FingerLakes1.com Forums
Browse or Create Your Listing
Page 1 of 3 123>
Topic Options
#1298078 - 09/15/11 03:48 PM While the original thread was locked
ovidtech
Senior Member


Registered: 07/13/07
Posts: 2848
Loc: Between.
While the original thread was locked, http://forums.fingerlakes1.com/ubbthread...true#Post959051 I just wanted to let the good folks of seneca county know this guy is still out and about, or will be again in a few days. With all his past arrests, you would think something would stick eventually.

"Seneca County Sheriff's Office reports that Sheriff's Deputies arrested Travis M. Swett age 33 of 8382 Main Street Interlaken Apt #3 for Criminal Contempt 2nd. Sheriff's Deputies investigated a Domestic Incident in the Town of Covert where it is alleged that Swett shoved an 18 year old female who was a protected party on an order of protection from Seneca County Family Court.

Swett was arraigned before Town of Ovid Justice Ewing and committed to the Seneca County Correctional Facility with no bail. Swett will appear in Town of Covert Court on September 19th at 1000"

http://senecadaily.com/?p=5133
_________________________
We now have a goverment of the feckless, by the crooked, for the connected.

Top
#1298113 - 09/15/11 04:47 PM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: ovidtech]
Big deal
Junior Member


Registered: 09/06/11
Posts: 2
Loc: u wish u knew
ok so is the girl in jail for letting him come over even though she needed protection his arrest was probably the **** that all women use when they ask for protection and then invite him over he and her get intio fight he goes to jail thats ** put them both in jail for stupidity end of post my thought

Edited by FL1 Mod 3 (04/16/12 07:45 PM)

Top
#1298123 - 09/15/11 05:11 PM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: Big deal]
twocats
Silver Member


Registered: 02/09/10
Posts: 10728
Loc: NYS
Originally Posted By: Big deal
ok so is the girl in jail for letting him come over


He was the one under a court order, not her. I'm not saying she is right in inviting him over, but she wasn't violating a judge's order by doing so. He is a grown man, able to make his own decisions, correct?
_________________________
How come we play War, not Peace?
Too few role models.

Calvin & Hobbes

Top
#1298125 - 09/15/11 05:21 PM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: twocats]
VM Smith
Diamond Member


Registered: 11/28/05
Posts: 34255
Loc: Reality
Quote:
e was the one under a court order, not her.


Bingo. It doesn't matter what she may have invited him to do. If he couldn't do it without violating the order, he should have chosen not to do it.
_________________________
The evils of tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it.

John Hay (1872)

Top
#1298250 - 09/16/11 08:47 AM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: VM Smith]
Roadtrip2nowhere
Senior Member


Registered: 02/03/09
Posts: 4447
Loc: No where but here
My husbands family had an order of protection for his parents to keep another family member away from them. (with out giving too many details, the protected parties had deminished mental capabilities).The parents didn't want the order and allowed the family member to call, come over and visit, they sent money to her etc. At one point this certain family member was sent to Seneca County Jail and was making repeated calls to the "protected" parties home, which was a blatent violation of the order.
The Sheriff was called, repeatedly the DA was called, repeadetly and the Judge that issued the O/P was called....the family got NO WHERE!
Finally after many many more calls to the DA's office (the present DA) he invited 2 family members to his office to discuss the matter....along with Sheriff Stenberg and I believe his investigator. This is what transpired:
Sheriff Stenberg informed the family members that because the "protected party" didn't want the O/P then they (law enforcement)didn't have a way to enforce it! So basicly it was just fine and dandy that a prisoner in his jail could just ignore a COURT ORDERED ORDER OF PROTECTION because her "victims" didn't want it.
Personally I think I should have taken out a full page ad in the newspaper that read: ATTENTION!!! anyone that has been arrested for allowing anyone to come in contact with you even though there is an O/P...if it was in Seneca county no worries it's OK! You won't get charged with CONTEMPT OF COURT!!!
_________________________
‎"The winds of grace are always blowing; all we need to do is raise our sails."

Top
#1298255 - 09/16/11 08:59 AM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: twocats]
s2hphoto.com
Senior Member


Registered: 05/04/10
Posts: 3303
Loc: NYS
Originally Posted By: twocats
Originally Posted By: Big deal
ok so is the girl in jail for letting him come over


He was the one under a court order, not her. I'm not saying she is right in inviting him over, but she wasn't violating a judge's order by doing so. He is a grown man, able to make his own decisions, correct?


From experience I know first hand restraining orders go BOTH ways... The Perp is not to contact the victim and the victim is not to contact the perp.

Just ask my spiteful high school/college ex-girlfriend who put a restraining order against me after our last argument/break-up. Even though we were broke up and an order in place, she started stalking me. She would drive by my parents house that's on a dead end street, show up to places she would know I would be, and even sit on the side of the road adjacent from my parents street watching me to come home and that time I drove past my parents street, went to the police station, and she was arrested ... it also happened to be her birthday.... HAPPY BIRTHDAY WITCH!!!!! BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA
_________________________
Spiritual people inspire me.
Religious people FRIGHTEN me!

Top
#1298257 - 09/16/11 09:37 AM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: Roadtrip2nowhere]
threeputt
Senior Member


Registered: 12/08/01
Posts: 2800
Loc: Waterloo
Originally Posted By: Roadtrip2nowhere
My husbands family had an order of protection for his parents to keep another family member away from them. (with out giving too many details, the protected parties had deminished mental capabilities).The parents didn't want the order and allowed the family member to call, come over and visit, they sent money to her etc. At one point this certain family member was sent to Seneca County Jail and was making repeated calls to the "protected" parties home, which was a blatent violation of the order.
The Sheriff was called, repeatedly the DA was called, repeadetly and the Judge that issued the O/P was called....the family got NO WHERE!
Finally after many many more calls to the DA's office (the present DA) he invited 2 family members to his office to discuss the matter....along with Sheriff Stenberg and I believe his investigator. This is what transpired:
Sheriff Stenberg informed the family members that because the "protected party" didn't want the O/P then they (law enforcement)didn't have a way to enforce it! So basicly it was just fine and dandy that a prisoner in his jail could just ignore a COURT ORDERED ORDER OF PROTECTION because her "victims" didn't want it.
Personally I think I should have taken out a full page ad in the newspaper that read: ATTENTION!!! anyone that has been arrested for allowing anyone to come in contact with you even though there is an O/P...if it was in Seneca county no worries it's OK! You won't get charged with CONTEMPT OF COURT!!!


.....and the DA agreed? Apparently, Stenberg is right. Maybe it sucks but that's the reality of it.

Top
#1298263 - 09/16/11 10:23 AM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: ovidtech]
Big deal
Junior Member


Registered: 09/06/11
Posts: 2
Loc: u wish u knew
oh wow you guys slow or what a protection order is to protect the so called victum of a crime because she /or he does not feel safe if a judge issues a order of protection on someone it is because the so called victum is in FEARFOR THE WELL being if that is the case why in the hell would you invite him over she should be in jail too.I have had a order of protection put on me because i punched a wall i didnt hurt anyone i PUNCHED A WALL i could not go there for any reason. so for six months i couldnt go see my kids####### i punched the wall because i found out my WIFE was banging my so called friends so instead of punching her i punched a wall 4 and ahalf years of probation later and repeted atempts to forgive and the morale of this storey is if she was so scared SHE SHOULD LEAVE HIM ALONE he wouldnt be in jail right now so she should be too in no way what so ever should we fell sorry for either of them they a both to mblame and that is a shame if children u know innocent children that in no way asked to be here suffer and grow up to hate its wrong our justice system is wrong for alowwing this ####- to happen dailey and again thats my thought

Edited by FL1 Mod 2 (04/16/12 08:12 PM)

Top
#1298265 - 09/16/11 10:42 AM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: Big deal]
threeputt
Senior Member


Registered: 12/08/01
Posts: 2800
Loc: Waterloo
You know what's a big deal, Big deal? Learning how to type a coherent sentence so people can actually read it and understand what the hell you're trying to say.
Top
#1298266 - 09/16/11 10:50 AM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: Big deal]
suckerfish
Member


Registered: 01/09/04
Posts: 106
Originally Posted By: Big deal
oh wow you guys slow or what a protection order is to protect the so called victum of a crime because she /or he does not feel safe if a judge issues a order of protection on someone it is because the so called victum is in FEARFOR THE WELL being if that is the case why in the hell would you invite him over she should be in jail too.I have had a order of protection put on me because i punched a wall i didnt hurt anyone i PUNCHED A WALL i could not go there for any reason. so for six months i couldnt go see my kids ###### i punched the wall because i found out my WIFE was banging my so called friends so instead of punching her i punched a wall 4 and ahalf years of probation later and repeted atempts to forgive and the morale of this storey is if she was so scared SHE SHOULD LEAVE HIM ALONE he wouldnt be in jail right now so she should be too in no way what so ever should we fell sorry for either of them they a both to mblame and that is a shame if children u know innocent children that in no way asked to be here suffer and grow up to hate its wrong our justice system is wrong for alowwing this #### to happen dailey and again thats my thought


"friends" as in plural? ouch


Edited by FL1 Mod 2 (04/16/12 08:11 PM)

Top
#1298267 - 09/16/11 10:56 AM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: suckerfish]
ovidtech
Senior Member


Registered: 07/13/07
Posts: 2848
Loc: Between.
Well I didn't propose to start a debate on ROs, If you read the locked thread you can see a few of the arrests this guy has walked away from. He has 2 children that I know of and he prefers his ladies to be as close to the age of consent as he can get. "Rumor" on the street is he likes to give his peeps names out to get out of these jams but as yet I can't state this as a fact.
_________________________
We now have a goverment of the feckless, by the crooked, for the connected.

Top
#1298277 - 09/16/11 12:03 PM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: threeputt]
Roadtrip2nowhere
Senior Member


Registered: 02/03/09
Posts: 4447
Loc: No where but here
Originally Posted By: threeputt
Originally Posted By: Roadtrip2nowhere
My husbands family had an order of protection for his parents to keep another family member away from them. (with out giving too many details, the protected parties had deminished mental capabilities).The parents didn't want the order and allowed the family member to call, come over and visit, they sent money to her etc. At one point this certain family member was sent to Seneca County Jail and was making repeated calls to the "protected" parties home, which was a blatent violation of the order.
The Sheriff was called, repeatedly the DA was called, repeadetly and the Judge that issued the O/P was called....the family got NO WHERE!
Finally after many many more calls to the DA's office (the present DA) he invited 2 family members to his office to discuss the matter....along with Sheriff Stenberg and I believe his investigator. This is what transpired:
Sheriff Stenberg informed the family members that because the "protected party" didn't want the O/P then they (law enforcement)didn't have a way to enforce it! So basicly it was just fine and dandy that a prisoner in his jail could just ignore a COURT ORDERED ORDER OF PROTECTION because her "victims" didn't want it.
Personally I think I should have taken out a full page ad in the newspaper that read: ATTENTION!!! anyone that has been arrested for allowing anyone to come in contact with you even though there is an O/P...if it was in Seneca county no worries it's OK! You won't get charged with CONTEMPT OF COURT!!!


.....and the DA agreed? Apparently, Stenberg is right. Maybe it sucks but that's the reality of it.


No actually the DA sat there looking like a deer in the headlights! I don't think he knew what to say, and to tell you the truth I think that b/c the "victims were both in their 80's the DA didn't want to look like a bully and drag them through the court system, the entire issue was a compete joke! The Judge was smart enough to see that the victims needed the order, placed it for their own good, but the "powers that be" let it slide. As a result THOUSANDS more dollars were conned out of this couple and countless items stolen from their home....morale of the story: don't count on the law to help victims!
You and I BOTH know there have been incidents where the "protected party" was arrested b/c they let the person who had the order placed on them into their lives.
_________________________
‎"The winds of grace are always blowing; all we need to do is raise our sails."

Top
#1298282 - 09/16/11 01:12 PM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: Roadtrip2nowhere]
SportsRef1
Senior Member


Registered: 11/30/03
Posts: 1869
Loc: Seneca County
I think we need an order of protection from Big Deal here on these forums......:)
Top
#1298288 - 09/16/11 01:33 PM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: twocats]
Blue_man
Member


Registered: 08/29/00
Posts: 316
Originally Posted By: twocats
Originally Posted By: Big deal
ok so is the girl in jail for letting him come over


He was the one under a court order, not her. I'm not saying she is right in inviting him over, but she wasn't violating a judge's order by doing so


You ever hear of conspiracy? How about being an accomplice?

Top
#1339055 - 04/16/12 07:35 PM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: Blue_man]
ovidtech
Senior Member


Registered: 07/13/07
Posts: 2848
Loc: Between.
Beer bottle over head, pool stick to the face in Ovid

FingerLakes1.com
4/16/12 @ 3:30 pm

The Seneca County Sheriff's Office reports that on 4/13/12 Deputies arrested Nathaniel E. Swett, age 36, of 1965 CO RT 1 Oswego NY, on the charges of Att. Assault 2nd degree, Menacing 2nd Degree, Criminal Mischief 4th Degree, and Disorderly Conduct. The Arrest stems from a fight at a Town of Ovid establishment where it is alleged that Swett struck another male in the face with a pool stick and threatened other people in the establishment. Swett was arraigned in the Town of Romulus Court and remanded to the SCCF in lieu of $1000 cash/ $2000 Bond. Swett it to appear in the Town of Ovid Court on 4/17/12 @ 10am to answer the charges.

The Seneca County Sheriff's Office reports that on 4/13/12 Deputies arrested Travis M. Swett, age 34, of 5524 Searsburg Road, Trumansburg. Swett was charged with Attempted Assault 2nd Degree and Disorderly Conduct. The arrest stems from a fight at a Town of Ovid establishment where it is alleged that Swett broke a beer bottle over the head of another male during a fight, it is also alleged that Swett bit the male on the finger during the altercation. Swett was arraigned in the Town of Romulus Court and remanded to the SCCF in lieu of $1000 cash/ $200 0 bond. Swett is to reappear in the Town of Ovid Court on 4/17/12 @10am to answer the charges.

http://www.fingerlakes1.com/addedstories/20120416152937.php#.T4x6W_Ck3z4.facebook

http://www.whec.com/news/stories/s2583781.shtml?cat=565

When will it end? Are authorities waiting for a death or are these 2 on the payroll.


Edited by ovidtech (04/16/12 07:39 PM)
_________________________
We now have a goverment of the feckless, by the crooked, for the connected.

Top
#1339069 - 04/16/12 08:34 PM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: s2hphoto.com]
123
Senior Member


Registered: 10/28/11
Posts: 845
Loc: From Ga.
Originally Posted By: s2hphoto.com
Originally Posted By: twocats
Originally Posted By: Big deal
ok so is the girl in jail for letting him come over


He was the one under a court order, not her. I'm not saying she is right in inviting him over, but she wasn't violating a judge's order by doing so. He is a grown man, able to make his own decisions, correct?


From experience I know first hand restraining orders go BOTH ways... The Perp is not to contact the victim and the victim is not to contact the perp.

Just ask my spiteful high school/college ex-girlfriend who put a restraining order against me after our last argument/break-up. Even though we were broke up and an order in place, she started stalking me. She would drive by my parents house that's on a dead end street, show up to places she would know I would be, and even sit on the side of the road adjacent from my parents street watching me to come home and that time I drove past my parents street, went to the police station, and she was arrested ... it also happened to be her birthday.... HAPPY BIRTHDAY WITCH!!!!! BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA



Damn!!!!!!!!! good thing you liked her.LMBO
_________________________
"If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my children may have peace."

Top
#1339074 - 04/16/12 08:38 PM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: ovidtech]
123
Senior Member


Registered: 10/28/11
Posts: 845
Loc: From Ga.
Originally Posted By: ovidtech
Well I didn't propose to start a debate on ROs, If you read the locked thread you can see a few of the arrests this guy has walked away from. He has 2 children that I know of and he prefers his ladies to be as close to the age of consent as he can get. "Rumor" on the street is he likes to give his peeps names out to get out of these jams but as yet I can't state this as a fact.


Damn bro this girls have to start some time/someplace. Sounds like wanted to be a teacher in real life.
_________________________
"If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my children may have peace."

Top
#1339085 - 04/16/12 09:30 PM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: Big deal]
Proofreader
Member


Registered: 02/09/09
Posts: 237
Loc: At-large
Originally Posted By: Big deal
oh wow you guys slow or what a protection order is to protect the so called victum of a crime because she /or he does not feel safe if a judge issues a order of protection on someone it is because the so called victum is in FEARFOR THE WELL being if that is the case why in the hell would you invite him over she should be in jail too.I have had a order of protection put on me because i punched a wall i didnt hurt anyone i PUNCHED A WALL i could not go there for any reason. so for six months i couldnt go see my kids####### i punched the wall because i found out my WIFE was banging my so called friends so instead of punching her i punched a wall 4 and ahalf years of probation later and repeted atempts to forgive and the morale of this storey is if she was so scared SHE SHOULD LEAVE HIM ALONE he wouldnt be in jail right now so she should be too in no way what so ever should we fell sorry for either of them they a both to mblame and that is a shame if children u know innocent children that in no way asked to be here suffer and grow up to hate its wrong our justice system is wrong for alowwing this ####- to happen dailey and again thats my thought



Yes, we need to protect the "victums." please don't fell sorry because they a both to mblame...

We in no way should be allowing this...Dailey...and so on... My head hurts as should anyone's who tries to comprehend this rubbish.

Top
#1339145 - 04/17/12 09:07 AM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: ovidtech]
Geedog
Member


Registered: 06/16/11
Posts: 44
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: ovidtech
Beer bottle over head, pool stick to the face in Ovid

FingerLakes1.com
4/16/12 @ 3:30 pm

The Seneca County Sheriff's Office reports that on 4/13/12 Deputies arrested Nathaniel E. Swett, age 36, of 1965 CO RT 1 Oswego NY, on the charges of Att. Assault 2nd degree, Menacing 2nd Degree, Criminal Mischief 4th Degree, and Disorderly Conduct. The Arrest stems from a fight at a Town of Ovid establishment where it is alleged that Swett struck another male in the face with a pool stick and threatened other people in the establishment. Swett was arraigned in the Town of Romulus Court and remanded to the SCCF in lieu of $1000 cash/ $2000 Bond. Swett it to appear in the Town of Ovid Court on 4/17/12 @ 10am to answer the charges.

The Seneca County Sheriff's Office reports that on 4/13/12 Deputies arrested Travis M. Swett, age 34, of 5524 Searsburg Road, Trumansburg. Swett was charged with Attempted Assault 2nd Degree and Disorderly Conduct. The arrest stems from a fight at a Town of Ovid establishment where it is alleged that Swett broke a beer bottle over the head of another male during a fight, it is also alleged that Swett bit the male on the finger during the altercation. Swett was arraigned in the Town of Romulus Court and remanded to the SCCF in lieu of $1000 cash/ $200 0 bond. Swett is to reappear in the Town of Ovid Court on 4/17/12 @10am to answer the charges.

http://www.fingerlakes1.com/addedstories/20120416152937.php#.T4x6W_Ck3z4.facebook

http://www.whec.com/news/stories/s2583781.shtml?cat=565

When will it end? Are authorities waiting for a death or are these 2 on the payroll.


Which of the establishments I wonder, pretty limited choice in Ovid.

Top
#1339175 - 04/17/12 11:59 AM Re: While the original thread was locked [Re: Geedog]
Greymane
Senior Member


Registered: 11/09/06
Posts: 6618
Loc: Central PA
Originally Posted By: Geedog


Which of the establishments I wonder, pretty limited choice in Ovid.


Right. Only a handful of choises.
_________________________
Against logic there is no armor like ignorance. - Dr. Lawrence J. Peter

Top
Page 1 of 3 123>




Moderator:  FL1 Staff, FL1 Mod, FL1 Tek Deluxe, FL1 Mod 2, FL1 Office, FL1 Mod 3 
Hop to:

Generated in 0.046 seconds in which 0.007 seconds were spent on a total of 14 queries. Zlib compression enabled.