FingerLakes1.com Forums
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >
Topic Options
#1376672 - 12/09/12 08:32 PM REAGAN NOT GUILTY
ric Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 02/17/08
Posts: 16
Loc: ovid, ny
ANOTHER LOST FOR THE YATES COUNTY DA'S OFFICE. AFTER THE WITNESS STATED THAT MR REAGAN DID NOT COMMIT A CRIME, THE ADA CONTINUED TO PROSECUTE THE CASE. WTF. CAN YOU SAY IT WAS PERSONAL AGAINST MR REAGAN? NOT GUILTY, NOT GUILTY!


Edited by ric (12/09/12 08:34 PM)

Top
FingerLakes1.com
#1376713 - 12/10/12 08:20 AM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: ric]
a49deere Offline
Member

Registered: 02/11/09
Posts: 55
Loc: ny
Hadn't heard this. I know when he was arrested they smeared his name in the mud multiple times, now that he was found not guilty, u don't hear a thing!!

Top
#1376717 - 12/10/12 08:37 AM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: a49deere]
Samuel Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 02/07/08
Posts: 4492
Loc: Potter, NY
Originally Posted By: a49deere
Hadn't heard this. I know when he was arrested they smeared his name in the mud multiple times, now that he was found not guilty, u don't hear a thing!!


I am sure you will see it in the news. Which charges were this trial for?

Top
#1376721 - 12/10/12 09:05 AM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: Samuel]
Mean Gene Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 08/10/09
Posts: 2362
Loc: Yates County
I would suspect the only way you would see it in the news is if the charged person brought it to the media's attention. The D.A.'s office doesn't do news releases on cases they lose.
_________________________
"Rational arguments based upon ample evidence will not change the minds of irrational people"

Top
#1376725 - 12/10/12 10:07 AM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: Mean Gene]
j3668py Offline
Member

Registered: 11/10/10
Posts: 483
Loc: new york
Originally Posted By: Mean Gene
I would suspect the only way you would see it in the news is if the charged person brought it to the media's attention. The D.A.'s office doesn't do news releases on cases they lose.
The finger lakes times ran a article last week after he was found not guilty within a half hour, should have never been charged but the DA had a hard on for him. The DA knew there was not a chance in hell he would get a conviction so he had his assistant try the case in village court, the DA watched the trial from a distance in the village police department over the camera, talk about being gutless.


Edited by j3668py (12/10/12 10:08 AM)

Top
#1376734 - 12/10/12 10:51 AM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: j3668py]
Samuel Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 02/07/08
Posts: 4492
Loc: Potter, NY
As far as the witness "tampering" as much of that goes on with the prosecution/law side than with the charged or indicted folks. Score it even and move along.

Top
#1376740 - 12/10/12 11:14 AM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: Samuel]
py.eternal.cynic Offline
Member

Registered: 12/05/12
Posts: 131
Loc: inside looking out
Is this the Reagan who was the former cop or a different reagan. I remember reading about the former cop that got into trouble.

Top
#1376743 - 12/10/12 12:06 PM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: a49deere]
S.P. King 4th Offline
Member

Registered: 05/05/11
Posts: 383
Loc: PARTYING!
Originally Posted By: a49deere
Hadn't heard this. I know when he was arrested they smeared his name in the mud multiple times, now that he was found not guilty, u don't hear a thing!!


I agree 100% if the arrest is in the news so should the not guilty verdict!

Looks like someone needs a job and it looks like the Penn Yan Police Dept. is hiring.

Top
#1376772 - 12/10/12 03:21 PM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: S.P. King 4th]
I did it! Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 06/26/12
Posts: 1960
Loc: West Coast 29 Palms
Another good old boys'club,you think?
_________________________
“The manner in which it is given is worth more than the gift”.

Top
#1376796 - 12/10/12 05:13 PM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: I did it!]
j3668py Offline
Member

Registered: 11/10/10
Posts: 483
Loc: new york
Presently Dick Reagan is captain of the fire police at the Hammondsport volunteer F.D. former marine and former law enforcement with the NYPD where he served as a tactical police officer... as a detective in narcotics... and DA office in the organized crime bureau. Mad Mike was the investigator in this case that led to a false arrest by the DA, jerks.


Edited by j3668py (12/10/12 05:49 PM)

Top
#1376804 - 12/10/12 05:53 PM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: j3668py]
py.eternal.cynic Offline
Member

Registered: 12/05/12
Posts: 131
Loc: inside looking out
Sounds like he has lived a distinguished life. I wish him nothing but the best and that he can put this behind him. Do you think that this may have been related to something else?

Top
#1377324 - 12/13/12 12:49 PM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: j3668py]
Superman03 Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 06/03/10
Posts: 19
Loc: Yates County
"The DA knew there was not a chance in hell he would get a conviction so he had his assistant try the case in village court, the DA watched the trial from a distance in the village police department over the camera, talk about being gutless."

Once again I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you must have been misinformed of the correct facts. First, the DA did not prosecute the case because it came from Benton, where the ADA handles the cases, The DA handles cases from other Towns. The trial was held in Village Court after a change of venue motion. Second, cameras are not allowed in the Court rooms, therefore, there is no video feed to the Police Department for the DA to watch.

Top
#1377325 - 12/13/12 12:59 PM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: j3668py]
Superman03 Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 06/03/10
Posts: 19
Loc: Yates County
"Presently Dick Reagan is captain of the fire police at the Hammondsport volunteer F.D. former marine and former law enforcement with the NYPD where he served as a tactical police officer... as a detective in narcotics... and DA office in the organized crime bureau."

Further; That sounds like quite the resume, if it was in fact accurate. An internet search will reveal the true resume of this gentleman. I think you will find the former to be trumped up and quite the opposite of the claimed (in addition to other 'interesting' facts).

That's all.

Top
#1377332 - 12/13/12 01:43 PM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: Superman03]
py.eternal.cynic Offline
Member

Registered: 12/05/12
Posts: 131
Loc: inside looking out
Are you implying that such a distinguished pundit as j3668py would misinform us with incorrect information? Shocking. Let's hear it!

Top
#1377337 - 12/13/12 02:03 PM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: Superman03]
Believer4 Offline
Member

Registered: 12/06/12
Posts: 83
Loc: New York State
There was no motion for change of venue. Benton Court Judge Grace recused himself from the Regan trial. Judge Falvey transferred the trial to PY town court.
Regan was a defense witness placed by the DA in a witness room in which the DA later placed 7 proscution witnesses. The court was not able to pick a jury from the jury pool.
Regan, a former NYPD cop, saw what was happening and left the room.

One of the proscution witnesses,44 days later, went to the DA's office said he had a short conversation with Regan. The DA took the ball and ran with it.
The Yates County DA instructed Investigator Christensen to interview Regan at his home. Yes, that investigator whose "retired", but not really. Twenty days after his interview...that is 66 days from the alleged incident... Regan was arrested.
Oh, by the way, the proscution witness who went to the DA's office was a Yates County Correction Officer.
A year and half later, Dec.4,2012, at a jury trial Regan is found not guilty in less than 30 minutes.
I'm not done with the story.
The next day the DA's office is quoted in the Finger Lakes Times article about the trial...."We still believe that Regan is guilty".
Folks... elections have consequence.
They were able to pick a jury six weeks later and the Benton Court judge instructed the defense lawyer and the DA's office before the trial that he wanted two witness rooms....one for the defense witnesses and one for the proscution witnesses.

Again, elections have consequence.

Top
#1377339 - 12/13/12 02:18 PM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: Superman03]
S.P. King 4th Offline
Member

Registered: 05/05/11
Posts: 383
Loc: PARTYING!

Top
#1377343 - 12/13/12 02:48 PM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: S.P. King 4th]
Mean Gene Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 08/10/09
Posts: 2362
Loc: Yates County
Originally Posted By: S.P. King 4th
I'm confused. Is this the same Reagan?

http://www.eveningtribune.com/news/x1134...es-County-court



No, that would be is son.
_________________________
"Rational arguments based upon ample evidence will not change the minds of irrational people"

Top
#1377347 - 12/13/12 03:04 PM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: S.P. King 4th]
Believer4 Offline
Member

Registered: 12/06/12
Posts: 83
Loc: New York State
Dear SP King and Superman the REGAN I'm talking about is not the Hornell cop....so get the spelling right. The Regan I'm talking about is close to 70 years old and his bio is correct.

And, Superman, the DA started the Regan process (hearings/motions,etc)in PY court. Saw where it was going and threw his ADA into the mess to take the hit.

MC the investigator...retired,not retired?...committed perjury at a hearing about a month before the trial while being questioned by the DA.

The entire affair was a car wreck and and an embarrsssment for the DA's office.

Top
#1377349 - 12/13/12 03:17 PM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: Mean Gene]
S.P. King 4th Offline
Member

Registered: 05/05/11
Posts: 383
Loc: PARTYING!
Originally Posted By: Mean Gene
Originally Posted By: S.P. King 4th
I'm confused. Is this the same Reagan?
http://www.eveningtribune.com/news/x1134...es-County-court

No, that would be is son.


So what was the farther charged with? I've seen the numerous charges for the son when I googled it but only remember seeing what the son has/had been charged with.

Top
#1377350 - 12/13/12 03:21 PM Re: REAGAN NOT GUILTY [Re: S.P. King 4th]
S.P. King 4th Offline
Member

Registered: 05/05/11
Posts: 383
Loc: PARTYING!

Top
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >