 |
 |
 |
 |
#1382813 - 01/16/13 12:58 AM
Re: New "Gun control" law passed by the state
[Re: Mean Gene]
|
S.P. King 4th
Member
Registered: 05/05/11
Posts: 318
Loc: PARTYING!
|
Mean Gene, can you go into specifics about the new laws? How does affect hunters in the area? Will any guns used for hunting be banned?
As far as my opinion, if that what it takes to prevent tragedies like Newtown, CT. I'm on board! Make sure all gun owners are responsible with their guns, if the mother of this guy in CT. properly had her guns locked away this would've never happened. I'm sorry she died but there is no reason her guns should have been out for her son to get especially with the problems she was having with him.
Nobody needs these type types of weapons unless they are planning on fighting an army. Anyone buying that amount of ammunition should have the FBI sent to their house!
Gun supporters are calling for mental health reform, yes I think this will help but you cannot assume everyone with a certain mental diagnosis is going to shoot up a school or movie theater. What do they want? Lock away anyone with a certain diagnosis why their precious guns remain on the street?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#1382875 - 01/16/13 10:24 AM
Re: New "Gun control" law passed by the state
[Re: S.P. King 4th]
|
RedSoloCup
Member
Registered: 12/30/11
Posts: 44
Loc: NY
|
They can make all the laws that they want but it is only hurting law abiding citizens. CRIMINAL DO NOT CARE ABOUT LAWS. Drugs are illegal and they are still being sold and use. If they want to ban "assault weapons" then they should ban cars, planes, trains, any type of utensil and anything that can be used to hurt or kill someone. It is a ridiculous law far as some of it goes like reducing the number of rounds from 10 to 7 in a gun that has a magazine, so in reality they are reducing it from 11 to 8. When you have 10 in the magazine and 1 in the chamber you have 11, and when you have 7 in the magazine and 1 in the chamber you have 8. Does the new law go for LEO also? If not it should because they fall under the law also. IMO the magazines should be left at 10 for law abiding citizens because criminals will still be using high cap magazines. Yes I believe that there should be more done with the mentally ill so they do not get a hold the firearms. If they are diagnosed as mentally ill at a young age then they should not be allowed to even shoot a firearm or know how to use one.
If you really think and look at where most of the mass shooting have taken place, most of them have been in GUN FREE ZONES, schools, some theater and first responder incidents. In Utah you are allowed to carry on some school grounds. If you would like more info on that just Google Utah school concealed carry and you will get all the info you need. What you don't see is when a criminal goes somewhere where there is an armed citizen that is willing to protect themselves with there CCW and 99% of the time the criminal is stopped or leaves because he/she does not want the confrontation or the risk of being caught.
It is not the gun that will kill people. I can leave my gun sitting on the table loaded ready to go target shooting and it will not go off. It is the person holding the gun that makes the gun shoot.
Also if the president is going to make it hard or impossible for law abiding citizens to have firearms then his security should be with firearms since the rest of us will not have. Oh wait that will NEVER happen because criminals will still have guns.
I know that I will get some negative feedback on this and that is fine. I will respond when I get a chance to all. I am sure Mean Gene will agree with me on some of this. The one thing that all of you have to think about is that a lot these shootings took place in GUN FREE ZONES.
Also feel free to PM me with you thoughts or questions
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#1382903 - 01/16/13 12:08 PM
Re: New "Gun control" law passed by the state
[Re: RedSoloCup]
|
evilducky
Member
Registered: 01/28/10
Posts: 75
Loc: NY
|
This law will not prevent any tragedies like the one in Newtown. This law only effects law abiding citizens and helps criminals. SP, what do you mean by these types of weapons? Semi-automatic weapons? You do realize that they are used in sporting competitions and everyday home/personal defense every day? If this is going to lower or stop crimes, then why is this guy saying that hes voting for it even though it wont do anything to stop crimes? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFC92PcHRxI&feature=player_detailpage#t=66s
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#1383108 - 01/17/13 09:42 AM
Re: New "Gun control" law passed by the state
[Re: Mean Gene]
|
Lucinda Knotts
Senior Member
Registered: 01/11/11
Posts: 1026
Loc: USA
|
So my old 13 round Browning Hi Power 9mm is exempt, but my newer 13 round Beretta model 92 Compact 9mm is prohibited? Who's going to enter my house to count the rounds in either pistol? Under what circumstances? For once, I (hack, cough) agree (hack, gasp, cough) with cwjga -- this is stupid!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#1383148 - 01/17/13 12:12 PM
Re: New "Gun control" law passed by the state
[Re: Cinnamon]
|
Cinnamon
Senior Member
Registered: 12/18/07
Posts: 793
Loc: Central NY
|
For the most part, the mass shootings were committed by people who were, until the time of the shooting, law-abiding citizens.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Moderator: FL1 Staff, FL1 Mod, FL1 Tek Deluxe, FL1 Mod 2, FL1 Office, FL1 Mod 3
|
|