 |
 |
 |
 |
#1338770 - 04/15/12 08:34 PM
9/11 conspiracy
|
Rich_Tallcot
Senior Member
Registered: 01/19/03
Posts: 3737
Loc: Union Springs, New York
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmbPh3u7_q0
9/11 conspiracy A bit over simplified, but food for thought.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1338861 - 04/15/12 11:01 PM
Re: 9/11 conspiracy
[Re: twocats]
|
MeRightYouWrong
Senior Member
Registered: 06/29/11
Posts: 1478
Loc: Mountain of Truth
|
The New American Century
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1338871 - 04/15/12 11:51 PM
Re: 9/11 conspiracy
[Re: MeRightYouWrong]
|
PO'ed Moderate
Member
Registered: 02/26/12
Posts: 39
Loc: middle of the road and getting...
|
Stand on an empty soda can then tap one side with you finger -- you will go straight down. No trick. No conspiracy. Just science. It is a game most of us played as a kid.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1338875 - 04/16/12 12:04 AM
Re: 9/11 conspiracy
[Re: MeRightYouWrong]
|
Rich_Tallcot
Senior Member
Registered: 01/19/03
Posts: 3737
Loc: Union Springs, New York
|
Excellent. Unfortunately the clip is so long even though it needs to be to get the point across.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1338932 - 04/16/12 10:05 AM
Re: 9/11 conspiracy
[Re: Chicago Jesus]
|
MeRightYouWrong
Senior Member
Registered: 06/29/11
Posts: 1478
Loc: Mountain of Truth
|
Not to mention the can is only a few inches tall, not 70+ stories tall. When you're talking about 70+ stories, even a tiny fraction of an inch toward one side would topple the structure over. The fact that three buildings collapsed completely into their own footprints is virtually impossible because all the supports would have had to have snapped at exactly the same time, meaning the first floor that fell would've had to have been completely level as it collapsed onto the floor below it, which would've then had to have had its supports all snap at the same exact time, allowing that floor to fall perfectly level down into the next, for all 70+ floors.
Then there is building 7 that collapsed, though nothing hit it.
Then you have jet fuel, which doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel but supposedly did. The jet fuel would've burned up very quickly, so the only materials supplying the flames that weakened the steel would be office furniture, plastics, and many other things that burn cooler than jet fuel.
Then you have to consider the Pentagon, the world's most heavily protected military HQ, that allowed a plane to crash into it. When Payne Stewart's jet failed to reply to air traffic control there were fighter jets sent immediately to intercept it. Why did it not happen on 9/11?
Then you have to consider that it was public information that Bush was in that school in Florida that morning. Yet, the Secret Service let him remain in the school for half an hour after it was known the country was under attack. Somehow the Secret Service knew the school would not be a target or they would've, and should've, gotten him out of there as quick as possible.
Then you have a skyscraper in Madrid that was a raging inferno that burned for more than 24 hours and did not collapse. In fact, no steel-frame building has ever collapsed due to fire. but on 9/11 we saw three of them do the impossible.
I don't know, the more I think of things the more I'm convinced I'm not being told the truth. Questions are not allowed to be asked on this topic. We're supposed to let the government investigate itself, return a verdict that they had no foresight or complicity, and accept it as fact. That would be like if we had let Nixon investigate Watergate. I wonder how that verdict would've turned out.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator: FL1 Staff, FL1 Mod, FL1 Tek Deluxe, FL1 Mod 2, FL1 Office, FL1 Mod 3
|
|
