 |
 |
 |
 |
#1465854 --- 02/10/15 06:30 AM
Re: State of the Science of the Health Risks of GMO Food
[Re: MissingArty]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2357
Loc: Waterloo, NY
|
Modern Farmer The Post-GMO Economy One mainstream farmer is returning to conventional seed — and he’s not alone By Elizabeth Royte on December 6, 2013 Still, winning converts to conventional corn can be an uphill slog. Post-harvest, farmers face a barrage of TV and print ads touting the latest seed technology. There’s a subtler psychology at work, too. Farmers have close relationships with their seed dealers, who often live nearby and keep them company at local baseball games, PTA meetings or church. “You can’t break up with them,” Bloom says, noting that seed dealers work on commission. DuPont Pioneer, for example, offers him a non-GMO corn for $180 a bag, while Wyffels Hybrids sold the same for $115 a bag last year. Why does Pioneer charge so much? Because it doesn’t want lower-priced conventional seed to lure customers away from GMOs. Bloom says a company dealer confessed: “We don’t want our farmers to buy it.” http://modernfarmer.com/2013/12/post-gmo-economy/
_________________________
Arty turns 11 this summer.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#1465887 --- 02/11/15 02:39 AM
Re: State of the Science of the Health Risks of GMO Food
[Re: MissingArty]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2357
Loc: Waterloo, NY
|
Institute for Responsible Technology “If these GE loblolly pines are released on a large scale in the US, there will be no way to stop them from cross contaminating native loblolly pines,” said biologist Dr. Rachel Smolker of Biofuelwatch. “This is deliberate, irreversible and completely irresponsible contamination of the environment with unknown and possibly devastating consequences. Forest ecosystems are barely understood, and the introduction of trees with genes for modified wood characteristics could have all manner of negative impacts on soils, fungi, insects, wildlife, songbirds, and public health. And all this for short term commercial profit.” http://sustainablepulse.com/2015/02/01/global-outrage-grows-unregulated-gm-trees/#.VNq_wI0tGAI
_________________________
Arty turns 11 this summer.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#1465889 --- 02/11/15 02:45 AM
Re: State of the Science of the Health Risks of GMO Food
[Re: MissingArty]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2357
Loc: Waterloo, NY
|
Erin Brockovich Before the sides line up to shoot at each other (and me), pay very close attention to what my question is. What is wrong with a consumer's Right to Know? If you want patent protection... and you want to sell your products to me, don't I have a Right to Know that is has been genetically altered. What is the problem with notification? What is there to hide? If it is safe... great; tell me and let me make my decision informed. The Deny Americans the Right to Know – or DARK – Act is expected to be reintroduced in Congress any day now. This reprehensible anti-labeling bill would both rule out any federal labeling requirement for genetically engineered foods and deny states the right to enact their own labeling legislation. In other words, if the DARK Act passes, the fight for genetic engineering (GE) labeling is over. In order to stop the DARK Act in its tracks, we need to make sure that every single supporter of GE labeling is heard loud and clear. That’s why this week I am joining forces with activists around the country in a National Week of Action to call on Congress to oppose the DARK Act and support mandatory GE labeling. Monsanto, the Grocery Manufacturers Association (an industry front group) and others have already spent over $100 million to keep consumers in the dark in Washington, California, Oregon and Colorado alone. And with millions more at their disposal, you can bet that Big Food will be pulling out all the stops to get this reprehensible bill passed this year. Let’s prove that the American people are louder than Big Food lobbyists. https://takeaction.takepart.com/actions/oppose-the-dark-act
Edited by MissingArty (02/11/15 02:48 AM)
_________________________
Arty turns 11 this summer.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#1466034 --- 02/14/15 05:36 AM
Re: State of the Science of the Health Risks of GMO Food
[Re: MissingArty]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2357
Loc: Waterloo, NY
|
National GMO Labeling Bill Reintroduced as U.S. Reps, Citizens Demand the Right to Know By Nick Meyer On February 12, 2015 A new bipartisan bill that would give Americans more information about what’s in their food was reintroduced on Thursday, Feb. 12 in both the U.S. Senate and House, as announced on the Center for Food Safety’s website. The bill, introduced by Sens. Barbara Boxer of California, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Rep. Peter DeFazio of Oregon, would require that food manufacturers label foods that contain genetically modified ingredients. “We cannot continue to keep Americans in the dark about the food they eat,” said Rep. Peter DeFazio. “More than sixty other countries make it easy for consumers to choose. Why should the U.S. be any different? If food manufacturers stand by their product and the technology they use to make it, they should have no problem disclosing that information to consumers.” http://www.march-against-monsanto.com/ge...-right-to-know/Sign the Petition https://www.facebook.com/notes/actions-f...889710961069591
_________________________
Arty turns 11 this summer.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#1466081 --- 02/14/15 11:49 PM
Re: State of the Science of the Health Risks of GMO Food
[Re: MissingArty]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/18/11
Posts: 2357
Loc: Waterloo, NY
|
Are Your Medications Safe? The FDA buries evidence of fraud in medical trials. My students and I dug it up. By Charles Seife If you manage to get your hands on these documents, you’ll see that, most of the time, key portions are redacted: information that describes what drug the researcher was studying, the name of the study, and precisely how the misconduct affected the quality of the data are all blacked out. These redactions make it all but impossible to figure out which study is tainted. My students and I looked at FDA documents relating to roughly 600 clinical trials in which one of the researchers running the trial failed an FDA inspection. In only roughly 100 cases were we able to figure out which study, which drug, and which pharmaceutical company were involved. (We cracked a bunch of the redactions by cross-referencing the documents with clinical trials data, checking various other databases, and using carefully crafted Google searches.) For the other 500, the FDA was successfully able to shield the drugmaker (and the study sponsor) from public exposure. http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and...idden_from.html
_________________________
Arty turns 11 this summer.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|