 |
 |
 |
 |
#1471509 --- 05/28/15 10:52 AM
Re: State of the Science of the Health Risks of GMO Food
[Re: MissingArty]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2349
Loc: Waterloo, NY
|
Parents and tax payers are paying for this... The GMO Debate – Science and Society - New University Course - 4 Credits Course Objectives To enable students to understand the scientific background about GMO crops and food, to objectively assess claims made in the media and on the internet, to present cogent reports on the science, government regulation and social attitudes, and to defend their viewpoints with well-referenced, reasoned arguments both verbally and in writing. http://www.hort.cornell.edu/gmodebate/Pro-terrorist Cornell University takes money from globalist Bill Gates to push GMOs destroying America March 31, 2015 - By J.D. Heyes “We taxpayers deserve to know the details about when our taxpayer-paid employees front for private corporations and their slick PR firms,” Ruskin said. “This use of surrogates is par for the course with the biotech industry,” wrote Tim Schwab of Food & Water Watch in September. “Sometimes called the soft lobby, corporations routinely engage neutral-appearing scientists and impartial-sounding front groups to help advance their political and economic agendas.” And while Lesser said the study contained his personal observations rather than those of Cornell, GMO backers nevertheless began to refer to his findings as “the Cornell study” in their efforts to stave off initiatives by states to force food makers to include labeling of GMO ingredients in their products. The Alliance for Science site, then, is essentially Cornell’s GMO propaganda instrument. Fast forward six months to the latest alliance effort to quash the FOIA requests; it’s as if Cornell believes that Americans should not be told whether professors at the public universities they help fund are being influenced at all in their support of GMO foods by the corporate and philanthropic interests developing and promoting them. https://www.intellihub.com/pro-terrorist...roying-america/Is Cornell the Go-To University for Industry Science? August 28, 2014 http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/blogs/is-cornell-the-go-to-university-for-industry-science/Public Research, Private Gain - Corporate Influence Over University Agricultural Research Starting in the 1980s, however, federal policies including the Bayh-Dole Act of 1982 began encouraging land-grant schools to partner with the private sector on agricultural research. A key goal was to develop agricultural products such as seeds, which were sold to farmers under an increasingly aggressive patent regime.1 By 2010, private donations provided nearly a quarter of the funding for agricultural research at land-grant universities. !is funding steers land-grant research toward the goals of industry. It also discourages independent research that might be critical of the industrial model of agriculture and diverts public research capacity away from important issues such as rural economies, environmental quality and the public health implications of agriculture. Private-sector funding not only corrupts the public research mission of land-grant universities, but also distorts the science that is supposed to help farmers improve their practices and livelihoods. Industry funded academic research routinely produces favorable results for industry sponsors. Because policymakers and regulators frequently voice their need for good science in decision-making, industry-funded academic research influences the rules that govern their business operations. http://documents.foodandwaterwatch.org/doc/PublicResearchPrivateGain.pdf
_________________________
Arty turns 10 this summer.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#1471516 --- 05/28/15 12:04 PM
Re: State of the Science of the Health Risks of GMO Food
[Re: MissingArty]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2349
Loc: Waterloo, NY
|
EU Regulators Bow to Pressure from American Trade Lobby on Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Beyond Pesticides, May 28, 2015 ...she sent a letter to the EC’s Environment Director-General Karl Falkenberg telling him to scrap draft criteria that could have led to a ban on over 30 endocrine (hormone) disrupting chemical (EDCs) in the European Union (EU). ...the Guardian reported that a scientific paper that would have adequately established ways to identify problematic EDCs was suppressed by EU officials at the behest of the chemical industry. Despite attempts from a number of U.S. Senators, including Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT), fast-track legislation has passed the Senate and is on its way to the U.S. House of Representatives. In an opinion article to the Washington Post, Senator Warren wrote on a clause within TTIP regarding “investor-state dispute settlements,” which would allow multinational corporations to challenge US laws it views as unfavorable by leapfroging the court system, and pleading its case in front of an international panel of arbitrators. “If the company won, the ruling couldn’t be challenged in U.S. courts, and the arbitration panel could require American taxpayers to cough up millions — and even billions — of dollars in damages,” Senator Warren wrote. “If that seems shocking, buckle your seat belt. ISDS could lead to gigantic fines, but it wouldn’t employ independent judges. Instead, highly paid corporate lawyers would go back and forth between representing corporations one day and sitting in judgment the next.” http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=15748
_________________________
Arty turns 10 this summer.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#1471601 --- 05/29/15 09:17 PM
Re: State of the Science of the Health Risks of GMO Food
[Re: MissingArty]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2349
Loc: Waterloo, NY
|
Ever wonder how one of the leading producers of warfare and agricultural chemicals was able to become the leader in seed production? Check out this article to learn how Monsanto created its monopoly of food production. 1901: Pharmaceutical company agent John F. Queeny launches Monsanto to produce saccharin, an artificial sweetener then only manufactured in Germany. 1907: The USDA investigates whether replacing saccharin with sugar violates the Pure Food and Drug Act, a consumer protection law. President Theodore Roosevelt, a saccharin consumer, objects to the investigation. 1911: The USDA proclaims foods with saccharin “adulterated,” thus banning it except for use by medical patients who must avoid sugar. 1914: World War I starts, and sugar shortages prompt the government to lift saccharin restrictions. 1915: With caffeine and vanillin added to Monsanto's product line, and Coca-Cola as a chief customer, sales reach $1 million. 1917: Monsanto begins producing aspirin, becoming the top producer in the U.S., a title it held until the 1980s. 1901: Pharmaceutical company agent John F. Queeny launches Monsanto to produce saccharin, an artificial sweetener then only manufactured in Germany. 1907: The USDA investigates whether replacing saccharin with sugar violates the Pure Food and Drug Act, a consumer protection law. President Theodore Roosevelt, a saccharin consumer, objects to the investigation. 1911: The USDA proclaims foods with saccharin “adulterated,” thus banning it except for use by medical patients who must avoid sugar. 1914: World War I starts, and sugar shortages prompt the government to lift saccharin restrictions. 1915: With caffeine and vanillin added to Monsanto's product line, and Coca-Cola as a chief customer, sales reach $1 million. 1917: Monsanto begins producing aspirin, becoming the top producer in the U.S., a title it held until the 1980s. https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/heres-how-worlds-largest-biotech-company-came-be
_________________________
Arty turns 10 this summer.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|