FingerLakes1.com Forums
Browse or Create Your Listing
Page 50 of 71 « First<4849505152>Last »
Topic Options
#1342665 - 05/04/12 11:27 PM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking *DELETED* [Re: Genevan]
rj1
Member


Registered: 02/18/12
Posts: 429
Loc: ny
Post deleted by FL1 Mod 2
Top
#1342716 - 05/05/12 09:44 AM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking [Re: rj1]
bluezone
Diamond Member


Registered: 12/19/04
Posts: 26674
Loc: USA
the state needs to enact laws making fracking waste a hazardous component

currently the waste can be sent to any landfill without regard to what is in the material
_________________________
"OUR COUNTRY IS IN MOURNING, A SOLDIER DIED TODAY."

Top
#1342736 - 05/05/12 10:27 AM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking [Re: VM Smith]
Ambient
Member


Registered: 02/07/05
Posts: 147
Loc: Seneca Falls
Without an act of God, the Japanese would still be cooking with nukes. It's flip analogy. There's an effort to veer away from nukes because of that experience, but the EPA, which everyone is so quick to quote, just approved the building of a new nuke on the Gulf Coast, I believe.
Top
#1342758 - 05/05/12 01:59 PM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking [Re: Ambient]
VM Smith
Diamond Member


Registered: 11/28/05
Posts: 34311
Loc: Reality
Originally Posted By: Ambient
Without an act of God, the Japanese would still be cooking with nukes. It's flip analogy. There's an effort to veer away from nukes because of that experience, but the EPA, which everyone is so quick to quote, just approved the building of a new nuke on the Gulf Coast, I believe.


Act of God? You're saying that God has it in for the Japanese? What's His problem? They don't look like Jesus, maybe?

One of the strategies the US used to force Japan into war was the oil embargo, directed at a country that has zero oil, by a country that, at the time, was the world's biggest producer. In 1950, FI, the US still produced over half the world's oil, a far cry from the 8% it produced in 2005, FI. That embargo is defined as an act of war.

The Japanese vowed that it would never happen again, so the twice nuclear attacked country bit the bullet and jumped on nuke power with both feet.

Quote:
There's an effort to veer away from nukes because of that experience, but the EPA, which everyone is so quick to quote, just approved the building of a new nuke on the Gulf Coast, I believe.


I've been quick to say (after pondering it for 40 years, LOL) that government, as a whole, doesn't care much at all about those it rules, and I think it should be clear that the unelected bureaucracies, such as the EPA, will care even less.

The Japanese have switched to being slowly cooked with nukes. The contamination is here now, and will eventually be worldwide. Depending on what happens with what used to be fuel pools, but which are now dry and tottering, and with the crane which could be used to move the fuel rods toppled, the contamination will probably get much worse than it is now; it may well be the bonfire to end all bonfires. Governments are even lying about the extent of the present contamination. Same old same old.
_________________________
Well I know what's right, I got just one life...
But I'll stand my ground and I won't back down

Petty

Top
#1342767 - 05/05/12 05:50 PM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking *DELETED* [Re: rj1]
Genevan
Senior Member


Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 1641
Loc: Geneva
Originally Posted By: rj1
Post deleted by FL1 Mod 2


Hes looking for his 20th ban...
_________________________
Statements by this member are personal opinion and are not to be construed as intentional slander.

Top
#1342768 - 05/05/12 05:53 PM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking *DELETED* [Re: Genevan]
Genevan
Senior Member


Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 1641
Loc: Geneva
Ooooopsy....better do some more homework...god might get angry again...

Five U.S. nuclear reactors in earthquake zones
By Steve Sternberg, USA TODAY

At least five U.S. nuclear reactors are in earthquake-prone seismic zones, potentially exposing them to the forces that damaged the Fukushima plant in Japan, a new analysis shows. The at-risk reactors are the Diablo Canyon Power Plant and San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in California; the South Texas Project near the Gulf Coast; the Waterford Steam Electric Station in Louisiana; and the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant in North Carolina.
_________________________
Statements by this member are personal opinion and are not to be construed as intentional slander.

Top
#1342770 - 05/05/12 06:10 PM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking *DELETED* [Re: Genevan]
Genevan
Senior Member


Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 1641
Loc: Geneva
Local prostitution linked to gas drilling industry
Three women arrested in Horseheads after police sting
11:16 PM, Feb. 20, 2012

Written by
Jeff Murray

The natural gas boom apparently has brought an unwelcome corollary business to the area -- prostitution.

Police over the weekend arrested three women at motels in Horseheads and charged them with prostitution following an undercover investigation involving Horseheads police, the Chemung County Sheriff's Office, the state police community narcotics enforcement unit and the Broome County special investigations unit.

Charged were Page Kirshblum, 20, and Angela D. Turner, 24, both of Rochester, who were arrested at the Motel 6, and Nicole A. Kuzmin, 24, of East Islip, N.Y., who was arrested at the Red Carpet Inn.

The emergence of prostitution in this region is probably connected at least in part to the influx of workers as a result of natural gas drilling and exploration, said Horseheads police Sgt. David Murray.

"One of the prostitutes we interviewed said a significant portion of her clientele works for the gas industry," Murray said.

Murray didn't indicate if more arrests are pending, but he said the investigation is continuing.

Prostitution often brings with it related crimes such as the use and sale of drugs, robbery and assault, police said.

Kirshblum, Turner and Kuzmin were arraigned in Village of Horseheads Court and were committed to the Chemung County Jail in lieu of $500 cash bail.
_________________________
Statements by this member are personal opinion and are not to be construed as intentional slander.

Top
#1342773 - 05/05/12 06:59 PM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking [Re: VM Smith]
Ambient
Member


Registered: 02/07/05
Posts: 147
Loc: Seneca Falls
Act of God, like in tsunami of unimagined proportions....like the small print in your homeowners ins.... I frankly don't care what we did to the Japanese post WWII. You can only prepare for so much... earthquake zones, diving 747s....etc.. American plants are designed for the real and imagined events that might impact them. What happens of it's two 747s...? Who knows? I do know this: the hysteria and boohooing over Three Mile Island went for naught. No three-headed goats. No sinking reactors to China. And, today, the plant is up and safely running. The singular, unvarnished truth is nukes provide clean, safe inexpensive power. I have the same unreserved hope for natural gas. Clear thinking people feel the same way. Then there's.....the chicken littles who have yet to be correct about anything. That includes the natural gas impacts and Y2K as well.
Top
#1342782 - 05/05/12 08:51 PM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking [Re: Ambient]
VM Smith
Diamond Member


Registered: 11/28/05
Posts: 34311
Loc: Reality
Quote:
Act of God, like in tsunami of unimagined proportions....like the small print in your homeowners ins.... I frankly don't care what we did to the Japanese post WWII. You can only prepare for so much... earthquake zones, diving 747s...


No doubt. You don't even care that the embargo I mentioned happened prewar, and was one of the prime ways that the USG caused the Japanese war.

Sure it was imagined...Japan is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in the world. They just thought their emergency diesels, on which they'd bet the farm, would never fail to work. Never. Ha! anybody who knows anything about wet engines and generators knows that could never happen!

You say it was an act of God. I'll ask again why God would smite Japan. A hit on the Shinto religion, whose adherents have many "false" gods before them?

I consider it a natural and man-made disaster, not a supernatural one. Of course, I wonder why He allowed it to happen, now that you've brought Him into it.

Quote:
American plants are designed for the real and imagined events that might impact them.


Fukushima is an American plant, in the sense that it was designed by GE. There are 23 essentially similar reactors in the states.

Three Mile was nothing like Chernobyl, which has killed a million people to date. The total radioactivity in the Fukushima pools is 85 times what was released by Chernobyl.

Quote:
The singular, unvarnished truth is nukes provide clean, safe inexpensive power. I have the same unreserved hope for natural gas.


Your endorsement of that "unvarnished truth" doesn't exactly inspire confidence in any other endorsement you may make.


You equate anyone worried about drilling into their aquifers, and around their lakes with Y2K freaks? Equate fears about things that have actually happened elsewhere, happening here , with the Y2K, almost entirely imagined phenomena that might possibly, theoretically happen?

Could be, but I think the anti-frackers couldn't be the same people. I think all the Y2K types are in the Occupy movement. \:\)

_________________________
Well I know what's right, I got just one life...
But I'll stand my ground and I won't back down

Petty

Top
#1342833 - 05/06/12 07:57 AM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking [Re: VM Smith]
Genevan
Senior Member


Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 1641
Loc: Geneva
notice how his slathering rant mentioned nothing of climate change....
_________________________
Statements by this member are personal opinion and are not to be construed as intentional slander.

Top
#1342837 - 05/06/12 08:48 AM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking [Re: Genevan]
Ambient
Member


Registered: 02/07/05
Posts: 147
Loc: Seneca Falls
@VM. I don't know what you're drinking, but it's obvious that you are missing vital skills. The "act of God" note refers to things outside the consideration of insurance companies and unnatural event planners. Other than that, you're welcome to your observations, but the Occupiers, Y2kers, and Global Warmists (thanks for the reminder, Geneva!) all are anti-fracking activists as well. And, as I'm sure you know, people are known by the company they keep. That axis of foolishness spread the falsehoods and make up other lies that seek to tear down American energy production. So, you can be against fracking and be sane, but you have to look at who supports your fears and decide if you want to be part of their movement.
Top
#1342904 - 05/06/12 12:50 PM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking [Re: Ambient]
Genevan
Senior Member


Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 1641
Loc: Geneva
More attempts at elegant variation from the pro-pollution jester prancing on stage like a frack fluid queen....
_________________________
Statements by this member are personal opinion and are not to be construed as intentional slander.

Top
#1342909 - 05/06/12 01:16 PM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking [Re: Ambient]
VM Smith
Diamond Member


Registered: 11/28/05
Posts: 34311
Loc: Reality
Quote:
M. I don't know what you're drinking, but it's obvious that you are missing vital skills. The "act of God" note refers to things outside the consideration of insurance companies and unnatural event planners.


I know what is meant. You are lacking the vital skill of being able to discern that I think it's a stupid, even when metaphorically used, insurance company, and popular, expression, because I don't see real natural disasters as acts of an imaginary God, but simply as randomly occurring natural events. I've had 1 oz of alcohol in the last 2 months, BTW, not because I keep myself under any certain limit, but simply because I don't drink much.
_________________________
Well I know what's right, I got just one life...
But I'll stand my ground and I won't back down

Petty

Top
#1343013 - 05/07/12 03:51 AM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking *DELETED* [Re: kyle585]
rslijetgold
Junior Member


Registered: 05/05/12
Posts: 6
Loc: US,New York
Post deleted by FL1 Mod 2
Top
#1343018 - 05/07/12 07:22 AM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking [Re: rslijetgold]
kyle585
Senior Member


Registered: 02/18/09
Posts: 7636
Loc: Somewhere out there
WGVA this morning said that Vermont has now banned hydrofracking.

http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/artic...g-hydrofracking

MONTPELIER -- Nobody has applied to Vermont for permission to drill for oil or gas using hydraulic fracturing.

No one is sure it would even be worthwhile to do so.

Still, the Legislature and Gov. Peter Shumlin are considering banning the practice, commonly called hydrofracking. Vermont would become the first state to do so.

"This is kind of saying, 'Don't bother. Close the door on the issue,'" said Rep. Tony Klein, D-East Montpelier, sponsor of a bill the House Fish & Wildlife Committee is preparing to vote on this week. "It's about protecting our most precious resource -- our groundwater."

A look at what's going on in neighboring New York state, across the border in Quebec, in Pennsylvania and elsewhere is all that some lawmakers and state officials needed to conclude they want no part of the procedure. Stories abound of possible links between drilling and contamination of well water, earthquakes and more.
_________________________
Cayugas: $1 million unpaid property taxes by April in SC.


Top
#1343124 - 05/07/12 05:23 PM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking [Re: VM Smith]
twocats
Silver Member


Registered: 02/09/10
Posts: 10735
Loc: NYS
Originally Posted By: VM Smith
Of course, I wonder why He allowed it to happen, now that you've brought Him into it.

I think He did it to prove that the Mayans were right.
\:o
_________________________
Dismiss whatever insults your own soul.

Walt Whitman

Top
#1343158 - 05/07/12 07:40 PM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking [Re: Ambient]
Jseemore
Member


Registered: 12/01/11
Posts: 252
Loc: New York
Originally Posted By: Ambient
So, you can be against fracking and be sane, but you have to look at who supports your fears and decide if you want to be part of their movement.


Right. I am sane and I am against fracking until transparency in full is implemented and safety takes priority.

Just because I take that position does not mean I am akin to occupiers, global warming supporters, Y2K'ers nor do I have to a part of their movement.
_________________________
If you say "gullible" slowly it sounds like "oranges".

Top
#1343190 - 05/07/12 09:14 PM Re: EPA takes fresh look at ’fracking [Re: Jseemore]
Jseemore
Member


Registered: 12/01/11
Posts: 252
Loc: New York
False Promises and Hidden Costs: The Illusion of Economic Benefits from Fracking

http://documents.foodandwaterwatch.org/doc/FalsePromisesHiddenCosts.pdf
_________________________
If you say "gullible" slowly it sounds like "oranges".

Top
#1343208 - 05/08/12 05:21 AM Re: EPA takes fresh look at �fracking [Re: kyle585]
Butt
Senior Member


Registered: 03/24/12
Posts: 883
Loc: Geneva
Originally Posted By: kyle585
WGVA this morning said that Vermont has now banned hydrofracking.

http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/artic...g-hydrofracking

MONTPELIER -- Nobody has applied to Vermont for permission to drill for oil or gas using hydraulic fracturing.

No one is sure it would even be worthwhile to do so.

Still, the Legislature and Gov. Peter Shumlin are considering banning the practice, commonly called hydrofracking. Vermont would become the first state to do so.



Romney has promised to ban the riding of UNICORNS on public highways if you make him president.

Top
#1343212 - 05/08/12 05:53 AM Re: EPA takes fresh look at �fracking [Re: Butt]
kyle585
Senior Member


Registered: 02/18/09
Posts: 7636
Loc: Somewhere out there
From FL Times Monday, May 7th:

By DAVID L. SHAW
dshaw@fltimes.com

WATERLOO — After being passed by the Environmental Affairs Committee, the full Seneca County Board of Supervisors is scheduled to vote Tuesday night on whether to object to Seneca Meadows Landfill accepting hydrofracking waste at its Seneca Falls facility.

The board recently learned in a news article that the landfill accepted drill cuttings from hydrofracking for natural gas in Pennsylvania in 2011. Pennsylvania officials reported that Seneca Meadows took 5,473 tons of drill cuttings from three companies in 2011. Drill cuttings are bits of broken rock and mud that are a byproduct of the process. No waste has been accepted thus far this year. “In light of the public concern with hydrofracking and the disposal of highly contaminated waste it generates, it is important that the county consider the implications of both dumping and transporting fracking waste in Seneca County and within the Cayuga/Seneca watershed and determine if there are any actions that could be taken in the matter,’’ the motion states.

The motion states the board opposes the acceptance of hydrofracking waste at privately owned Seneca Meadows and directs board chairman Robert Hayssen to send a letter to landfill officials. The motion will be introduced by Stephen Churchill, D-Seneca Falls, Environmental Affairs Committee chairman. Seneca Meadows officials defended their acceptance of the waste at the April 24 committee meeting.


Edited by kyle585 (05/08/12 05:58 AM)
_________________________
Cayugas: $1 million unpaid property taxes by April in SC.


Top
Page 50 of 71 « First<4849505152>Last »




Moderator:  FL1 Staff, FL1 Mod, FL1 Tek Deluxe, FL1 Mod 2, FL1 Office, FL1 Mod 3 
Hop to:

Generated in 0.136 seconds in which 0.099 seconds were spent on a total of 13 queries. Zlib compression enabled.