Why were they so threatened by that?

Dr. H: I knew because of my background in statistics, I knew what they were doing. I knew that they were actively working hard to bury a relationship that they didn't want to go public and I knew that the reason why they were doing that, I had recovered emails via the FOIA...

Dr. G: For those that don't understand that FOIA is the Freedom of Information Act, the CDC it's a government entity and we the citizenry have rights to get disclosed, not all of information is available to us but a lot of information is available to us so you filed this requested for FOIA and if they honor the request they'll give you certain documents, so what did you find?

Dr. H: I received documents early on from the CDC and I found that in the background the chief scientists in vaccine safety were trying to preserve the vaccination program. They had no intent to help children but everything was focused on oh, we have to preserve the vaccine program and we have to keep that going. And there's also...

Dr. G: Why do you think that is? Why do you think they seemed so hell bent, these are scientists supposedly they are serving the cause of humanity. Why do you think they were hell bent on preserving the vaccine program as compared to reporting the data as they saw it?

Dr. H: The CDC acts as a vaccine company. They buy 4.6 billion dollars worth of vaccines every year from pharmaceutical companies and they take those vaccines and they distribute them to the state health departments.

Dr. G: Literally, the CDC purchases over 4 billion dollars worth of vaccines themselves?

Dr. H: That is correct, that is one of the things

Dr. G: So they're a purchasing agent also not just a researching entity but a purchasing agent?

Dr. H: They are a purchasing agent and they're extremely conflicted. They did not want vaccination rates to go down primarily because if vaccination rates went down they would not be reimbursed for the vaccines that they were buying to be distributed by state public health departments. So, it's big business. It's big money. 4.6 billion dollars were on the line and that's when you see a scientist talking about the nebulous well, we have to keep the vaccine program going, we can't damage the vaccine program, when you see a CDC scientist saying that, basically what they are saying in the background is we need to get our reimbursement of that 4.6 billion.

Dr. G: So you start submitting your first FOIA requests, what comes back?

Dr. H: The first FOIA requests that I submitted were in 2004 and just to back up, the primary reason I was submitting those requests was because CDC had cut off any scientist to scientist contact that I had with Thompson or any of the other scientists in the vaccine division so, my only recourse to get information from CDC was via the FOIA and I started to submit requests and one of the first things that came back was a big cheat on a study that had come out of Denmark.

Dr. G: A big cheat, what does that mean?

Dr. H: Cheat. It means that they used statistics to lie about the autism incidents in Denmark.

Dr. G: That's an extremely bold statement so you're asserting it like with full certainty, so why do you say that?

Dr. H: I have full certainty that what they did, somebody got the big idea that autism rates were increasing in Denmark even though they had removed Thimerosal from the vaccines in 1992. So therefore if there was a connection between Thimerosal and vaccines and the autism epidemic, then you should have seen numbers go down in Denmark. Okay? What they did was they published false data showing a very false increase in the incidence of autism in Denmark. But it came to data that was in 1999, 2000 and 2001 when the oldest kids were actually able to get an autism diagnosis and there was a steady downward trend. So what CDC did in connection with the Denmark researchers is that they recommended that they remove the last data point so the only thing that you would see was an upward trend and the autism diagnosis after they removed Thimerosal from vaccines and we know, historically, we know now that's what is called the Madson study, it came out in 2003 in the Journal of Pediatrics (JOP) and historically that study has been debunked but I actually got the emails where they made the decision that they were not going to put the last data points in the study because they indeed showed a downward trend and that was counter to CDC policy to keep Thimerosal in vaccines.

Dr. G: So let me get clear, you've actually seen emails where they said we're going to remove certain data points to give a false impression of autism rates so people will not draw the correlation between Thimerosal, in this particular case Thimerosal and autism?

Dr. H: You have to understand the CDC never puts that type of verbiage in an email. They will never say something like that. But they had a coauthor from Denmark who was saying these data sets, these data points are important and but we need to include them in the publication and then the principle investigator who was at the CDC at the time said no, we have to have a discussion and we may have to remove that data and we know historically, if you go back to the Paper, they removed the information that would have shown a downward trend, not an upward trend, but a downward trend after they removed Thimerosal in vaccines.

Dr. G: And was there any reason given for the removal for the person at the CDC advocating no, no, we need to remove that data, did they give a reason?

Dr. H: No.

Dr. G: Just the fact that it had to be removed.

Dr. H: There was no evidence, there was no reason, there was no scientific reason to remove that data point. The data point was clear. It was data from 2000 and 2001. It needed to be included because it showed the rates were going down. So there's no scientific reason to do that.

Dr. G: So now, this is roughly 2004 or so (Dr. H: That's correct.) so now you're seeing the first evidence, I'm talking about evidence, not speculation (Dr. H: Right) that they are literally manipulating data, omitting information to get a certain outcome impression in their data that they want to release publicly? (Dr. H: Right.) What happened after that?

Dr. H: The information started tumbling in from the CDC and one of the things you know people have asked me before why did you FOIA the CDC so many times. Well, it was easy. All I had to do was shoot off an email and the CDC would process the information and at first the information was coming back in a very, very timely basis. I would get information maybe five, six months after submitting the request, which in government terms, was a short period of time. I was analyzing the information along with David Guyer who is a very prolific scientist who works with his dad, Mark Guyer, who published many, many studies on Thimerosal and we would go through the information together just glean anything that we could that would show the evidence of fraud, evidence of manipulation or evidence of taking whole data sets and hiding them from the public and that's probably the thing that stuck out the most was what CDC was trying to do, they were coming up with their own fraudulent studies and then by law they were supposed to supply the data so independent scientists could check their work but what they were doing in the background was they were playing a shell game so they could hide that data so nobody could get access to the data, reanalyze the studies and show the faults and the fatal flaws in their science.

Dr. G: So you were extrapolating these conclusions by teasing out bits and pieces from all the FOIA information that came back to you?

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: What kind of volume are we talking about? How much stuff are they sending you?

Dr. H: I've probably received, I'd say 500,000 pages of documents.

Dr. G: 500,000 pages?

Dr. H: Some of them are redacted, redacted means that the information is blocked out and removed, some are actually just full clean copies of information. I received a contract between the CDC and the IOM regarding their final meeting in 2004 which basically put the nails in the coffin in terms of the government's response on Thimerosal in vaccines.

Dr. G: How so?

Dr. H: The 2004 IOM, the committee met in February of that year and they submitted a report, the report came out in May and not only did they say that there was no conclusive evidence showing a relationship between Thimerosal exposure and autism, but they also went further in an unprecedented move and they said that no research should be done further on this particular link and you know when somebody's saying no research should be done on a particular link, that they're trying to hide something.

Dr. G: Wow, what's going through your mind at this point? It's 2004, you're the father of an autistic child, you have basically done the research and math to say this much mercury went into his body, that's an extraordinary amount of toxicity and that my child is autistic, it's disrupted and transformed my entire life, my wife's life, our family, etc., I'm a research scientist, and you've got a background in statistics and you start getting this information and you see literally the malfeasance and now I could understand the (inaudible) saying wow this is really wrong, etc. but what's going on in the kind of the psycho emotional side that your seeing this and realizing the damage it's done to your family and that they're trying to hide this stuff. How did that feel?

Dr. H: It was very, very difficult. Between 2004 until about 2007 I literally for my own emotional stability, I took a break in 2007 and I curtailed some of my FOIA activities just because I needed to rest. When you look at that much evil in the face on a regular basis and you know people are lying wholesale about a large portion of children in our society, it's very, very difficult to sleep at night. I didn't realize that the government entities could be as evil and corrupt as the CDC was and still is, and so I worked very, very hard to get the information to some level of closure. I put out a website with another autism dad who's actually very, very active in community, J.B, Handley. J.B. and I published a website called Put Children First .org and many of the information requests and many of the responses to the information requests that I received were put out on that website and it had an entire narrative specifically at that time regarding Thimerosal in vaccines. I also had, I just was starting to come to the grips with the fact that the CDC was studying Thimerosal in vaccines because they were trying to put down the furor that was in the public regarding children's exposure to mercury. What that meant was that there was an entire vaccination schedule, there was an entire laundry list of other components that because there was no furor about the CDC wasn't studying. Okay, so that threw everything regarding the vaccination program in doubt.

Dr. G: And you have to imagine, so here you are this huge government institution that has the public trust and that they are also buying 4.6 billion of vaccines a year that they are actually a purchaser of billions of dollars of these things to imagine that if they said oops, we made a mistake. How could they possibly admit to that but now your pinned in a corner in a respect because we will lose the faith of the American people, we will be under extraordinary attack but if we continue to try and protect and hide the results that we know to be true, more kids are being damaged and families destroyed every single day.

Dr. H: It just flat out appeared from the documents that I received via the FOIA that the CDC didn't care. There was such a huge level of callousness and enmity for the parents of affected children.

Dr. G: So when you say evil, that's what you mean.

Dr. H: Not only did I hate the CDC but the CDC hated parents like me. They hated anybody that would question the status quo. Anybody that would rail against the advisory committee for immunization practices and the schedule that they put out every year. Anybody that would raise a stink against that. I was calling my congressional official, I was calling my two senators, they were conducting their own independent investigations. At that time Dr. David Weldon was a member of Congress, he was running his own independent investigation. I was working with his office on that investigation and so the CDC instead of looking at that and responding appropriately and saying we have a problem, we have not only a public relations problem but a scientific and a grave medical problem. They continued to cover up and they became very, very polarized against anybody that like I said would rail against the status quo.

Dr. G: Now 2004, 2007, you're crawling through huge volumes of documents, your seeing this as you referred to it as the face of evil and now in 2007 you need to take a break. What happens then?

Dr. H: In 2007 I took a break from the activity, I finished my career up at the National Laboratory and made the decision to move on.

Dr. G: Well incidantely this is interesting, while this is going on you're working for the government.

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: The government hired you because they felt your credentials as a scientist, researcher, etc. in your area of expertise, they felt that you were worthy of employment for that. In the meantime your looking at what the government's doing in a different branch of the government and seeing all this malfeasance and now you know you couldn't write this story in a novel to make it believable. Now 2007 you decide you're going to leave that government position or you're going to move on to another phase of your career and take a break from all this activity in reviewing the CDC's activities.

Dr. H: That is correct, I suspended the activities in 2007. I also then concluded my career as more of a prolific researcher scientist in 2009. I left the National Laboratory and then became a part of the faculty at Simpson University in 2010. I felt there was an intense amount of scrutiny that National Laboratory was a great environment to do research but it was also in and of itself it was a pressure cooker of a job and having those types of responsibilities and having a special needs child at home and a wife who has sacrificed her career to take care of a special needs child at home, then I needed to have a change.

Dr. G: So now what happens, when did you reengage, what encouraged you to reengage in this?

Dr. H: I started my job at Simpson University in 2010 and very early on I contacted Mark and David Guyer and wanted to talk to them about some of the FOIA requests that I had done at the very beginning back in 2004. I felt like there was more information available. The CDC had done a level best job of withholding, redacting, marking out information that I felt was vital and would expose more of the lies in terms of the studies that the CDC was saying was reliable evidence to show that vaccines and vaccine components were safe. In conversation with the Guyers, we decided to sue the CDC.

Dr. G: You sued the CDC?

Dr. H: Yes July, 2011 with my attorney Bob Reeves. We filed a suit against the CDC for withholding information for the four first FOIA requests that I had ever submitted. These had to deal with studies on Thimerosal that involved Denmark, studies on Thimerosal that involved the UK, and several internal series of documents that I was trying to get from the CDC and at first I felt that this would be a very, very simple endeavor and that I had seen the documentation, we were in the Obama Administration. At the beginning of his administration he had filed a presidential order to say that entities like the CDC needed to err on the side of being able to release, err on the side of openness and so I was using that even as some of my exhibits in the lawsuit so I thought okay the CDC will see this and they'll finally release those documents. But instead what ensued was a two year fight against the CDC, tooth and nail, where we were filing motion after motion and then they would file motions not only to, not only against what we had filed as evidence, but motions to vacate previous decisions that the judge had made.

Dr. G: Really, so the judge had ruled on some motions and they wanted him to vacate those rulings.

Dr. H: Right, right, at that point in time the judge was ruling that the CDC turn over documents that had been improperly withheld, documents that had been improperly redacted and the CDC was trying to vacate those motions and the fight ended almost exactly two years later in July, 2013 and during that particular period of time the CDC had to release about 500 pages, more pages of documents because of the order of the federal judge and then we finally, rather than having to go through the appeals process with the case, we finally came up with a settlement with the CDC but the thing that stood out was the CDC was fighting tooth and nail not to release this information.
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494573 --- 01/22/17 06:26 PM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY

From Episode 6, Part 2 - Dr. Brian Hooker

Dr. G: In 2014, you start to having phone conversations with Dr. William Thompson of the CDC.

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: So give me the lead up to that, so how did those communications start because you been in communication with him since the early 2000's, right?

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: So then what happened that got him to get on the phone with you?

Dr. H: As part of the lawsuit some documents surfaced that showed in the background Dr. William Thompson talking to CDC attorneys and actually attorneys who were fighting against my son in vaccine court, they were having these conversations behind the scenes as early as 2003 and 2004. To this day I have no clue why Dr. Thompson would be talking about my son's particular vaccine injury case, and so I emailed him, I was furious, and I didn't care if the CDC said that I couldn't email CDC scientists. I looked up his email address and I started emailing him and saying how could you talk about my son's case behind his back, how could you use that in order to curtail my conversations with CDC scientists, how could you use that against me, and I think I wore him down because low and behold you know I probably sent him three or four emails over the period of three or four months and then in November of 2013, I receive a phone call, I look down, it's a 404 area code, it's the CDC. I'd received harassing calls from the CDC FOIA office before and anonymous phone calls from the CDC before, so I knew not to pick up the phone. I didn't want to deal with what could be at the other end of the line but my curiosity got the best of me and I did a reverse phone look up and low and behold it was Dr. William Thompson.

Dr. G: What happened when you got on the phone, what did he say?

Dr. H: We actually had a very, very polite conversation. One of the first things he asked was about my son and how my son was doing and he was almost apologetic in tone and this was somebody that was very, very different than the phone conversations that I had had with him back in 2003, 2004. He was a different man, he was a changed man and I could tell that right away just by sort of a conciliatory tone and it took about two phone conversations for him to say I know you're looking for information, I know you want to get in to the central repository of vaccine safety data from the CDC, you're going about it in all the wrong ways, here's what you do.

Dr. G: He wanted to help you?

Dr. H: He wanted to help me get data sets so somebody on the outside could independently analyze the data sets and see first hand the flaws of the CDC.

Dr. G: So basically, he knew that there was something wrong with the way they were analyzing the data and he knew that you were looking to try to get that data to analyze it independently of the CDC but he also knew that you weren't going about it in the right way and he was giving you guidance.

Dr. H: That is correct and very, very quickly he showed me how to submit a release for a public data set and by law the CDC when they use federal funds to do a vaccine study they have to come up with a public data set that the general public, primarily scientists on the outside, can have access to and through his guidance, by January 2014 I was swimming in data that I never knew existed.

Dr. G: Wow, what motivated him, what did he see from the inside that made him want to help guide you from the outside?

Dr. H: He was motivated and this came out December 2013, January 2014 time frame, he knew that the CDC was doing bad statistics. He knew and he was telling me that the CDC was actually lying about the relationship between vaccines and autism.

Dr. G: You used the word lying, ...so knowingly were lying about the, what data they were reporting relative to vaccines and autism.

Dr. H: Right, he knew that not only, it started out a little more innocuous and he was talking about the flaws and the methodology that the CDC was using and then all of a sudden the conversation turned on a dime and we were talking about fraud.

Dr. G: Wow, do you think his conscience got to him, what do you think happened?

Dr. H: I think that this is something that had been brewing in his conscience since 2004 since when he saw just very, very specific blatant fraud by his superiors at the CDC and this is what he was reporting to me and he wanted to make sure that somebody on the outside knew that this fraud had taken place, and the that way he wanted to go about doing that was to give me the data and to publish, for me to publish the results in peer reviewed scientific literature that showed yes, there is a relationship and we started out with the MMR vaccine, which I undertook in trepidation because I was not an expert at that time regarding the MMR but we started out with a study that was fraudulent and flawed that he did in 2004 and he said I want you to reanalyze that data set

Dr. G: So just to get clear because this is very dramatic, a research scientist at the CDC who's involved in the autism study in MMR autism relationship which was one of the prime studies to debunk the relationship, because Andy Wakefield was completely discredited over, his minor assertion in the beginning that there might be a relationship here and then everybody says ... that it's been disproven that there's a relationship between the two, the CDC study, etc. This was something that was a milestone study and the guy who's on the research project contacts you and says please get this information and reanalyze it.

Dr. H: That is correct. He was the lead statistician on this particular study, the first author was Frank DeStefano who was and still is the head of the Immunization Safety Office (ISO) at CDC. One of the authors was Colleen Boyle, who is pretty much second in command at the CDC. She's a head of one of the major centers The National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities. Another chief researcher Marcia (inaudible), and then a post doc who was just on loan from her university. The five of them colluded to cover up the results, several different alarming results that showed when you get the MMR on time you are indeed more susceptible and more likely to get an autism diagnoses than when you delay it until after three years of age.

Dr. G: Wow, so again strong words, colluded that literally and did Thompson talk about this collusion that these people got together and eliminated data from the study to make it appear a certain way?

Dr. H: He would talk about it in a very vague terms but he did use the word collude and he used very, very strong language to say that the data that the data that were published were completely fraudulent, that they had embarked upon the study and he started to share documentation, documentation of how the study was supposed to be done in the first place and then he guided me through the steps on how they deviated from that plan because they saw relationships between the MMR and autism and they did not want to publish them.

Dr. G: The hair on the back on my neck is literally standing up right now, so here you are and incidently you've had numerous conversations with him for which were recorded so that you have documentary evidence to say these conversations are real (Dr. H: That's right.) and it's validated that these things were said and many more things that weren't recorded but the point is so here you are the parent of an autistic child who has the course of your entire life altered because of vaccines that your child was given and your on the phone now with a research scientist from the CDC who publishes with other coauthors a Paper and he's the lead guy on the statistics for the Paper and is basically saying that there is collusion between these authors to misrepresent the data to try to show that there was not a relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism and yet the reality is that if you look at the data they had there is, and so now you are saying not only how are you affected but because of the collusion how many other families out there are sitting there with autistic kids because this information was never represented properly or truthfully.

Dr. H: The CDC knew about these relationships as early as November 7, 2001 because I have the memo that says November 7, 2001 and it delineates these relationships and it shows a positive relationship with the MMR and autism among African Americans, it showed an association with what the CDC terms isolated autism, that's kids like my son that got autism but didn't have any other types of co-morbidity like cerebral palsy or mental retardation that just basically regressed into autism there were strong statistically significant relationships CDC knew about it November 7, 2001 and you look at how many kids have been born since then, how many kids have been diagnosed with autism since then and how many kids actually got the MMR on time and how many lives, how many families could have been saved.

Dr. G: In your wildest dreams do you think you would have ever gotten to the point where you're on the phone (inaudible) with a CDC scientist who's on the autism study with MMR calling you and talking to you and basically saying reanalyze this data please and saying there is collusion between the scientists that there's fraud in the way that they're representing the data that you are a family that's affected. You know in 2001 you already reviewed that they were hiding things, I think you said November 7, 2001 that there was email traffic that you got through FOIA, all these years, all these kids getting vaccinated and one of the things, that I know because I've had conversations with you previously and I've watched Vaxxed, etc., but one of the things is that what they showed in this study was that if you delayed the use of the MMR vaccine the risk of autism goes down precipitately, correct?

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: I mean it was an obvious thing and they didn't even want to report that, they could have just said hey we have new data delay this but then it would admit that the people who followed the schedule in the beginning, have autistic kids as a result of their recommendations so they couldn't admit it.

Dr. H: The CDC would never go on record and admit that, so they chose to cover it up and what they did is they sat on that information for a year and a half, they would meet weekly, these five scientists would meet on a weekly basis, they would have Thompson rerun the data, reanalyze the data, he could not make the affect go away.

Dr. G: Even trying making the effect go away by reanalyzing the data or using different statistical manipulation, he still couldn't make it go away.

Dr. H: He couldn't make that information go away and so what they decided to do specifically with the African Americans, was they said we will only rely on race data for those individuals that have a valid State of Georgia birth certificate. So it took that population and it reduced it by almost a half, it became half as large and everybody that knows statistics knows that if you have a smaller sampling size you lose statistical power, you lose the relationship and so they used that, there was no good reason to say that oh we got race data from birth certificates because the race data was in all the school records for all the children that were participating in that study. The only reason they did that was to reduce the statistical power the scientists that were Thompson's superiors said run it this way and see what happens and low and behold when they eliminated those kids, the relationship went away.

Dr. G: And there could be no logic, they're saying oh I know one way we can reduce the sample sizes, if they don't have a Georgia birth certificate, as if that changes them genetically somehow, if that changes their species, why should it matter what birth certificate they have to the study and the population in the study. Is there any rational?

Dr. H: There is no effective rational for that. There is no scientific reason for that. It is clear cut that what they wanted to do was reduce the statistical power so they could make that relationship go away and when they were able to do that, Dr. Colleen Boyle and Dr. Frank DeStano called a meeting, said bring in all of your information regarding the effect with African Americans and we are going to throw it away, we are going to destroy that information. I don't have the exact day that they met but it was between September and October 2002 so that they've been sitting on that data for about eight months and they decided that they would trash can that data and if you look at the information that the CDC had after the trash can meeting, those results were no where to be found. They buried them.

Dr. G: Whoa, Dr. Thompson who was on the study affirms that this shredding party, if you will, happened?

Dr. H: Dr. Thompson was there at the shredding party. Interestingly enough the superior who ordered the shredding party, Dr. Colleen Boyle, decided not to attend that particular meeting so her finger prints were all over the meeting but she would not do the dirty work.

Dr. G: So literally these scientists on this project got together ordered together by their superiors to get together and said we want to eliminate this data and we are literally going to shred or discard, dispose of this data so we have no record of it.

Dr. H: That is correct, that is a violation of the Federal Records Act of 1950 as amended in the 1970's they were taking federal records that information could have been considered federal information and they instead of handling it properly and archiving the federal records, they destroyed it.

Dr. G: And when you look at the study it obviously isn't there and then they can say it's no where to be found except they didn't count on the fact that Dr. Thompson kept a copy.

Dr. H: Dr. Thompson knew that he would be legally liable for destroying that information so he retained his own copy of not only the hard copies but he also had the electronic copies of the hard drive of his computer and that's what ultimately what he shared with me.

Dr. G: This is kind of a pretty damming situation for these CDC officials because if I understand correctly Congressman Posey in Florida has a copy of this in his safe and there trying to call Dr. Thompson as a whistleblower to appear in front of Congress and talk about this fraud and deception.

Dr. H: That is correct. Dr. Thompson during the conversations that we had I wanted Dr. Thompson to do two things. I wanted him to hire a whistleblower attorney and declare federal whistleblower status so that he had the protections that were afforded by that particular status. He did that, he ended up getting one of the top whistleblower attorneys in the country in order to represent himself. The second thing that I wanted him to do was reach out to Congressman Bill Posey. Bill Posey has been sympathetic regarding the autism vaccine issue since he took office I believe in 2012 and so when he took office, when he took over he was a friend of our community and Dr. Thompson then went to him with large bins of information, physically took bins of information to Bill Posey's office, set those down and shared all the records that he had shared with me up to that point in time and we're talking about tens of thousands of pages of documents that showed CDC fraud that showed CDC (inaudible) inclination that when they found a positive relationship that showed a tie between a vaccine or vaccine component and autism that they would either bury the relationship entirely by throwing it in the trash can or they would down play the relationship and make sure that the final publication had verbiage that said there's nothing to worry about, there's nothing to worry about the MMR, there's nothing to worry about Thimerosal, so indeed instead of changing the vaccine schedule to err on the side of safety they changed the vaccine schedule to err on the side of more profits for the pharmaceutical companies and themselves acting as a vaccine company.

Dr. G: Wow, I'm basically speechless so I can't imagine what's going on inside of your mind cause you're wearing all these hats, first of all your like the investigator who's discovering all this, you have a child that's vaccine damaged, you're a research scientist yourself so you understand these things on a deep level as far as how this could be pulled off and how they could pull the wool over one's eyes and you were also cognitive to the fact that there are children damaged every single day right now because this information is not public. What do you feel inside?

Dr. H: I was completely conflicted, when my head hit the pillow at night I would think about the lives that could be saved if this information was made public and I would try to weigh that against continuing the relationship with Thompson and other documents that he could funnel from the CDC to me in order to you know bring the CDC down which is you know I think it's still a worthy goal and if something needs to happen we need complete reform in the CDC. Thompson himself told me that vaccine safety didn't belong in the CDC or in the Department of Health and Human Services as a whole, it needed to be moved out, it needed to be an independent agency so, I weighed that affecting change against CDC and being able to reform this so somebody somewhere could know that the CDC came clean versus how many people were diagnosed with autism today. How many people are going to be diagnosed with autism tomorrow. How many people are going to comply blindly with a bloated vaccination schedule that's a recipe for disaster, it's a grand medical experiment. It hasn't been researched properly and the research that has been done shows grave danger for people who follow that vaccination schedule and so I was very, very conflicted. I also worked early on, it was never really palatable for me to record phone conversations with Dr. Thompson especially without his knowledge. I did not want him to know that I was recording these conversations because I wanted him to speak honestly, I wanted him to repeat some of the things that he had said to me in conversations with me that I had not recorded and so I had two attorneys working with me to make sure that what I was doing was not illegal. Now, I life in California, California is a two party consent state so it is illegal to record somebody without their knowledge. I'm next door to Oregon so two of the calls that were recorded were made in Oregon, another one of the calls was made in Virginia which is a one party state and then the final call was made in Illinois which is a one party state and so I needed to protect my family, I wanted some type of proof that this had happened. I wanted some type of evidence, some type of time stamp that said we had these conversations, this is definitively Bill Thompson revealing this information to me. This isn't me with a pile of information this was me with a government employee who's making admissions of collusion to commit fraud by senior CDC officials and that's why I recorded those calls.

Dr. G: And not only is it government employee it's not like some ad...(inaudible) person going I don't know what's going on in the other room over here it's the guy in the center of it basically he's one of the guys on the study but here's the thing out in the world when you mention autism and vaccines, oh, but that's been disproven, they look at you like you're some kind of idiot oh, that's been refuted, that's been scientifically proven, so now people are lining up saying now I don't have to worry about this that's all been disproven because of what's been put out and they are vaccinating these kids and literally even if you decided that you wanted to vaccinate which is probably based on everything that we know not a good idea but even if you decide I want to do it literally if they just reported the data and they delayed in the administration of the MMR vaccine that would reduce the risk your taking by a lot according to the data that that study originally gathered.

Dr. H: That is correct. If you look at the original data and I did the analysis, I did the analysis in January and February of 2014 I saw that the risk for African American males that received the MMR on time was three times greater than African American males that got the MMR vaccine after three years of age.

Dr. G: Three times greater?

Dr. H: Three times greater. There was three times as much autism.

Dr. G: It's not like a 15 or 20 percent, it's three times more likely to get autism if they vaccinate before 36 months as compared to after?

Dr. H: That is correct, that is correct.

Dr. G: In the African American population.

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: And that's what they said, we're going to bury that data, we're going to dispose of that data, we're not reporting it at all but it's in the original.

Dr. H: It's in the original study. It's in their data and it was I attempted to publish that information. I had a publication accepted in the Journal of Translational Neuro.... (inaudible). It's a journal that I had published in before. We went through peer review, the article appeared in print. At the end of July of 2014 and low and behold when the entire whistleblower story broke, and this broke in around August 21, 2014, it took about four days and the Journal took my Paper down from the web cite so it was no longer, at first they said

Dr. G: Did they full retract it or did they just don't put it up?

Dr. H: They published a statement, they took the Paper completely down, they published a statement saying the results of this Paper would have a negative effect on public health.

Dr. G: The truth has negative effect on public health and we can't let that happen.

Dr. H: So, we can't let them happen, about 24 hours later they instead changed that and said that I had undisclosed conflict of interests, which was rubbish, which was completely fabricated.

Dr. G: What's your conflict of interest? What monetary gain do you get by publishing this data, but what I'm hearing is they never said that your statistical analysis was wrong.

Dr. H: No.

Dr. G: So they basically were trying to find other ways (inaudible) it went through peer review they said this is properly done (Dr. H: Right) so they're looking for different angle to try to discredit the Paper.

Dr. H: Ultimately the Paper was put I like to call it on time out, because you know kids get time out and have to go sit in the time out chair, so my Paper was put in time out for about six weeks and during those six weeks I argued back and forth with the Journal regarding why it should be published, why my science was sound. They sent me back a paragraph description from one of their editors saying that my science was unacceptable. I rebutted that paragraph, they never sent a response to that and then on October 3rd, they completely retracted the Paper.

Dr. G: And of course no coincidence that when the whistleblower story comes out there's no (inaudible) profile of that, that's when your Paper gets retracted.

Dr. H: That's when my Paper gets retracted.

Dr. G: .... because your science was fine when they published it. How do you control the outrage and how do you not let it eat you up inside, it's really almost unthinkable?

Dr. H: It is very...very, very difficult to respond to be able to let things like that go and it was difficult, it was a difficult step for me to forgive Thompson, I mean in the first place. I mean I felt like he alone, by sitting on this as long as he did is culpable for a large amount of damage to society. There are a lot of families who have been shattered and I really did have to let it go and my wife, Marsha, was instrumental in you know what you need to let this thing whole thing go and getting my Paper retracted, I never got detention in school, I never had anything big like that happen, I've never had a Paper retracted and so having that was a real psychological blow to me and I just had to let it go but the silver lining was I was contacted by several scientists that said look we know what you've gone through, we want you to republish that data because that data needs to be in the public domain and they've provided an opportunity, this whole Paper will be republished, actually in a much more expanded form and laying out the logic of why my results are correct and why the Paper should never have been retracted in the first place and it's coming out in a book I believe in the Fall of 2017 that's published by Elsaveer Scientific, one of the very reputable publishing companies (Dr. G: I know who they are, sure.) and I've had my day in the public domain, I will have my day in the public domain and I count myself worthy of some of the scars that were endured by great people like Andy Wakefield.
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494574 --- 01/22/17 06:34 PM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY
Official transcripts of all the interviews can be obtained at www.vaccinesrevealed.com. If you add one of the items to the cart, at the bottom of the cart page there is an option to buy a jump drive that is a lot cheaper but includes only the transcripts.

The few transcripts that I have posted are not official transcripts.


Part 3 of Dr. Hooker's interview:

Dr. G is Dr. Patrick Gentempo, Dr. H is Dr. Brian Hooker.

Dr. G: In your conversations with Dr. Thompson the autism issue wasn't the only issue that came out, there's an issue with mercury and tics …

Dr. H: It's very interesting when you go to CDC's website and they have a specific website on thimerosal what they report is that there is no incidence of harm and that there is no harm caused by thimerosal except for occasional redness and swelling at the injection site . Nothing could be further from the truth and we don't have to go to independent literature to find that out. We go to CDC's literature. Thompson wrote a study that was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2007 and he looked at neurotypical kids, these are kids with no developmental delays, no malities, their ages were somewhere between 6 and 10 I believe and what they did is that they split the group into a high exposure group that had thimerosal vaccines and a low exposure group that had a lesser amount of thimerosal and they looked at all of these different psychological and neurological battery tests and what they found was a very, very profound difference in the number of boys that had tics in the high thimerosal group versus the numbers of boys that had tics in the low thimerosal group. ...It was statistically significant the relative risk was above 2.0 which means that it would argue in a court of law, so boys that were receiving the lion's share of thimerosal in their vaccines were at least twice as likely to have tics and show tics ... evaluated by an independent professional ...this isn't just due to parental reporting but an independent professional who’s trained to see these types of issues was observing these children over a three hour period and those that exhibited tics again the high thimerosal group had a lot more tics in boys than the low thimerosal group. The study that they didn't do they didn't have enough thimerosal control, so you could imagine if you had a control that wasn't exposed to mercury at all that the difference would probably be significant....Not only, the Thompson study came out in 2007 but the Verstratten study that the CDC used to bury the connection between vaccines and autism had a corollary... and it basically said that in one of the ... tested they showed a strong relationship, statistically significant again, between thimerosal exposure and tics.

The CDC had a hand in a UK study they were actually ultimately responsible for the funding decision for the UK study where they came out in 2004 that also showed a relationship again between thimerosal and tics and this time they looked at boys and girls together, they didn't separate them out but it was statistically significant. Add on to that another study that Thompson did, he was extremely emphatic that thimerosal was causing tics especially in boys and so he did another study in 2012 that was published with a graduate student by the name of Jack Bareil ... and again a strong statistically significant relationship between thimerosal and tics in boys.

In what he described was this systematic watering down of any result that he had if there was a statistical significance. ... He described it to me on the phone and he also shared documentation where there were memos written about his paper specifically on why he should not publish the result on thimerosal and tics. A chief CDC official, his name was Ed Travatan who was in the National Immunization program basically came down hard on Thompson and said you will not publish this result unless you can have a tic expert verify the result and basically what Dr. Travatan was trying to do was trying to dissuade Thompson from publishing the results in the first place. He wanted it in the background, he wanted it to never see the light of day.

Dr. G: And if you're called upon you have the documentation to support what you're asserting…

Dr. H: Oh, absolutely, yea I have the documentation, I also have Dr. Tonya Popavic who used to be the Associate Director for Science for the entire CDC. She was like one of the number two in the second tier but directly below the CDC director who said that what Thompson had to do was empathize the non statically significant relationship, those things that showed that thimerosal wasn't in the clear and downplay those few relationships that showed that thimerosal was causing harm.

Dr. G: So top level officials at the CDC directed him to downplay the relationship that he was observing in his research?


Dr. H: That is correct and it was so transparent that Dr. Thompson with his 2012 paper he went to the Journal of the American Medical Association and tried to get it published there ... The reception that he got from the peer reviewers was laughable. They basically said when CDC tries...sees a relationship that they don't like they try to downplay it, they try to do everything in their power basically to convince the public that this isn't a true statistically significant relationship even though it is.

Dr. G: So the peer reviewers saw that the paper was attempting to water it down and they basically said we're not buying it.


Dr. H: They're not publishing it, so they had to go to a second tier journal in order to get that research published. The Journal of the American Medical Association basically called foul on the CDC .

Dr. G: Now in your recorded conversation with Dr. Thompson do you talk about this mercury issue in tics and does he talk about what happened?


Dr. H: Not only do we talk about the relationship between mercury and tics but he also wanted me to launch a campaign basically suing CDC science against them showing, hey there are four publications that have CDC direct ties that shows that mercury causes tics in boys, why is this still in the flu shot.


Dr. G: So if you were to interpret the dynamics of the circumstance, basically this guy is having private conversations with you and he’s saying they're not letting me reveal what I have found in my research. Can you please get that data and get it out to the world? So do you feel that he was having an issue of conscience trying to do the right thing even though he was in an environment that would not permit it?


Dr. H: Absolutely, he wanted the truth to be revealed. He wanted the truth to be revealed about mercury and tics. He wanted the truth to be known about the MMR and autism and the day my paper was published, that MMR paper was published, he said he called me up and he said, you have vindicated me, the results are out. He figuratively breathed a sigh of relief that this thing that he had been hiding for all those years since 2001 was finally brought into the forefront and was actually published, and so it was a crisis of conscience for Dr. Thompson, he tried to alert chief cdc officials about these relationships and he was shut down summarily and instead of anybody, including all the way to the top, the CDC director at the time was Dr. Julie Gerbidin, shut him directly down and instead they made it an issue of his psychological state and said look, he's unstable, HR recommended that he get counseling, that he see a counseling psychologist, and that's traditionally what the CDC does. If someone falls out of line and is not spewing the party line of this CDC, then they become a personnel problem

Dr. G: What does the CDC say as their signature on their emails "Saving Lives, Protecting People." ...that's their moniker, yet there's now documentary evidence that they're doing exactly the opposite of that and then when somebody mentally breaks down, because they have an issue of conscience as a scientist who's charged with finding the truth and can't reveal it, they now think they need counseling.

Dr. H: They need counseling, these are crazy people, so instead of saving lives and protecting people it's saving programs and protecting profits. Exactly, that is what they are trying to do. People need to understand CDC functions as a for profit company. They are taking money, taxpayer dollars, they're buying vaccines, they're distributing those vaccines to the state public health department and then they are getting reimbursed for that distribution. If vaccine rates fall off, CDC loses money.


---------


Episode 9: Part 4, Dr. Brian Hooker

Dr. G: So, Dr. Hooker, you're a research scientist, your Ph.D. is in biochemical engineering and you know something about toxicity especially because a lot of your career was spent cleaning up the environment from toxins. What can you say to us about Gardasil and what's in Gardasil and what you think of that particular vaccine?

Dr. H: The Gardasil vaccine is loaded with aluminum, upwards to 750 micrograms of aluminum per shot, okay, and they're giving the Gardasil vaccine down to girls and boys of 9 years of age...nine years old, there are some pediatricians, some physicians are giving it as early as 9 years of age. Aside from the fact that Gardasil was never really tested on that population, aluminum does not belong in human body. It just doesn't, there is no purpose for it, it has been tied to amnioplax (spelling?) in the brain, it is increases risks of neurological difficulties, the immune system doesn't know what to do with the aluminum atom, and so what we're doing is through a series of shots we're introducing not micrograms but milligrams of this toxic substance into girls and boys. It's incidents and we're seeing that Gardasil is having the highest amount of adverse reactions reported of any other vaccine that's on the market. It is truly a dirty vaccine. Now if you look at the number of reports of adverse events of Gardasil it is similar to the number of reports of adverse events to the birth control pill Yaz. Yaz was on the market several years ago and there were over 13,000 reports of adverse events from Yaz and so the FDA made the decision to pull Yaz out of the market, okay. Gardasil has been on the market since 2007 and it's far eclipse adverse event reporting that was made in conjunction with the Yaz but yet instead of pulling Gardasil out of off the market, or trying to do rational testing or trying to change the formulation to eliminate aluminum exposure, instead what they're doing is now they're looking at trials to give Gardasil at birth, so instead of giving Gardasil to a 9, 10, 11 year old child, they're giving it to, they want to ultimately give Gardasil to an infant.

Dr. G: So, let me get this straight, it has the highest reporting of adverse reactions events of any vaccine,

Dr. H: that is correct.

Dr. G: and the reaction to that is not only keep it on the market, but to now give it to infants instead, or in addition.

Dr. H: In addition to give it to infants. In the public health community a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, and so if they can get that baby at a well baby visit then they feel like they're going to have better vaccine compliance if they can pop that into an infant rather than trying to coax an adolescent and their families to come to a physician, so that's why they're doing it.

Dr. G: Why do they put aluminum in them in these vaccines, what's the purpose of it from a say if you're a vaccine advocate here's why we put aluminum in them?

Dr. H: Aluminum in the formulation in vaccines basically stimulates a non specific immune response. So if you ad it, it's called an adjuvant and when you ad an adjuvant to vaccines that drastically magnifies the immune response that the antigen, the HPV virus partical that's in that vaccine that drastically increases the response and it basically tricks the immune system into thinking that it has a bigger problem then it actually has. The problem with that is when you trick the immune system in that you get a prolonged immune response and you get an immune response that's improper for the human body. Not only does Gardasil when you have the quadravalent Gardasil that has four different types of the human papa...virus and then you have the 9 valiant vaccine that has 9 different types, not only is that completely unnatural in the way that the human immune system responds, we just don't, in nature we don't inject antigens directly into our body, 4 at a time, 9 at a time, that's completely improper, that's not how the immune system works but now we ad an adjuvant like aluminum, that drastically magnifies the response so the response is prolonged, the response is much more severe so you start to see auto immune immunity in the men and women that are getting this vaccine.

Dr. G: Wow, and if they have the adjuvant does that mean they could reduce the amount of antigen and save some money?

Dr. H: If they have the adjuvant literally there is another adjuvant that's used in vaccines called squalene and the term for squalene inside the CDC is Hamburger Helper because it can extend it. You can take a small amount of antigen and you can add adjuvant to it and it will magnify the response so that so you can save money, you hit the nail on the head, you can save money by adding that aluminum which is completely toxic to human physiology.
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494581 --- 01/23/17 04:52 AM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY
A corrected, spell checked copy. This is not an official V.R. transcript. See instructions below to obtain an official transcript.



Part 1 interview of Dr. Brian Hooker, Bioengineer, Associate Professor of Biology

Interviewed for Vaccines Revealed .com by Dr. Patrick Gentempo

Dr. G is Dr. Patrick Gentempo, Dr. H is Dr. Brian Hooker.

My name's Brian Hooker and I have a Ph.D. in Biochemical Engineering. I've been involved in biotechnology research for over 25 years now. Currently Associate Professor of Biology at Simpson University and also Science Advisor for the Focus For Health Foundation. Prior to that, I worked in areas of Environmental Restoration and also Plant Genetic Engineering when I was a Senior Research Scientist at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. I am the father of an 18 year old son who was damaged by his infant vaccines and he has autism.

Dr. G: So Brian, your a Ph.D. in Biochemical Engineering. What type of work have you done over your career?

Dr. H: Over my career as a BE, I started working in environmental restoration. I was working primarily on EPA superfund sites, the sites that are considered the most contaminated and the most toxic in the United States, and so I worked in developing strategies using natural micro organisms that would degrade the contaminants, eat the contaminants and then release things that were innocuous.

Dr. G: For a period of time you were working and doing research for the US government, correct?

Dr. H: That is correct, yes. I worked for National Laboratory actually in Eastern Washington and the National Laboratory was co-located at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, which is a superfund site. It's one of the most laden with toxic waste sites in the country, taking some of the legacy waste, some of the waste that had been there for years and years and converting it to benign substances before the waste actually reached the Columbia River. We were running out the clock, trying to make sure that when, what we call these plumes of toxic waste would travel through the groundwater, we would want to be able to clean them up before they became a hazard to humans that were in, and animals in the environment, that all in that area were relying on the Columbia River.

Dr. G: Now you've also published several Papers, if I read your bio correctly, you have over 60 peer reviewed Papers to your credit?

Dr. H: That is correct. I started publishing as a part of my Ph.D. dissertation back in 1990 and I've continued to publish doing work starting out in environmental restoration, then I did some work in plant genetic engineering and ultimately where I am now at Simpson University. Then primarily I'm doing epidemiology research and something that is near and dear to my heart that is the connection between vaccines, vaccine components and neurodevelopmental disabilities like autism.

Dr. G: What got you interested in vaccine research?

Dr. H: What got me interested in vaccine research primarily was my son's adverse reaction to vaccines. We believe he had an adverse reaction and cumulative adverse reaction from all the vaccines that he received from two weeks of life all the way to his 15 month well baby check up and that's when he had his most severe reaction and we curtailed vaccination at that time. Because of that I became deeply interested in the connection between vaccines primarily I started out with the vaccine component Thimerosal. Thimerosal is about 50 percent mercury by weight, and it's used as a preservative in still in the flu shot. At that time it was used in three of the childhood vaccines that my son received and he was on a single day, and I didn't know this until after he had had his adverse reaction to vaccines, but on a single day he was receiving over 100 micrograms of mercury which vastly exceeded the EPA guidelines and the FDA guidelines for a single dose of mercury for an infant of his size. Even if he had received one of those vaccines when he was an adult, as an adult in order to correctly process that mercury based on the EPA guidelines, he would have had to weigh 550 pounds and he didn't weigh 550 pounds, he started out as an 8 pound infant and it just over whelmed his system.

Dr. G: It seems somewhat ironic that your career has been spent detoxifying the environment and yet you have a child who now has been vaccine damaged because of the toxic substances that went into the ecology of his system.

Dr. H: It's very ironic. I started out my career, I'm still doing environmental restoration as a part of my career and yet one of the most toxic things that I ever encountered was handling the body fluids from my son because he was detoxifying mercury and other components that are in vaccines, including aluminum, including formaldehyde and when I originally, when my wife and I originally made the decision to vaccinate my son, we had no idea that these poisons were in these vaccines in such high quantities. If I would have known what I know now, there is absolutely no way that we would have anybody touch him with any type of vaccine or any type of vaccine component and anything that enters his body as a practice now, anything that enters his body we look at the packet insert. We make sure that there's anything if there's anything that's questionable that that particular medication, that therapeutic, does not enter my son's body. We trusted the medical establishment because of my background, I grew up in a public health family. My mother served as a public health nurse for many, many years and we were taught that vaccinations were safe, there were efficacious and I remember when my son was being vaccinated for things like Chicken Pox thinking oh how convenient, he's never going have to get the Chickenpox, and he'll never have to miss school and, but little did I know, the toxic storm that at that point was going on in his body.

Dr. G: That was 18 years ago, now given what the vaccine schedule is today and the contents of the vaccines, how do you think he would have responded?

Dr. H: If we had vaccinated today, given the bloated CDC vaccine schedule, I really don't know if my son could have survived that. I think, you know, you hear of infants dying of within hours, days after receiving their two week, two month, four month, six month vaccines. I believe that he very well could have been one of those cases because his system, the schedule was so relatively innocuous in 1998 as compared to what it is today and his system couldn't even handle that and so knowing the toxins that are going in, knowing the multiple doses of vaccines that are going in left arm, right arm, left leg, right leg, in a single doctor's visit, I don't see how he could have survived.

Dr. G: Now, we'll talk about the science surrounding all of this or maybe the lack of science surrounding all this, but from the personal side here you are a young couple at that point you have a child and the child becomes vaccine damaged, how has that altered the course of your life and the experience of family?

Dr. H: Having a vaccine damaged child is basically living at ground zero of a nuclear explosion everyday, 24/7. Things that happened in our life were so drastically altered by my son's vaccine injury. We planned to have other children and because of his vaccine injury and because of the some of the moral choices we would make and not vaccinating our other children, we decided that it wasn't a choice that we could make. We couldn't look at him and say I'm sorry your vaccine damaged and your siblings dogged a bullet. So we did not have other children and part of the reason was because of the 24/7 care that my son needed. My son sleeps an average of 3 to 4 hours a night and so my wife and I have to take shifts, she stays up late with him, I wake up early with him. There's a constant battle in terms of deciding what type of supplementation we're going to give him, what type of therapies we're going to use for him, what type of individuals we're going to allow into our household that might provide care for him, because my wife does need to break away to do grocery shopping, to take care of our family's personal needs and so it is such a drastic alteration of life to see autism modeled in the press as oh these children are a little weird or a little geeky or they're just a little bit different than the mainstream society. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Dr. G: So you're a well credentialed research scientist with multiple degrees, publications, patents, etc., is there any doubt in your mind that the vaccines caused his autism?

Dr. H: There is no doubt in my mind that the vaccines that my son received caused his autism. There is absolutely no doubt. We saw the regression, we saw the implications of every vaccine that he received on the schedule. It seemed as if every vaccine that he received would cause more damage and then we would see a little more damage and as new parents we didn't really have a baseline, we did not have other siblings that we could compare my son's development to. I remember teaching my son how to crawl and having a conversation with another parent and that parent saying, well you know how kids just pick up things on their own, and I scratched my head, I was stymied, like my son doesn't really pick up anything on his own. We've taught him to sit up, we've worked hours to get him to sit up, we've taught him to roll over, we've taught him to crawl, we've come up with games, moving blankets around so it would force him to crawl. We worked to get and hit every milestone and the milestones that we did hit we're all abolished when he received his 15 month vaccines. Before my son's 15 month vaccines he had language, he was speaking, we have him on video saying short phrases referring to the dog next door which was one of his wonderful passions when he was one years old. Then all of that is lost. There are things that we have captured my son doing on video before his 15 month vaccines that he still cannot do to this day.

Dr. G: Is he verbal today?

Dr. H: No, my son is nonverbal. He has a few words he can say, mama, daddy, yes, no and that's really just about it. He does understand language, we can give him simple commands and we're working through communicating with him through an Ipad, but other than that, there is no expressive language.

Dr. G: So I think you're to be commended with your wife on an extraordinary expenditure of energy and emotion to adapt your entire lives for the needs of your son. It's really incredible. What is the financial impact?

Dr. H: The financial impact is immense. The outlay that you never see that is never talked about in the media is the shear damage that my son can do to physical property. Things having to be replaced, things that he needs. He has his routines and his certain videos that he has to watch, but he also doesn't understand that if he breaks those videos that they have to be replaced. If he puts a whole in the wall, and he has been in severe pain and unfortunately where he is not violent against other people but he's self injurious, so he'll knock his shoulder up against the wall, he'll put a whole in the wall, we have to get the hole in the wall repaired and then on top of that, many of the therapies that we use with him are not covered by insurance, obviously the over-the-counter supplements, the things we have taken on to keep his primarily his gastrointestinal system which is, you know what's screwed up from stem to stern you know from his esophagus, all the way down to his rectum, we had problems and so medically we have to address that. So the financial outlay is immense. In order to provide for my family and provide for this sort of intense drain on our budget, then not only am I a professor at a university but I also run a consulting firm, I consult for multiple clients and I teach adjunct at a community college. So I'm juggling three jobs and having a family in order to provide financially because of the train wreck that autism is.

Dr. G: So, a little bit of a touch question, do you ever reflect on how life would have been different for you and your family if this didn't happen?

Dr. H: That's a really good question, I reflect on that on a regular basis. This year the beginning of the semester when I had students come in for their classes was rather hard on me because this would have been the freshman year of college that my son would have started if he hadn't have been vaccine damaged and seeing these young adults come in, take their classes, buy their books, study, interact with their peers, go have a good time, go to movies, drive a car, all of these things that my son cannot do, it really, really hit me hard this year. It was the first time that I had actually encountered that. We've homeschooled my son since he was four years old. We had a bad experience in a public preschool and at that point we decided that we would withdraw him from the school district, and so we chose to homeschool him but, this was the first time I interacted with students that were the same age as my son and saw the, just the complete difference, going home and helping my son with his Barney videos, watching Barney, watching Bob the Builder, watching things that just are not age appropriate for an 18 year old whose voice has changed, who's developing a beard. These are just not the things that you plan in life.

Dr. G: So with this obviously if you had understood the nature of vaccines, the risks of vaccines, the components of vaccines and especially with your education and academic background, you had had the to make other choices perhaps at least the opportunity to weigh it out and decide if this was the right thing or not and you've now done a good bit of research and in the vaccine community, in the autism community, you've become a very strong advocate for getting the truth out there, where has this lead you this journey to discover, why does the public not know about this, why do parents not know about this, why is it maybe a bad idea that the government wants to mandate that children get vaccinated? So talk about that journey a little bit.

Dr. H: Well my journey started in 2001. That's the first time that the Institute of Medicine (IOM) which is a part of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), that was the first time they convened a meeting and they specifically convened a meeting regarding Thimerosal, the mercury containing preservative that was in three of the series of vaccines that my son received, that's the first time that there was every any type of public meeting where parents could participate, parents could send in comments. I was on the west coast, the meeting was in the east coast but, I was firing away emails to the NAS, I was following the research at the CDC which at that point, even though the CDC had not officially published any research on Thimerosal, we knew because of some of the things that were being leaked out, that the CDC had found a relationship between Thimerosal containing vaccines and autism, especially within the first month of life. The CDC was actively working to cover that up with very dubious statistics and I knew something was dead wrong and I was, with the internet really starting to grow at that particular point in time, the early 2000's, I was starting to meet other parents, other families, other people that were going through the same nightmare in their own personal lives that my family was going through and so I became active. In my past research I had done a lot of statistics. When you clean up a superfund site and you say it's clean, you have to prove it to some level of certainty . So I had developed an expertise in statistics and I tried to and I believe was successful in applying that expertise to the epidemiology that the powers that be, the CDC, the NIH, the things, and the FDA, the things they were relying upon in order to somehow proclaim in a very religious fashion that Thimerosal was safe. We knew that it was preposterous that anybody would say mercury, in any form, was safe to inject into an infant's body. We knew that and so the eyes were on the NAS, the IOM did deem that they could not rule out a relationship between T containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental disabilities and then the race was on. The CDC was trying to cover up this relationship. I was actively at that point calling CDC researchers, giving my input on their studies, studies that they were doing in the United States, studies that they were planning to do in Denmark, Italy, the UK. The CDC was so desperate that at that time to find any population of children that would somehow indemnify Thimerosal that they were going to Greenland. They were looking at cohorts of individuals with autism in Greenland to somehow to use that particular population to say there's no relationship between the Thimerosal that you get in the infant schedule in the United States and autism. They were completely desperate and so I knew at that particular point in time I had to get involved.

Dr. G: Wow, ... quite a journey because you ended up in communication with CDC scientists and most notably probably, Dr. Thompson. So you had a series of conversations now that have now been made public and some of them were recorded and were made public and it's kind of out there and people are seeing you know kind of behind the curtain. Can you speak to those conversations and what Dr. Thompson revealed to you?

Dr. H: Dr. Thompson was one of the scientists that I interacted with very early on in an official capacity. When I contacted the CDC's public liaison, she referred me to Dr. Thompson and another physician by the name of David Shay, who was working with Dr. Thompson at the time and so we had several very abrupt conversations, the CDC didn't like what I was saying, I received a cease and desist letter in 2004 from a CDC attorney saying that I was no longer allowed to contact these scientists, that the only recourse that I had was through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Dr. G: Why do you think that they felt so threatened that they had to cease and desist just to have conversations with their own scientists from one person who's got expertise in biostatistics and others and saying hey I want to talk to you about this. Why were they so threatened by that?

Dr. H: I knew because of my background in statistics, I knew what they were doing. I knew that they were actively working hard to bury a relationship that they didn't want to go public and I knew that the reason why they were doing that, I had recovered emails via the FOIA...

Dr. G: For those that don't understand that FOIA is the Freedom of Information Act, the CDC it's a government entity and we the citizenry have rights to get disclosed, not all of information is available to us but a lot of information is available to us so you filed this request for FOIA and if they honor the request they'll give you certain documents, so what did you find?

Dr. H: I received documents early on from the CDC and I found that in the background the chief scientists in vaccine safety were trying to preserve the vaccination program. They had no intent to help children but everything was focused on oh, we have to preserve the vaccine program and we have to keep that going. And there's also...

Dr. G: Why do you think that is? Why do you think they seemed so hell bent, these are scientists supposedly they are serving the cause of humanity. Why do you think they were hell bent on preserving the vaccine program as compared to reporting the data as they saw it?

Dr. H: The CDC acts as a vaccine company. They buy 4.6 billion dollars worth of vaccines every year from pharmaceutical companies and they take those vaccines and they distribute them to the state health departments.

Dr. G: Literally, the CDC purchases over 4 billion dollars worth of vaccines themselves?

Dr. H: That is correct, that is one of the things

Dr. G: So they're a purchasing agent also not just a researching entity but a purchasing agent?

Dr. H: They are a purchasing agent and they're extremely conflicted. They did not want vaccination rates to go down primarily because if vaccination rates went down they would not be reimbursed for the vaccines that they were buying to be distributed by state public health departments. So, it's big business. It's big money. 4.6 billion dollars were on the line and that's when you see a scientist talking about the nebulous well, we have to keep the vaccine program going, we can't damage the vaccine program, when you see a CDC scientist saying that, basically what they are saying in the background is we need to get our reimbursement of that 4.6 billion.

Dr. G: So you start submitting your first FOIA requests, what comes back?

Dr. H: The first FOIA requests that I submitted were in 2004 and just to backup, the primary reason I was submitting those requests was because CDC had cut off any scientist to scientist contact that I had with Thompson or any of the other scientists in the vaccine division so, my only recourse to get information from CDC was via the FOIA and I started to submit requests and one of the first things that came back was a big cheat on a study that had come out of Denmark.

Dr. G: A big cheat, what does that mean?

Dr. H: Cheat. It means that they used statistics to lie about the autism incidents in Denmark.

Dr. G: That's an extremely bold statement so you're asserting it like with full certainty, so why do you say that?

Dr. H: I have full certainty that what they did, somebody got the big idea that autism rates were increasing in Denmark even though they had removed Thimerosal from the vaccines in 1992. So therefore if there was a connection between Thimerosal and vaccines and the autism epidemic, then you should have seen numbers go down in Denmark. Okay? What they did was they published false data showing a very false increase in the incidence of autism in Denmark. But it came to data that was in 1999, 2000 and 2001 when the oldest kids were actually able to get an autism diagnosis and there was a steady downward trend. So what CDC did in connection with the Denmark researchers is that they recommended that they remove the last data point so the only thing that you would see was an upward trend and the autism diagnosis after they removed Thimerosal from vaccines and we know, historically, we know now that's what is called the Madison study, it came out in 2003 in the Journal of Pediatrics (JOP) and historically that study has been debunked but I actually got the emails where they made the decision that they were not going to put the last data points in the study because they indeed showed a downward trend and that was counter to CDC policy to keep Thimerosal in vaccines.

Dr. G: So let me get clear, you've actually seen emails where they said we're going to remove certain data points to give a false impression of autism rates so people will not draw the correlation between Thimerosal, in this particular case Thimerosal and autism?

Dr. H: You have to understand the CDC never puts that type of verbiage in an email. They will never say something like that. But they had a coauthor from Denmark who was saying these data sets, these data points are important and but we need to include them in the publication and then the principle investigator who was at the CDC at the time said no, we have to have a discussion and we may have to remove that data and we know historically, if you go back to the Paper, they removed the information that would have shown a downward trend, not an upward trend, but a downward trend after they removed Thimerosal in vaccines.

Dr. G: And was there any reason given for the removal for the person at the CDC advocating no, no, we need to remove that data, did they give a reason?

Dr. H: No.

Dr. G: Just the fact that it had to be removed.

Dr. H: There was no evidence, there was no reason, there was no scientific reason to remove that data point. The data point was clear. It was data from 2000 and 2001. It needed to be included because it showed the rates were going down. So there's no scientific reason to do that.

Dr. G: So now, this is roughly 2004 or so (Dr. H: That's correct.) so now you're seeing the first evidence, I'm talking about evidence, not speculation (Dr. H: Right) that they are literally manipulating data, omitting information to get a certain outcome impression in their data that they want to release publicly? (Dr. H: Right.) What happened after that?

Dr. H: The information started tumbling in from the CDC and one of the things you know people have asked me before why did you FOIA the CDC so many times. Well, it was easy. All I had to do was shoot off an email and the CDC would process the information and at first the information was coming back in a very, very timely basis. I would get information maybe five, six months after submitting the request, which in government terms, was a short period of time. I was analyzing the information along with David Guyer who is a very prolific scientist who works with his dad, Mark Guyer, who published many, many studies on Thimerosal and we would go through the information together just glean anything that we could that would show the evidence of fraud, evidence of manipulation or evidence of taking whole data sets and hiding them from the public and that's probably the thing that stuck out the most was what CDC was trying to do, they were coming up with their own fraudulent studies and then by law they were supposed to supply the data so independent scientists could check their work but what they were doing in the background was they were playing a shell game so they could hide that data so nobody could get access to the data, reanalyze the studies and show the faults and the fatal flaws in their science.

Dr. G: So you were extrapolating these conclusions by teasing out bits and pieces from all the FOIA information that came back to you?

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: What kind of volume are we talking about? How much stuff are they sending you?

Dr. H: I've probably received, I'd say 500,000 pages of documents.

Dr. G: 500,000 pages?

Dr. H: Some of them are redacted, redacted means that the information is blocked out and removed, some are actually just full clean copies of information. I received a contract between the CDC and the IOM regarding their final meeting in 2004 which basically put the nails in the coffin in terms of the government's response on Thimerosal in vaccines.

Dr. G: How so?

Dr. H: The 2004 IOM, the committee met in February of that year and they submitted a report, the report came out in May and not only did they say that there was no conclusive evidence showing a relationship between Thimerosal exposure and autism, but they also went further in an unprecedented move and they said that no research should be done further on this particular link and you know when somebody's saying no research should be done on a particular link, that they're trying to hide something.

Dr. G: Wow, what's going through your mind at this point? It's 2004, you're the father of an autistic child, you have basically done the research and math to say this much mercury went into his body, that's an extraordinary amount of toxicity and that my child is autistic, it's disrupted and transformed my entire life, my wife's life, our family, etc., I'm a research scientist, and you've got a background in statistics and you start getting this information and you see literally the malfeasance and now I could understand the (inaudible) saying wow this is really wrong, etc. but what's going on in the kind of the psycho emotional side that you're seeing this and realizing the damage it's done to your family and that they're trying to hide this stuff. How did that feel?

Dr. H: It was very, very difficult. Between 2004 until about 2007 I literally for my own emotional stability, I took a break in 2007 and I curtailed some of my FOIA activities just because I needed to rest. When you look at that much evil in the face on a regular basis and you know people are lying wholesale about a large portion of children in our society, it's very, very difficult to sleep at night. I didn't realize that the government entities could be as evil and corrupt as the CDC was and still is, and so I worked very, very hard to get the information to some level of closure. I put out a website with another autism dad who's actually very, very active in community, J.B, Handley. J.B. and I published a website called Put Children First .org and many of the information requests and many of the responses to the information requests that I received were put out on that website and it had an entire narrative specifically at that time regarding Thimerosal in vaccines. I also had, I just was starting to come to the grips with the fact that the CDC was studying Thimerosal in vaccines because they were trying to put down the furor that was in the public regarding children's exposure to mercury. What that meant was that there was an entire vaccination schedule, there was an entire laundry list of other components that because there was no furor about the CDC wasn't studying. Okay, so that threw everything regarding the vaccination program in doubt.

Dr. G: And you have to imagine, so here you are this huge government institution that has the public trust and that they are also buying 4.6 billion of vaccines a year that they are actually a purchaser of billions of dollars of these things to imagine that if they said oops, we made a mistake. How could they possibly admit to that but now you're pinned in a corner in a respect because we will lose the faith of the American people, we will be under extraordinary attack but if we continue to try and protect and hide the results that we know to be true, more kids are being damaged and families destroyed every single day.

Dr. H: It just flat out appeared from the documents that I received via the FOIA that the CDC didn't care. There was such a huge level of callousness and enmity for the parents of affected children.

Dr. G: So when you say evil, that's what you mean.

Dr. H: Not only did I hate the CDC but the CDC hated parents like me. They hated anybody that would question the status quo. Anybody that would rail against the advisory committee for immunization practices and the schedule that they put out every year. Anybody that would raise a stink against that. I was calling my congressional official, I was calling my two senators, they were conducting their own independent investigations. At that time Dr. David Weldon was a member of Congress, he was running his own independent investigation. I was working with his office on that investigation and so the CDC instead of looking at that and responding appropriately and saying we have a problem, we have not only a public relations problem but a scientific and a grave medical problem. They continued to cover up and they became very, very polarized against anybody that like I said would rail against the status quo.

Dr. G: Now 2004, 2007, you're crawling through huge volumes of documents, you're seeing this as you referred to it as the face of evil and now in 2007 you need to take a break. What happens then?

Dr. H: In 2007 I took a break from the activity, I finished my career up at the National Laboratory and made the decision to move on.

Dr. G: Well incidentally this is interesting, while this is going on you're working for the government.

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: The government hired you because they felt your credentials as a scientist, researcher, etc. in your area of expertise, they felt that you were worthy of employment for that. In the meantime you're looking at what the government's doing in a different branch of the government and seeing all this malfeasance and now you know you couldn't write this story in a novel to make it believable. Now 2007 you decide you're going to leave that government position or you're going to move on to another phase of your career and take a break from all this activity in reviewing the CDC's activities.

Dr. H: That is correct, I suspended the activities in 2007. I also then concluded my career as more of a prolific researcher scientist in 2009. I left the National Laboratory and then became a part of the faculty at Simpson University in 2010. I felt there was an intense amount of scrutiny that National Laboratory was a great environment to do research but it was also in and of itself it was a pressure cooker of a job and having those types of responsibilities and having a special needs child at home and a wife who has sacrificed her career to take care of a special needs child at home, then I needed to have a change.

Dr. G: So now what happens, when did you reengage, what encouraged you to re engage in this?

Dr. H: I started my job at Simpson University in 2010 and very early on I contacted Mark and David Guyer and wanted to talk to them about some of the FOIA requests that I had done at the very beginning back in 2004. I felt like there was more information available. The CDC had done a level best job of withholding, redacting, marking out information that I felt was vital and would expose more of the lies in terms of the studies that the CDC was saying was reliable evidence to show that vaccines and vaccine components were safe. In conversation with the Guyers, we decided to sue the CDC.

Dr. G: You sued the CDC?

Dr. H: Yes July, 2011 with my attorney Bob Reeves. We filed a suit against the CDC for withholding information for the four first FOIA requests that I had ever submitted. These had to deal with studies on Thimerosal that involved Denmark, studies on Thimerosal that involved the UK, and several internal series of documents that I was trying to get from the CDC and at first I felt that this would be a very, very simple endeavor and that I had seen the documentation, we were in the Obama Administration. At the beginning of his administration he had filed a presidential order to say that entities like the CDC needed to err on the side of being able to release, err on the side of openness and so I was using that even as some of my exhibits in the lawsuit so I thought okay the CDC will see this and they'll finally release those documents. But instead what ensued was a two year fight against the CDC, tooth and nail, where we were filing motion after motion and then they would file motions not only to, not only against what we had filed as evidence, but motions to vacate previous decisions that the judge had made.

Dr. G: Really, so the judge had ruled on some motions and they wanted him to vacate those rulings.

Dr. H: Right, right, at that point in time the judge was ruling that the CDC turn over documents that had been improperly withheld, documents that had been improperly redacted and the CDC was trying to vacate those motions and the fight ended almost exactly two years later in July, 2013 and during that particular period of time the CDC had to release about 500 pages, more pages of documents because of the order of the federal judge and then we finally, rather than having to go through the appeals process with the case, we finally came up with a settlement with the CDC but the thing that stood out was the CDC was fighting tooth and nail not to release this information.

Part 2 - Dr. Brian Hooker

Dr. G: In 2014, you start to having phone conversations with Dr. William Thompson of the CDC.

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: So give me the lead up to that, so how did those communications start because you been in communication with him since the early 2000's, right?

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: So then what happened that got him to get on the phone with you?

Dr. H: As part of the lawsuit some documents surfaced that showed in the background Dr. William Thompson talking to CDC attorneys and actually attorneys who were fighting against my son in vaccine court, they were having these conversations behind the scenes as early as 2003 and 2004. To this day I have no clue why Dr. Thompson would be talking about my son's particular vaccine injury case, and so I emailed him, I was furious, and I didn't care if the CDC said that I couldn't email CDC scientists. I looked up his email address and I started emailing him and saying how could you talk about my son's case behind his back, how could you use that in order to curtail my conversations with CDC scientists, how could you use that against me, and I think I wore him down because low and behold you know I probably sent him three or four emails over the period of three or four months and then in November of 2013, I receive a phone call, I look down, it's a 404 area code, it's the CDC. I'd received harassing calls from the CDC FOIA office before and anonymous phone calls from the CDC before, so I knew not to pick up the phone. I didn't want to deal with what could be at the other end of the line but my curiosity got the best of me and I did a reverse phone lookup and low and behold it was Dr. William Thompson.

Dr. G: What happened when you got on the phone, what did he say?

Dr. H: We actually had a very, very polite conversation. One of the first things he asked was about my son and how my son was doing and he was almost apologetic in tone and this was somebody that was very, very different than the phone conversations that I had had with him back in 2003, 2004. He was a different man, he was a changed man and I could tell that right away just by sort of a conciliatory tone and it took about two phone conversations for him to say I know you're looking for information, I know you want to get into the central repository of vaccine safety data from the CDC, you're going about it in all the wrong ways, here's what you do.

Dr. G: He wanted to help you?

Dr. H: He wanted to help me get data sets so somebody on the outside could independently analyze the data sets and see first hand the flaws of the CDC.

Dr. G: So basically, he knew that there was something wrong with the way they were analyzing the data and he knew that you were looking to try to get that data to analyze it independently of the CDC but he also knew that you weren't going about it in the right way and he was giving you guidance.

Dr. H: That is correct and very, very quickly he showed me how to submit a release for a public data set and by law the CDC when they use federal funds to do a vaccine study they have to come up with a public data set that the general public, primarily scientists on the outside, can have access to and through his guidance, by January 2014 I was swimming in data that I never knew existed.

Dr. G: Wow, what motivated him, what did he see from the inside that made him want to help guide you from the outside?

Dr. H: He was motivated and this came out December 2013, January 2014 time frame, he knew that the CDC was doing bad statistics. He knew and he was telling me that the CDC was actually lying about the relationship between vaccines and autism.

Dr. G: You used the word lying, ...so knowingly were lying about the, what data they were reporting relative to vaccines and autism.

Dr. H: Right, he knew that not only, it started out a little more innocuous and he was talking about the flaws and the methodology that the CDC was using and then all of a sudden the conversation turned on a dime and we were talking about fraud.

Dr. G: Wow, do you think his conscience got to him, what do you think happened?

Dr. H: I think that this is something that had been brewing in his conscience since 2004 since when he saw just very, very specific blatant fraud by his superiors at the CDC and this is what he was reporting to me and he wanted to make sure that somebody on the outside knew that this fraud had taken place, and the that way he wanted to go about doing that was to give me the data and to publish, for me to publish the results in peer reviewed scientific literature that showed yes, there is a relationship and we started out with the MMR vaccine, which I undertook in trepidation because I was not an expert at that time regarding the MMR but we started out with a study that was fraudulent and flawed that he did in 2004 and he said I want you to reanalyze that data set

Dr. G: So just to get clear because this is very dramatic, a research scientist at the CDC who's involved in the autism study in MMR autism relationship which was one of the prime studies to debunk the relationship, because Andy Wakefield was completely discredited over, his minor assertion in the beginning that there might be a relationship here and then everybody says ... that it's been disproven that there's a relationship between the two, the CDC study, etc. This was something that was a milestone study and the guy who's on the research project contacts you and says please get this information and reanalyze it.

Dr. H: That is correct. He was the lead statistician on this particular study, the first author was Frank DeStefano who was and still is the head of the Immunization Safety Office (ISO) at CDC. One of the authors was Colleen Boyle, who is pretty much second in command at the CDC. She's a head of one of the major centers The National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities. Another chief researcher Marcia (inaudible), and then a postdoc who was just on loan from her university. The five of them colluded to cover up the results, several different alarming results that showed when you get the MMR on time you are indeed more susceptible and more likely to get an autism diagnoses than when you delay it until after three years of age.

Dr. G: Wow, so again strong words, colluded that literally and did Thompson talk about this collusion that these people got together and eliminated data from the study to make it appear a certain way?

Dr. H: He would talk about it in a very vague terms but he did use the word collude and he used very, very strong language to say that the data that the data that were published were completely fraudulent, that they had embarked upon the study and he started to share documentation, documentation of how the study was supposed to be done in the first place and then he guided me through the steps on how they deviated from that plan because they saw relationships between the MMR and autism and they did not want to publish them.

Dr. G: The hair on the back on my neck is literally standing up right now, so here you are and incidentally you've had numerous conversations with him for which were recorded so that you have documentary evidence to say these conversations are real (Dr. H: That's right.) and it's validated that these things were said and many more things that weren't recorded but the point is so here you are the parent of an autistic child who has the course of your entire life altered because of vaccines that your child was given and you're on the phone now with a research scientist from the CDC who publishes with other coauthors a Paper and he's the lead guy on the statistics for the Paper and is basically saying that there is collusion between these authors to misrepresent the data to try to show that there was not a relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism and yet the reality is that if you look at the data they had there is, and so now you are saying not only how are you affected but because of the collusion how many other families out there are sitting there with autistic kids because this information was never represented properly or truthfully.

Dr. H: The CDC knew about these relationships as early as November 7, 2001 because I have the memo that says November 7, 2001 and it delineates these relationships and it shows a positive relationship with the MMR and autism among African Americans, it showed an association with what the CDC terms isolated autism, that's kids like my son that got autism but didn't have any other types of co-morbidity like cerebral palsy or mental retardation that just basically regressed into autism there were strong statistically significant relationships CDC knew about it November 7, 2001 and you look at how many kids have been born since then, how many kids have been diagnosed with autism since then and how many kids actually got the MMR on time and how many lives, how many families could have been saved.

Dr. G: In your wildest dreams do you think you would have ever gotten to the point where you're on the phone (inaudible) with a CDC scientist who's on the autism study with MMR calling you and talking to you and basically saying reanalyze this data please and saying there is collusion between the scientists that there's fraud in the way that they're representing the data that you are a family that's affected. You know in 2001 you already reviewed that they were hiding things, I think you said November 7, 2001 that there was email traffic that you got through FOIA, all these years, all these kids getting vaccinated and one of the things, that I know because I've had conversations with you previously and I've watched Vaxxed, etc., but one of the things is that what they showed in this study was that if you delayed the use of the MMR vaccine the risk of autism goes down precipitately, correct?

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: I mean it was an obvious thing and they didn't even want to report that, they could have just said hey we have new data delay this but then it would admit that the people who followed the schedule in the beginning, have autistic kids as a result of their recommendations so they couldn't admit it.

Dr. H: The CDC would never go on record and admit that, so they chose to cover it up and what they did is they sat on that information for a year and a half, they would meet weekly, these five scientists would meet on a weekly basis, they would have Thompson rerun the data, reanalyze the data, he could not make the effect go away.

Dr. G: Even trying making the effect go away by reanalyzing the data or using different statistical manipulation, he still couldn't make it go away.

Dr. H: He couldn't make that information go away and so what they decided to do specifically with the African Americans, was they said we will only rely on race data for those individuals that have a valid State of Georgia birth certificate. So it took that population and it reduced it by almost a half, it became half as large and everybody that knows statistics knows that if you have a smaller sampling size you lose statistical power, you lose the relationship and so they used that, there was no good reason to say that oh we got race data from birth certificates because the race data was in all the school records for all the children that were participating in that study. The only reason they did that was to reduce the statistical power the scientists that were Thompson's superiors said run it this way and see what happens and low and behold when they eliminated those kids, the relationship went away.

Dr. G: And there could be no logic, they're saying oh I know one way we can reduce the sample sizes, if they don't have a Georgia birth certificate, as if that changes them genetically somehow, if that changes their species, why should it matter what birth certificate they have to the study and the population in the study. Is there any rational?

Dr. H: There is no effective rational for that. There is no scientific reason for that. It is clear cut that what they wanted to do was reduce the statistical power so they could make that relationship go away and when they were able to do that, Dr. Coleen Boyle and Dr. Frank DeStano called a meeting, said bring in all of your information regarding the effect with African Americans and we are going to throw it away, we are going to destroy that information. I don't have the exact day that they met but it was between September and October 2002 so that they've been sitting on that data for about eight months and they decided that they would trash can that data and if you look at the information that the CDC had after the trashcan meeting, those results were nowhere to be found. They buried them.

Dr. G: Whoa, Dr. Thompson who was on the study affirms that this shredding party, if you will, happened?

Dr. H: Dr. Thompson was there at the shredding party. Interestingly enough the superior who ordered the shredding party, Dr. Coleen Boyle, decided not to attend that particular meeting so her fingerprints were all over the meeting but she would not do the dirty work.

Dr. G: So literally these scientists on this project got together ordered together by their superiors to get together and said we want to eliminate this data and we are literally going to shred or discard, dispose of this data so we have no record of it.

Dr. H: That is correct, that is a violation of the Federal Records Act of 1950 as amended in the 1970's they were taking federal records that information could have been considered federal information and they instead of handling it properly and archiving the federal records, they destroyed it.

Dr. G: And when you look at the study it obviously isn't there and then they can say it's nowhere to be found except they didn't count on the fact that Dr. Thompson kept a copy.

Dr. H: Dr. Thompson knew that he would be legally liable for destroying that information so he retained his own copy of not only the hard copies but he also had the electronic copies of the hard drive of his computer and that's what ultimately what he shared with me.

Dr. G: This is kind of a pretty damming situation for these CDC officials because if I understand correctly Congressman Posey in Florida has a copy of this in his safe and there trying to call Dr. Thompson as a whistleblower to appear in front of Congress and talk about this fraud and deception.

Dr. H: That is correct. Dr. Thompson during the conversations that we had I wanted Dr. Thompson to do two things. I wanted him to hire a whistleblower attorney and declare federal whistleblower status so that he had the protections that were afforded by that particular status. He did that, he ended up getting one of the top whistleblower attorneys in the country in order to represent himself. The second thing that I wanted him to do was reach out to Congressman Bill Posey. Bill Posey has been sympathetic regarding the autism vaccine issue since he took office I believe in 2012 and so when he took office, when he took over he was a friend of our community and Dr. Thompson then went to him with large bins of information, physically took bins of information to Bill Posey's office, set those down and shared all the records that he had shared with me up to that point in time and we're talking about tens of thousands of pages of documents that showed CDC fraud that showed CDC (inaudible) inclination that when they found a positive relationship that showed a tie between a vaccine or vaccine component and autism that they would either bury the relationship entirely by throwing it in the trash can or they would downplay the relationship and make sure that the final publication had verbiage that said there's nothing to worry about, there's nothing to worry about the MMR, there's nothing to worry about Thimerosal, so indeed instead of changing the vaccine schedule to err on the side of safety they changed the vaccine schedule to err on the side of more profits for the pharmaceutical companies and themselves acting as a vaccine company.

Dr. G: Wow, I'm basically speechless so I can't imagine what's going on inside of your mind cause you're wearing all these hats, first of all your like the investigator who's discovering all this, you have a child that's vaccine damaged, you're a research scientist yourself so you understand these things on a deep level as far as how this could be pulled off and how they could pull the wool over one's eyes and you were also cognitive to the fact that there are children damaged every single day right now because this information is not public. What do you feel inside?

Dr. H: I was completely conflicted, when my head hit the pillow at night I would think about the lives that could be saved if this information was made public and I would try to weigh that against continuing the relationship with Thompson and other documents that he could funnel from the CDC to me in order to you know bring the CDC down which is you know I think it's still a worthy goal and if something needs to happen we need complete reform in the CDC. Thompson himself told me that vaccine safety didn't belong in the CDC or in the Department of Health and Human Services as a whole, it needed to be moved out, it needed to be an independent agency so, I weighed that effecting change against CDC and being able to reform this so somebody somewhere could know that the CDC came clean versus how many people were diagnosed with autism today. How many people are going to be diagnosed with autism tomorrow. How many people are going to comply blindly with a bloated vaccination schedule that's a recipe for disaster, it's a grand medical experiment. It hasn't been researched properly and the research that has been done shows grave danger for people who follow that vaccination schedule and so I was very, very conflicted. I also worked early on, it was never really palatable for me to record phone conversations with Dr. Thompson especially without his knowledge. I did not want him to know that I was recording these conversations because I wanted him to speak honestly, I wanted him to repeat some of the things that he had said to me in conversations with me that I had not recorded and so I had two attorneys working with me to make sure that what I was doing was not illegal. Now, I life in California, California is a two party consent state so it is illegal to record somebody without their knowledge. I'm next door to Oregon so two of the calls that were recorded were made in Oregon, another one of the calls was made in Virginia which is a one party state and then the final call was made in Illinois which is a one party state and so I needed to protect my family, I wanted some type of proof that this had happened. I wanted some type of evidence, some type of timestamp that said we had these conversations, this is definitively Bill Thompson revealing this information to me. This isn't me with a pile of information this was me with a government employee who's making admissions of collusion to commit fraud by senior CDC officials and that's why I recorded those calls.

Dr. G: And not only is it government employee it's not like some ad...(inaudible) person going I don't know what's going on in the other room over here it's the guy in the center of it basically he's one of the guys on the study but here's the thing out in the world when you mention autism and vaccines, oh, but that's been disproven, they look at you like you're some kind of idiot oh, that's been refuted, that's been scientifically proven, so now people are lining up saying now I don't have to worry about this that's all been disproven because of what's been put out and they are vaccinating these kids and literally even if you decided that you wanted to vaccinate which is probably based on everything that we know not a good idea but even if you decide I want to do it literally if they just reported the data and they delayed in the administration of the MMR vaccine that would reduce the risk you're taking by a lot according to the data that that study originally gathered.

Dr. H: That is correct. If you look at the original data and I did the analysis, I did the analysis in January and February of 2014 I saw that the risk for African American males that received the MMR on time was three times greater than African American males that got the MMR vaccine after three years of age.

Dr. G: Three times greater?

Dr. H: Three times greater. There was three times as much autism.

Dr. G: It's not like a 15 or 20 percent, it's three times more likely to get autism if they vaccinate before 36 months as compared to after?

Dr. H: That is correct, that is correct.

Dr. G: In the African American population.

Dr. H: That is correct.

Dr. G: And that's what they said, we're going to bury that data, we're going to dispose of that data, we're not reporting it at all but it's in the original.

Dr. H: It's in the original study. It's in their data and it was I attempted to publish that information. I had a publication accepted in the Journal of Translational Neuro.... (inaudible). It's a journal that I had published in before. We went through peer review, the article appeared in print. At the end of July of 2014 and low and behold when the entire whistleblower story broke, and this broke in around August 21, 2014, it took about four days and the Journal took my Paper down from the web site so it was no longer, at first they said

Dr. G: Did they full retract it or did they just don't put it up?

Dr. H: They published a statement, they took the Paper completely down, they published a statement saying the results of this Paper would have a negative effect on public health.

Dr. G: The truth has negative effect on public health and we can't let that happen.

Dr. H: So, we can't let them happen, about 24 hours later they instead changed that and said that I had undisclosed conflict of interests, which was rubbish, which was completely fabricated.

Dr. G: What's your conflict of interest? What monetary gain do you get by publishing this data, but what I'm hearing is they never said that your statistical analysis was wrong.

Dr. H: No.

Dr. G: So they basically were trying to find other ways (inaudible) it went through peer review they said this is properly done (Dr. H: Right) so they're looking for different angle to try to discredit the Paper.

Dr. H: Ultimately the Paper was put I like to call it on time out, because you know kids get time out and have to go sit in the time out chair, so my Paper was put in time out for about six weeks and during those six weeks I argued back and forth with the Journal regarding why it should be published, why my science was sound. They sent me back a paragraph description from one of their editors saying that my science was unacceptable. I rebutted that paragraph, they never sent a response to that and then on October 3rd, they completely retracted the Paper.

Dr. G: And of course no coincidence that when the whistleblower story comes out there's no (inaudible) profile of that, that's when your Paper gets retracted.

Dr. H: That's when my Paper gets retracted.

Dr. G: .... because your science was fine when they published it. How do you control the outrage and how do you not let it eat you up inside, it's really almost unthinkable?

Dr. H: It is very...very, very difficult to respond to be able to let things like that go and it was difficult, it was a difficult step for me to forgive Thompson, I mean in the first place. I mean I felt like he alone, by sitting on this as long as he did is culpable for a large amount of damage to society. There are a lot of families who have been shattered and I really did have to let it go and my wife, Marsha, was instrumental in you know what you need to let this thing whole thing go and getting my Paper retracted, I never got detention in school, I never had anything big like that happen, I've never had a Paper retracted and so having that was a real psychological blow to me and I just had to let it go but the silver lining was I was contacted by several scientists that said look we know what you've gone through, we want you to republish that data because that data needs to be in the public domain and they've provided an opportunity, this whole Paper will be republished, actually in a much more expanded form and laying out the logic of why my results are correct and why the Paper should never have been retracted in the first place and it's coming out in a book I believe in the Fall of 2017 that's published by Elsevier Scientific, one of the very reputable publishing companies (Dr. G: I know who they are, sure.) and I've had my day in the public domain, I will have my day in the public domain and I count myself worthy of some of the scars that were endured by great people like Andy Wakefield.

Part 3 of Dr. Hooker's interview:

Dr. G is Dr. Patrick Gentempo, Dr. H is Dr. Brian Hooker.

Dr. G: In your conversations with Dr. Thompson the autism issue wasn't the only issue that came out, there's an issue with mercury and tics …

Dr. H: It's very interesting when you go to CDC's website and they have a specific website on thimerosal what they report is that there is no incidence of harm and that there is no harm caused by thimerosal except for occasional redness and swelling at the injection site . Nothing could be further from the truth and we don't have to go to independent literature to find that out. We go to CDC's literature. Thompson wrote a study that was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2007 and he looked at neurotypical kids, these are kids with no developmental delays, no malities, their ages were somewhere between 6 and 10 I believe and what they did is that they split the group into a high exposure group that had thimerosal vaccines and a low exposure group that had a lesser amount of thimerosal and they looked at all of these different psychological and neurological battery tests and what they found was a very, very profound difference in the number of boys that had tics in the high thimerosal group versus the numbers of boys that had tics in the low thimerosal group. ...It was statistically significant the relative risk was above 2.0 which means that it would argue in a court of law, so boys that were receiving the lion's share of thimerosal in their vaccines were at least twice as likely to have tics and show tics ... evaluated by an independent professional ...this isn't just due to parental reporting but an independent professional who’s trained to see these types of issues was observing these children over a three hour period and those that exhibited tics again the high thimerosal group had a lot more tics in boys than the low thimerosal group. The study that they didn't do they didn't have enough thimerosal control, so you could imagine if you had a control that wasn't exposed to mercury at all that the difference would probably be significant....Not only, the Thompson study came out in 2007 but the Verstraeten study that the CDC used to bury the connection between vaccines and autism had a corollary... and it basically said that in one of the ... tested they showed a strong relationship, statistically significant again, between thimerosal exposure and tics.

The CDC had a hand in a UK study they were actually ultimately responsible for the funding decision for the UK study where they came out in 2004 that also showed a relationship again between thimerosal and tics and this time they looked at boys and girls together, they didn't separate them out but it was statistically significant. Add on to that another study that Thompson did, he was extremely emphatic that thimerosal was causing tics especially in boys and so he did another study in 2012 that was published with a graduate student by the name of Jack Bareil ... and again a strong statistically significant relationship between thimerosal and tics in boys.

_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494582 --- 01/23/17 05:06 AM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY
In what he described was this systematic watering down of any result that he had if there was a statistical significance. ... He described it to me on the phone and he also shared documentation where there were memos written about his paper specifically on why he should not publish the result on thimerosal and tics. A chief CDC official, his name was Ed Travatan who was in the National Immunization program basically came down hard on Thompson and said you will not publish this result unless you can have a tic expert verify the result and basically what Dr. Travatan was trying to do was trying to dissuade Thompson from publishing the results in the first place. He wanted it in the background, he wanted it to never see the light of day.

Dr. G: And if you're called upon you have the documentation to support what you're asserting…

Dr. H: Oh, absolutely, yea I have the documentation, I also have Dr. Tonya Popavic who used to be the Associate Director for Science for the entire CDC. She was like one of the number two in the second tier but directly below the CDC director who said that what Thompson had to do was empathize the non statically significant relationship, those things that showed that thimerosal wasn't in the clear and downplay those few relationships that showed that thimerosal was causing harm.

Dr. G: So top level officials at the CDC directed him to downplay the relationship that he was observing in his research?

Dr. H: That is correct and it was so transparent that Dr. Thompson with his 2012 paper he went to the Journal of the American Medical Association and tried to get it published there ... The reception that he got from the peer reviewers was laughable. They basically said when CDC tries...sees a relationship that they don't like they try to downplay it, they try to do everything in their power basically to convince the public that this isn't a true statistically significant relationship even though it is.

Dr. G: So the peer reviewers saw that the paper was attempting to water it down and they basically said we're not buying it.

Dr. H: They're not publishing it, so they had to go to a second tier journal in order to get that research published. The Journal of the American Medical Association basically called foul on the CDC .

Dr. G: Now in your recorded conversation with Dr. Thompson do you talk about this mercury issue in tics and does he talk about what happened?

Dr. H: Not only do we talk about the relationship between mercury and tics but he also wanted me to launch a campaign basically suing CDC science against them showing, hey there are four publications that have CDC direct ties that shows that mercury causes tics in boys, why is this still in the flu shot.

Dr. G: So if you were to interpret the dynamics of the circumstance, basically this guy is having private conversations with you and he’s saying they're not letting me reveal what I have found in my research. Can you please get that data and get it out to the world? So do you feel that he was having an issue of conscience trying to do the right thing even though he was in an environment that would not permit it?

Dr. H: Absolutely, he wanted the truth to be revealed. He wanted the truth to be revealed about mercury and tics. He wanted the truth to be known about the MMR and autism and the day my paper was published, that MMR paper was published, he said he called me up and he said, you have vindicated me, the results are out. He figuratively breathed a sigh of relief that this thing that he had been hiding for all those years since 2001 was finally brought into the forefront and was actually published, and so it was a crisis of conscience for Dr. Thompson, he tried to alert chief cdc officials about these relationships and he was shut down summarily and instead of anybody, including all the way to the top, the CDC director at the time was Dr. Julie Gerbidin, shut him directly down and instead they made it an issue of his psychological state and said look, he's unstable, HR recommended that he get counseling, that he see a counseling psychologist, and that's traditionally what the CDC does. If someone falls out of line and is not spewing the party line of this CDC, then they become a personnel problem

Dr. G: What does the CDC say as their signature on their emails "Saving Lives, Protecting People." ...that's their moniker, yet there's now documentary evidence that they're doing exactly the opposite of that and then when somebody mentally breaks down, because they have an issue of conscience as a scientist who's charged with finding the truth and can't reveal it, they now think they need counseling.

Dr. H: They need counseling, these are crazy people, so instead of saving lives and protecting people it's saving programs and protecting profits. Exactly, that is what they are trying to do. People need to understand CDC functions as a for profit company. They are taking money, taxpayer dollars, they're buying vaccines, they're distributing those vaccines to the state public health department and then they are getting reimbursed for that distribution. If vaccine rates fall off, CDC loses money.

Part 4, Dr. Brian Hooker

Dr. G: So, Dr. Hooker, you're a research scientist, your Ph.D. is in biochemical engineering and you know something about toxicity especially because a lot of your career was spent cleaning up the environment from toxins. What can you say to us about Gardasil and what's in Gardasil and what you think of that particular vaccine?

Dr. H: The Gardasil vaccine is loaded with aluminum, upwards to 750 micrograms of aluminum per shot, okay, and they're giving the Gardasil vaccine down to girls and boys of 9 years of age...nine years old, there are some pediatricians, some physicians are giving it as early as 9 years of age. Aside from the fact that Gardasil was never really tested on that population, aluminum does not belong in human body. It just doesn't, there is no purpose for it, it has been tied to aminoplex (spelling?) in the brain, it is increases risks of neurological difficulties, the immune system doesn't know what to do with the aluminum atom, and so what we're doing is through a series of shots we're introducing not micrograms but milligrams of this toxic substance into girls and boys. It's incidents and we're seeing that Gardasil is having the highest amount of adverse reactions reported of any other vaccine that's on the market. It is truly a dirty vaccine. Now if you look at the number of reports of adverse events of Gardasil it is similar to the number of reports of adverse events to the birth control pill Yaz. Yaz was on the market several years ago and there were over 13,000 reports of adverse events from Yaz and so the FDA made the decision to pull Yaz out of the market, okay. Gardasil has been on the market since 2007 and it's far eclipse adverse event reporting that was made in conjunction with the Yaz but yet instead of pulling Gardasil out of off the market, or trying to do rational testing or trying to change the formulation to eliminate aluminum exposure, instead what they're doing is now they're looking at trials to give Gardasil at birth, so instead of giving Gardasil to a 9, 10, 11 year old child, they're giving it to, they want to ultimately give Gardasil to an infant.

Dr. G: So, let me get this straight, it has the highest reporting of adverse reactions events of any vaccine,

Dr. H: that is correct.

Dr. G: and the reaction to that is not only keep it on the market, but to now give it to infants instead, or in addition.

Dr. H: In addition to give it to infants. In the public health community a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, and so if they can get that baby at a well baby visit then they feel like they're going to have better vaccine compliance if they can pop that into an infant rather than trying to coax an adolescent and their families to come to a physician, so that's why they're doing it.

Dr. G: Why do they put aluminum in them in these vaccines, what's the purpose of it from a say if you're a vaccine advocate here's why we put aluminum in them?

Dr. H: Aluminum in the formulation in vaccines basically stimulates a non specific immune response. So if you add it, it's called an adjuvant and when you add an adjuvant to vaccines that dramatically magnifies the immune response that the antigen, the HPV virus particle that's in that vaccine that drastically increases the response and it basically tricks the immune system into thinking that it has a bigger problem than it actually has. The problem with that is when you trick the immune system in that you get a prolonged immune response and you get an immune response that's improper for the human body. Not only does Gardasil when you have the quadrivalent Gardasil that has four different types of the human papa...virus and then you have the 9 valent vaccine that has 9 different types, not only is that completely unnatural in the way that the human immune system responds, we just don't, in nature we don't inject antigens directly into our body, 4 at a time, 9 at a time, that's completely improper, that's not how the immune system works but now we add an adjuvant like aluminum, that dramatically magnifies the response so the response is prolonged, the response is much more severe so you start to see auto immune immunity in the men and women that are getting this vaccine.

Dr. G: Wow, and if they have the adjuvant does that mean they could reduce the amount of antigen and save some money?

Dr. H: If they have the adjuvant literally there is another adjuvant that's used in vaccines called squalene and the term for squalene inside the CDC is Hamburger Helper because it can extend it. You can take a small amount of antigen and you can add adjuvant to it and it will magnify the response so that so you can save money, you hit the nail on the head, you can save money by adding that aluminum which is completely toxic to human physiology.

Official transcripts of all the interviews can be obtained at www.vaccinesrevealed.com. If you add one of the items to the cart, at the bottom of the cart page there is an option to buy a jump drive that is a lot cheaper but includes only the transcripts.
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494658 --- 01/24/17 08:39 AM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY
Episode 10: There are 11 hours left to watch it.

Dr. Tony Bark interviews Dr. Diane Harper on the HPV Gardisil vaccine and Merck.

"Godmother of the vaccine movement," and founder of the National Vaccine Information Center, Barbara Loe Fisher

Part 4 interview with Sayer Gi

Dr. Terry Wahls

The Check family and their attorney, Patricia Finn, on their legal battle.

Harper

Dr. Harper: “You see for Gardasil that protection is about forty percent. You see for Cervarix you see that it only has two types in the actual vaccine. That protection was ninety-three percent. So it shows that Cervarix has much more protection against HPV types that aren’t even in vaccine than does Gardasil. You don’t see that difference advertised because Merck was the first to market and they were a year and a half ahead of GSK. It truly is the marketing principle that one, which is whoever gets to market first gets over 90 percent of the market share and then people are anchored in what it is they purchased, what it is they think about and it’s very hard for them to change to something else.”

“So the public needs a simple message but unfortunately, that message was created by a for profit company and the simple message was at the time it came out, get Gardasil and your daughter will be one less meaning one less cervical cancer victim. Well in reality, she was never going to be a cervical cancer victim if she had gone on with her pap smears. So the concept of using fear to sell vaccines was prominent and knew that it could get a reaction from the public about I want to protect my daughter, I want to be a good parent.”

Dr. Bark: Do we know that injecting HPV dna in the bloom stream directly is safe? Where is evidence that … I understand in natural environment HPV is skin-to-skin, I understand that, but do we have any evidence to show that injecting HPV dna into somebody’s blood stream is safe

Dr. Harper: No.

In conclusion,

Dr. Bark: So it’s as though the vaccine and the whole marketing campaign around vaccine has reduced good behavior.

Dr. Harper: That’s right, and that is going to hurt women in the long run.

Dr. Bark: It will put them at higher risk for missed cancers.

Dr. Harper: That’s correct.

---------------

Fisher

Dr. Bark: Is it law that doctors have to give informed consent on vaccines?

Fisher: It is a federal law under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act that doctors are supposed to give parents ahead of time written information about the benefits and risks of vaccines and a description of vaccine reactions. Now the vaccine information statement that the CDC publishes is partly in existence because of that law and safety provision. Now we know that a lot of doctors don’t give parents anything because there’s no punishment or sanction in the law for not complying with the safety provisions.




http://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494694 --- 01/24/17 05:39 PM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY
Episode 10 extended, they also added on episode 3.

Available for 26 more hours.
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494763 --- 01/26/17 09:05 AM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY

Replay

Live Q&A with Vaccines Revealed founders, Dr. Beau Pierce and Dr. Patrick Gentempo.... We answer your most burning questions about the docuseries!

http://www.vaccinesrevealed.com/episode-qa-watch-now/
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
#1494929 --- 02/01/17 12:58 AM Re: More Doctors Coming Out Against Vaccinations [Re: MissingArty]
MissingArty Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 1968
Loc: Waterloo, NY

CDC Scientist Connects Vaccines to…

You are not getting the full story; you are not even getting a reasonable half story. The earth shattering scoop here is not about MMR, thimerosal, autism, tics, or language delays. It is about the very real possibility that there is outright malfeasance taking place at the federal agency responsible for vaccine safety, recommendation, promotion, and distribution. The CDC.

I have been working closely with an attorney engaged in vaccine injury litigation who is very familiar with the issues and players connected with the recordings. We have obtained authorization from Dr. Hooker, who owns these recordings, to publish them for the first time in their substantive entirety. This first post addresses the 4th conversation that took place on July 28, 2014. The recording and transcript, along with the relevant scientific studies, follow my colleague’s statement. The remaining three recordings will be posted shortly.

http://fearlessparent.org/cdc-scientist-connects-vaccines-to-tics-language-delay-recording-4/



The Brilliance of Dr. Suzanne Humphries on The Dangers of Vaccines

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McfXd_Xuojs&feature=youtu.be



RFJ, Jr. speaking at the CDC Truth Rally Grant Park Atlanta on 10/24/15 at 3:03 - 3:33.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1FFCyhQaE4



The Vaccine Did It: Mutated MMR Mumps Virus in the Brain of a Child Caused His Death, British Researchers Confirm

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/vaccine...h-british-resea



Historic Vaccine Laws Affecting You and Your Rights – Part One: The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act

My family’s research into vaccine safety began only because it had to. After our perfectly healthy twin sons became severely ill, and ultimately neurologically disabled following their routine childhood vaccines, we set out to find answers. Like so many, I had blindly trusted that anything approved by the FDA, and recommended by the CDC and my pediatrician, had been rigorously tested and proven safe and effective. I also trusted that I had been fully counseled on both the benefits and potential risks of the vaccines my babies were receiving. I was shocked to find out those things were not true.

During my early research, I was stunned by how much of what I was finding contradicted what I had actually been told.

http://www.texansforvaccinechoice.com/on...ine-injury-act/



Current Safety Concerns with Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: A Cluster Analysis of Reports in VigiBase - January 2017

A number of safety signals—complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)—have emerged with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, which share a similar pattern of symptomatology. Previous signal evaluations and epidemiological studies have largely relied on traditional methodologies and signals have been considered individually.

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40264-016-0456-3



R. Eyrland: “About those "PARTICLES" in vaccines! Here is some of what they found in vaccines. We know they have allowed for decades retroviral virus like particles to be in the finished vaccine products. I've been posting all the manufacturing FDA guidelines that proves that on my page. These pieces and particles would be difficult to test for because they can recombine in the cell lines used, to form new versions that there is no sequence test for because they are newly formed types. According to this report not all particles have been identified! So decades later they decide to start LOOKING??

New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro and Nanocontamination

Abstract: Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed.

In the Discussion section: It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA.

Results” The investigations verified the physical-chemical composition of the vaccines considered according to the inorganic component as declared by the Producer. In detail, we verified the presence of saline and Aluminum salts, but further presence of micro-, submicro-and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases, whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product (Table 2).

http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf
https://www.facebook.com/groups/22386297...485539221145613



Two Year Anniversary | My Anti-Vaccine Interview on CNN By The Drs, Wolfson

https://www.thedrswolfson.com/two-year-anniversary/



We Don’t Vaccinate Because...video and transcript

http://www.stopmandatoryvaccination.com/...are-not-needed/



Remember Dr. Judy Mikovits? She says that viruses are passed from animals to humans through vaccines.

Identification of replication competent murine gamma-retroviruses in commonly used prostate cancer cell lines

https://jhu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publica...retroviruses--4



CDC has until the 31st to comply

https://energycommerce.house.gov/sites/r...20170117CDC.pdf



Simpsonwood - The truth behind the vaccine cover-up by Russell L. Blaylock, MD

Abstract: On June 7-8, 2000 a secret conference was held at the Simpsonwood Conference Center in Norcross, Georgia to discuss a study examining the link between increasing doses of Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders. The study was done using the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) database, an official governmental data bank collecting patient vaccination information on the children from the health maintenance organizations (HMOs) being paid to participate. Attending were 51 scientists, representatives of pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturing companies and a representative of the World Health Organization; the public and the media were unlawfully excluded. The conclusions of this meeting were quite startling, since it confirmed a dose-response link between Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders that held up to rigorous statistical analyses. In their discussion, they make plain why the meeting was held in secret: the conclusions would have destroyed the public’s confidence in the vaccine program, and more importantly, their faith in vaccine authorities. When the results of this study were published three years later in the journal Pediatrics, the “problem” had been fixed, in that by adding another set of data from a third HMO, reorganizing the criteria for inclusion and restructuring the patient groupings, a less than statistically significant link was demonstrated. In my analysis I discuss the more outrageous statements made
during the meeting and how accepted experts in the field of mercury neurotoxicity were excluded from the meeting.

http://medicalveritas.com/manBlaylock.pdf
Website: www.russellblaylockmd.com



19 years after the Wakefield Lancet paper discussed the possibility of a link between the Gut and Autism, other researchers are now "discovering" the connection.

Study finds alterations in both blood-brain barrier and intestinal permeability in individuals with autism

http://www.massgeneral.org/about/pressrelease.aspx?id=2041



WIDE AWAKE: The Seminar that Changed Everything (Two 2 minute trailers)

They told us vaccines were safe. They lied. They told us vaccines were effective. They lied. They told us vaccines were necessary. They lied. It's time to learn the truth and see the information they don't want you to see. Join The Drs. Wolfson for a rare full-length cinema seminar presentation regarding the danger of vaccination, why the viruses and bacteria are beneficial, and ways to boost your immune system naturally.

https://vimeo.com/ondemand/wideawakeseminar/199392943?autoplay=1



Quotes from Simpsonwood (From Dr. Brian Hooker’s website)

http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/chapter2.html



CDC Knew Its Vaccine Program Was Exposing Children to Dangerous Mercury Levels Since 1999


http://www.ecowatch.com/cdc-mercury-vaccines-kennedy-2199157054.html



The Cover-Up Ctte Gov Rfrm Investigate-Mercury/Vaccine/Autism

Washington DC. Rep. Dan Burton, Chair of Gov Reform Committee comments on vaccines and mercury showing a video of an autistic child in full melt down.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Y1VTYzLYy4



SIMPSONWOOD

All the raw data supporting this study has been lost so say Dr. Verstraeten and the CDC, making it impossible to be reviewed independently.

You can review the Simpsonwood Transcripts that were obtained by the Freedom of Information Act - Here.

Here is Verstraeten's final redesigned study.

http://autismrawdata.net/blog/simpsonwood



A Must Read Before it is too Late! By K. Stoller

While the public-at-large does not yet realize that our science and relevant governmental agencies have been bought and sold, Heckenlively explains it all in detail using the revelations from CDC whistle-blowers about why we have the mysterious autism epidemic. The CDC Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research (SPIDER) is perhaps the most profound whistle-blower event ever and now all with eyes and ears know that the CDC is a den of pseudo-science and corruption that has sold-out our children for job security and money. The horrible crime against humanity that technocrats at our most trusted agencies perpetrated on the world's children will undoubtedly go down as one of the greatest crimes against mankind in recorded history, and if that sounds grandiose and incredulous, read Inoculated if you dare.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1945390964/ref=tsm_1_fb_lk



Mercury, Vaccines and the CDC's Worst Nightmare

This Interview With Robert Kennedy Jr A Is A MUST Read.

http://www.ecowatch.com/kennedy-mercury-cdc-autism-2147157503.html



As New State Legislative Sessions Begin, Renewed Efforts to Increase Mandatory Vaccines

2017 has started off with a bang. We are only about one week into legislative sessions across the country and so much is happening. New State vaccine legislation is being introduced daily – all over the country. Here’s the status of State bills throughout the US as of 1/17/17.

If you live in one of the following states, there are already vaccine bills filed that can affect your rights if they pass:

AR, IN, KY, MN, MO, MS, MT, NE, NH, NJ, NY, OR, PA, TX, and VA.

Here is a breakdown of the bills filed that we are tracking as of 1/17/17.

http://vaccineimpact.com/2017/as-new-sta...atory-vaccines/



Congress demands details of secret CDC lab incidents revealed by USA TODAY

But after taking nearly two years to release the reports about incidents that occurred from 2013 to 2015, the CDC blacked out large swaths of information when accidents involved particularly dangerous pathogens, such as anthrax, Ebola and certain deadly strains of influenza.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/01/17/congress-wants-details-of-cdc-lab-accidents/96551636/



Dr. Meehan's reaction to the documentary "Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0SCHhMCC-U&feature=share



Virginia House subcommittee tosses out immunization mandate bill

http://www.richmond.com/life/health/arti...2ehFe4.facebook



Synergistic Destruction: How Vaccines and GMOs Converge to Fuel Autism and Neurodegenerative Conditions
By: Dr. Matthew Buckley, PSc.D.

In order to solve our collective health challenges and the explosion of chronic degnerative diseases, it is imperative that we bring sanity back to our food production and disease prevention. Doing so means eliminating the scourge on humanity that Monsanto represents, and educating people about the necessity of detoxification strategies and nutrient repletion.

http://kinseimindbody.com/synergistic-de...ive-conditions/



Vaccines Are Totally Safe Say the People Who Brought us Vioxx, Bextra, Baycol, Trovan, Phen-Fen, Xarelto, Raxar and Seldane....

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/vacc...b08f5134b624b3?



Marcella on RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RU2BDZL3OFY&feature=youtu.be



Allergens in Vaccines Are Causing Life-Threatening Food Allergies

What food proteins are found in vaccines? The list includes ovalbumin, casein, gelatin, and soy. As Arumugham ascertained, however, synthetic vaccine ingredients such as polysorbate 80 and sorbitol also are sourced from food items, including coconut, palm, sunflower, wheat, and corn. Arumugham observes that it is likely impossible to fully eliminate residual allergen proteins deriving from these sources. Moreover, it takes very low-level exposure to food proteins to cause allergic sensitization.

Synergy with aluminum-based adjuvants

A more subtle and troubling point is that the aluminum adjuvants contained in many vaccines augment the food proteins’ immunogenicity (a substance’s ability to provoke an immune response). When numerous food proteins and adjuvants get injected in one sitting, as is the case when multiple shots are administered simultaneously, the probability of sensitization greatly increases.

http://info.cmsri.org/the-driven-researc...source=facebook



Vaccinosis: Health Hazards of Scheduled Animal and Pet Vaccines

Most pet owners aren't aware of the dangers in animal vaccinations that have been discovered in recent years. Major veterinary associations now agree that immunizations can trigger all sorts of maladies, from allergies to cancer - but most pet caretakers (and many veterinarians, it seems) haven't gotten the word. "With vaccines that are repeated year after year, the frequency and severity of these side-effects in our pets has increased dramatically." Dr. Donna Starita Mehan, DVM

https://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/AnimalWellness/Petvacc



Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons: was there a synergistic fetal toxicity associated with the two-vaccine 2009/2010 season?

CONCLUSION:"Although there was an approximate fourfold (43%/11.3%) increase in the percentage of pregnant women vaccinated in 2009/2010 compared with 2008/2009, there was a 43.5-fold increase in fetal-loss reports – from 4 in 2008/2009 to 174 in 2009/2010"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23023030



Contentious flu vaccine policies at hospitals are based on flawed research, study says

But a new study is calling into question the scientific evidence underpinning these increasingly common hospital policies — and could fuel challenges to the contentious orders.

The study, published Friday in PLOS One, concludes that the research used to justify mandatory flu shots for health sector workers is flawed, and that the policies cannot plausibly produce the benefits that had widely been assumed.

https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/27/flu-vaccine-health-care-workers/

Influenza Vaccination of Healthcare Workers: Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Benefit Underpinning Policies of Enforcement - January 27, 2017

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163586



CDC Publishes New Rules for Quarantine and Isolation on Last Day of Obama Presidency

There are new U.S. government rules that can force travelers into quarantine or isolation if they are suspected of having a contagious disease. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published their revised rules explaining how they will intervene to protect the public from the spread of quarantinable communicable diseases such as Ebola.

http://vaccineimpact.com/2017/cdc-publis...ama-presidency/



When 1 in 88 is Really 1 in 29

Sobering. Isn’t it? Think about this when The CDC tells you there’s no need to panic….

http://vaxtruth.org/2012/04/when-1-in-88-is-really-1-in-29/



Brand new podcast--listen to the doctor! Know a couple expecting their first child? Someone with young children?

Dr. Thomas has the largest practice of pediatrics in Portland, OR for a reason--he tells the truth about vaccines and practices true informed consent.

https://soundcloud.com/user-507883655/6-dr-paul-thomas-interview-how-to-end-the-autism-epidemic



New York State Requirements for Vitamin K & Eye Drops at Birth

http://nyvic.org/law/vitamin-k.htm

New York State Vaccine Requirements

http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements/newyork.aspx




Crunchies of Rochester

https://www.facebook.com/groups/Crunchie...485533678051570



Erin Brockovich fighting against Legionnaires’ Disease in NY

http://news10.com/2017/01/24/erin-brockovich-fighting-against-legionnaires-disease-in-ny/
https://www.facebook.com/ErinBrockovichO...485270946997132



CDC Knew Its Vaccine Program Was Exposing Children to Dangerous Mercury Levels Since 1999

Uncovered documents show that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) knew that infant vaccines were exposing American children to mercury far in excess of all federal safety guidelines since 1999. The documents, created by a FDA consulting toxicologist, show how federal regulators concealed the dangerous impacts and lied to the public.

In 1997, Congress passed the FDA Modernization Act. A provision of that statute required the FDA to "compile a list of drugs that contain intentionally introduced mercury compounds, and provide a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the mercury compounds on the list." In response, manufacturers reported the use of the mercury-based preservative, thimerosal, in more than 30 licensed vaccines.

FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) was responsible for adding up the cumulative exposure to mercury from infant vaccines, a simple calculation that, astonishingly, had never been performed by either the FDA or the CDC. When the agency finally performed that basic calculation, the regulators realized that a six month-old infant who received thimerosal-preserved vaccines following the recommended CDC vaccine schedule would have received a jaw dropping 187.5 micrograms of mercury.

Instead of immediately ordering the removal of thimerosal, FDA officials circled the wagons treating the public health emergency as a public relations problem. Peter Patriarca, then director of the FDA Division of Viral Products, warned his fellow bureaucrats that hasty removal of thimerosal from vaccines would:

" … raise questions about FDA being 'asleep at the switch' for decades by allowing a potentially hazardous compound to remain in many childhood vaccines, and not forcing manufacturers to exclude it from new products. It will also raise questions about various advisory bodies regarding aggressive recommendations for use. We must keep in mind that the dose of ethylmercury was not generated by "rocket science." Conversion of the percentage thimerosal to actual micrograms of mercury involves ninth grade algebra. What took the FDA so long to do the calculations? Why didn't CDC and the advisory bodies do these calculations when they rapidly expanded the childhood immunization schedule?"

http://www.ecowatch.com/cdc-mercury-vaccines-kennedy-2199157054.html



POLYSORBATE 80 - TWEEN 80 By Marcella Piper-Terry

In January 2016 the American College of Pediatricians released its Position Paper on the association of Gardasil with Premature Ovarian Failure (POF). One of the signs of POF is amenorrhea (cessation of periods after one has already begun having menstrual cycles). The ingredient of concern (as far as POF is concerned) is Polysorbate 80.

Gardasil is given primarily to adolescents and young adults... and is now being pushed on children as young as nine years of age. Of course, in female children who have not yet begun to menstruate, it will be difficult to tell if they have problems with cessation of periods.

Polysorbate 80 is also in the vitamin K shot given on the first day of life - within hours of birth. The Amphastar brand of the vitamin K injection contains 10 mg. (milligrams) of Polysorbate 80. It's the first ingredient listed.
Gardasil contains 50 mcg. (micrograms; there are 1,000 micrograms in 1 milligram).
Compared to Gardasil, Amphostar Vitamin K shot has 200 TIMES the amount of Polysorbate 80, and it is given to infants, including very low birth weight infants.

Look at this table...The American College of Pediatricians is concerned about Gardasil; a three-shot series given to teenagers, with a combined amount of 150 mcg.

TDap, given to pregnant women has up to double the amount.

Check out the amounts for the flu vaccines.

DTap, given to infants 4 times before the age of 18 months (five times before kindergarten) contains up to twice as much as Gardasil, for a total of up to 500 mcg.

Prevnar 13, given to infants 4 times before 18 months, has 100 mcg. each, for a total of 400 mcg.

Rotavirus, given 2-3 times (depending on age started) has Polysorbate 80 in "amounts not specified."

So... infants and children vaccinated according to The CDC's Schedule are receiving MANY TIMES the amount of Polysorbate 80 as teenagers vaccinated with Gardasil.

I would like to see a response to this from the American College of Pediatricians. It's not just about Gardasil.
Educate BEFORE you vaccinate.

http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/Components-Excipients%2014-0528.pdf
_________________________
Arty turns 8 this summer.

Top
Page 18 of 20 < 1 2 ... 16 17 18 19 20 >